Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
December 14th 07, 07:27 PM
On Dec 14, 11:34 am, Eeyore >
wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
>
> > Eeyore wrote:
>
> > > Do you automatically assume they must be tainted in some way ? If so, then you need
> > > to look very seriously at your prejudices.
>
> > I automatically assume that power generation or power distribution in
> > no way "changes the science". I question why it is necessary for EVERY
> > SINGLE GROUP trying to discredit the science to have an "energy
> > expert" on staff. Don't you find that at all curious? I sure do.
>
> Any more odd than they might have an audio engoineer too ?
What would the audio engineer bring to the table? Should we consider
that audio engineer's opinion with the same weight as a
climatologist's opinion? Should I go to an audio engineer when I have
an ear ache, rather than an ear, nose, and throat specialist? After
all, both have something to do with hearing! (Although I cannot figure
out how power generation is correlated to climate. At least the audio
engineer has something to do with hearing, no matter how loosely...)
> Are you suggesting a conspiracy ?
No need to suggest it. It's an already proven fact. Or haven't you
seen the Exxon memo?
http://www.environmentaldefense.org/article.cfm?ContentID=4870
Or any of this?
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/investigation-of-exxon-front-g
http://www.nrdc.org/media/pressreleases/020403.asp
But let me guess: the power engineer on your site disagrees. LOL!
wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
>
> > Eeyore wrote:
>
> > > Do you automatically assume they must be tainted in some way ? If so, then you need
> > > to look very seriously at your prejudices.
>
> > I automatically assume that power generation or power distribution in
> > no way "changes the science". I question why it is necessary for EVERY
> > SINGLE GROUP trying to discredit the science to have an "energy
> > expert" on staff. Don't you find that at all curious? I sure do.
>
> Any more odd than they might have an audio engoineer too ?
What would the audio engineer bring to the table? Should we consider
that audio engineer's opinion with the same weight as a
climatologist's opinion? Should I go to an audio engineer when I have
an ear ache, rather than an ear, nose, and throat specialist? After
all, both have something to do with hearing! (Although I cannot figure
out how power generation is correlated to climate. At least the audio
engineer has something to do with hearing, no matter how loosely...)
> Are you suggesting a conspiracy ?
No need to suggest it. It's an already proven fact. Or haven't you
seen the Exxon memo?
http://www.environmentaldefense.org/article.cfm?ContentID=4870
Or any of this?
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/investigation-of-exxon-front-g
http://www.nrdc.org/media/pressreleases/020403.asp
But let me guess: the power engineer on your site disagrees. LOL!