Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Deadlines in music production
Opps Sorry about firing off that blank email.
Subscribe to Tape-op. The best magazine about recording out there and free. Lots of professional producers talking about that exact thing. http://www.tapeop.com/subscription/index.html Recording ain't a bad magazine either. The answer in short is. Are your a finisher? If so you need to start the project knowing how long you have and make the decisions early on to get it done. If you let a million options creep into your work process you will never finish anything. Can you get good results fast? Who knows but a lot of #1 records were made in the 60's that only took a day or two and they are still some of the best records. And there are people doing exactly that now. Recent tape op articles talk about how someone like John Frusciante, Red Hot CHillie Peppers guitarist made six albums in six months. One week in the studio doing the entire record and three weeks getting the songs together for the next one. Anyone can work forever on an album. How long it takes does not necessarily speak to quality. "rakmanenuff" wrote in message ups.com... Deadlines really suck sometimes. I've asked a few successful producers how long they usually spend on a track, and they don't generally spend any longer than 4 days max. But then you hear stories of a dance track that took months to make etc. If the aim is to be a "professional producer", then coming up with the goods quickly (but not too quickly) is probably a requirement. When I was younger I used to be involved in raw, underground styles of music, and we just didn't have the patience to fiddle around with details for hours. Plus, we liked it raw. Small labels on low budgets sometimes abuse their engineers by booking 2-3 days of recording/programming for a whole 14-song album, then another 2 days to mix the whole thing. What are you supposed to do? 3 days without sleep and a product full of minor flaws.... Do those flaws matter? How much? Left to my own devices, I'd work in a really scatty, creative way. I'd work on a track, then put it aside and move onto something else, then come back to it many days later, do a bit more work, then leave it again and come back to it again. I'd have regular breaks from production to listen to cds, practice instruments and sift through my sound library. That way you stay fresh, but you can also get slightly lost in your creative madness. On the other hand, your stuff will sound pretty good without sounding boring or mass produced. I'd love to hear other people's viewpoints or experiences. |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Deadlines in music production
Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote:
The answer in short is. Are your a finisher? If so you need to start the project knowing how long you have and make the decisions early on to get it done. If you let a million options creep into your work process you will never finish anything. Can you get good results fast? In my particular case it's the frustration of having changed musical styles just recently. This is due to market forces, but I don't know the new style inside out yet, so I feel thrown in at the deep end. People are not expecting me to experiment and find my footing, they just want the finished mix by next week, obviously. Anyone can work forever on an album. How long it takes does not necessarily speak to quality. Agreed. In some types of music the lines between writing, practicing, playing, engineering and production have become really blurred. All of it seems like editing, maybe that's another issue. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Deadlines in music production
"rakmanenuff" wrote in message ups.com... Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote: The answer in short is. Are your a finisher? If so you need to start the project knowing how long you have and make the decisions early on to get it done. If you let a million options creep into your work process you will never finish anything. Can you get good results fast? In my particular case it's the frustration of having changed musical styles just recently. This is due to market forces, but I don't know the new style inside out yet, so I feel thrown in at the deep end. People are not expecting me to experiment and find my footing, they just want the finished mix by next week, obviously. I just ask them "how many times do you want me to listen to your song/tracks before we commit it to stone?" I explain that I can do it in one pass and your get what you get for such and such a price. I ask it they think the final product will be more suitable for what they are after if perhaps they want me to listen to each track for crap and perhaps remove the garbage that is not music then listen over and over while I ballance the guitars during the various parts of the song, ballance the vocals and ride the gain, then play all the songs against one another and ballance them against one another on the album. If they think that will result in something that is more what they want, then guess what? It will take more time and cost more. I also ask them if they want me to rush now or perhaps let it sit a couple days and finish it with fresh ears? They can pick any two. Cheap, Fast or Good. How well you can explain this and connect your effort with the customers expectations will probably determine how successful you will be in this business. peace dawg peace dawg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Deadlines in music production | Pro Audio | |||
FA: "Tom Dowd & The Language of Music" - DVD on recording and music production | Pro Audio | |||
A new way to experience music? Useful for production? | Pro Audio | |||
Production music library | Pro Audio | |||
Production Music Libraries | Pro Audio |