Re: but can you play it behind your back...?

[David Hajicek]

"mcdonald" > wrote in message
. giganews.com...
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 6:27:24 -0700, MikeK wrote
> (in message >):
>
> > Human hearing
> > tops out at tones that vibrate at about 20,000 cycles per second. The
> > high-pitched sound of the nanoguitar twanged forth at 40 million cycles
per
> > second, putting it 17 octaves above what human ears take for music.
>
> This doesn't add up. Using 20,000 Hz as a base frequency, 40 million Hz is
> only 10.97 octaves higher. Perhaps the writer misunderstood what the
Cornell
> people were telling him, since 40 million Hz is 16.47 octaves above A =
440
> Hz, which is almost 17 octaves. The note would be somewhere in between a D
> and a D#. I don't think it would harmonize well with the Bb of the black
> hole. I wonder though if 40 million is the exact figure, or if it's
rounded.
> That would affect the value of the note.
>
>
> mcd
>
And they could "bend" the note by heating the "string" with the laser beam.

Dave Hajicek

[mcdonald]

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:33:50 -0700, David Hajicek wrote:

> And they could "bend" the note by heating the "string" with the laser beam.

Hey, you might be on to something here. Perhaps the 40 million Hz tone is the
nanoguitar's "blue note".


mcd






--
1. To prove the Riemann hypothesis
2. To make a brilliant play in a crucial cricket match
3. To prove the nonexistence of God
4. To murder Mussolini

British mathematician G.H. Hardy¹s four life ambitions

[Gary]

"MikeK" > wrote in message >...
> The
> high-pitched sound of the nanoguitar twanged forth at 40 million cycles per
> second, putting it 17 octaves above what human ears take for music.

This may be the best invention ever for guitar!

[Sleepy Fingers Jones]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:45:12 -0700, mcdonald
> wrote:

>On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 6:27:24 -0700, MikeK wrote
>(in message >):
>
>> Human hearing
>> tops out at tones that vibrate at about 20,000 cycles per second. The
>> high-pitched sound of the nanoguitar twanged forth at 40 million cycles per
>> second, putting it 17 octaves above what human ears take for music.
>
>This doesn't add up. Using 20,000 Hz as a base frequency, 40 million Hz is
>only 10.97 octaves higher. Perhaps the writer misunderstood what the Cornell
>people were telling him, since 40 million Hz is 16.47 octaves above A = 440
>Hz, which is almost 17 octaves. The note would be somewhere in between a D
>and a D#. I don't think it would harmonize well with the Bb of the black
>hole. I wonder though if 40 million is the exact figure, or if it's rounded.
>That would affect the value of the note.
>

Good point.

P