[[email protected]]

I've been very careful not to drag the organising club of the Kutztown
Radio Meet into the nightcart-load of trouble Peter Wieck has brought
upon himself. Gray Glasser went further and removed them from
suspicion by saying "the Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC)
is reputable and respectable". But now some thoughtless fulminator
from the DVHRC has taken it on himself to give an opinion, in a
tribute thread to Worthless Wiecky no less! Bending over backwards to
be fair, I have waited over a day for calmer heads to prevail and the
retraction to arrive. It hasn't happened.

On Sep 18, 5:33 pm, " wrote:
On behalf of the DVHRC, we have been silent in regards to the prior
posts, for the obvious reason that they do not deserve a response.

Perhaps you will tell us, Mr Saegers, or whatever your name is, since
the DVHRC is now officially taking a position that the "prior
posts ... do not deserve a response", which prior posts are the DVHRC
thereby condemning?

Are you describing the posts supporting Peter Wieck as beneath a
response?

Are you describing the posts accusing Peter Wieck of crapping in other
people's houses as beneath a response?

Rather than choosing the lose-lose option of taking sides, you would
have been so much smarter to remain silent.

With sympathy,

Andre Jute
"Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving
us wordly evidence of the fact."-- George Elliot

[Andre Jute]

On Sep 19, 8:28 pm, Chris Hornbeck
wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:25:36 -0700, wrote:

Something

Any chance you could manage to keep this nut-job
stuff out of r.a.t?
I have a right to defend myself against the character assassination
of scum like Worthless Wiecky. When over a period two years Worthless
Wiecky hounded my every post with bullying and attempted blackmail, I
didn't hear a single word of objection from you.

Peter Wieck tried to blackmail me by first persecuting me without
provocation and then offering to cease and desist if I would "stop
prosetylizing". Now you're trying to apply moral blackmail.

I don't succumb to blackmail. I publish and damn the blackmailer.

You're embarassing yourself, and everyone else here.

To quote a protege whose book I'm just editing as I dictate this to
you: "A friend who can be embarrassed by me, isn't."

Thanks, I hope,

In good time, when I finish, gratitude will be graciously received..

Chris Hornbeck

wrote:
I've been very careful not to drag the organising club of the Kutztown
Radio Meet into the nightcart-load of trouble Peter Wieck has brought
upon himself. Gray Glasser went further and removed them from
suspicion by saying "the Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC)
is reputable and respectable". But now some thoughtless fulminator
from the DVHRC has taken it on himself to give an opinion, in a
tribute thread to Worthless Wiecky no less! Bending over backwards to
be fair, I have waited over a day for calmer heads to prevail and the
retraction to arrive. It hasn't happened.

On Sep 18, 5:33 pm, " wrote:
On behalf of the DVHRC, we have been silent in regards to the prior
posts, for the obvious reason that they do not deserve a response.

Perhaps you will tell us, Mr Saegers, or whatever your name is, since
the DVHRC is now officially taking a position that the "prior
posts ... do not deserve a response", which prior posts are the DVHRC
thereby condemning?

Are you describing the posts supporting Peter Wieck as beneath a
response?

Are you describing the posts accusing Peter Wieck of crapping in other
people's houses as beneath a response?

Rather than choosing the lose-lose option of taking sides, you would
have been so much smarter to remain silent.

With sympathy,

Andre Jute
"Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving
us wordly evidence of the fact."-- George Elliot

[Shawn K]

To Andre Jute:

OK, I am fed up with you now. You have not posted anything on this
newsgroup (rec.antiques.radio+phono) that would be helpful or even
remotely useful to anyone. Peter, on the other hand, has been very
helpful to many people here, including myself, by offering advice,
giving away equipment (only asking to have postage covered), and doing
seminars at Kutztown.

So GO AWAY! STOP posting here, unless you have something interesting to
contribute about antique radios. You are VERY annoying, and that is
putting it mildly.

I am now going to add you to my filter list, so I will never be able to
receive e-mail or posts from you ever again.

PS: I apologize to all good forum members for putting up with my rant.

PS: Andre Jute: GO AWAY!!

wrote:
I've been very careful not to drag the organising club of the Kutztown
Radio Meet into the nightcart-load of trouble Peter Wieck has brought
upon himself. Gray Glasser went further and removed them from
suspicion by saying "the Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC)
is reputable and respectable". But now some thoughtless fulminator
from the DVHRC has taken it on himself to give an opinion, in a
tribute thread to Worthless Wiecky no less! Bending over backwards to
be fair, I have waited over a day for calmer heads to prevail and the
retraction to arrive. It hasn't happened.

On Sep 18, 5:33 pm, " wrote:
On behalf of the DVHRC, we have been silent in regards to the prior
posts, for the obvious reason that they do not deserve a response.

Perhaps you will tell us, Mr Saegers, or whatever your name is, since
the DVHRC is now officially taking a position that the "prior
posts ... do not deserve a response", which prior posts are the DVHRC
thereby condemning?

Are you describing the posts supporting Peter Wieck as beneath a
response?

Are you describing the posts accusing Peter Wieck of crapping in other
people's houses as beneath a response?

Rather than choosing the lose-lose option of taking sides, you would
have been so much smarter to remain silent.

With sympathy,

Andre Jute
"Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving
us wordly evidence of the fact."-- George Elliot



--

Shawn K
www.thisoldradio.com

[Andre Jute]

On Sep 20, 7:15 pm, Chris Hornbeck
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:04:39 -0700, Andre Jute
wrote:

Something

Any chance you could manage to keep this nut-job
stuff out of r.a.t?

You're embarassing yourself, and everyone else here.

Thanks, I hope,

Chris Hornbeck

Your message is skipping, Chris. Nudge the tone-arm gently, or pick it
up and put it elsewhere, or switch over to CD.

You're choosing the wrong side here, for the wrong reasons.

Andre Jute

[Andre Jute]

On Sep 20, 6:58 pm, Shawn K wrote:
To Andre Jute:

OK, I am fed up with you now.

It's taken you long enough. Are you often mistaken for a victim?

You have not posted anything on this
newsgroup (rec.antiques.radio+phono) that would be helpful or even
remotely useful to anyone.

Holy Moses, the boy has a point. Give him a banana.

Peter, on the other hand, has been very
helpful to many people here, including myself, by offering advice,
giving away equipment (only asking to have postage covered), and doing
seminars at Kutztown.

Like I said, Worthless Wiecky bought your corrupt ass. But, if you
want his slack, lying ass, I'm here to make you an offer you can't
refuse.

So GO AWAY! STOP posting here, unless you have something interesting to
contribute about antique radios.

Old radios tinkle pleasingly when shoved off the table. Sometimes you
can use the metal box inside after you strip off the crappy 2A3 and
suchlike; saves punching a new case for a real amp.

You are VERY annoying, and that is
putting it mildly.

Holy Moses. Give that boy another banana for being so observant.

D'y'see, your scumbag Worthless Wiecky came to RAT specifically to
persecute me. He's sent hundreds of messages for two years. Now I'm
returning the favour, only of course doing it better (our view is that
Worthless Wiecky is a prime incompetent -- he probably doesn't sweep
too clean either about his janitorial duties). I shall keep returning
the favour until you persuade the little **** to leave RAT or until he
breaks. I'm taking bets on which happens first, if you're a gambler
and want in, or if you merely fancy you're a better pscyhologist than
I am.

I am now going to add you to my filter list, so I will never be able to
receive e-mail or posts from you ever again.

Pity that you won't see my generous offer above.

PS: I apologize to all good forum members for putting up with my rant.

I haven't seen any good forum members. They all seem to assume that it
is all right for scum like Worthless Peter Wieck to bully someone
constantly for two years, just as long as he does it elsewhere. I have
no sympathy for such insensitive and immoral people.

PS: Andre Jute: GO AWAY!!

When I finish my business here.

wrote:
I've been very careful not to drag the organising club of the Kutztown
Radio Meet into the nightcart-load of trouble Peter Wieck has brought
upon himself. Gray Glasser went further and removed them from
suspicion by saying "the Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC)
is reputable and respectable". But now some thoughtless fulminator
from the DVHRC has taken it on himself to give an opinion, in a
tribute thread to Worthless Wiecky no less! Bending over backwards to
be fair, I have waited over a day for calmer heads to prevail and the
retraction to arrive. It hasn't happened.

On Sep 18, 5:33 pm, " wrote:
On behalf of the DVHRC, we have been silent in regards to the prior
posts, for the obvious reason that they do not deserve a response.

Perhaps you will tell us, Mr Saegers, or whatever your name is, since
the DVHRC is now officially taking a position that the "prior
posts ... do not deserve a response", which prior posts are the DVHRC
thereby condemning?

Are you describing the posts supporting Peter Wieck as beneath a
response?

Are you describing the posts accusing Peter Wieck of crapping in other
people's houses as beneath a response?

Rather than choosing the lose-lose option of taking sides, you would
have been so much smarter to remain silent.

With sympathy,

Andre Jute
"Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving
us wordly evidence of the fact."-- George Elliot

--

Shawn Kwww.thisoldradio.com

[[email protected]]

In rec.antiques.radio+phono Andre Jute wrote:
Peter, on the other hand, has been very
helpful to many people here, including myself, by offering advice,
giving away equipment (only asking to have postage covered), and doing
seminars at Kutztown.
Like I said, Worthless Wiecky bought your corrupt ass. But, if you
want his slack, lying ass, I'm here to make you an offer you can't
refuse.

He never offered me things for free or useful advice, and still I think
you are a nasty troll. Go away and do something useful with your time, if
possible at all.

--
Met vriendelijke groet,

Maarten Bakker.

[[email protected]]

On Sep 21, 2:28 am, wrote:
In rec.antiques.radio+phono Andre Jute wrote:

Peter, on the other hand, has been very
helpful to many people here, including myself, by offering advice,
giving away equipment (only asking to have postage covered), and doing
seminars at Kutztown.
Like I said, Worthless Wiecky bought your corrupt ass. But, if you
want his slack, lying ass, I'm here to make you an offer you can't
refuse.

He never offered me things for free or useful advice, and still I think
you are a nasty troll. Go away and do something useful with your time, if
possible at all.

--
Met vriendelijke groet,

Maarten Bakker.

First of all, Mijnheer Bakker, in English we put greetings (groet) in
the salutation of letters. Second, there is nothing vriendelijk
(friendly) about your spiteful little missive. Third, it is a lie for
you to say: "He never offered me things for free" -- Worthless Wiecky
publicly offered bribes to anyone who wished to take them; they were
called "Free Mondays"; you merely weren't quick enough to take him up
on it. Fourth, I'm not a troll, I'm protesting being bullied by
Worthless Wiecky for two years with hundreds of denigratory messages.
Fifth, far from me being "nasty", you're the nasty one for your
immorality of trying to deny the victim justice. Sixth, I am doing
something useful with my time: I am protecting free speech (Worthless
Wiecky tried to intimidate me into silence with his bullying; he is
also a blackmailer who offered to stop bullying me if I would let him
control what I say and how I say it). Seventh, you are defending
vicious scum, Bakker. You should take care that you don't become scum
by association.

I see you are at a perfectly sound university. You sound like you're a
new undergraduate; if so, you'll learn. If you are a lecturer, seek
the advice of someone from the Philosophy Department on logic and
morality, because right now you're making a fool of yourself.

Andre Jute
Immovable rigour