Are there any REAL audio groups anymore?

[Sherman Webers]

In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.

-ZZzzzz....-

[George M. Middius]

Sherman Webers said:

> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
> groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
> talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.

You mean how to qualify for the Usenet Morons Society? Yes, that's pretty
tame stuff compared to vacuuming pubic hairs out of circuit boards.

[AZ Nomad]

On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:13:51 -0500, Sherman Webers > wrote:
>In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
>groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
>talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.

I just did a quick search for your wonderful posts... all zero of them.
Do you have anything to offer other than whining?

Why don't you start an actual thread about something that interests you?

Otherwise, don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out.

[Eeyore]

Sherman Webers wrote:

> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
> groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
> talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.

Well don't post HERE then. It's all opinion and no audio (nearly).

There are several other audio groups with useful content.


Graham

[Fella[_2_]]

Sherman Webers wrote:

> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
> groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
> talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.
>
> -ZZzzzz....-
>
>
Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman
here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways.
Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... :)

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella > wrote:
> Sherman Webers wrote:
> > In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
> > groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
> > talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.
>
> > -ZZzzzz....-
>
> Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman
> here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways.
> Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... :)

I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than
it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end.

[Fella]

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
> On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella > wrote:
>> Sherman Webers wrote:
>>> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
>>> groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
>>> talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.
>>> -ZZzzzz....-
>> Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman
>> here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways.
>> Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... :)
>
> I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than
> it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end.

Sir! you are deluded! All amps sound the same, except when we say they
don't! Next.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 17, 2:36 am, Fella > wrote:
> Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
>
> > On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella > wrote:
> >> Sherman Webers wrote:
> >>> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
> >>> groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
> >>> talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.
> >>> -ZZzzzz....-
> >> Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman
> >> here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways.
> >> Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... :)
>
> > I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than
> > it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end.
>
> Sir! you are deluded!

I did not insult you. I have more morals than that, jerk.

> All amps sound the same, except when we say they
> don't! Next.

Unless they are properly broken. Then we like the sound, which is all
alike. It's like when I mike one of the many bands that don't pay me
to record them because I do it out of love. I break their amps too. I
do that out of love too and they don't pay me for that either too.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 17, 3:11 am, "Soundhaspriority" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella > wrote:
> >> Sherman Webers wrote:
> >> > In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these
> >> > USENet
> >> > groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we
> >> > really
> >> > talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed
> >> > here.
>
> >> > -ZZzzzz....-
>
> >> Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman
> >> here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways.
> >> Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... :)
>
> > I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than
> > it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end.
>
> I hate tube amps and turntables, but it was necessary to make an alliance of
> convenience. All these years, I have hidden my bitterness, each time a
> stylus skated across vinyl, each time another "audiophile" slobbered
> gushingly at the obscenity called Red Seal. Each time, I said, "Let it go.
> Revenge shall be mine, just like Freddy Krueger got his." I scraped the axe
> blade along the back of my hand, just enough to draw the blood that
> symbolizes Red Seal, and carefully put it back in it's antirust, antistatic,
> lambswool axe sheath. But the carefully hatched plot to destroy Freddy's
> brother, Arny Krueger, is almost ready to bear fruit. And then, and
> Then,...And THen,...,AND THEN!!!!!
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!

So tell me: how many GOIAs can Dance on the Head of a Pin?

(This is a trick question, as no Good Baptist would ever be caught
Dancing.)

> Token audio remark: I wire my speakers with #20 zipcord. How about you?

I use speaker cable that has braided solid-gold conducters which have
been hand-selected from hair plucked from the Heads of Angels. Not
everybody has access to cable like this, but I do because I know God
personally. It sounds Heavenly.

God gave me a really good deal on it too. But beware! There are
counterfeit cables made from look-alike conductors scrounged from the
Hairbrushes of Demons. These Demons Dwell in the Sewer. These cables
Sound like ****.

[Fella]

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2:36 am, Fella > wrote:
>> Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella > wrote:
>>>> Sherman Webers wrote:
>>>>> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
>>>>> groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
>>>>> talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.
>>>>> -ZZzzzz....-
>>>> Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman
>>>> here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways.
>>>> Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... :)
>>> I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than
>>> it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end.
>> Sir! you are deluded!
>
> I did not insult you. I have more morals than that, jerk.
>

Well I never! How dare you! Twirp!

>> All amps sound the same, except when we say they
>> don't! Next.
>
> Unless they are properly broken.

You mean broken *in* there, slick.

Then we like the sound, which is all
> alike.

What are you trying to insinuate? Everything of course all sound
"alike"! And if you start throwing audiophool gobbledyook at me, all
that "bass slam, pace, rythm, soundstage, imaging, depth, smearing ,
skin effect, strand interaction, warmth, bloomy, analytical, bass bloom,
analog-like, transparency" all that stuff will get into big trouble!

Try to be more origional!

And yes! We know! Your wife heard the difference from another room!
Yawn. Next.

[Clyde Slick]

On 17 Dec, 07:57, Eeyore >
wrote:
> Sherman Webers wrote:
> > In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
> > groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
> > talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.
>
> Well don't post HERE then. It's all opinion and no audio (nearly).
>
> There are several other audio groups with useful content.
>


interesting audio discussions can be
found at alt.global-warming.

[Clyde Slick]

On 17 Dec, 10:12, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella > wrote:
>
> > Sherman Webers wrote:
> > > In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
> > > groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
> > > talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.
>
> > > -ZZzzzz....-
>
> > Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman
> > here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways.
> > Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... :)
>
> I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than
> it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end.

also, you should try sighted listening

[Fella]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> On 17 Dec, 10:12, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > wrote:
>> On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella > wrote:
>>
>>> Sherman Webers wrote:
>>>> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
>>>> groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
>>>> talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.
>>>> -ZZzzzz....-
>>> Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman
>>> here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways.
>>> Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... :)
>> I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than
>> it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end.
>
> also, you should try sighted listening
>

Sighted listening should be avoided at all costs! If you find yourself
looking at your amp, or CD player, or lamp wire when listening to music
the first thing to do is stop listening and match those levels! Also,
sighted eating, smelling, seeing, touching and for instance f.cking are
also prone to bias and should be level matched!

Next.

[Arny Krueger]

"Sherman Webers" > wrote in message

> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really
> enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a
> dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked
> about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is
> discussed here.

Yes, the villiage idiot(s) of audio dominate over here.

Try alt.audio. equipment, rec.audio.misc, rec.audio.tech, and
rec.audio.high-end.

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Sherman Webers" > wrote in message
>
> > In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really
> > enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a
> > dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked
> > about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is
> > discussed here.
>
> Yes, the villiage idiot(s) of audio dominate over here.
>
> Try alt.audio. equipment, rec.audio.misc, rec.audio.tech, and
> rec.audio.high-end.

Does anyone post here more than you do?

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in
message

> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Sherman Webers" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really
>>> enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a
>>> dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked
>>> about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is
>>> discussed here.

>> Yes, the villiage idiot(s) of audio dominate over here (RAO).

>> Try alt.audio. equipment, rec.audio.misc,
>> rec.audio.tech, and rec.audio.high-end.

> Does anyone post here more than you do?

Google counts for this year so far:

RAO's OT regular(s):

Scottw 3,140
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! 3,140
Middiot 2,770
Clyde Slick 1,740
Jenn 1,710
Stephen 1,490

Someone who posts on RAO almost exclusively about audio:

Arny 1,480

[Bill Riel]

In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-2D04BB.09212117122007
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
says...
> Does anyone post here more than you do?
>

Thanks Jennn for admitting jenn, that you don't know how to use gogle!
LoTS!!

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in
> message
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Sherman Webers" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really
> >>> enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a
> >>> dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked
> >>> about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is
> >>> discussed here.
>
> >> Yes, the villiage idiot(s) of audio dominate over here (RAO).
>
> >> Try alt.audio. equipment, rec.audio.misc,
> >> rec.audio.tech, and rec.audio.high-end.
>
> > Does anyone post here more than you do?
>
> Google counts for this year so far:
>
> RAO's OT regular(s):
>
> Scottw 3,140
> Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! 3,140
> Middiot 2,770
> Clyde Slick 1,740
> Jenn 1,710
> Stephen 1,490
>
> Someone who posts on RAO almost exclusively about audio:
>
> Arny 1,480

Well, I certainly stand corrected.

[Clyde Slick]

On 17 Dec, 19:36, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in
>
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> "Sherman Webers" > wrote in message
>
> >>> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really
> >>> enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a
> >>> dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked
> >>> about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is
> >>> discussed here.
> >> Yes, the villiage idiot(s) of audio dominate over here (RAO).
> >> Try alt.audio. equipment, rec.audio.misc,
> >> rec.audio.tech, and rec.audio.high-end.
> > Does anyone post here more than you do?
>
> Google counts for this year so far:
>
> RAO's OT regular(s):
>
> Scottw 3,140
> Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! 3,140
> Middiot 2,770
> Clyde Slick 1,740
> Jenn 1,710
> Stephen 1,490
>
> Someone who posts on RAO almost exclusively about audio:
>
> Arny 1,480

here is an audio post for you
pcabx is useless

[Bill Riel]

In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-373CD9.09452517122007
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
says...

>
> Well, I certainly stand corrected.
>

It is true that Arns isn't posting as much to RAO as he used to, but I
think that's because fewer and fewer people are willing to engage him in
'discussion'.

Did you notice his lame attempt to troll JA? No one bit, but I'm sure if
he had been challenged we'd be witnessing another fine display of The
Debating Trade.

--
Bill

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 17, 4:04 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 17 Dec, 07:57, Eeyore >
> wrote:
>
> > Sherman Webers wrote:
> > > In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
> > > groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
> > > talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.
>
> > Well don't post HERE then. It's all opinion and no audio (nearly).
>
> > There are several other audio groups with useful content.
>
> interesting audio discussions can be
> found at alt.global-warming.

Or rec.right-wing. politics

[George M. Middius]

Jenn said:

> > Yes, the villiage[sic] idiot(s)

> Does anyone post here more than you do?

Arnii was promoted past mere villiage idiot ages ago. He's since won
All-County Idiot honors and been nominated several times for All-State
Idiot. Jennenn its like, Jneen you're jealous of Mr. Krooger Jeeenn. LOl!
mUch! ;-)

[George M. Middius]

Bill Riel said:

> Did you notice his lame attempt to troll JA? No one bit, but I'm sure if
> he had been challenged we'd be witnessing another fine display of The
> Debating Trade.

You're right about that. Have you ever experienced the Krooborg's Xmas
version of the "debating trade"? He calls it "extra stinky". ;-)

[Bill Riel]

In article >, George M.
Middius <cmndr _ george @ comcast . net> says...

>
> You're right about that. Have you ever experienced the Krooborg's Xmas
> version of the "debating trade"? He calls it "extra stinky". ;-)

Does he do a Christmas special? Thankfully I've never experienced it,
but I shouldn't get ahead of myself: there is still a week left.

--
Bill

[George M. Middius]

Bill Riel said:

> > You're right about that. Have you ever experienced the Krooborg's Xmas
> > version of the "debating trade"? He calls it "extra stinky". ;-)

> Does he do a Christmas special? Thankfully I've never experienced it,
> but I shouldn't get ahead of myself: there is still a week left.

Turdy inaugurated the seasonal version several years ago. It came on the
heels of his arrest and conviction for stalking and kiddie porn
trafficking. He got probation as part of the plea bargain, but he needed
somewhere to take out his frustration, so lucky us. ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

"Bill Riel" > wrote in message
t
> In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-373CD9.09452517122007
> @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
> says...
>
>>
>> Well, I certainly stand corrected.

> It is true that Arns isn't posting as much to RAO as he
> used to, but I think that's because fewer and fewer
> people are willing to engage him in 'discussion'.

It is a good thing that you villiage idiots are bothering your betters less
frequently. Trouble is that your continual senseless chatter makes the
place look like a place where only stupid people post. That's the essence of
the OP, and that's the reputation of RAO.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Bill Riel" > wrote in message
>
> t
>
> > In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-373CD9.09452517122007
> > @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
> > says...
>
> >> Well, I certainly stand corrected.
> > It is true that Arns isn't posting as much to RAO as he
> > used to, but I think that's because fewer and fewer
> > people are willing to engage him in 'discussion'.
>
> It is a good thing that you villiage idiots are bothering your betters less
> frequently. Trouble is that your continual senseless chatter makes the
> place look like a place where only stupid people post. That's the essence of
> the OP, and that's the reputation of RAO.

I'd suggest leaving before your reputation gets sullied.

[George M. Middius]

Shhhh! said:

> > > It is true that Arns isn't posting as much to RAO as he
> > > used to, but I think that's because fewer and fewer
> > > people are willing to engage him in 'discussion'.

> > villiage

> I'd suggest leaving before your reputation gets sullied.

He'd have to clean off many years' worth of encrusted **** before it could
be noticeably sullied.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 17, 5:21 am, "Soundhaspriority" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote

> > On Dec 17, 3:11 am, "Soundhaspriority" > wrote:

> >> Token audio remark: I wire my speakers with #20 zipcord. How about you?
>
> > I use speaker cable that has braided solid-gold conducters which have
> > been hand-selected from hair plucked from the Heads of Angels. Not
> > everybody has access to cable like this, but I do because I know God
> > personally. It sounds Heavenly.
>
> > God gave me a really good deal on it too. But beware! There are
> > counterfeit cables made from look-alike conductors scrounged from the
> > Hairbrushes of Demons. These Demons Dwell in the Sewer. These cables
> > Sound like ****.
>
> You're crazy, man! I'm walkin the other way, fast. Just remember, I'm your
> friend. OK? OK?

I have no friends here because I immorally use swear words sometimes.
Therefore you are not my friend. Therefore watch your back.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

[Dwight D. Eisenhower[_2_]]

On Dec 16, 10:13 pm, "Sherman Webers" > wrote:
> In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
> groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
> talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.
>
> -ZZzzzz....-



that's because in the early days of the internet, there were less
trolls, and the WWW. type groups with graphics, etc. were not
perfected yet- there only WAS Usenet email based groups

now the Usenet groups are a shallow, hollow shell of their former
self- and eventually will be axed altogether

all the groups needs to be moderated

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 17, 4:47 pm, "Soundhaspriority" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 17, 5:21 am, "Soundhaspriority" > wrote:
> >> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote
>
> >> > On Dec 17, 3:11 am, "Soundhaspriority" > wrote:
>
> >> >> Token audio remark: I wire my speakers with #20 zipcord. How about
> >> >> you?
>
> >> > I use speaker cable that has braided solid-gold conducters which have
> >> > been hand-selected from hair plucked from the Heads of Angels. Not
> >> > everybody has access to cable like this, but I do because I know God
> >> > personally. It sounds Heavenly.
>
> >> > God gave me a really good deal on it too. But beware! There are
> >> > counterfeit cables made from look-alike conductors scrounged from the
> >> > Hairbrushes of Demons. These Demons Dwell in the Sewer. These cables
> >> > Sound like ****.
>
> >> You're crazy, man! I'm walkin the other way, fast. Just remember, I'm
> >> your
> >> friend. OK? OK?
>
> > I have no friends here because I immorally use swear words sometimes.
> > Therefore you are not my friend. Therefore watch your back.
>
> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
> You are really whacked, man. You need an autopsy.

I've already had one.

[Jenn]

In article
>,
"Dwight D. Eisenhower" > wrote:

> On Dec 16, 10:13 pm, "Sherman Webers" > wrote:
> > In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
> > groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really
> > talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here.
> >
> > -ZZzzzz....-
>
>
>
> that's because in the early days of the internet, there were less
> trolls, and the WWW. type groups with graphics, etc. were not
> perfected yet- there only WAS Usenet email based groups
>
> now the Usenet groups are a shallow, hollow shell of their former
> self- and eventually will be axed altogether

Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used to be much better.
Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a pretty good place.
Arny's posting style is usually quite different there than it is here.

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Bill Riel" > wrote in message
> t
> > In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-373CD9.09452517122007
> > @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
> > says...
> >
> >>
> >> Well, I certainly stand corrected.
>
> > It is true that Arns isn't posting as much to RAO as he
> > used to, but I think that's because fewer and fewer
> > people are willing to engage him in 'discussion'.
>
> It is a good thing that you villiage idiots are bothering your betters less
> frequently. Trouble is that your continual senseless chatter makes the
> place look like a place where only stupid people post. That's the essence of
> the OP, and that's the reputation of RAO.

Is this one of your audio posts?

[Bill Riel]

In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-C37BEF.16382417122007
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
says...

> Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used to be much better.
> Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a pretty good place.
> Arny's posting style is usually quite different there than it is here.

Did you know Arny was banned from posting there for years?

Interesting, given that it's pretty much an objectivist dominated
newsgroup.

--
Bill

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 17, 7:17 pm, "Soundhaspriority" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 17, 4:47 pm, "Soundhaspriority" > wrote:
> >> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in
> >> ...
>
> >> > On Dec 17, 5:21 am, "Soundhaspriority" > wrote:
> >> >> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote
>
> >> >> > On Dec 17, 3:11 am, "Soundhaspriority" > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> Token audio remark: I wire my speakers with #20 zipcord. How about
> >> >> >> you?
>
> >> >> > I use speaker cable that has braided solid-gold conducters which
> >> >> > have
> >> >> > been hand-selected from hair plucked from the Heads of Angels. Not
> >> >> > everybody has access to cable like this, but I do because I know God
> >> >> > personally. It sounds Heavenly.
>
> >> >> > God gave me a really good deal on it too. But beware! There are
> >> >> > counterfeit cables made from look-alike conductors scrounged from
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > Hairbrushes of Demons. These Demons Dwell in the Sewer. These cables
> >> >> > Sound like ****.
>
> >> >> You're crazy, man! I'm walkin the other way, fast. Just remember, I'm
> >> >> your
> >> >> friend. OK? OK?
>
> >> > I have no friends here because I immorally use swear words sometimes.
> >> > Therefore you are not my friend. Therefore watch your back.
>
> >> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
> >> You are really whacked, man. You need an autopsy.
>
> > I've already had one.
>
> Well what did they take out man? You can really spew. You need to have that
> looked at, cause they din't get it all. I know a guy who lost his license so
> he can do it cheap.

Din't they? I feel ripped off now. You get what you pay for in
autopsies, just like in anything else in life.

Oh well. Some moron who called himself "Bwian" referred me to him.
Bwian lost his license too, due to criminal activities, so they had
that going for them, which is good.

[Jenn]

In article >,
Bill Riel > wrote:

> In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-C37BEF.16382417122007
> @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
> says...
>
> > Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used to be much better.
> > Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a pretty good place.
> > Arny's posting style is usually quite different there than it is here.
>
> Did you know Arny was banned from posting there for years?

I don't know for how long, but I knew that he was banned for some period
of time. The moderators told me that he's being watched very carefully.

>
> Interesting, given that it's pretty much an objectivist dominated
> newsgroup.
>
> --
> Bill

[George M. Middius]

Jenn said:

> > villiage

> Is this one of your audio posts?

Are you suggesting the snot quotient was too low for this post to qualify?

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" > wrote in message

> "Jenn" > wrote in
> message
> ...
>> In article
>> >, Bill Riel
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-C37BEF.16382417122007
>>> @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
>>> says...
>>>
>>>> Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used
>>>> to be much better. Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a
>>>> pretty good place. Arny's posting
>>>> style is usually quite different there than it is
>>>> here.
>>>
>>> Did you know Arny was banned from posting there for
>>> years?
>>
>> I don't know for how long, but I knew that he was banned
>> for some period of time. The moderators told me that
>> he's being watched very carefully.
>
> That'll teach 'em to tell you anything in confidence.
>
> So how are you going to cure yourself of your Arny
> fixation?

Arny fixation is generally incurable, especially in gay people.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in
message


> I don't know for how long, but I knew that he was banned
> for some period of time. The moderators told me that
> he's being watched very carefully.

It is lovely to catch Jenn in two deceptions in one post.

(1) There are not moderators, and there haven't been for over a year. There
is a moderator.

(2) There are only about 6 people posting on RAHE with any frequency at all,
so of course all posters are watched very carefully.

Jenn sure does like to put on the airs, now doesn't she?

[Jenn]

In article >,
"ScottW" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> ...
> > In article >,
> > Bill Riel > wrote:
> >
> >> In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-C37BEF.16382417122007
> >> @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
> >> says...
> >>
> >> > Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used to be much better.
> >> > Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a pretty good place.
> >> > Arny's posting style is usually quite different there than it is here.
> >>
> >> Did you know Arny was banned from posting there for years?
> >
> > I don't know for how long, but I knew that he was banned for some period
> > of time. The moderators told me that he's being watched very carefully.
>
> That'll teach 'em to tell you anything in confidence.

It wasn't told in confidence. It's told to anyone who wants to discuss
the issue.

>
> So how are you going to cure yourself of your Arny fixation?

Differently than you are curing yourself of your Shhh! fixation,
obviously.

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>
> > "Jenn" > wrote in
> > message
> >
> > et...
> >> In article
> >> >, Bill Riel
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-C37BEF.16382417122007
> >>> @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
> >>> says...
> >>>
> >>>> Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used
> >>>> to be much better. Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a
> >>>> pretty good place. Arny's posting
> >>>> style is usually quite different there than it is
> >>>> here.
> >>>
> >>> Did you know Arny was banned from posting there for
> >>> years?
> >>
> >> I don't know for how long, but I knew that he was banned
> >> for some period of time. The moderators told me that
> >> he's being watched very carefully.
> >
> > That'll teach 'em to tell you anything in confidence.
> >
> > So how are you going to cure yourself of your Arny
> > fixation?
>
> Arny fixation is generally incurable, especially in gay people.

lol

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in
> message
>
>
> > I don't know for how long, but I knew that he was banned
> > for some period of time. The moderators told me that
> > he's being watched very carefully.
>
> It is lovely to catch Jenn in two deceptions in one post.
>
> (1) There are not moderators, and there haven't been for over a year. There
> is a moderator.

There are regular posts signed by the "RAHE ModeratorsS".

>
> (2) There are only about 6 people posting on RAHE with any frequency at all,
> so of course all posters are watched very carefully.
>
> Jenn sure does like to put on the airs, now doesn't she?

lol

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 17, 6:38 pm, Soundhaspriority >
wrote:

> Sorry guys, forgery.

Don't worry about it. I like playing with the criminally insane.;-)

[George M. Middius]

Shhhh! said:

> > Sorry guys, forgery.

> Don't worry about it. I like playing with the criminally insane.;-)

Bwian has switched from buzzard to google, note.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 18, 12:50 am, "Soundhaspriority" > wrote:
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr _ george @ comcast . net> wrote in messagenews:hulem39ne8a3k19q0ch4kg1pcr2j9h4srq@4ax .com...
>
> > Shhhh! said:
>
> >> > Sorry guys, forgery.
>
> >> Don't worry about it. I like playing with the criminally insane.;-)
>
> > Bwian has switched from buzzard to google, note.
>
> Bwian seems to have switched to google for most of his primary forgeries,
> although he habitually runs a supporting cast from other providers.
>
> He really is criminally insane. Just think, tiny little r.a.o. now has it's
> own Hannibal Lector, an Adolph Hitler (blow one out your ass for Bret), and
> a Mussolini (Solid State subsumes the individual will).

And apparently Eeyore has his Tojo (the dreaded "greens"), so the
triumvirate is complete.

[Clyde Slick]

On 18 Dec, 03:52, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:


>
> Arny fixation is generally incurable, especially in gay people.

must be your nice round cute butt

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> > Arny fixation is generally incurable, especially in gay people.

> must be your nice round cute butt

Thank you for the "straight" viewpoint.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 18, 12:50 pm, ScottW > wrote:

> Poor little sssshhhhiee is not an issue worthy of discussion.

Of course not, for a couple of reasons:

1. He's on to you
2. He asks you hard questions that you cannot answer without looking
like an imbecile.

[Jenn]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Dec 17, 6:07 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "ScottW" > wrote:
> > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > .
> > >net
> > > ...
> > > > In article >,
> > > > Bill Riel > wrote:
> >
> > > >> In article <jennconductsREMOVETHIS-C37BEF.16382417122007
> > > >> @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
> > > >> says...
> >
> > > >> > Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used to be much
> > > >> > better.
> > > >> > Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a pretty good
> > > >> > place.
> > > >> > Arny's posting style is usually quite different there than it is
> > > >> > here.
> >
> > > >> Did you know Arny was banned from posting there for years?
> >
> > > > I don't know for how long, but I knew that he was banned for some
> > > > period
> > > > of time. The moderators told me that he's being watched very
> > > > carefully.
> >
> > > That'll teach 'em to tell you anything in confidence.
> >
> > It wasn't told in confidence.
>
> Really..... was that an e-mail exchange?

Yes, an email from the moderators that began, "As we're informing all
who inquire about this issue..."

>
> > It's told to anyone who wants to discuss
> > the issue.
>
> What issue? Arny is now an issue for you?

See above.

> >
> >
> >
> > > So how are you going to cure yourself of your Arny fixation?

I replied: "Differently than you are curing yourself of your Shhh!
fixation, obviously."
> >
> Poor little sssshhhhiee is not an issue worthy of discussion.
> YMOV with regard to Arny.

Still rowing down that big Egyptian river, I see.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 18, 8:17 pm, "ScottW" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote
>
> > On Dec 18, 12:50 pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> >> Poor little sssshhhhiee is not an issue worthy of discussion.
>
> > Of course not, for a couple of reasons:
>
> > 1. He's on to you
>
> OMG, I've been found out. Lol.

Yes, and I'm not the only one who knows, 2pid.

> > 2. He asks you hard questions that you cannot answer without looking
> > like an imbecile.
>
> Is that what you think? I thought they were silly repetitious questions based
> on
> false premises not worthy of a response.

Oh, like the waterboarding one, concerning morality, and dozens of
others? Poor 2pid! Words just confuse him all to pieces!

> But keep asking. Some day like a blind squirrel you'll put one together
> worth dealing with seriously.

Row, row, row your boat, gently down denial...