Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet
groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. -ZZzzzz....- |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sherman Webers said: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. You mean how to qualify for the Usenet Morons Society? Yes, that's pretty tame stuff compared to vacuuming pubic hairs out of circuit boards. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:13:51 -0500, Sherman Webers wrote:
In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. I just did a quick search for your wonderful posts... all zero of them. Do you have anything to offer other than whining? Why don't you start an actual thread about something that interests you? Otherwise, don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sherman Webers wrote: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. Well don't post HERE then. It's all opinion and no audio (nearly). There are several other audio groups with useful content. Graham |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sherman Webers wrote:
In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. -ZZzzzz....- Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways. Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... ![]() |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella wrote:
Sherman Webers wrote: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. -ZZzzzz....- Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways. Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... ![]() I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella wrote: Sherman Webers wrote: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. -ZZzzzz....- Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways. Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... ![]() I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end. Sir! you are deluded! All amps sound the same, except when we say they don't! Next. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 2:36 am, Fella wrote:
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella wrote: Sherman Webers wrote: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. -ZZzzzz....- Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways. Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... ![]() I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end. Sir! you are deluded! I did not insult you. I have more morals than that, jerk. All amps sound the same, except when we say they don't! Next. Unless they are properly broken. Then we like the sound, which is all alike. It's like when I mike one of the many bands that don't pay me to record them because I do it out of love. I break their amps too. I do that out of love too and they don't pay me for that either too. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 3:11 am, "Soundhaspriority" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in ... On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella wrote: Sherman Webers wrote: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. -ZZzzzz....- Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways. Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... ![]() I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end. I hate tube amps and turntables, but it was necessary to make an alliance of convenience. All these years, I have hidden my bitterness, each time a stylus skated across vinyl, each time another "audiophile" slobbered gushingly at the obscenity called Red Seal. Each time, I said, "Let it go. Revenge shall be mine, just like Freddy Krueger got his." I scraped the axe blade along the back of my hand, just enough to draw the blood that symbolizes Red Seal, and carefully put it back in it's antirust, antistatic, lambswool axe sheath. But the carefully hatched plot to destroy Freddy's brother, Arny Krueger, is almost ready to bear fruit. And then, and Then,...And THen,...,AND THEN!!!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!! So tell me: how many GOIAs can Dance on the Head of a Pin? (This is a trick question, as no Good Baptist would ever be caught Dancing.) Token audio remark: I wire my speakers with #20 zipcord. How about you? I use speaker cable that has braided solid-gold conducters which have been hand-selected from hair plucked from the Heads of Angels. Not everybody has access to cable like this, but I do because I know God personally. It sounds Heavenly. God gave me a really good deal on it too. But beware! There are counterfeit cables made from look-alike conductors scrounged from the Hairbrushes of Demons. These Demons Dwell in the Sewer. These cables Sound like ****. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
On Dec 17, 2:36 am, Fella wrote: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella wrote: Sherman Webers wrote: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. -ZZzzzz....- Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways. Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... ![]() I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end. Sir! you are deluded! I did not insult you. I have more morals than that, jerk. Well I never! How dare you! Twirp! All amps sound the same, except when we say they don't! Next. Unless they are properly broken. You mean broken *in* there, slick. Then we like the sound, which is all alike. What are you trying to insinuate? Everything of course all sound "alike"! And if you start throwing audiophool gobbledyook at me, all that "bass slam, pace, rythm, soundstage, imaging, depth, smearing , skin effect, strand interaction, warmth, bloomy, analytical, bass bloom, analog-like, transparency" all that stuff will get into big trouble! Try to be more origional! And yes! We know! Your wife heard the difference from another room! Yawn. Next. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Dec, 07:57, Eeyore
wrote: Sherman Webers wrote: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. Well don't post HERE then. It's all opinion and no audio (nearly). There are several other audio groups with useful content. interesting audio discussions can be found at alt.global-warming. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Dec, 10:12, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella wrote: Sherman Webers wrote: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. -ZZzzzz....- Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways. Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... ![]() I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end. also, you should try sighted listening |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clyde Slick wrote:
On 17 Dec, 10:12, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Dec 17, 1:30 am, Fella wrote: Sherman Webers wrote: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. -ZZzzzz....- Let's all shape up folks, and start whemently discussing audio. Sherman here has reminded us, so eloquently, as to the errors of our ways. Thansk for the heads-up there old sherr... ![]() I vehemently like tube amps and turntables if for no other reason than it seems to **** GOIA and some others off to no end. also, you should try sighted listening Sighted listening should be avoided at all costs! If you find yourself looking at your amp, or CD player, or lamp wire when listening to music the first thing to do is stop listening and match those levels! Also, sighted eating, smelling, seeing, touching and for instance f.cking are also prone to bias and should be level matched! Next. |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sherman Webers" wrote in message
In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. Yes, the villiage idiot(s) of audio dominate over here. Try alt.audio. equipment, rec.audio.misc, rec.audio.tech, and rec.audio.high-end. |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote: "Sherman Webers" wrote in message In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. Yes, the villiage idiot(s) of audio dominate over here. Try alt.audio. equipment, rec.audio.misc, rec.audio.tech, and rec.audio.high-end. Does anyone post here more than you do? |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jenn" wrote in
message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Sherman Webers" wrote in message In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. Yes, the villiage idiot(s) of audio dominate over here (RAO). Try alt.audio. equipment, rec.audio.misc, rec.audio.tech, and rec.audio.high-end. Does anyone post here more than you do? Google counts for this year so far: RAO's OT regular(s): Scottw 3,140 Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! 3,140 Middiot 2,770 Clyde Slick 1,740 Jenn 1,710 Stephen 1,490 Someone who posts on RAO almost exclusively about audio: Arny 1,480 |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-2D04BB.09212117122007
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... Does anyone post here more than you do? Thanks Jennn for admitting jenn, that you don't know how to use gogle! LoTS!! |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Sherman Webers" wrote in message In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. Yes, the villiage idiot(s) of audio dominate over here (RAO). Try alt.audio. equipment, rec.audio.misc, rec.audio.tech, and rec.audio.high-end. Does anyone post here more than you do? Google counts for this year so far: RAO's OT regular(s): Scottw 3,140 Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! 3,140 Middiot 2,770 Clyde Slick 1,740 Jenn 1,710 Stephen 1,490 Someone who posts on RAO almost exclusively about audio: Arny 1,480 Well, I certainly stand corrected. |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Dec, 19:36, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Sherman Webers" wrote in message In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. Yes, the villiage idiot(s) of audio dominate over here (RAO). Try alt.audio. equipment, rec.audio.misc, rec.audio.tech, and rec.audio.high-end. Does anyone post here more than you do? Google counts for this year so far: RAO's OT regular(s): Scottw 3,140 Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! 3,140 Middiot 2,770 Clyde Slick 1,740 Jenn 1,710 Stephen 1,490 Someone who posts on RAO almost exclusively about audio: Arny 1,480 here is an audio post for you pcabx is useless |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-373CD9.09452517122007
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... Well, I certainly stand corrected. It is true that Arns isn't posting as much to RAO as he used to, but I think that's because fewer and fewer people are willing to engage him in 'discussion'. Did you notice his lame attempt to troll JA? No one bit, but I'm sure if he had been challenged we'd be witnessing another fine display of The Debating Trade. -- Bill |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 4:04 am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 17 Dec, 07:57, Eeyore wrote: Sherman Webers wrote: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. Well don't post HERE then. It's all opinion and no audio (nearly). There are several other audio groups with useful content. interesting audio discussions can be found at alt.global-warming. Or rec.right-wing. politics |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jenn said: Yes, the villiage[sic] idiot(s) Does anyone post here more than you do? Arnii was promoted past mere villiage idiot ages ago. He's since won All-County Idiot honors and been nominated several times for All-State Idiot. Jennenn its like, Jneen you're jealous of Mr. Krooger Jeeenn. LOl! mUch! ;-) |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bill Riel said: Did you notice his lame attempt to troll JA? No one bit, but I'm sure if he had been challenged we'd be witnessing another fine display of The Debating Trade. You're right about that. Have you ever experienced the Krooborg's Xmas version of the "debating trade"? He calls it "extra stinky". ;-) |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , George M.
Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net says... You're right about that. Have you ever experienced the Krooborg's Xmas version of the "debating trade"? He calls it "extra stinky". ;-) Does he do a Christmas special? Thankfully I've never experienced it, but I shouldn't get ahead of myself: there is still a week left. -- Bill |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bill Riel said: You're right about that. Have you ever experienced the Krooborg's Xmas version of the "debating trade"? He calls it "extra stinky". ;-) Does he do a Christmas special? Thankfully I've never experienced it, but I shouldn't get ahead of myself: there is still a week left. Turdy inaugurated the seasonal version several years ago. It came on the heels of his arrest and conviction for stalking and kiddie porn trafficking. He got probation as part of the plea bargain, but he needed somewhere to take out his frustration, so lucky us. ;-) |
#26
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Riel" wrote in message
t In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-373CD9.09452517122007 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... Well, I certainly stand corrected. It is true that Arns isn't posting as much to RAO as he used to, but I think that's because fewer and fewer people are willing to engage him in 'discussion'. It is a good thing that you villiage idiots are bothering your betters less frequently. Trouble is that your continual senseless chatter makes the place look like a place where only stupid people post. That's the essence of the OP, and that's the reputation of RAO. |
#27
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 1:30 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Bill Riel" wrote in message t In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-373CD9.09452517122007 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... Well, I certainly stand corrected. It is true that Arns isn't posting as much to RAO as he used to, but I think that's because fewer and fewer people are willing to engage him in 'discussion'. It is a good thing that you villiage idiots are bothering your betters less frequently. Trouble is that your continual senseless chatter makes the place look like a place where only stupid people post. That's the essence of the OP, and that's the reputation of RAO. I'd suggest leaving before your reputation gets sullied. |
#28
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Shhhh! said: It is true that Arns isn't posting as much to RAO as he used to, but I think that's because fewer and fewer people are willing to engage him in 'discussion'. villiage I'd suggest leaving before your reputation gets sullied. He'd have to clean off many years' worth of encrusted **** before it could be noticeably sullied. |
#29
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 5:21 am, "Soundhaspriority" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote On Dec 17, 3:11 am, "Soundhaspriority" wrote: Token audio remark: I wire my speakers with #20 zipcord. How about you? I use speaker cable that has braided solid-gold conducters which have been hand-selected from hair plucked from the Heads of Angels. Not everybody has access to cable like this, but I do because I know God personally. It sounds Heavenly. God gave me a really good deal on it too. But beware! There are counterfeit cables made from look-alike conductors scrounged from the Hairbrushes of Demons. These Demons Dwell in the Sewer. These cables Sound like ****. You're crazy, man! I'm walkin the other way, fast. Just remember, I'm your friend. OK? OK? I have no friends here because I immorally use swear words sometimes. Therefore you are not my friend. Therefore watch your back. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! |
#30
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 16, 10:13 pm, "Sherman Webers" wrote:
In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. -ZZzzzz....- that's because in the early days of the internet, there were less trolls, and the WWW. type groups with graphics, etc. were not perfected yet- there only WAS Usenet email based groups now the Usenet groups are a shallow, hollow shell of their former self- and eventually will be axed altogether all the groups needs to be moderated |
#31
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 4:47 pm, "Soundhaspriority" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in ... On Dec 17, 5:21 am, "Soundhaspriority" wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote On Dec 17, 3:11 am, "Soundhaspriority" wrote: Token audio remark: I wire my speakers with #20 zipcord. How about you? I use speaker cable that has braided solid-gold conducters which have been hand-selected from hair plucked from the Heads of Angels. Not everybody has access to cable like this, but I do because I know God personally. It sounds Heavenly. God gave me a really good deal on it too. But beware! There are counterfeit cables made from look-alike conductors scrounged from the Hairbrushes of Demons. These Demons Dwell in the Sewer. These cables Sound like ****. You're crazy, man! I'm walkin the other way, fast. Just remember, I'm your friend. OK? OK? I have no friends here because I immorally use swear words sometimes. Therefore you are not my friend. Therefore watch your back. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You are really whacked, man. You need an autopsy. I've already had one. |
#32
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, "Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote: On Dec 16, 10:13 pm, "Sherman Webers" wrote: In the days of old (early Internet), I used to really enjoy these USENet groups. Now they are such a dissapointment. I miss the days where we really talked about audio instead of...well; it is just sad what is discussed here. -ZZzzzz....- that's because in the early days of the internet, there were less trolls, and the WWW. type groups with graphics, etc. were not perfected yet- there only WAS Usenet email based groups now the Usenet groups are a shallow, hollow shell of their former self- and eventually will be axed altogether Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used to be much better. Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a pretty good place. Arny's posting style is usually quite different there than it is here. |
#33
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote: "Bill Riel" wrote in message t In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-373CD9.09452517122007 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... Well, I certainly stand corrected. It is true that Arns isn't posting as much to RAO as he used to, but I think that's because fewer and fewer people are willing to engage him in 'discussion'. It is a good thing that you villiage idiots are bothering your betters less frequently. Trouble is that your continual senseless chatter makes the place look like a place where only stupid people post. That's the essence of the OP, and that's the reputation of RAO. Is this one of your audio posts? |
#34
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-C37BEF.16382417122007
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used to be much better. Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a pretty good place. Arny's posting style is usually quite different there than it is here. Did you know Arny was banned from posting there for years? Interesting, given that it's pretty much an objectivist dominated newsgroup. -- Bill |
#35
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 7:17 pm, "Soundhaspriority" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in ... On Dec 17, 4:47 pm, "Soundhaspriority" wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in ... On Dec 17, 5:21 am, "Soundhaspriority" wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote On Dec 17, 3:11 am, "Soundhaspriority" wrote: Token audio remark: I wire my speakers with #20 zipcord. How about you? I use speaker cable that has braided solid-gold conducters which have been hand-selected from hair plucked from the Heads of Angels. Not everybody has access to cable like this, but I do because I know God personally. It sounds Heavenly. God gave me a really good deal on it too. But beware! There are counterfeit cables made from look-alike conductors scrounged from the Hairbrushes of Demons. These Demons Dwell in the Sewer. These cables Sound like ****. You're crazy, man! I'm walkin the other way, fast. Just remember, I'm your friend. OK? OK? I have no friends here because I immorally use swear words sometimes. Therefore you are not my friend. Therefore watch your back. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You are really whacked, man. You need an autopsy. I've already had one. Well what did they take out man? You can really spew. You need to have that looked at, cause they din't get it all. I know a guy who lost his license so he can do it cheap. Din't they? I feel ripped off now. You get what you pay for in autopsies, just like in anything else in life. Oh well. Some moron who called himself "Bwian" referred me to him. Bwian lost his license too, due to criminal activities, so they had that going for them, which is good. |
#36
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bill Riel wrote: In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-C37BEF.16382417122007 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used to be much better. Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a pretty good place. Arny's posting style is usually quite different there than it is here. Did you know Arny was banned from posting there for years? I don't know for how long, but I knew that he was banned for some period of time. The moderators told me that he's being watched very carefully. Interesting, given that it's pretty much an objectivist dominated newsgroup. -- Bill |
#37
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jenn said: villiage Is this one of your audio posts? Are you suggesting the snot quotient was too low for this post to qualify? |
#38
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ScottW" wrote in message
"Jenn" wrote in message ... In article , Bill Riel wrote: In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-C37BEF.16382417122007 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used to be much better. Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a pretty good place. Arny's posting style is usually quite different there than it is here. Did you know Arny was banned from posting there for years? I don't know for how long, but I knew that he was banned for some period of time. The moderators told me that he's being watched very carefully. That'll teach 'em to tell you anything in confidence. So how are you going to cure yourself of your Arny fixation? Arny fixation is generally incurable, especially in gay people. |
#39
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jenn" wrote in
message I don't know for how long, but I knew that he was banned for some period of time. The moderators told me that he's being watched very carefully. It is lovely to catch Jenn in two deceptions in one post. (1) There are not moderators, and there haven't been for over a year. There is a moderator. (2) There are only about 6 people posting on RAHE with any frequency at all, so of course all posters are watched very carefully. Jenn sure does like to put on the airs, now doesn't she? |
#40
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message ... In article , Bill Riel wrote: In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-C37BEF.16382417122007 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... Yep, so many of the NGs are just troll bait. It used to be much better. Moderated groups are one option. RAHE is generally a pretty good place. Arny's posting style is usually quite different there than it is here. Did you know Arny was banned from posting there for years? I don't know for how long, but I knew that he was banned for some period of time. The moderators told me that he's being watched very carefully. That'll teach 'em to tell you anything in confidence. It wasn't told in confidence. It's told to anyone who wants to discuss the issue. So how are you going to cure yourself of your Arny fixation? Differently than you are curing yourself of your Shhh! fixation, obviously. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
real time audio level compression for computer audio output | Tech | |||
DVD-Audio Channel Groups and 20 bit resolution | High End Audio | |||
DVD-Audio Groups | Pro Audio | |||
CD audio can't read CD anymore | Car Audio | |||
Not all audio "Groups" listed in the Audigy 2 DVD-Audio player | Tech |