Eeyore
December 14th 07, 07:27 PM
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
> Eeyore wrote:
> > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
> > > Eeyore wrote:
> > > > Trevor Wilson wrote:
> > > > > "Eeyore" wrote
> > > > > > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
> >
> > > > > >> "Brian Leyland, MSc , FIEE, FIMechE, FIPENZ, an Electrical and
> > > > > >> Mechanical Engineer specialising in power generation and power
> > > > > >> systems, now a power industry consultant."
> >
> > > > > > Why the hell shouldn't they have an energy expert on their panel ?
> >
> > > > > **Because it's about CLIMATE SCIENCE, not power generation. The two are
> > > > > unrelated.
> >
> > > > You would disenfranchise certain scientists because of their area of
> > > > specialisation ?
> >
> > > Answer me this: if this group is sincere in its effort to propogate
> > > the "truth" and challenge the "nutters", how does a nuclear engineer,
> > > a power generation and distribution specialist, or the like, enhance
> > > that effort?
> >
> > Why would he detract from it ?
>
> Um, bias?
You're automatically assuming anti-AGW bias because the guy's an energy expert ?
I'm sorry but that's a ridiculous assertion.
> Um, not wanting to bite the hand that feeds him?
Who is paying them ? You're just making things up.
Clealry you're both seriously deluded and have a closed mind.
Graham
> Eeyore wrote:
> > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
> > > Eeyore wrote:
> > > > Trevor Wilson wrote:
> > > > > "Eeyore" wrote
> > > > > > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
> >
> > > > > >> "Brian Leyland, MSc , FIEE, FIMechE, FIPENZ, an Electrical and
> > > > > >> Mechanical Engineer specialising in power generation and power
> > > > > >> systems, now a power industry consultant."
> >
> > > > > > Why the hell shouldn't they have an energy expert on their panel ?
> >
> > > > > **Because it's about CLIMATE SCIENCE, not power generation. The two are
> > > > > unrelated.
> >
> > > > You would disenfranchise certain scientists because of their area of
> > > > specialisation ?
> >
> > > Answer me this: if this group is sincere in its effort to propogate
> > > the "truth" and challenge the "nutters", how does a nuclear engineer,
> > > a power generation and distribution specialist, or the like, enhance
> > > that effort?
> >
> > Why would he detract from it ?
>
> Um, bias?
You're automatically assuming anti-AGW bias because the guy's an energy expert ?
I'm sorry but that's a ridiculous assertion.
> Um, not wanting to bite the hand that feeds him?
Who is paying them ? You're just making things up.
Clealry you're both seriously deluded and have a closed mind.
Graham