Why Bush wins in November!

[Sander deWaal]

Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Lionel]

Sander deWaal wrote:
> Simple, really.
> Bush looks better than Kerry.

Your amps look horrible, this doesn't mean that they sound bad.

[Sander deWaal]

Lionel > said:

>> Simple, really.
>> Bush looks better than Kerry.
>
>Your amps look horrible, this doesn't mean that they sound bad.

Have you ever seen them? :-)

What I meant is that the looks are more important than actions.
Sad but true.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[jak163]

On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:26:19 +0200, Sander deWaal >
wrote:

>
>Simple, really.
>Bush looks better than Kerry.

Especially with that phony smile he had on during the third debate.
That made him look so impressive.

[Bruce J. Richman]

jak163 wrote:


>On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:26:19 +0200, Sander deWaal >
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Simple, really.
>>Bush looks better than Kerry.
>
>Especially with that phony smile he had on during the third debate.
>That made him look so impressive.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

His wife is referred to in some quarters as The First Robot.



Bruce J. Richman

[Lionel]

Sander deWaal wrote:
> Lionel > said:
>
>
>>>Simple, really.
>>>Bush looks better than Kerry.
>>
>>Your amps look horrible, this doesn't mean that they sound bad.
>
>
> Have you ever seen them? :-)

No, this was you own comment.

> What I meant is that the looks are more important than actions.
> Sad but true.

People love to be mystified...
Our RAO dandy for example, George M. Middius, useless but charming. ;-)

[Bruce J. Richman]

jak163 wrote:


>On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:26:19 +0200, Sander deWaal >
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Simple, really.
>>Bush looks better than Kerry.
>
>Especially with that phony smile he had on during the third debate.
>That made him look so impressive.
>
>
>
>
>
>

I was waiting for him to say, "What, me worry"" .



Bruce J. Richman

[paul packer]

On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:03:49 -0400, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>
>
>jak163 said:
>
>> >Simple, really.
>> >Bush looks better than Kerry.
>>
>> Especially with that phony smile he had on during the third debate.
>> That made him look so impressive.
>
>I thought God tells Dubya when to smile and when to frown. And when to
>inahle.

'Inahle'? I saw someone do that once and it killed him.

[jeffc]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> >>Simple, really.
> >>Bush looks better than Kerry.
> >
> >Especially with that phony smile he had on during the third debate.
> >That made him look so impressive.
> >
>
> I was waiting for him to say, "What, me worry"" .

Really.
http://www.thenation.com/covers/alfredw/

[Trevor Wilson]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Sander deWaal wrote:
>> Lionel > said:
>>
>>
>>>>Simple, really.
>>>>Bush looks better than Kerry.
>>>
>>>Your amps look horrible, this doesn't mean that they sound bad.
>>
>>
>> Have you ever seen them? :-)
>
> No, this was you own comment.
>
>> What I meant is that the looks are more important than actions.
>> Sad but true.
>
> People love to be mystified...
> Our RAO dandy for example, George M. Middius, useless but charming. ;-)

**Charming??!! Charming, in the same way that a Citroen 2CV is over-powered.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[Lionel]

Trevor Wilson wrote:
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Sander deWaal wrote:
>>
>>>Lionel > said:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Simple, really.
>>>>>Bush looks better than Kerry.
>>>>
>>>>Your amps look horrible, this doesn't mean that they sound bad.
>>>
>>>
>>>Have you ever seen them? :-)
>>
>>No, this was you own comment.
>>
>>
>>>What I meant is that the looks are more important than actions.
>>>Sad but true.
>>
>>People love to be mystified...
>>Our RAO dandy for example, George M. Middius, useless but charming. ;-)
>
>
> **Charming??!! Charming, in the same way that a Citroen 2CV is over-powered.

I'm sorry to tell you that but it seems that you lack the cynicism and
derision to appreciate Middius' kitsch. ;-)

[Trevor Wilson]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Trevor Wilson said:
>
>> > Our RAO dandy for example, George M. Middius, useless but charming. ;-)
>
>> **Charming??!! Charming, in the same way that a Citroen 2CV is
>> over-powered.
>
> Do you WANT to get snake-bit?

**Sorry George. I call it the way I see it. You may have many qualities, but
charm does not appear to be one of them. At least, that is the way it
appears on RAO.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[paul packer]

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:36:29 -0400, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>
>
>Trevor Wilson said:
>
>> >> **Charming??!! Charming, in the same way that a Citroen 2CV is
>> >> over-powered.
>> >
>> > Do you WANT to get snake-bit?
>>
>> **Sorry George. I call it the way I see it. You may have many qualities, but
>> charm does not appear to be one of them. At least, that is the way it
>> appears on RAO.
>
>Don't apologize for being trailer trash.


Do you always try to prove your detractors right?

[Seabiscuit]

That's ****in' twisted and sick, Sander. Watch www.cspan.org's video feed
of the debates, turn off the volume, and be prepared for your stomach to
turn inside out as you watch Dubya's facial contortions.


"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...
>
> Simple, really.
> Bush looks better than Kerry.
>
> --
> Sander de Waal
> " SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Sander deWaal]

"Seabiscuit" > said:

>That's ****in' twisted and sick, Sander. Watch www.cspan.org's video feed
>of the debates, turn off the volume, and be prepared for your stomach to
>turn inside out as you watch Dubya's facial contortions.

I *am* sick and twisted :-)
I must admit to not have seen the debates though.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "