Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
I'm editing one of my favorite organists and organs.
Right now a soft, flowing reed melody is supported by a bass pedalpoint. The loudest component frequency in the recording at this point is 16 Hz. I just hope that somewhere there's an organ enthusiast/audiophile with a system that can reproduce such a flavor. |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
"Carey Carlan" wrote in message
I'm editing one of my favorite organists and organs. Right now a soft, flowing reed melody is supported by a bass pedalpoint. The loudest component frequency in the recording at this point is 16 Hz. I just hope that somewhere there's an organ enthusiast/audiophile with a system that can reproduce such a flavor. I know a number of them in the Detroit area. The usual tools involve collections of 4 or more 15-18" long-stroke woofers, connected to the listening room through plenums mounted in the basement and terminated in the floor of the listening room, usually in a corner. One has the 4 woofers mounted in 2 minimal-sized boxes, and uses very high power amplifiers and a lot of equalization to get the desired bass extension. IME it all works. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
"Carey Carlan" schreef in bericht ... The loudest component frequency in the recording at this point is 16 Hz. I just hope that somewhere there's an organ enthusiast/audiophile with a system that can reproduce such a flavor. In this thread we found some nice speakersthat could do that ;-) http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=11336 Henk |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
"H. Schaap" wrote in message
news:wB5Li.3049$Hv4.157@amstwist00 "Carey Carlan" schreef in bericht ... The loudest component frequency in the recording at this point is 16 Hz. I just hope that somewhere there's an organ enthusiast/audiophile with a system that can reproduce such a flavor. In this thread we found some nice speakersthat could do that ;-) http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=11336 Sad to say, the mouths of the horns are way undersized if an unequalized F3 of 16 Hz or lower is desired. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
On Sep 27, 8:48 pm, Carey Carlan wrote:
I'm editing one of my favorite organists and organs. Right now a soft, flowing reed melody is supported by a bass pedalpoint. The loudest component frequency in the recording at this point is 16 Hz. I just hope that somewhere there's an organ enthusiast/audiophile with a system that can reproduce such a flavor. Wait, R u rLy edithin' ur lifez ?!?!? rofl lolzzz Sorry couldn't resist |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
"Arny Krueger" wrote in
: In this thread we found some nice speakersthat could do that ;-) http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=11336 Sad to say, the mouths of the horns are way undersized if an unequalized F3 of 16 Hz or lower is desired. How big would it have to be? 16 Hz wavelength approaches 69 feet. Sadly, the 32' stop on this organ is electronic (even the 16' pipes had to bend to fit under the ceiling). The sound is produced by a speaker in about a 4 foot cabinet (with the whole organ chamber as a resonance cavity). It has the advantage, however, of being tuned to produce just those tones. Its distortion components are "part of the sound". |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
"Carey Carlan" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in : In this thread we found some nice speakersthat could do that ;-) http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=11336 Sad to say, the mouths of the horns are way undersized if an unequalized F3 of 16 Hz or lower is desired. How big would it have to be? 16 Hz wavelength approaches 69 feet. Quarter wave,comes to mind. Sadly, the 32' stop on this organ is electronic (even the 16' pipes had to bend to fit under the ceiling). The sound is produced by a speaker in about a 4 foot cabinet (with the whole organ chamber as a resonance cavity). I've seen 16 Hz come out of 4 cubic foot, but there was a lot of power and lot of equalization in play. It has the advantage, however, of being tuned to produce just those tones. Its distortion components are "part of the sound". The energy coming out of real world organ pipes is mostly harmonics. |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:36:50 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: I've seen 16 Hz come out of 4 cubic foot, but there was a lot of power and lot of equalization in play. And, to continue the example, *any* low frequency response is possible with *any* existing box and driver. Below the mounted driver's fundamental resonance an electronic boost at (asymtotically) 12dB per octave down to whatever desired rolloff can *completely* correct both magnitude and phase response. Seigfried Linkwitz gives a brilliant single op-amp stage design on his website (also in the 1980 Speaker Builder article). Now, volume/excursion, that's another matter... Thanks, as always, Chris Hornbeck |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
"Chris Hornbeck" wrote in
message On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:36:50 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: I've seen 16 Hz come out of 4 cubic foot, but there was a lot of power and lot of equalization in play. And, to continue the example, *any* low frequency response is possible with *any* existing box and driver. Below the mounted driver's fundamental resonance an electronic boost at (asymtotically) 12dB per octave down to whatever desired rolloff can *completely* correct both magnitude and phase response. Seigfried Linkwitz gives a brilliant single op-amp stage design on his website (also in the 1980 Speaker Builder article). Now, volume/excursion, that's another matter... I seem to recall that this system was capable of 122+ dB @10 Hz with 10% THD. Drivers had 1" Xmax. |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:53:27 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: I've seen 16 Hz come out of 4 cubic foot, but there was a lot of power and lot of equalization in play. Now, volume/excursion, that's another matter... I seem to recall that this system was capable of 122+ dB @10 Hz with 10% THD. Drivers had 1" Xmax. Yikes! My best "yeah, it's cold, and it's deep too" story is my experience playing with the Nearfield Acoustics system that stopped here in Little Rock on its way back from the 2001 CES. They were shown on both sides of the creek, and the bigger setup stopped here at a wealthier-than-me-fersure-and-possible-purchaser's) house, where I got to experiment with the crossover networks for several weeks. At the end of the stopover Craig, who'd flown me to the show as a part of his group and given me exhibitor passes and carte blanche, got ****ed and never spoke to me again. I still wonder why, but that's life. Anywho... the woofers (and this is for a home audio system!) consisted of four pairs of 18 inch long-excursion woofers mounted in push-push across four maybe 30" Corian tubes. The driver fundamental resonances, in box, were above their operating range, and electronically corrected. IMO, perhaps biased, but there it is, these speakers made the big Wilson's and anything else at the show look weak. And they only cost $70,000! Only a little more than my house. Arf. Thanks, as always, Chris Hornbeck |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
"Chris Hornbeck" wrote in
message On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:53:27 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: I've seen 16 Hz come out of 4 cubic foot, but there was a lot of power and lot of equalization in play. Now, volume/excursion, that's another matter... I seem to recall that this system was capable of 122+ dB @10 Hz with 10% THD. Drivers had 1" Xmax. Anywho... the woofers (and this is for a home audio system!) consisted of four pairs of 18 inch long-excursion woofers mounted in push-push across four maybe 30" Corian tubes. The driver fundamental resonances, in box, were above their operating range, and electronically corrected. As were these. IMO, perhaps biased, but there it is, these speakers made the big Wilson's and anything else at the show look weak. And they only cost $70,000! Only a little more than my house. Arf. Last time I looked, some of the largest displacement (Sd x 2 x Xmax) subwoofer drivers around are still very much under $1K each. The boxes are small enough to cut a pair of them from maybe 2 sheets of plywood. I think the BOM for this project from a few years back was under $3K for a pair. If you still count your change at the supermarket, there are some very good high displacement woofers for under $300 each. It might take a few more to do the same job, and the boxes would have to be somewhat larger to hold them. |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Editing and loving life
Right now a soft, flowing reed melody is supported by a bass pedalpoint.
The loudest component frequency in the recording at this point is 16 Hz. I just hope that somewhere there's an organ enthusiast/audiophile with a system that can reproduce such a flavor. Wait, R u rLy edithin' ur lifez ?!?!? rofl lolzzz Sorry couldn't resist Wouldn't you if you could? Everyone has an embarassing moment or two. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Guitar-loving friends,walk up | Pro Audio | |||
the life of an audio cd | Audio Opinions | |||
tnka ya massa,you spoke my name!or-"everything I need in life is that I see my name on the net" or-"virtual life is more than life" | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Life without Rumsfeld | Pro Audio |