Pailin' lies in her book... Where's Witless to raise the alarm?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Who's on guard duty in Wingnut Estates? A firefight has broken out between
Lyin' Sarah Pailin' and McCain's crew. Here's a bit from the AP article:

Palin comes across as particularly upset about being stuck with
$50,000 in legal bills that she says were directly related to the
legal vetting process for the VP slot. She says she was never
informed that she would have to personally take care of expenses
related to the selection process, and jokes that if she'd known she
was going to get stuck with the bill, she would have given shorter
responses.

According to the book, Palin asked officials at the Republican
National Committee and what was left of the McCain campaign if
they would help her financially. She says she was told that if
McCain had won, the bills would have been paid, but since he
lost, the bills were her responsibility.

Trevor Potter, the McCain campaign's general counsel, told the
AP the campaign never asked Palin to pay a legal bill.

"To my knowledge, the campaign never billed Gov. Palin for any
legal expenses related to her vetting and I am not aware of her
ever asking the campaign to pay legal expenses that her own
lawyers incurred for the vetting process," Potter said.

If Palin's lawyer billed her for work related to her vetting, the
McCain campaign never knew about it, Potter said.


If Witless won't defend Pailin', let's hope Bachman and Beck will step up.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Who's on guard duty in Wingnut Estates? A firefight has broken out between
> Lyin' Sarah Pailin' and McCain's crew. Here's a bit from the AP article:
>
> Palin comes across as particularly upset about being stuck with
> $50,000 in legal bills that she says were directly related to the
> legal vetting process for the VP slot. She says she was never
> informed that she would have to personally take care of expenses
> related to the selection process, and jokes that if she'd known she
> was going to get stuck with the bill, she would have given shorter
> responses.
>
> According to the book, Palin asked officials at the Republican
> National Committee and what was left of the McCain campaign if
> they would help her financially. She says she was told that if
> McCain had won, the bills would have been paid, but since he
> lost, the bills were her responsibility.
>
> Trevor Potter, the McCain campaign's general counsel, told the
> AP the campaign never asked Palin to pay a legal bill.
>
> "To my knowledge, the campaign never billed Gov. Palin for any
> legal expenses related to her vetting and I am not aware of her
> ever asking the campaign to pay legal expenses that her own
> lawyers incurred for the vetting process," Potter said.
>
> If Palin's lawyer billed her for work related to her vetting, the
> McCain campaign never knew about it, Potter said.
>
>
> If Witless won't defend Pailin', let's hope Bachman and Beck will step up.

Limbaugh calls the book "truly one of the most substantive policy books
that I've read." OK, we'll see.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > If Palin's lawyer billed her for work related to her vetting, the
> > McCain campaign never knew about it, Potter said.
> >
> >
> > If Witless won't defend Pailin', let's hope Bachman and Beck will step up.
>
> Limbaugh calls the book "truly one of the most substantive policy books
> that I've read." OK, we'll see.

<snicker>

Pailin's most pungent line from her time in the spotlight was that dogma
about "getting government out of the way". She was the greediest sow feeding
at the government trough in Alaska's history.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 13, 7:43*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Jenn said:
>
> > > * * * If Palin's lawyer billed her for work related to her vetting, the
> > > * * * McCain campaign never knew about it, Potter said.
>
> > > If Witless won't defend Pailin', let's hope Bachman and Beck will step up.
>
> > Limbaugh calls the book "truly one of the most substantive policy books
> > that I've read." *OK, we'll see.
>
> <snicker>
>
> Pailin's most pungent line from her time in the spotlight was that dogma
> about "getting government out of the way". She was the greediest sow feeding
> at the government trough in Alaska's history.

Here's a more thorough dissection:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_el_pr/us_palin_book_fact_check

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > > > * * * If Palin's lawyer billed her for work related to her vetting, the
> > > > * * * McCain campaign never knew about it, Potter said.
> >
> > > > If Witless won't defend Pailin', let's hope Bachman and Beck will step up.
> >
> > > Limbaugh calls the book "truly one of the most substantive policy books
> > > that I've read." *OK, we'll see.
> >
> > <snicker>
> >
> > Pailin's most pungent line from her time in the spotlight was that dogma
> > about "getting government out of the way". She was the greediest sow feeding
> > at the government trough in Alaska's history.
>
> Here's a more thorough dissection:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_el_pr/us_palin_book_fact_check

Pailin' is such a tool.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 15, 3:25*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Boon said:
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > > * * * If Palin's lawyer billed her for work related to her vetting, the
> > > > > * * * McCain campaign never knew about it, Potter said.
>
> > > > > If Witless won't defend Pailin', let's hope Bachman and Beck will step up.
>
> > > > Limbaugh calls the book "truly one of the most substantive policy books
> > > > that I've read." *OK, we'll see.
>
> > > <snicker>
>
> > > Pailin's most pungent line from her time in the spotlight was that dogma
> > > about "getting government out of the way". She was the greediest sow feeding
> > > at the government trough in Alaska's history.
>
> > Here's a more thorough dissection:
> >http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_el_pr/us_palin_book_fact_check
>
> Pailin' is such a tool.

And to many she's still a viable candidate for 2012. Disgusting.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Nov 15, 3:25*pm, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
> > Boon said:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > > * * * If Palin's lawyer billed her for work related to her vetting,
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > * * * McCain campaign never knew about it, Potter said.
> >
> > > > > > If Witless won't defend Pailin', let's hope Bachman and Beck will
> > > > > > step up.
> >
> > > > > Limbaugh calls the book "truly one of the most substantive policy
> > > > > books
> > > > > that I've read." *OK, we'll see.
> >
> > > > <snicker>
> >
> > > > Pailin's most pungent line from her time in the spotlight was that
> > > > dogma
> > > > about "getting government out of the way". She was the greediest sow
> > > > feeding
> > > > at the government trough in Alaska's history.
> >
> > > Here's a more thorough dissection:
> > >http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_el_pr/us_palin_book_fact_check
> >
> > Pailin' is such a tool.
>
> And to many she's still a viable candidate for 2012. Disgusting.

To think that she could have been a heartbeat away...

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > > Pailin' is such a tool.
> >
> > And to many she's still a viable candidate for 2012. Disgusting.
>
> To think that she could have been a heartbeat away...

Luckily, Scottie couldn't bark loud enough to make that happen.

[Boon[_2_]]

Evidently McCain is less than thrilled with the book. This woman is
burning one bridge after another.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 16, 11:43*am, Boon > wrote:
> Evidently McCain is less than thrilled with the book. This woman is
> burning one bridge after another.

Usually politicians start at the extremes and race to the middle as
elections near.

Palin is too stupid to do that. LoL.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> Evidently McCain is less than thrilled with the book. This woman is
> burning one bridge after another.

Angry John is tellin' folks to let her be and not fire back. What a wuss.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 16, 1:07*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Boon said:
>
> > Evidently McCain is less than thrilled with the book. This woman is
> > burning one bridge after another.
>
> Angry John is tellin' folks to let her be and not fire back. What a wuss.

Then again, he might just be thinking she's her own worst enemy, and
that we should all step back so we don't get any on us when she
'splodes.

[John Atkinson[_2_]]

On Nov 16, 2:26*pm, Boon > wrote:
> Then again, he might just be thinking she's her own worst enemy,
> and that we should all step back so we don't get any on us when
> she 'splodes.

Cheney & Palin in 2012 - the Dems dream ticket!

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

John Atkinson said:

> Cheney & Palin in 2012 - the Dems dream ticket!

You think that's a joke? They'd win several states. As we saw most recently
in 2004, overestimating the intelligence of the American electorate is very
easy to do.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
John Atkinson > wrote:

> On Nov 16, 2:26*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > Then again, he might just be thinking she's her own worst enemy,
> > and that we should all step back so we don't get any on us when
> > she 'splodes.
>
> Cheney & Palin in 2012 - the Dems dream ticket!
>
> John Atkinson
> Editor, Stereophile

How about Palin/Bachmann?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 17, 11:46*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *John Atkinson > wrote:
>
> > On Nov 16, 2:26*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > > Then again, he might just be thinking she's her own worst enemy,
> > > and that we should all step back so we don't get any on us when
> > > she 'splodes.
>
> > Cheney & Palin in 2012 - the Dems dream ticket!
>
> > John Atkinson
> > Editor, Stereophile
>
> How about Palin/Bachmann?

Um, Jenn? Let's not push it.

Do you really want to hear those two numbskulls campaigning for 18
months?

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:

> On Nov 17, 11:46*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> > *John Atkinson > wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 16, 2:26*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > > > Then again, he might just be thinking she's her own worst enemy,
> > > > and that we should all step back so we don't get any on us when
> > > > she 'splodes.
> >
> > > Cheney & Palin in 2012 - the Dems dream ticket!
> >
> > > John Atkinson
> > > Editor, Stereophile
> >
> > How about Palin/Bachmann?
>
> Um, Jenn? Let's not push it.
>
> Do you really want to hear those two numbskulls campaigning for 18
> months?

I think so! It would be a never ending source of amusement.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 18, 1:27*am, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 17, 11:46*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > >,
> > > *John Atkinson > wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 16, 2:26*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > > > > Then again, he might just be thinking she's her own worst enemy,
> > > > > and that we should all step back so we don't get any on us when
> > > > > she 'splodes.
>
> > > > Cheney & Palin in 2012 - the Dems dream ticket!
>
> > > > John Atkinson
> > > > Editor, Stereophile
>
> > > How about Palin/Bachmann?
>
> > Um, Jenn? Let's not push it.
>
> > Do you really want to hear those two numbskulls campaigning for 18
> > months?
>
> I think so! *It would be a never ending source of amusement.

I just read that Bachmann has a favorable approval rating in her
district.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 18, 12:49*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Nov 17, 11:46*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > In article
> > >,
> > *John Atkinson > wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 16, 2:26*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > > > Then again, he might just be thinking she's her own worst enemy,
> > > > and that we should all step back so we don't get any on us when
> > > > she 'splodes.
>
> > > Cheney & Palin in 2012 - the Dems dream ticket!
>
> > > John Atkinson
> > > Editor, Stereophile
>
> > How about Palin/Bachmann?
>
> Um, Jenn? Let's not push it.
>
> Do you really want to hear those two numbskulls campaigning for 18
> months?

Will they be wearing bikinis? Will they be covered with oil?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 18, 4:42*pm, Boon > wrote:
> On Nov 18, 12:49*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Nov 17, 11:46*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > In article
> > > >,
> > > *John Atkinson > wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 16, 2:26*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > > > > Then again, he might just be thinking she's her own worst enemy,
> > > > > and that we should all step back so we don't get any on us when
> > > > > she 'splodes.
>
> > > > Cheney & Palin in 2012 - the Dems dream ticket!
>
> > > > John Atkinson
> > > > Editor, Stereophile
>
> > > How about Palin/Bachmann?
>
> > Um, Jenn? Let's not push it.
>
> > Do you really want to hear those two numbskulls campaigning for 18
> > months?
>
> Will they be wearing bikinis? Will they be covered with oil?

Cheney and Palin? Why, I don't know.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 18, 5:37*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 4:42*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 18, 12:49*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > On Nov 17, 11:46*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> > > > *John Atkinson > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Nov 16, 2:26*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > > > > > Then again, he might just be thinking she's her own worst enemy,
> > > > > > and that we should all step back so we don't get any on us when
> > > > > > she 'splodes.
>
> > > > > Cheney & Palin in 2012 - the Dems dream ticket!
>
> > > > > John Atkinson
> > > > > Editor, Stereophile
>
> > > > How about Palin/Bachmann?
>
> > > Um, Jenn? Let's not push it.
>
> > > Do you really want to hear those two numbskulls campaigning for 18
> > > months?
>
> > Will they be wearing bikinis? Will they be covered with oil?
>
> Cheney and Palin? Why, I don't know.

No, silly. Cheney's not a MILF.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > Do you really want to hear those two numbskulls campaigning for 18
> > months?
>
> Will they be wearing bikinis? Will they be covered with oil?

Aha! You've made up with Sacky, haven't you?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 18, 6:13*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Boon said:
>
> > > Do you really want to hear those two numbskulls campaigning for 18
> > > months?
>
> > Will they be wearing bikinis? Will they be covered with oil?
>
> Aha! You've made up with Sacky, haven't you?

I'll never be that horny.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 18, 5:58*pm, Boon > wrote:
> On Nov 18, 5:37*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Nov 18, 4:42*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 18, 12:49*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On Nov 17, 11:46*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > > > In article
> > > > > >,
> > > > > *John Atkinson > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Nov 16, 2:26*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > > > > > > Then again, he might just be thinking she's her own worst enemy,
> > > > > > > and that we should all step back so we don't get any on us when
> > > > > > > she 'splodes.
>
> > > > > > Cheney & Palin in 2012 - the Dems dream ticket!
>
> > > > > > John Atkinson
> > > > > > Editor, Stereophile
>
> > > > > How about Palin/Bachmann?
>
> > > > Um, Jenn? Let's not push it.
>
> > > > Do you really want to hear those two numbskulls campaigning for 18
> > > > months?
>
> > > Will they be wearing bikinis? Will they be covered with oil?
>
> > Cheney and Palin? Why, I don't know.
>
> No, silly. Cheney's not a MILF.

Maybe not to you, but those conservatives are a whacky bunch.