Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I need some help with my ARC SP8. The manual talks about an option to add a resistor - R28 (value - 39.2k) to cut gain by 6dB's in the case of high efficiency speakers or high gain power amps. The usable area of the Gain control is cramped right down into the first 3 or 4 clicks of the knob so it's either too loud or too quiet and fine control is impossible. I guess I need to add resistor no. 28!! Has anyone done this, and can they help me identify the correct location for these resistors? I'm a bit of an electronics virgin but I do see the position on the circuit diagram where the resistor goes. However, I can't be 100% sure that I've found the position for it on the unit. A double sided circuit board doesn't help too much either! I am pretty confident at soldering though. My assessment is that the position for the resistor is on the underside of the board, on the right hand side. There are two sets of metal posts that look like they could have been meant to attach a resistor to and the components upstream & downstream of the circuit tracks look like they are what the diagram shows. . I'm fairly sure I'm right but I need some reassurance before I go ahead & do it. The first pair of these posts (one channel) are located just in front of what I take to be a heat shield (a sheet of aluminium rising out of the circuit board at 90 degrees. The second pair (the second channel) are about 4 inches in front of these, right at the front of the unit. The best way I had of confirming that these could indeed be the positions was that they both showed 39.2k, which is the also value of resistor 29, that the new resistors need to be wired in parallel with. Am I right in my assumption, or am I about to blow my preamp up?? I'd also like to know what would be the best type of resistor to get to do the job with? Would it be possible to add a higher value resistor to give me more than 6 dB's if I need it - without compromising sound quality? Thanks for any help you can offer. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "François Yves Le Gal" wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:05:50 GMT, Patrick Turner wrote: I just downloaded a copy of the SP8 schematic but its such a poor scan I cannot read the R numbers. Have you tried the ARCDB site? They've got quite readable schematics of most versions of the SP-8 as well as of many vintage ARC products. http://www.arcdb.ws/SP8/SP8.html Thanks Francois, The schematic here is exactly the same one as at http://www.analogstereo.com/audio_re...ce_manuals.htm But your source is much clearer, because ARC scanned it at higher dpi. I was right. Alter gain by varying R27 between points A&B. Do NOT change the value by adding or subtracting another R to what is shown as R83, 33k, which is a dc carrying load R for V6. Minimum gain is when R27 is omitted entirely. Benn should try omitting R27 immediately, and if ordinary levels are enjoyed with gain pot set to the 12 o'clock position then all is well and nothing more needs to be done. However, a good tech would perform a stability check. Its unlikely that loooong cables with high capacitance effects are being used, and unlikely HF oscillations will occur with the increase in NFB by removing R27. The reason is that the removal of R27 also increases the local current NFB of V4, thus reducing the open loop gain of this triode and thus the open loop gain of the two triodes, V4, V5, so although the global NFB is increased, open loop gain is decreased, and so the amount of reduction of open loop is kept more constant this way. Patrick Turner. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems that you have do have different schematics to the one that is
in my SP8 manual. I looked at the one on the ARCDB and it is from a later version. From the photos on that website it seems I have a Mark I preamp. I don't know whether it's revision 2 or 3, but the schematic does mention changes made in 1981, so I would assume it's not the original version - called revision 1 on the ARCDB (although how the first version of something can be a revision, I'm not sure!). Anyway, my manual does not show this resistor no. 27 in this position. Rather, resistor 28 is in a similar place to resistor 83 and there is shown a line parallel to it that has a gap in it. The lines end in circles with crosses in them similar to the ones at either end of your r27 on the ARCDB site. This is the place where it says that r29 should go if needed. I also note that the gain reduction quoted here is 10 dB's rather than the 6dB's mentioned for my 39.2k resistor. If you look at the photo of the Mark 1 SP8 internals on ARCDB you can see the bottom of 2 of the posts I was referring to where they protrude from the other side of the double sided circuit board. Frustratingly, there is no photo of the underside of the board & mine is very different from the underside photo of the later amp that is shown. Here's how you find them: If you locate the yellow Wondercap to the far left, below the mains transformer, you can see the shiny edge of the heat shield I referred to. Now, between the Wondercap and the heatshield there are 4 solder tracks that go under the cap. The left hand one goes under the left hand end of the cap, leaving 3 more going under the upper edge of it. The track to the left and the one to the right show the bottoms of these posts as shiny discs. I think r29 should be soldered across these posts because I measured the resistance between them and found 39.2, which I assume to be the value of the paralled resistor, r28. If you then look to the right of these posts, there is a black resistor with its left hand wire going into a spot of track with no begining or end - I think this is r28. If you want to see what the posts look like from above there are two more over near the top of the amp between the topmost psu capacitor (one of the upright ones) and the transistor mounted in the heatsink. There is a black device soldered between these posts - not sure if it's a resistor or not. The lower of the two posts is easier to make out than the other one. I wonder if anyone looking at this has a similar vintage SP8 with a resistor across these posts on their amp? Cheers Chris |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Patrick, Thanks for your help.
I called ARC and a guy called Leonard who does servicing confirmed that on my model I had indeed found the right spot for the resistors. Later versions require a resistor removal just as you described. I shall do some experiments to see whether there is a loss of sound quality, if there is then I'll work with attenuating the signal of line sources further up the chain. Cheers |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com It seems that you have do have different schematics to the one that is in my SP8 manual. I looked at the one on the ARCDB and it is from a later version. From the photos on that website it seems I have a Mark I preamp. I don't know whether it's revision 2 or 3, but the schematic does mention changes made in 1981, so I would assume it's not the original version - called revision 1 on the ARCDB (although how the first version of something can be a revision, I'm not sure!). Anyway, my manual does not show this resistor no. 27 in this position. Rather, resistor 28 is in a similar place to resistor 83 and there is shown a line parallel to it that has a gap in it. The lines end in circles with crosses in them similar to the ones at either end of your r27 on the ARCDB site. This is the place where it says that r29 should go if needed. I also note that the gain reduction quoted here is 10 dB's rather than the 6dB's mentioned for my 39.2k resistor. If you look at the photo of the Mark 1 SP8 internals on ARCDB you can see the bottom of 2 of the posts I was referring to where they protrude from the other side of the double sided circuit board. Frustratingly, there is no photo of the underside of the board & mine is very different from the underside photo of the later amp that is shown. Here's how you find them: If you locate the yellow Wondercap to the far left, below the mains transformer, you can see the shiny edge of the heat shield I referred to. Now, between the Wondercap and the heatshield there are 4 solder tracks that go under the cap. The left hand one goes under the left hand end of the cap, leaving 3 more going under the upper edge of it. The track to the left and the one to the right show the bottoms of these posts as shiny discs. I think r29 should be soldered across these posts because I measured the resistance between them and found 39.2, which I assume to be the value of the paralled resistor, r28. If you then look to the right of these posts, there is a black resistor with its left hand wire going into a spot of track with no begining or end - I think this is r28. If you want to see what the posts look like from above there are two more over near the top of the amp between the topmost psu capacitor (one of the upright ones) and the transistor mounted in the heatsink. There is a black device soldered between these posts - not sure if it's a resistor or not. The lower of the two posts is easier to make out than the other one. I wonder if anyone looking at this has a similar vintage SP8 with a resistor across these posts on their amp? Probably not anybody who posts here regularly. It appears to be that you are either underequipped, undertrained, or too timid. If the shoe fits there are probably skilled professionals who can serve you. If you've got some traces on a circuit board that go who-knows-where, you can always power the unit up, maybe send a tone through it, and probe around with a scope and/or a meter. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny......
It appears to be that you are either underequipped, undertrained, or too timid. If the shoe fits there are probably skilled professionals who can serve you. Thanks for your vote of confidence. With the greatest respect, did you inherit your audio electronics skills from a long line of engineers? Unfortunately I'm not so lucky and find I have to learn gradually through experimentation. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, thanks for the quick responses!!
Brett - I have only a schematic and a parts list. The board is not marked with component positions. I'm in the UK so a call to ARC would be a little pricey. Their website says there is no public email access at the moment either! Patrick - On the schematic, resistor 28 and 29 are bottom right - to the left of the manual mute switch (28 is above 29 - both rated at 39.2K 1%) and it says 'see note 2'. The notes are directly below the symbol for R29. Note 2 says 'Add R28 39.2k to cut gain 6 dB' The right hand side of these resistors leads up to a group of 4 capacitors and the left hand side runs up to the line that goes between a 1.28k resistor and tube no. 4 . I'm afraid that the thing I just spotted flying over my head must have been your explanation! (as I said, I'm an electronics virgin!! NFB - Negative feedback? On my diagram R27 that you mention is a 33k value. Cheers Chris |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Wow, thanks for the quick responses!! Brett - I have only a schematic and a parts list. The board is not marked with component positions. I'm in the UK so a call to ARC would be a little pricey. Their website says there is no public email access at the moment either! ARC are too old fashioned to maintain friendly email facilities. They also like to keep as much secret about the devices they use to ensure ppl only buy spares from them and deal with them only at a price per hour far in excess of what ordinary ppl like me earn. They also make everything far more complex than it needs to be. Its engineering for the sake of engineering; and each amp is an ode to somebody's skills at putting so many bits together, usually surrounded with loops of lots of NFB, most of which isn't needed at all.......but anyway, we can find our way with enough applied zeal.... Patrick - On the schematic, resistor 28 and 29 are bottom right - to the left of the manual mute switch (28 is above 29 - both rated at 39.2K 1%) and it says 'see note 2'. The notes are directly below the symbol for R29. Note 2 says 'Add R28 39.2k to cut gain 6 dB' I don't have the same schematic as you have because that comment does not appear in the notes list on my schematic from http://www.analogstereo.com/audio_re...ce_manuals.htm It does say to remove R27 for less gain. This R is soldered between two points meant to allow gain adjustment resistors to be added/removed The right hand side of these resistors leads up to a group of 4 capacitors and the left hand side runs up to the line that goes between a 1.28k resistor and tube no. 4 . I'm afraid that the thing I just spotted flying over my head must have been your explanation! (as I said, I'm an electronics virgin!! NFB - Negative feedback? NFB = negative feedback. NFB + electronics virgin = man in quandary = confused be-fuddled person. Without any NFB network between output and input, the line preamp would have a gain of about 150, way too much. This gain without any NFB is called the "open loop gain". When a sdample of output voltage is fed back to one of the two inputs of the amp, ie, the cathode terminal of V4, there is the input signal applied to the V4 grid from the gain control, and the NFB signal applied to the cathode. Both are of the same phase, and the difference between them is amplified. So if you have 0.2Vrms signal from volume control applied to the grid, then there may be 0.18Vrms of NFB signal applied to the cathode, and the difference = 0.02Vrms. The open loop gain amplifies 0.02V by 150, giving an output = 3Vrms. The gain with NFB connected is called the closed loop gain, and in the example I just mentioned the closed loop gain with NFB = output voltage divided by grid input signal = 3V / 0.2V = 15. The NFB signal applied to V4 cathode is a sample fraction of the signal at the V6 output cathode terminal. The size or amplitude of the V4 cathode signal may be varied by altering the resistance network between V6 and V4 cathodes. But first we must know we are looking at the same schematic, and then be able to allow you to identify the R you need to remove or add to alter the gain. Its a very easy simple thing you wish to do once you know what you are doing. Techs would do all this without a board layout diagram which is usually in the workshop manual for the amp. But by deduction we find out where we are on a board from just the schematic R values, other things adjacently connected and and voltage measurements. Patrick Turner. On my diagram R27 that you mention is a 33k value. Cheers Chris |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have an SP9
It's a solder connection on the PC board that neeeds to be made open. You will need a schematic for the board. The original instruction manual show's you specifically where it is. Call ARC. tech help will tell you what too do. I needed because of too much gain from my CD |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Would I Gain Anything? | Pro Audio | |||
Too Much Gain??? | Vacuum Tubes | |||
pre-amp - no gain - help | Pro Audio | |||
line level input gain control vs console pre-amp gain? saturation question. | Pro Audio | |||
PA CONUNDRUM: AMP GAIN KNOBS vs MIXER GAIN SETTINGS | Pro Audio |