Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dennis Moore wrote:
Good point JA, you had the integrity to publish the review and the tests that showed the real performance.Â* I think you're setting the bar awfully low here. See my comments below. And such is about all that has been keeping me a reader of Stereophile the last couple of years. Dennis "John Atkinson" wrote in message news:9vMGc.36713$%_6.6021@attbi_s01... "DennisÂ* Moore" wrote in message ... I just wonder if JA still owned the magazine rather than working for a large publishing owner, would he have said differently? No. I said what I had to say just the way I intended to say it, both in the review and in my "As We See It." With respect, I believe you all need to remember just how it was you learned this ridiculous amplifier had such poor measured performance. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile I don't question the right of Stereophile to published unrestrained praise--or even restrained praise--of anything they want. A large contingent of Stereophile's readers want to know about the latest and greatest--and they do not want to know that it is junk. So Atkinson was merely giving his public what it wants. The message those readers got, however, was, "This amp may not measure so well, but it sounds great!" If John Atkinson thinks this amp is "ridiculous," as he says here on RAHE, the message he sent to his readers was something else entirely. He pulled his punches in the magazine; we can only speculate as to why. There's also a larger issue. This amp is perhaps the most sublime manifestation ever conceived of what is wrong with high-end audio--the triumph of marketing, glitz, and pseudo-technical bull**** over quality and value, and the anointing of "golden-eared" reviewers whose judgment, if they ever had any, goes south at the sight of a pricetag. Has there ever been a better example of why high-end audio is the laughingstock of EE departments from coast to coast? Stereophile fashions itself a champion of the high end. Running a positive review of an amp like this champions nothing but decadent excess. It's an insult to the entire field, and to everyone who's ever tried to design a quality component. It's also a disservice to every consumer who's out there trying to find those quality components. Too bad the field doesn't have a visible champion to stand up and say so. bob __________________________________________________ _______________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/...ave/direct/01/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Steely Dan The Absolute Sound | High End Audio | |||
the emperor's clothes | High End Audio | |||
Sound, Music, Balance | High End Audio | |||
science vs. pseudo-science | High End Audio | |||
Why DBTs in audio do not deliver (was: Finally ... The Furutech CD-do-something) | High End Audio |