Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A friend has recently moved his MS-16 into my home studio and I was
testing it out today. It seems to punch in just fine, but the punching out is incredibly slow - even slower than the old A80 where I used to work. Is this normal for this machine? If not, what needs fixing? Thanks for any info. It's greatly appreciated. Kris Poulin Chicago, IL |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 13, 12:25 am, wrote:
It seems to punch in just fine, but the punching out is incredibly slow - even slower than the old A80 where I used to work. Is this normal for this machine? It shouldn't be slow. What, exactly, is slow? Does it leave a long erased gap when you drop out of Record? Is it just slow switching from input to repro monitor? Is it the same on all channels? Make some measurements so you can tell just how slow it really is. Record a steady tone and punch a different tone in and out on the track to analyze what's really happening. If not, what needs fixing? Your recorder. But punch timing isn't the same for all machines. If you're used to a Studer A80, you may need to learn a different rhythm to get tight punches on the MS16. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jul 13, 6:15 am, Mike Rivers wrote: On Jul 13, 12:25 am, wrote: It seems to punch in just fine, but the punching out is incredibly slow - even slower than the old A80 where I used to work. Is this normal for this machine? It shouldn't be slow. What, exactly, is slow? This reminds me of something I forgot to mention: When punching in, there is an approximately 250 ms drop out, though, upon play back, the punch is as tight as I could ask for. Punching out is basically the opposite. Does it leave a long erased gap when you drop out of Record? It's not so much a long erased gap as it is a really quick crossfade. Again, we're talking about 250 ms. Is it just slow switching from input to repro monitor? See above. Is it the same on all channels? It is the same - or at least very close - on all channels. Make some measurements so you can tell just how slow it really is. Record a steady tone and punch a different tone in and out on the track to analyze what's really happening. I ran two tests; one of steady tones and one of a bass player bussed to all the tracks. Punching in from one tone to the next, seemed OK - just a slight crossfade effect. Punching in on the bass playing sounded like music - I was able to punch in between the notes as desired. Punching out yielded essentially the same result on both the tones and bass playing; the above-mentioned 250 ms "smear" or crossfade. If not, what needs fixing? Your recorder. But punch timing isn't the same for all machines. If you're used to a Studer A80, you may need to learn a different rhythm to get tight punches on theMS16. Yes, the recorder! Gotcha. I'd already eliminated things like the mixing desk, the microphones, and the coffee maker! ![]() I was asking what parts inside the machine might I look at first as requiring adjustment or replacement. I not a proper tech, but I'd at least like to narrow it down a bit before I get one in here. Or, if it's simple enough, do it myself. I hope it's just a matter of getting used to the MS16, but I'd be surprised if it is. I haven't worked on an A80 since that studio closed 4 years ago and, since then, it's been every variety from MX5050 to MTR90 to A820 to JH24, etc., with very short learning curves to manage acceptable punches. Thanks again. Kris Poulin Chicago, IL |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 12:12 pm, wrote:
This reminds me of something I forgot to mention: When punching in, there is an approximately 250 ms drop out, though, upon play back, the punch is as tight as I could ask for. Punching out is basically the opposite. There has to be a ramp-up and ramp-down of the bias and erase current so you don't record a click. I suspect that the time that you're hearing is inherent in the machine's design. You may be able to modify the timing of the control circuitry by changing a capacitor value to speed that up. There was a modification like that for the Ampex MM-1100 that I used to have. I ran two tests; one of steady tones and one of a bass player bussed to all the tracks. Punching in from one tone to the next, seemed OK - just a slight crossfade effect. Punching in on the bass playing sounded like music - I was able to punch in between the notes as desired. Sounds to me like it's working normally. Best policy is to make your punches in places where they'll be audible. I was asking what parts inside the machine might I look at first as requiring adjustment or replacement. I not a proper tech, but I'd at least like to narrow it down a bit before I get one in here. You'd need a proper tech. I don't think there's anything defective, but if your tech can locate the record timing circuitry he may be able to speed that up by changing the value of a capacitor or resistor. I have a Mackie HDR24/96 that does some housekeeping every time a channel comes out of record. If you do a 24-track "rolling" punch-out, unless it's a very short recording, there's quite a noticeable delay before the original track starts playing again. But the acutal punch is as accurate as your finger was on the button. Now THAT'S something that takes getting used to. But I just have learned how to avoid it most of the time and it doesn't bother anybody. There sure was a lot of fussing about it when the machine first came out, though. Everybody was concocting unrealistic demonstrations to show how bad it was. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I meant to finish off this thread a week ago, when I discovered some
info in a friend's MS-16 manual that has all of its pages. (Mine's missing a few...) According to the manual, this machine is actually up to spec! Boooooo. According to the book, punch in time is 170 ms and punch out time is 230 ms. Like Mike said in the first place, I'll just have to get used to its timing. On Jul 14, 11:12 am, wrote: On Jul 13, 6:15 am, Mike Rivers wrote: On Jul 13, 12:25 am, wrote: It seems to punch in just fine, but the punching out is incredibly slow - even slower than the old A80 where I used to work. Is this normal for this machine? It shouldn't be slow. What, exactly, is slow? This reminds me of something I forgot to mention: When punching in, there is an approximately 250 ms drop out, though, upon play back, the punch is as tight as I could ask for. Punching out is basically the opposite. Does it leave a long erased gap when you drop out of Record? It's not so much a long erased gap as it is a really quick crossfade. Again, we're talking about 250 ms. Is it just slow switching from input to repro monitor? See above. Is it the same on all channels? It is the same - or at least very close - on all channels. Make some measurements so you can tell just how slow it really is. Record a steady tone and punch a different tone in and out on the track to analyze what's really happening. I ran two tests; one of steady tones and one of a bass player bussed to all the tracks. Punching in from one tone to the next, seemed OK - just a slight crossfade effect. Punching in on the bass playing sounded like music - I was able to punch in between the notes as desired. Punching out yielded essentially the same result on both the tones and bass playing; the above-mentioned 250 ms "smear" or crossfade. If not, what needs fixing? Your recorder. But punch timing isn't the same for all machines. If you're used to a Studer A80, you may need to learn a different rhythm to get tight punches on theMS16. Yes, the recorder! Gotcha. I'd already eliminated things like the mixing desk, the microphones, and the coffee maker! ![]() I was asking what parts inside the machine might I look at first as requiring adjustment or replacement. I not a proper tech, but I'd at least like to narrow it down a bit before I get one in here. Or, if it's simple enough, do it myself. I hope it's just a matter of getting used to theMS16, but I'd be surprised if it is. I haven't worked on an A80 since that studio closed 4 years ago and, since then, it's been every variety from MX5050 to MTR90 to A820 to JH24, etc., with very short learning curves to manage acceptable punches. Thanks again. Kris Poulin Chicago, IL |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Punch in time is actually 130 ms and punch out time is 270 ms.
On Jul 31, 11:13 pm, wrote: I meant to finish off this thread a week ago, when I discovered some info in a friend'sMS-16manual that has all of its pages. (Mine's missing a few...) According to the manual, this machine is actually up to spec! Boooooo. According to the book,punchin time is 170 ms andpunchout time is 230 ms. Like Mike said in the first place, I'll just have to get used to its timing. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
My Tascam 38 question | Pro Audio | |||
TASCAM 34, 34B tape question | Pro Audio | |||
TASCAM 34, 34B tape question | Pro Audio | |||
Tascam US-122 Setup Question | Pro Audio | |||
Tascam MS-16 and ES-50 cable question. | Pro Audio |