Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Sander deWaal wrote:
Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

Your amps look horrible, this doesn't mean that they sound bad.

Lionel said:

Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

Your amps look horrible, this doesn't mean that they sound bad.

Have you ever seen them? :-)

What I meant is that the looks are more important than actions.
Sad but true.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Sander deWaal wrote:
Lionel said:


Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

Your amps look horrible, this doesn't mean that they sound bad.


Have you ever seen them? :-)

No, this was you own comment.

What I meant is that the looks are more important than actions.
Sad but true.

People love to be mystified...
Our RAO dandy for example, George M. Middius, useless but charming. ;-)

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
Sander deWaal wrote:
Lionel said:


Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

Your amps look horrible, this doesn't mean that they sound bad.


Have you ever seen them? :-)

No, this was you own comment.

What I meant is that the looks are more important than actions.
Sad but true.

People love to be mystified...
Our RAO dandy for example, George M. Middius, useless but charming. ;-)

**Charming??!! Charming, in the same way that a Citroen 2CV is over-powered.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

Trevor Wilson wrote:
"Lionel" wrote in message
...

Sander deWaal wrote:

Lionel said:



Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

Your amps look horrible, this doesn't mean that they sound bad.


Have you ever seen them? :-)

No, this was you own comment.


What I meant is that the looks are more important than actions.
Sad but true.

People love to be mystified...
Our RAO dandy for example, George M. Middius, useless but charming. ;-)


**Charming??!! Charming, in the same way that a Citroen 2CV is over-powered.

I'm sorry to tell you that but it seems that you lack the cynicism and
derision to appreciate Middius' kitsch. ;-)

On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:26:19 +0200, Sander deWaal
wrote:


Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

Especially with that phony smile he had on during the third debate.
That made him look so impressive.

jak163 wrote:


On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:26:19 +0200, Sander deWaal
wrote:


Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

Especially with that phony smile he had on during the third debate.
That made him look so impressive.








His wife is referred to in some quarters as The First Robot.



Bruce J. Richman

jak163 wrote:


On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:26:19 +0200, Sander deWaal
wrote:


Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

Especially with that phony smile he had on during the third debate.
That made him look so impressive.







I was waiting for him to say, "What, me worry"" .



Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

Especially with that phony smile he had on during the third debate.
That made him look so impressive.


I was waiting for him to say, "What, me worry"" .

Really.
http://www.thenation.com/covers/alfredw/

That's ****in' twisted and sick, Sander. Watch www.cspan.org's video feed
of the debates, turn off the volume, and be prepared for your stomach to
turn inside out as you watch Dubya's facial contortions.


"Sander deWaal" wrote in message
...

Simple, really.
Bush looks better than Kerry.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

"Seabiscuit" said:

That's ****in' twisted and sick, Sander. Watch www.cspan.org's video feed
of the debates, turn off the volume, and be prepared for your stomach to
turn inside out as you watch Dubya's facial contortions.

I *am* sick and twisted :-)
I must admit to not have seen the debates though.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "