"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> McKelvy is obviously incapable of telling the truth, substantiag his
> delusional screeching, or carrying on a rational conversation, so, the
> following response it quite apropriate:
>
> In response to proven libeler and pathological liar McKelvy's continued
> repetition of false claims, coupled with a laughable "demand" that I
> produce evidence that he has a lengthy history of lying and libeling me
> on RAO, I decided to call this cretin's pathetic attempts to dodge
> responsibility for his despicable behavior with the following response.
>
> A couple of observations, should be added re. my post of April 9, 2004,
> which is reproduced below:
>
> 1. In the first example of libel by McKelvy which I cite, he initiated
> libel thread with the title "Richman's ethical lapses". It is worth
> noting that he does not and CAN NOT list any. So obviously, his sole
> purpose was to libel and defame another person. I chose to ignore this
> piece of unprovoked garbage which he initiated. As did every other RAO
> poster.
>
> 2. As of the time of this writing, 4:00 PM EST on 4/10/04, the proven
> liar and libeler Mckelvy has failed to respond directly to the post
> reproduced below. It is obvious that his latest bluff/bull**** has
> been called and he's been exposed for what most on RAO already have
> known him to be for a long time - a hatemongering, bitter, delusional
> liar and character assassin whose primary purpose in posting on RAO is
> to smear others with whatever lies, libelous false claims and libelous
> labels of other people his diseased, delusional "mind" (such as it is
> in its primitive state) can regurgitate.
>
> 3. Proven liar and libeler McKelvy has been challenged to submit his
> delusional "complaints" about my professional and ethical behavior
> (about which he has admitted he knows nothing - one of the few true
> things he has ever said) to the appropriate licensing board in my
> state. Of course, he has failed to do so, most likely because he knows
> that he's full of it, and will be sued by me after he does so.
>
> 4. I could have provided many more examples of McKelvy's compulsive
> lies and libels against me, but felt that for now, 2 would be
> sufficient. Pending the results of Mr. Wheeler's case, and in
> consultation with my attornies, I may elect to pursue legal action
> against him and use a quite impressive and lengthy file of false,
> libelous claims he has made against me as evidence. No doubt, he will
> "help" by continuing to provide further evidence that can be used
> against him.
>
> 5. I apologize for the lengfh of this post in advance, but in
> consideration of McKelvy's obvious compulsive, pathological responses
> which almost always consist of further lies and libelous false
> statements about me, this response is IMHO, quite appropriate.
>
> 6. This response will be the one used in the future to deal with
> McKelvy's subsequent sociopathic, delusional, false, and libelous
> personal attacks against me.
>
>
>
>
> Mike McKelvy continues to avoid providing proof of his slander:
>>>From: (Bruce J. Richman)
>>
>>>Mike McKelvy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>From: (Bruce J. Richman)
>>>>
>>>
>>><deletion of further lies in which McKelvy tries to avoid
> responsibility for
>>>lengthy history of lying and committing slander re. my credentials,
> training
>>>and professional activities.>
>>>
>>>This despicable scumbag, after first admitting he knows nothing about
> my
>>>credentials, training and professional activities, then laughingly
> trying to
>>>claim his slanderous bull**** was merely opinions, and now attempting
> to
>>deny
>>>all responsibility for his ridiculous lies ? insults the
> intelligence of
>>all
>>>RAO readers.
>>>
>>>His requests for "proof" ? like all his imbecilic grunts and
> mutterings
>>>concerning me ? are a joke. As is his very RAO existence.
>>>
>>>While he continue to deny slandering me, and requesting proof, his
>>>credibility
>>>remains zero (except perhaps, in the eyes of his hero, Krueger).
>>>
>>>His false claims re. my professional background are a matter of
> Google
>>>record,
>>>and virtually all RAO readers at all familiar with this sociopath's
>>imbecilic
>>>bull**** re. my background know this to be the case.
>>>
>>>Since he's been purveying lies about me, he needs to present the
> proof for
>>>all
>>>his nonsense, or stick his head further up the orifice in which it's
>>>obviously
>>>been inserted for so long.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Bruce J. Richman
>>>
>>
>
> <repetitive bull**** similar to that pruveyed over a 6 year period by
> this
> pathological liar and proven slanderer deleted>
>
> For this pathological liar, all false claims about another person's
> training,
> credentials, professional experience, etc. ? are only "opinions" ? a
> piece of
> bull**** nobody other than this lying cretin believes.
>
> Here's just one example of his slander:
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF?8&threadm=vthbp0ffk2j625%
> 40corp.supernews.com&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DMcKelvy%2Band%2Blicensing%2
> Bboard%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26t ab%3Dwg
>
> Note that this was an attack thread started by McKelvy, in which this
> fool,
> reproduces the Ethical Code followed by psychologists.
>
> Note the slanderous title of the post.
>
> Note also the question, this proven slanderer asks in the last line
> after
> quoting the Ethical code.
>
> Needless to say, this pathological liar has no evidence that I have
> ever
> committed any ethics violations, and in fact his use of the title of
> this
> thread, to which nobody responded, constitutes slander.
>
> I have directly challenged this despicable cretin and proven liar to
> submit any
>
> complaints he has to the Florida State Licensing Board. He has refused
> to do
> so, because he knows he's been lying about me for 6 years.
>
> This fool, in a conversation with Scott Wheeler commiitted another
> blatant lie:
>
>
> "The person claiming to be B.J. Richman, a Ph.D is a fake as should be
> obvious to anybody with more than 2 active neurons."
>
> The reference for this is
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF?8&selm=vtg1igk0458h89%40c
> orp.supernews.com
>
> Now, no doubt, proven liar and slanderer McKelvy will claim he's just
> voiced an
> opinion, but defamation and libel of a licensed psychologist, whose
> identity is
>
> acknowledged and has been proven on RAO to the satisfaction of
> virtually all
> conscious lifeforms with the exception of McKelvy and Krueger, is *not*
> an
> opinion.
>
> His lies are a matter of public record, and these 2 examples are just a
> few of
> many that could be easily obtained from the Google record.
>
> He has also deliberately ignored the following evidence presented on
> Google:
>
> "The University of Texas at Austin, has long had one of the most highly
> regarded
> doctoral programs in Clinical Psychology in the United States (top 10
> ranking). Since I had the good fortune to have a very good record in
> my
> Master's propgram at Clinical Psychology at Boston College,l and
> perhaps
> becauise I hit the 99th %ile on the Graduate Record Examination (Verbal
> Portion) and the 99th %ile examination on the Psychology Acvhievement
> section,
> I had the rather odd experience of being actively recruited by schools
> to which
> I applied. (I had always thought this just happened to jocks, but I
> was
> wrong). One unforgettable day, I got a call from the head of the
> Clinical
> Psychology program at the University of Texas, a Dr. James Bieri, who
> basically
> said "We've seen your application, we'd like you to come here, and
> we're
> prepared to make you a nice offfer". That nice offer, which I
> accepted, turned
> out to be a NIMH (National Institutes of Mental Health) Traineeship in
> Clinical
> Psychology, for an unlimited period of time, with no strings attached
> other
> than that I meet the academic requirements of the program (maintain a B
> average).. It took care of all my expenses (tuition, room & board,
> books,
> etc.) and gave me s small stipend to live on as well. Some of my
> classmates
> congratulated me on my good fortune (many of them had to accept
> teaching
> assistantships to help pay their bills, while all I had to do was hit
> the
> books). The program turned out to be a real meatgrinder (as one of my
> classmates put it). It made my undergraduate program at an elite
> "small Ivy
> League school" (Bowdoin College) and my M.A. program seem like
> kindergarten.
> Almost everybody in my entering class of about 20 had either a Phi
> Beta Kappa key, was published and or came from Ivy League schools or
> places
> like U. of Chicago, Stanford or Berkeley. Of the 20 who started the
> program,
> only 5 of us survived and got our doctorates. It took not only a high
> degree
> of intelligence and perserverance, but also a large ability to deal
> with the
> stress of knowing that you were in a program with a very high attrition
> rate
> and some professors, who frankly, until you got to the 2nd year and had
> "paid
> your dues", didn't give a damn if you survived or not. I'll never
> forgot one
> of my Statistics professors who used to get up in front of the class
> and say
> "Even if you don't make it through graduate school, you can still be a
> good
> citizen""
>
> and the following:
>
> "I was accepted for an Internship in Clnical
> Psycnology at Massachusetts General Hospital, which I accepted and
> completed"
>
> and the followiong:
>
> "After obtaining my doctorate, I was
> also accepted for postdoctoral training at Temple Medical School,
> Department of
> Psychiary, Institute for Behavior Therapy, in Philadelphia. I enjoyed
> my time
> there had learned a lot under the supervision of the late Dr. Joseph
> Wolpe, a
> world famous psychiatrist who is considered to be one of the founders
> of
> Cognitive?Behavioral Therapy, the predominant type of therapy now
> practiced by
> most psychologists and psychiatrists (aside from pharmacotherapy). "
>
> The above quotes are from a post written in response to Howard
> Ferstler,
> another well known zealot, pathological liar, and purveyor of libel on
> RAO (not
> surprisingly, frequently defended by Krueger, McKelvy's role model).
>
> The complete post (and thread) can be referened at:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF?8&selm=20030203225629.076
> 19.00000418%40mb?mg.aol.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DFerstler%2Band%2BRichman%2B
> and%2BUniversity%2Bof%2BTexas%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26 ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26ta
> b%3Dwg
>
> So McKelvy's slandeous claims about quacks, frauds, and fakes are
> nothing more
> than the delusional, sociopathic rantings and repetitions of a proven
> liar and
> libeler.
>
> No doubt he will claim that this is all made up, but the only thing
> made up are
> his nonsensical departures from reality which pollute RAO whenever he
> continues
> to libel me and others.
>
> One further fact, which I may or may not be able to prove since it
> happened a
> long time ago, and I don't know if the radio station keeps records.
> And I
> challenge the cretin and liar, McKelvy, to disprove it ? LOL! :
>
> In about 1976 or 1977, I was employed as the "Psychology Director" of a
> private
> Cardiac Rehabilitation Center based in Miami, Florida. The center ran
> a
> 30?day, interdisciplinary inpatient program for patients who were
> either at
> high risk for cardiac disease or had already undergone such procedures
> as
> cardiac bypass surgery. My main responsibility was to direct the
> behavioral
> component of this intensive program (which also involved dieticians,
> exercise
> physiologists, cardiologists, and RNs). Areas such as stress
> management,
>
> smoking cessation, behavioral approaches to obesity, etc. were among
> the
> targets that I had to address. One of my other responsibilities was,
> in
> conjunction with the medical director, to promote the program through
> various
> media appearances in both TV and radio. Two interviews in particular
> stand out
> in my mind. The first came in the wee hours of the morning in New York
> City on
> a nationally syndicated program ? "The Long John Nebel Show" (New
> Yorkers old
> enough may remember this). The second occurred in my home base on the
> 79th
> Street Causeway in Miami Beach at a radio station where Miami's best
> known talk
> show host (at the time) was carrying forth ? I spent 2 hours being
> interviewed
> very incisively on the main topic which was "Stress and Heart Disease".
> I
> remember coming away from that interview thinking that the interviewer
> was very
> sharp and well prepared to really grill me. The name of the radio
> station (and
> I'm relying on long ago recall was, I believe either WKAT or WIOD).
> The name
> of the host ? Larry King.
>
> Shortly thereafter, Larry left Miami and the rest is history.
>
> I challenge the proven liar, and libeler, McKelvy to dispute any of
> these facts
> with any factual evidence he cares to fabricate from the diseased empty
> spaces
> composing his deluded cranium.
>
> No doubt he will choose to delete most of this post instead.
>
> LOL!!!
>
> (I apologize for appearing to be bragging about past or present
> accomplishments, but since this despicable, loudmouthed, unbelievably
> stupid,
> delusional, libeler and liar decided to completely embarass himself
> once again,
> it was just too tempting to not assist him in making a fool of himself
> and
> exposing his sociopathic behavior once again).
>
> Nothing more needs to be said about his lies, so when he responds with
> more
> bull****, I will respond with a standard, previously used, canned
> response that
> perfectly describes this moron's basic character, motivations, and
> irrational
> behaviors.
>
> Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
> Licensed Psychologist
> (FL PY 2543)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The above probably covers whatever new set of fabrications McKelvy
> will attempt to once again use to insult the intelligence of RAO's
> readers.
>
> However, in case he is laboring under the misguided impression that I
> will any longer read his deluded garbage, the following should apply:
>
> I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written below..
> There is
> no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each
> daily
> addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings ?
> essentially as
> meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day ? he simply
> continues
> to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic
> thought
> processes, and of course, his hatred.
>
> No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to
> this post
> as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite
> closely
> to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some
> food. In
> this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in
> his head
> telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The
> "food"
> metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs
> that others
> are getting his "message".
>
> State tuned for another chapter in the never ending saga of McKelvy's
> "Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> "Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > Michael McKelvy wrote:
>> >
>> >>"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >>> Michael McKelvy wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
>> ups.com...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Michael McKelvy wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> "Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
>> >>>>>> oups.com...
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > BTW, I'm not sure that he will remember me, but he might.
> There is
>> >>>>> a
>> >>>>>> > psychologist by the name of Dr. Jeffrey M. Lulow, who has a
>> >>>>> practice in
>> >>>>>> > Encino, California. He is a graduate of the same Clinical
>> >>>>> Psychology
>> >>>>>> > doctoral program that I am - at the University of Texas at
> Austin.
>> >>>>> You
>> >>>>>> > can always call him and ask if he remembers me.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Right, Doctors love that kind of stuff. Hi you don't know but
> let's
>> >>>>> talk
>> >>>>>> about this guy on a NG.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> You really are a blithering idiot !!!! I don't have to prove a
> damn
>> >>>>> thing to you, and expect you to continue your almost 7 year
> campaign
>> >>>>> of
>> >>>>> lies and libel.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Keep calling it that. I'll keep telling the truth and call them
>> >>>>opinions.
>> >>>
>> >>> I intend to, because it exposes your dishonesty. Your attempts
> to
>> >>> mislabel
>> >>> your false statements and lies as opinions are just more examples
> of
>> >>> your
>> >>> chronic lying.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> "Doctors love that sort of thing" - Are you totally
>> >>>>> paranoid? He was a classmate of mine - that's all, you moron.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>That was your school U Moron?
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I wouldn't expect a documeneted imbecile like yourself to know
> this, but
>> >>> the
>> >>> University of Texas at Austin has long bveen ranked among the top
> 10 or
>> >>> 20
>> >>> graduate training programs in Clinical Psychology in the United
> States,
>> >>> you
>> >>> fool.
>> >>> I went there on a National Institutes of Mental Health Fellowship
> -
>> >>> hardly
>> >>> something handed out to people that are developmentally disabled
> like
>> >>> yourself.
>> >>>
>> >>> I also did a postdoctoral in Behavior Therapy in Temple
> University
>> >>> Medical
>> >>> School in Philadelphia. And I interned at Massachusetts General
>> >>> Hospital
>> >>> in
>> >>> Boston. Ever heard of those places, moron?
>> >>>
>> >>I"m sure the real Dr. Richman did, what's that got to do with you?
>> >
>> > What does reality-testing and telling the truth have to do with
> you?
>> > Nothing,
>> > of course. More lies are all you can babble.
>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>>> You don't have to mention this NG at all, dummy.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>I'd have to along with some of your classic posts to show him how
> sane
>> >>>>and
>> >>>>professional you have become in your old age.
>> >>>
>> >>> If you do that, Dr. Lulow will no doubt be astute enough to have
> your
>> >>> involuntarily committed under California law for exhibiting that
> you're
>> >>> either
>> >>> dangerous to yourself or others, or unable to care for yourself
> because
>> >>> of
>> >>> a
>> >>> mental illness
>> >>
>> >>Showing him your words would make him want to commit me, riiigghht.
>> >>
>> >>(that's how the cdmmittment papers read in most states, but you
>> >>> probably already know that from prior experiences with the mental
>
>> >>> hospital
>> >>> system).
>> >>
>> >>More projection? I must be getting to you again, the spelling's
> getting
>> >>wierd again. How many people do you knowthat have been
> "cdmmittmented."
>> >>
>> >> IOW, he's know you're crazy
>> >>
>> >>I'm sure "he's know you're crazy." They all do.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Who is they, crazy man?
>>
>> Everybody who reads what you right.
>>
>>
>>
>> >>and have you committed against your will.
>> >>> After your release, you can rant and rave some more about how
> Drs.
>> >>> Richman,
>> >>> Lulow and a couple of probably dead psychologists from the
> University of
>> >>> Texas
>> >>> all conspired to fool him about my identity.
>> >>>
>> >>You have a very rich fantasy life.
>> >
>> > Only the above conspiracy theories are products of your paranoid
> and quite
>> > delusionoal set of false beliefrs
>> >
>>
>> Unless they're not.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > Now, you can still claim you that somebody is impersonating
> me, a
>> >>>>> false
>> >>>>>> > statement you've made more than once, but do you really
> think
>> >>>>> anybody
>> >>>>>> > is that good an actor? Also, as I've pointed out to you
> it's
>> >>>>> AGAINST
>> >>>>>> > THE LAW FOR SOMEBODY TO CLAIM THEY ARE A PSYCHOLOOGIST IF
> THEY ARE
>> >>>>> NOT.
>> >>>>>> > I'm not perfect, but neither am I stupid, self-destructive,
> or
>> >>>>> anxious
>> >>>>>> > to be arrested.
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> Let's see if I have this correct.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I suspect you are a sockpuppet.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Far be it from me to prevent you from continuing to make a fool
> of
>> >>>>> yourself. Feel free to demonstrate your stupidity.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> You deny it.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> <At this point, McKelvy copied his role model, Krueger's, nasty
> habit of
>> >>> deleting information that exposed his dishonesty:P
>> >>>
>> >>It would be so hard for somebody to go back a couple of posts to
> see what
>> >>I
>> >>actually wrote, wouldn't it?
>> >>
>> > Why would any rational person want to reread your trash?
>>
>> To get the whole truth and not your selective editing. To see who is
>
>> telling the truth, which doesn't favor you.
>>
>> Besides, your
>> > attempts to cover up the truth are consistent with your typical
> posting
>> > style.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>>>> Thanks for providing more evidence of your paranoia.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Is that your word for healthy skepticism?
>> >>>
>> >>> No, it's my term for a ridiculous statement in reference to a
>> >>> psychologist
>> >>> that
>> >>> I have neither seen nor communicated with in over 30 years and 2
> other
>> >>> psychologists (whose roles only real clinical psychology graduate
>
>> >>> students
>> >>> in
>> >>> that program would know, dumbass) that may or may not be alive.
> It's my
>> >>> term
>> >>> for a conspiracy theory based on a set of false beliefs - AKA
> delusions.
>> Richman world, truths are lies. Accuate descriptions are delusions.
>>
>> >>
>> >>Like the delusion you have that you're a doctor?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Care to put some money on that, you lying bag of ****?
>>
>> Not really, I already acknowledged you might be a shrink.
>>
>> Are you ready to
>> > publish your false claims in an American printed publication?
>>
>> This is an American publication. The stuff you're reading, it's
> print.
>>
>> Why don't you
>> > admit, you worthless liar and libeler, that your proposal was about
> as
>> > phony as
>> > we know you to be?
>>
>> Because that would be a lie.
>>
>> You just wanted to see if you could scam the RAO readers.
>> >
>> I just want to know the truth about RAO's king of the whackos.
>>
>> > Admit, asshole, that you've ducked my prroposal because you can't
> cheat on
>> > it,
>> > and it would provide the evidence you've tried to avoid for 7
> years.
>>
>> I couldn't have cheated on mine.
>> >
>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>> That's right,
>> >>>>> Mikey, it's all part of a carefully constructed plot involving
> a
>> >>>>> psychologist in California that I haven't seen in over 30 years
> and a
>> >>>>> couple of other psychologists who may or may not still be
> alive.
>> >>
>> >>If he hasn't seen Dr. Richman in that long, I'd better just cull
> one or
>> >>two
>> >>of your best posts, so I don't shock him too badly.
>> >
>> > Take your best shot, asshole. After spending a few minutes with
> you,
>> > he'll
>> > know you're a paranoid, delusional piece of **** in need of
> involuntary
>> > treatment (since you're too stupid to have any self-awareness or
> believe
>> > what
>> > many have already told you).
>> >
>> More projection?
>>
>> >>
>> >> But
>> >>>>> you know it's part of a conspiracy - just like the conspiracies
>> >>>>> involving Leslie Van Vreeland (see the Dormer post), Dave Weil,
> the
>> >>>>> telephone companies in South Floria, Jim Johnston, and numerous
> other
>> >>>>> conspirators.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>Childs play compared to some of the really wierd stuff that's
> happened
>> >>>>here
>> >>>>over the last decade. Hell, last night some guy who's been
> flaming
>> >>>>people
>> >>>>for
>> >>>>nothing, for 7 ****ing years, claimed he'd done no wrong, Oh
> wait, that
>> >>>>was
>> >>>>you.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> That's not what I said, asshole. But feel free to misquote me.
>> >>I'll refresh your pathetic memory.
>> >>I said:
>> >>
>> >>" I'm capable of accepting my fault, hope about you and yours?"
>> >>
>> >>And Bruce replied:
>> >>
>> >>"There's none for me to accept."
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> And as usual,
>> >>> you're lying your ass off when you claim that I've been flaming
> people
>> >>> ......."FOR NOTHING".
>>
>> For some very petty stuff that NORMAL people would have simply
> shrugged off.
>>
>> Just keep telling yourslef that. The evidence of your crybaby
> attitude is
>> there for all to see.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Bull****. Almost every time you open your lying mouth, you give
> people a
>> > very
>> > valid reason to flame you.
>>
>> But the others at least get the facts right, you just make it up as
> you go
>> along.
>>
>> That would also be true of Krueger and Lionel, a
>> > couple of equally obnoxious and dedicated flamers who more often
> than not
>> > can
>> > be found insulting one person or another on RAO.
>>
>> And you like to fan the flames, hippocrite.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>You're in denial when it comes to the numerous smears of
>> >>> Krueger, yourself and a few others.
>> >>
>> >>We all know who's in denial, Bruce.
>> >>
>> >
>> > We sure do, Mike.
>> >
>> >
>> >> Nobody on RAO is flaming people "for
>> >>> nothing" except Krueger and Ferstler.
>> >>
>> >>I knew you'd get to an outright lie eventually, thanks for not
>> >>dissappointing.
>> >>
>> >> It's a matter of Google record that
>> >>> Krueger has frequently attacked people personally simply because
> they
>> >>> disagreed
>> >>> with his views.
>> >>
>> >>Show me.
>> >
>> > Deny it and prove once again that you're a liar.
>>
>> Inability to show valid evidence noted.
>>
>> Anybody with even the
>> > smallest iota of dishonesty -
>>
>> I'm pretty sure I have the smallest iota of "dishonesty." Freudian
> slip?
>>
>> which excludes you - can simply put in key words
>> > like vinyl, tubes, or the names of the numerous people listed in
> the
>> > thread
>> > entitled "Have You Had A Bad Krueger Experience" and read what
> Krueger has
>> > had
>> > to say to them.
>> >
>> And find the same 12 idiots who are always involved in the flame
> fest.
>>
>> >>
>> >> If you believe otherwise, than you're clearly delusional.
>> >>
>> >>OOPS, more of that professional lingo, naughty, naughty.
>> >>
>> >
>> > More accurate description of a lying piece of garbage named McKelvy
> who
>> > has a 7
>> > year history of making false statements based on a set of false
> beliefs
>> > not
>> > supported by factual evidence. IOW, evidence of delusions.
>> >
>> Actually it's more a fitting description of somebody who feels so put
> upon
>> that he has to flame somebody in the Julian Hirsch RIP thread.
>> >>
>> >>> Also, Ferstler, frequently smears people both collectively by
> starting
>> >>> his
>> >>> posts with salutations like "Hello, Idiots", or individually,
> again,
>> >>> just
>> >>> because they don't agree with his biases.
>> >>
>> >>Just like what happpens when he doesn't agree with theirs, nobody
> is guilt
>> >>free,
>> >>especially you.
>> >
>> > You juust contradicted yourself and provided more evidence that you
> can't
>> > even
>> > keep your lies in this oost straight.
>> > You claim that people flame people for nothing.
>>
>> I said you do, so do some others, some of the time. You do it all of
> the
>> time. There are plenty of threads on record where you have not been
>> mentioned and you feel compelled to insert a flame, just like the
> Julian
>> Hirsch thread. It's what you do.
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >>> And then there's you, of course, that has made self-serving
> statements
>> >>> in
>> >>> which
>> >>> you claim you have the right to attack people that have attacked
> your
>> >>> few
>> >>> friends like your role model, Krueger.
>> >>
>> >>There's another thing you won't be able to find a quote for, since
> I never
>> >>said it.
>> >
>> > You've recently claimed that you attack me because I attack Arny.
>>
>> Sometimes.
>>
>> Several
>> > [people have noticed it and commented on it.
>>
>> But of course you won't bother to post the full, in context quote.
>>
>> You're full of **** again if you
>> > deny saying words to that effect.
>>
>> Get the quote.
>>
>> Chronic flamers like you just love to smear
>> > anybody that retaliates against one of your very few fellow
> flamers.
>>
>> Another lie.
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> IOW, you don't care if somebody has
>> >>> attacked you or not, you're just looking for any excuse you can
> find to
>> >>> smear
>> >>> your enemies.
>> >>>
>>
>> You have us confused Bruce, that's your M.O..
>>
>>
>> >>Hmmmmmm, who else do we know like that? Some ****head who made a
> personl
>> >>attack during the Julian Hirsch thread. Oh yeah, YOU.
>> >>
>> >
>> > We all know a wrothless piece of **** named McKelvy that launched a
> smear
>> > campaign in the same thread even though his name was never
> mentioned.
>>
>> Because of your stupid, ****ing, completely unprovoked, completely
>> inappropriate flame in that thread.
>>
>> We
>> > alkso can provide evidence and have in the past, that this is
> typical
>> > behavior
>> > for McKelvy.
>> >
>> And of yours as has been done, but you just deny it and say you're
> the
>> victim.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> The *real* Dr. Richman has been coaching me for seven years on
> what to
>> >>>>> say.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>So you finally come clean, eh?
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Naaaaaaaaah. I'm just feeding your delusional system and taking
>> >>> advantage
>> >>> of
>> >>> your stupidity.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> He also told me not to worry about being arrested for
>> >>>>> impersonating a psychologist, because he could bribe the legal
>> >>>>> authorities to overlook this felony.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>There's no proof that the person posting as BJM is actually in
> Florida.
>> >>>
>> >>> I don't know about that. I haven't made the acquaintance of BJM.
>> >>>
>> >>OOPS, my turn, that should have been BLR, I guess I just think of
> you as a
>> >>BM.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Since most of us realize that hour head has been inserted in your
> rectum
>> > ever
>> > since you began polluting RAOI,
>>
>> RAOI? Gotta take the pills on time Doc.
>>
>> we also know that you are terminallly
>> > constipated when it comes to rational thoughts, and constantly
> overflowing
>> > with
>> > verbal diarrhea.
>> >
>>
>> Thus spaks thelongest wind **** on RAO. LOL
>> >
>> >>
>> >>>>There's no reason you couldn't actually be a psychologist.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Finally, a valid statement. Congratulations.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> He also hooked up a telephone
>> >>>>> forwarding system between his office and mine, in case anybody
> called
>> >>>>> from RAO, so that he could answer questions that an impostor
> like me
>> >>>>> wouldn't know.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Probably the real one got one of those call blockers that require
> extra
>> >>>>digits.
>> >>>
>> >>> More delusions, on cue.
>> >>>
>> >>A possibility, not a delusion, I'm not saying that is in fact the
> case,
>> >>only
>> >>that it could be. Nice try though.
>> >>>
>> >>>>He was probably getting tired of all the calls from people you'd
> ****ed
>> >>>>off.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> More evidence of paranoia, on cue.
>> >>>
>> >>See above.
>> >>>
>> >>>>He also got in touch with the schools he attended and
>> >>>>> th hospital that he interned at, and told them he was going to
> let an
>> >>>>> impostor claim he went to these places.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Fake CV's are a dime a dozen.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> But school and hospital records that can be verified or not,
> dumbass.
>> >>
>> >>No reason why you couldn't know the real Dr. Richman.
>> >
>> > I know him a lot better than you'll ever realize, since you're
> quite
>> > delusional
>> > and in denial re. the facts.
>> >
>> Or not.
>>
>> >>
>> >>Neither
>> >>> are records that are part of public information.
>> >>> Would you also like a list of hospitals at which I've had medical
> staff
>> >>> privileges, dumbo?
>> >>
>> >>And read more of your lies and distortions? No thanks.
>> >
>> > Tell that to the hospitals. Several of them have psychiatric
> floors and
>> > will
>> > be interested to hear from somebody like you that clearly qualifies
> for
>> > admission.
>> >
>>
>> Which hospitals were you confined in?
>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>> It seems to have escaped your grasp, however. Posting on a
> public forum
>> >>> and
>> >>> representing yourself as a psychologist if you are not qualified
> to do
>> >>> so
>> >>> is a
>> >>> felony, dumbo.
>> >>
>> >>Already addressed that issue Goofy.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> I guess you glossed over that piece of information above. And
>> >>> if one psychologist were to pretend to be another psychologist,
> that
>> >>> would
>> >>> also
>> >>> be fraud, genius. Feel free to file a complaint with the legal
>> >>> authorities and
>> >>> let us all have more opportunities to laugh at you.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Guess what? I've been getting away with for almost 7
>> >>>>> years. And with "detectives" like McKelvy, I can get away with
> it
>> >>>>> forever.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>At least until they finish looking into your online behavior.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Take your best shot, asshole. Your 7 yea history of lying about
> my
>> >>> online
>> >>> behavior is worthless, given your total lack of credibility. I
> hope you
>> >>> never
>> >>> have to take a polygraph test, because you'd end up having to pay
> for
>> >>> breaking
>> >>> the machine.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>Likewise, I'm sure. Of course if you actually believe your own
> bull****,
>> >>you could probably pass.
>> >>>
>> >>>>> And you question the use of terms like paranoid and delusional
> when
>> >>>>> applied to your online behavior?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>When they come from a guy like you, abso-****ing-lutely.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Then you're a fool and in denial. Your behavior gives even
> laymen, let
>> >>> alone
>> >>> mental health professionals, all the proof they need. But those
> that
>> >>> are
>> >>> mentally ill like yourself, have a lot of difficulty recognizing
> their
>> >>> own
>> >>> pathology.
>> >>
>> >>If irony killed.
>> >>
>> >
>> >> So your statement is totally predictable and actually provides
> more
>> >>> evidence about your mental status.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> You just provided some very
>> >>>>> convincing evidence that it fully applies.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>And you've been providing evidence for 7 years that you are:
>> >>>>A: A sock puppet
>> >>>>B. A major league cry baby
>> >>>>C. A demented prankster
>> >>>
>> >>> Congratulations on being able to actually count to "C" in
> presenting a
>> >>> trioi of
>> >>> delusional lies.
>> >>>
>> >>> I was tempted to retaliate by forging what you said and
> substituting
>> >>> answers.
>> >>> But since I have something, that you can only dream about and
> wish for,
>> >>> self-control, I've decided not copy your latest exercise in fraud
> and
>> >>> misrepresentation of what another person has said.
>> >>
>> >>Sure you do, that's why you go off on tangents when somebody simply
>
>> >>wonders
>> >>why you include PhD. in your sig line.
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Let's just innstead just observe that McKelvy has provided
> evidence on
>> >>> RAO
>> >>> for
>> >>> about 7 years of the following:
>> >>>
>> Snip of more of BJ's opinions based on nothing.
>>
>>
>> >>>>> Sure, your beliefs about me are perfectly valid.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Oh, I'm sure of it.
>> >>>
>> >
>> >>>>
>> >>>>It's the rest of the
>> >>>>> world (almost) that's wrong.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>It's possible. The bottom line is, I'm skeptical, get over it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> it bothers you a lot more than it bothers me. LOL !!!
>> >>>
>> >>> You're the one that initiated a bogus proposal designed to prove
> nothing
>> >>> other
>> >>> than that you could lie again and violate any promise you might
> make.
>> >>
>> >>There was nothing bogus about it, of course we'll never know for
> sure
>> >>since
>> >>you ran screaming away from it.
>> >
>> > You saw and heard that? Be sure and tell that to Dr Lulow if you
> meet
>> > him.
>>
>> Inability to recognize when someone is speaking figuratively, noted.
>>
>> > The only running and screaming about yoru proposal is contained in
> your
>> > visual
>> > and auditory hallucinations which you have somehow connecteed to
> printed
>> > words
>> > in an RAO post. Man, you really are waaaaaay over the edge!
>> >
>> Only in Richman world where truth is delusion and opinions are lies.
>>
>> > As more rational and nondelusional readers know, you made a phony
> proposal
>> > (which nobody asked for btw)
>>
>> I asked for it, I'm the one who wanted to know.
>>
>> based on some bizarre telephone scheme in which
>> > you hoped that somebody would see through your scam.
>>
>> It was not a scam, just a way to simply verify that you are the sam
> BJR that
>> I found a phone number for, which you seemunwilling to prove.
>>
>> Obviously, your proposal
>> > was easy to cheat on with you lying after the fact about either
> your
>> > calling or
>> > my responding. We both know this, and many on RAO realized it
>> > immediately.
>> >
>> You mean you bdreamed that up as an excuse for not going along.
>>
>> > OTOH, contrary to what you've hallucinated about, there was no
> runnnhing
>> > or
>> > screaming. Instead, I made a counterproposal which would prevent
> yo from
>> > cheating, so naturally, you turned it down. My proposal would have
>
>> > provided a
>> > taped record of both your call and my response. Obviously, a
> compulsive
>> > liar
>> > and libeler like yourself wouldn't dare do something where your
> lies
>> > after
>> > the fact could be easily demonstrateed.
>> >
>> My proposal just rtequired you to oost 4 digits from a phone number.
>> Obviously beyond you limited abilities, or beyond your reach.
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
SCORE!