Bruce J. Richman
December 19th 04, 06:35 PM
George M. Middius wrote:
>Just the other day, the Krooglebeast attested that he participates in Usenet
>just for fun. This despite numerous occasions over the years in which he has
>referred to his and others' "Usenet careers". And despite his overblown
>accusations that John Atkinson and others "attack" Mr. **** in order to
>stymie his "business" endeavors.
>
>The most glaring evidence that exposes Turdy's lies is his consuming
>paranoia. You can see it in the many detailed accusations of conspiracies
>he's posted, and the bizarre accusations like "one dirty hand washes the
>other". And then there's the preoccupation with his so-called "enemies".
>Here are a selection of the latter.
>
>
>
>"I'm talking about apologies to enemies, such as Atkinson, Bamborough,
>Zelnicker, etc."
>
>"I'm taking a high-handed put-down administered in public at face
>value. My enemies treat me no worse."
>
>"...in several cases a number of my enemies humbly accepted my apology by
>dumping-on much abuse as they could."
>
>"I do have this policy of giving straight answers to technical questions,
>even to my enemies."
>
>"Even my enemies don't seriously dispute that...."
>
>"Some of my enemies like Zelniker and Atkinson ... are quite arguably real."
>
>
>
>
>Of course, as with all of Krooger's insane mutterings, you have to get past
>the garbling of meaning that's inherent in Krooglish. But looking at the
>situation from a moderate altitude, wouldn't you say that "fun" and
>"enemies" are mutually exclusive?
>
>
In addition to the very revealing quotations that you cited as examples of
Krueger's raging paranoia, he has recently confessed that he used an AOL
account at one time to "get information" on "sockpuppets" and "malefactors".
Presumably these people were also on his enemies list. It certainly can be
asked - "What sane person would go to such lengths?". Add to that the well
documented fact that he has also questioned the identities of many of his
enemies and suggested that *they* too are sockpuppets, even though there is no
evidence that would convince any rational person of this delusioinal
accusation.
Bruce J. Richman
>Just the other day, the Krooglebeast attested that he participates in Usenet
>just for fun. This despite numerous occasions over the years in which he has
>referred to his and others' "Usenet careers". And despite his overblown
>accusations that John Atkinson and others "attack" Mr. **** in order to
>stymie his "business" endeavors.
>
>The most glaring evidence that exposes Turdy's lies is his consuming
>paranoia. You can see it in the many detailed accusations of conspiracies
>he's posted, and the bizarre accusations like "one dirty hand washes the
>other". And then there's the preoccupation with his so-called "enemies".
>Here are a selection of the latter.
>
>
>
>"I'm talking about apologies to enemies, such as Atkinson, Bamborough,
>Zelnicker, etc."
>
>"I'm taking a high-handed put-down administered in public at face
>value. My enemies treat me no worse."
>
>"...in several cases a number of my enemies humbly accepted my apology by
>dumping-on much abuse as they could."
>
>"I do have this policy of giving straight answers to technical questions,
>even to my enemies."
>
>"Even my enemies don't seriously dispute that...."
>
>"Some of my enemies like Zelniker and Atkinson ... are quite arguably real."
>
>
>
>
>Of course, as with all of Krooger's insane mutterings, you have to get past
>the garbling of meaning that's inherent in Krooglish. But looking at the
>situation from a moderate altitude, wouldn't you say that "fun" and
>"enemies" are mutually exclusive?
>
>
In addition to the very revealing quotations that you cited as examples of
Krueger's raging paranoia, he has recently confessed that he used an AOL
account at one time to "get information" on "sockpuppets" and "malefactors".
Presumably these people were also on his enemies list. It certainly can be
asked - "What sane person would go to such lengths?". Add to that the well
documented fact that he has also questioned the identities of many of his
enemies and suggested that *they* too are sockpuppets, even though there is no
evidence that would convince any rational person of this delusioinal
accusation.
Bruce J. Richman