[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

ScottW contends that science *decides* good audio. He admitted
that if he was to "sell" his opinion, he will have science on side when
selecting good audio. He exclaimed that hi-fi reviewers and
selectors of RCL add science in their selecting process, that is,
not just based solely on what they think is good audio. Science sell,
I suppose. He extol that *no science* is like listening to sticks on
hollow logs with ... topless women doing the Shakira....

So, no science to him is as good as listening to sticks and logs with
topless women wearing grass skirt swinging and twisting all around.

After a few posting exchanges in hope to understand his mind,
he now have a change of heart, because now he confessed that
good audio to him is simply based on what he likes. If science
were to comes marching down telling him that a particular audio
component(s) sounds good, he'd be simply mildly interested if that
opportunity presented itself. Science to him, now, just tends to tell
if it has the potential to sound good.

[ScottW]

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
. ..

ScottW contends that science *decides* good audio.

JBorg, Jr., no that's not it. Ludo Jr. is much more
spot on.

Go ahead and delude yourself to your hearts content.
Maybe it will make you as happy as Bob.

ScottW

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote




ScottW contends that science *decides* good audio.

JBorg, Jr., no that's not it. Ludo Jr. is much more
spot on.

Go ahead and delude yourself to your hearts content.
Maybe it will make you as happy as Bob.

ScottW


What was it that you mean then that no science is like
listening to sticks on hollow logs with ... topless women ?

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

Soundhaspriority wrote:




Jborg,
Brilliant analysis! The conundrum that was Scotty is reduced to a
Rubik's cube with stuck joints.

Bob Morein
Dresher, PA
(215) 646-4894


Thank you very much. The bs-o'-meter atop my head awaits his
reply.



" LONG LIVE AUDIOPHILES " (except Arnii & his minions)

[ScottW]

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
.. .
ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote




ScottW contends that science *decides* good audio.

JBorg, Jr., no that's not it. Ludo Jr. is much more
spot on.

Go ahead and delude yourself to your hearts content.
Maybe it will make you as happy as Bob.

ScottW


What was it that you mean then that no science is like
listening to sticks on hollow logs with ... topless women ?

I mean with no science at all the technology to record
sound would not exist.

ScottW

[ScottW]

"Soundhaspriority" wrote in message
...

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
. ..

ScottW contends that science *decides* good audio. He admitted
that if he was to "sell" his opinion, he will have science on side when
selecting good audio. He exclaimed that hi-fi reviewers and
selectors of RCL add science in their selecting process, that is,
not just based solely on what they think is good audio. Science sell,
I suppose. He extol that *no science* is like listening to sticks on
hollow logs with ... topless women doing the Shakira....

So, no science to him is as good as listening to sticks and logs with
topless women wearing grass skirt swinging and twisting all around.

After a few posting exchanges in hope to understand his mind,
he now have a change of heart, because now he confessed that
good audio to him is simply based on what he likes. If science
were to comes marching down telling him that a particular audio
component(s) sounds good, he'd be simply mildly interested if that
opportunity presented itself. Science to him, now, just tends to tell
if it has the potential to sound good.

Jborg,
Brilliant analysis! The conundrum that was Scotty is reduced to a Rubik's
cube with stuck joints.

You know Bob. It's stuff like this that shows me how truly full of
**** you are. Condoning someone who obviously
can't comprehend even comprehend simple statements and embarks on
an out of context rampant misinterpretation for purposes unknown
that tells me that you're no different than the Middiots and ssshhhhiees.
You don't want to discuss audio. You want to play the game and
be accepted by the nutters who give audio a bad name.
But you know....truly happy people don't need to do that for kicks, Bob.
So what's eating you? You've got deep-seated issues that need to be
resolved or you'll never get over Brian.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Witless goes to dig up a hoary old bone.

What was it that you mean then that no science is like
listening to sticks on hollow logs with ... topless women ?

I mean with no science at all the technology to record
sound would not exist.

Is that how you psych yourself up to pray that "science" will lead you
to the perfect $600 stereo?





--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[ScottW]

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
. ..
Soundhaspriority wrote:




Jborg,
Brilliant analysis! The conundrum that was Scotty is reduced to a
Rubik's cube with stuck joints.

Bob Morein
Dresher, PA
(215) 646-4894


Thank you very much. The bs-o'-meter atop my head awaits his
reply.

That bs-0-meter must be permanently pegged by Bobs stamp of approval.

Too bad to. I thought my approach is a reasonable balance between
pure subjectivists and objectivists reasonably applying a bit of each
where you can. But you're not interested in any of that.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Yapper barked:

You know Bob. It's stuff like this that shows me how truly full of
**** you are. Condoning someone who obviously
can't comprehend even comprehend simple statements and embarks on
an out of context rampant misinterpretation for purposes unknown
that tells me that you're no different than the Middiots and ssshhhhiees.
You don't want to discuss audio. You want to play the game and
be accepted by the nutters who give audio a bad name.
But you know....truly happy people don't need to do that for kicks, Bob.
So what's eating you? You've got deep-seated issues that need to be
resolved or you'll never get over Brian.

As far as the Whack-the-Scottie-Pinata stakes, I vote Robert the winner
for the entire month of July. That was a 24-karat rant and Robert
triggered it with only a reference to an '80s fad toy.





--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Witless goes to dig up a hoary old bone.

What was it that you mean then that no science is like
listening to sticks on hollow logs with ... topless women ?

I mean with no science at all the technology to record
sound would not exist.

Is that how you psych yourself up to pray that "science" will lead you
to the perfect $600 stereo?

If science leads someone to create the indisputable perfect
stereo...I'm all for it.
Then we can apply other sciences to bring it to us all for a reasonable
price.

Except you George. You don't get one just because there is a god
and god is ****ed at you.

ScottW

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Yapper barked:

You know Bob. It's stuff like this that shows me how truly full of
**** you are. Condoning someone who obviously
can't comprehend even comprehend simple statements and embarks on
an out of context rampant misinterpretation for purposes unknown
that tells me that you're no different than the Middiots and ssshhhhiees.
You don't want to discuss audio. You want to play the game and
be accepted by the nutters who give audio a bad name.
But you know....truly happy people don't need to do that for kicks, Bob.
So what's eating you? You've got deep-seated issues that need to be
resolved or you'll never get over Brian.

As far as the Whack-the-Scottie-Pinata stakes, I vote Robert the winner
for the entire month of July. That was a 24-karat rant and Robert
triggered it with only a reference to an '80s fad toy.

I'm sure Bob now feels complete.
Why don't you give him a call and make his year?

ScottW

[ScottW]

"ScottW" wrote in message
...

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Yapper barked:

You know Bob. It's stuff like this that shows me how truly full of
**** you are. Condoning someone who obviously
can't comprehend even comprehend simple statements and embarks on
an out of context rampant misinterpretation for purposes unknown
that tells me that you're no different than the Middiots and ssshhhhiees.
You don't want to discuss audio. You want to play the game and
be accepted by the nutters who give audio a bad name.
But you know....truly happy people don't need to do that for kicks, Bob.
So what's eating you? You've got deep-seated issues that need to be
resolved or you'll never get over Brian.

As far as the Whack-the-Scottie-Pinata stakes, I vote Robert the winner
for the entire month of July. That was a 24-karat rant and Robert
triggered it with only a reference to an '80s fad toy.

I'm sure Bob now feels complete.
Why don't you give him a call and make his year?

Better yet...invite him down to your place. I bet he'd jump
a plane or train and be there tomorrow if you'd ask.
Come on George...ask him. You can do it.
What are you afraid of?

ScottW

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote
ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote


ScottW contends that science *decides* good audio.

JBorg, Jr., no that's not it. Ludo Jr. is much more
spot on.

Go ahead and delude yourself to your hearts content.
Maybe it will make you as happy as Bob.

ScottW

What was it that you mean then that no science is like
listening to sticks on hollow logs with ... topless women ?

I mean with no science at all the technology to record
sound would not exist.

ScottW

LoL !

Is that why you insist that reviewers and RCL selectors need
science in order to ensure that their equipment is capable of
playing recorded sound to determine good audio ?

Is that why you needed 'science' if you were to "sell" your
opinion to verify that you have sufficient technology during
playbacks to determine if it is "good audio" or not ?

The above from you lacks wisdom and therefore rejected.

It has cost you full point. Try again.

[George M. Middius]

Yapper yapped:

Come on George...ask him. You can do it.
What are you afraid of?

Now you sound like Ferstler. Too bad you're immune to shame.





--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote
Soundhaspriority wrote:




Jborg,
Brilliant analysis! The conundrum that was Scotty is reduced to
a Rubik's cube with stuck joints.

Bob Morein
Dresher, PA
(215) 646-4894


Thank you very much. The bs-o'-meter atop my head awaits his
reply.

That bs-0-meter must be permanently pegged by Bobs stamp of approval.

Too bad to. I thought my approach is a reasonable balance between
pure subjectivists and objectivists reasonably applying a bit of each
where you can. But you're not interested in any of that.


I'm interested in everything that doesn't make sense. You should
be grateful that I'm interested because you don't make sense.

Aren't you ?


ScottW

[ScottW]

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
. ..
ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote
ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote


ScottW contends that science *decides* good audio.

JBorg, Jr., no that's not it. Ludo Jr. is much more
spot on.

Go ahead and delude yourself to your hearts content.
Maybe it will make you as happy as Bob.

ScottW

What was it that you mean then that no science is like
listening to sticks on hollow logs with ... topless women ?

I mean with no science at all the technology to record
sound would not exist.

ScottW

LoL !

Is that why you insist that reviewers and RCL selectors need
science in order to ensure that their equipment is capable of
playing recorded sound to determine good audio ?

Wow....you are easily confused.


Is that why you needed 'science' if you were to "sell" your
opinion to verify that you have sufficient technology during
playbacks to determine if it is "good audio" or not ?

The above from you lacks wisdom and therefore rejected.

It has cost you full point. Try again.

You remind me of the homeless guy who hit us up for change.
The wife emptied her pockets and he complained it wasn't
enough.

ScottW

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Yapper yapped:

Come on George...ask him. You can do it.
What are you afraid of?

Now you sound like Ferstler.

I take it they'll be no call to Bob tonight?

Too bad you're immune to shame.

Nah, I'm just immune to you.

ScottW

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

ScottW wrote:
Soundhaspriority wrote



Jborg,

Brilliant analysis! The conundrum that was Scotty is reduced to
a Rubik's cube with stuck joints.

You know Bob. It's stuff like this that shows me how truly full of
**** you are. Condoning someone who obviously
can't comprehend

Bwahahahah !! LoL !! LoL!!


You are hurt, hurt, hurt !



LoL !



ScottW

[ScottW]

"Soundhaspriority" wrote in message
...

"ScottW" wrote in message
...

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
. ..
Soundhaspriority wrote:




Jborg,
Brilliant analysis! The conundrum that was Scotty is reduced to a
Rubik's cube with stuck joints.

Bob Morein
Dresher, PA
(215) 646-4894


Thank you very much. The bs-o'-meter atop my head awaits his
reply.

That bs-0-meter must be permanently pegged by Bobs stamp of approval.

Too bad to. I thought my approach is a reasonable balance between
pure subjectivists and objectivists reasonably applying a bit of each
where you can. But you're not interested in any of that.

ScottW

You might have a worthwhile message; compromise always has promise, but I
missed it in your torrent of political rants. Care to expound a little?

The hint of a discussion...which Jr. quickly backed away from....
started ~ here.


ScottW

[ScottW]

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
.. .
ScottW wrote:
Soundhaspriority wrote



Jborg,

Brilliant analysis! The conundrum that was Scotty is reduced to
a Rubik's cube with stuck joints.

You know Bob. It's stuff like this that shows me how truly full of
**** you are. Condoning someone who obviously
can't comprehend

Bwahahahah !! LoL !! LoL!!


You are hurt, hurt, hurt !

Yup..it always sucks to think, if even for an instant,
someone wants to discuss audio...only to find out
the're just another gamer.

ScottW

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote
ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote
ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote


ScottW contends that science *decides* good audio.

JBorg, Jr., no that's not it. Ludo Jr. is much more
spot on.

Go ahead and delude yourself to your hearts content.
Maybe it will make you as happy as Bob.

ScottW

What was it that you mean then that no science is like
listening to sticks on hollow logs with ... topless women ?

I mean with no science at all the technology to record
sound would not exist.

ScottW

LoL !

Is that why you insist that reviewers and RCL selectors need
science in order to ensure that their equipment is capable of
playing recorded sound to determine good audio ?

Wow....you are easily confused.

Is that why you needed 'science' if you were to "sell" your
opinion to verify that you have sufficient technology during
playbacks to determine if it is "good audio" or not ?

The above from you lacks wisdom and therefore rejected.

It has cost you full point. Try again.

You remind me of the homeless guy who hit us up for change.
The wife emptied her pockets and he complained it wasn't
enough.

ScottW


The above for you again lacks some solid man-to-man response
and therefore rejected. All you're showing so far is pick on
topless women dancing to the beat of sticks and hollow logs.

This has cost you another full point.

Please tell why you insist that hifi reviewers and RCL selectors
needs science to determine good audio ?

[Clyde Slick]

George M. Middius a scris:


Is that how you psych yourself up to pray that "science" will lead you
to the perfect $600 stereo?


"At least" Scott is willing to shell
out a good amount of money for wahtever it is he wants.
Unless he scarfed up his Quads for couple of hundred!

[ScottW]

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
. ..
ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote
ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote
ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote


ScottW contends that science *decides* good audio.

JBorg, Jr., no that's not it. Ludo Jr. is much more
spot on.

Go ahead and delude yourself to your hearts content.
Maybe it will make you as happy as Bob.

ScottW

What was it that you mean then that no science is like
listening to sticks on hollow logs with ... topless women ?

I mean with no science at all the technology to record
sound would not exist.

ScottW

LoL !

Is that why you insist that reviewers and RCL selectors need
science in order to ensure that their equipment is capable of
playing recorded sound to determine good audio ?

Wow....you are easily confused.

Is that why you needed 'science' if you were to "sell" your
opinion to verify that you have sufficient technology during
playbacks to determine if it is "good audio" or not ?

The above from you lacks wisdom and therefore rejected.

It has cost you full point. Try again.

You remind me of the homeless guy who hit us up for change.
The wife emptied her pockets and he complained it wasn't
enough.

ScottW


The above for you again lacks some solid man-to-man response
and therefore rejected. All you're showing so far is pick on
topless women dancing to the beat of sticks and hollow logs.

This has cost you another full point.

Please tell why you insist that hifi reviewers and RCL selectors
needs science to determine good audio ?

Did I insist? I think I said it would be beneficial to know how it
compares to their reference system.
So many reviews are just a bunch of mindnumbing adjectives
and the obvious impact of advertiser funded publications
has diminished the entire industries credibility IMO.

ScottW

[Clyde Slick]

ScottW a scris:
You remind me of the homeless guy who hit us up for change.
The wife emptied her pockets and he complained it wasn't
enough.


"At least" none of the homeless people
I see in Maryland are Mexicans.
Same goes for Romania!

[ScottW]

"Soundhaspriority" wrote in message
...

"ScottW" wrote in message
...

"Soundhaspriority" wrote in message
...

"ScottW" wrote in message
...

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
. ..
Soundhaspriority wrote:




Jborg,
Brilliant analysis! The conundrum that was Scotty is reduced to a
Rubik's cube with stuck joints.

Bob Morein
Dresher, PA
(215) 646-4894


Thank you very much. The bs-o'-meter atop my head awaits his
reply.

That bs-0-meter must be permanently pegged by Bobs stamp of approval.

Too bad to. I thought my approach is a reasonable balance between
pure subjectivists and objectivists reasonably applying a bit of each
where you can. But you're not interested in any of that.

ScottW

You might have a worthwhile message; compromise always has promise, but I
missed it in your torrent of political rants. Care to expound a little?

The hint of a discussion...which Jr. quickly backed away from....
started ~ here.


ScottW
The "@" sign makes the above an email address. Please give me a valid link and
I'll follow it.

No..it makes it a message id. Paste into the advanced search....
nevermind, I'll do it for you.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...945937af?hl=en

ScottW

[ScottW]

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
ups.com...

ScottW a scris:
You remind me of the homeless guy who hit us up for change.
The wife emptied her pockets and he complained it wasn't
enough.


"At least" none of the homeless people
I see in Maryland are Mexicans.

They don't consider living in a campsite
as being homeless.

ScottW

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

Clyde Slick wrote:
ScottW a scris:


You remind me of the homeless guy who hit us up for change.
The wife emptied her pockets and he complained it wasn't
enough.


"At least" none of the homeless people
I see in Maryland are Mexicans.
Same goes for Romania!


No Mexican/Latin blood flows down this way
for better or worse, note.

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote

Please tell why you insist that hifi reviewers and RCL selectors
needs science to determine good audio ?


Did I insist? I think I said it would be beneficial to know how it
compares to their reference system.

So many reviews are just a bunch of mindnumbing adjectives
and the obvious impact of advertiser funded publications
has diminished the entire industries credibility IMO.

ScottW


You are out of order !

Please tell what you mean by saying that no science is like
listening to sticks on hollow logs with ... topless women ?

Please tell why you insist that hifi reviewers and RCL
selectors needs science to determine *good audio* ?

I'm sorry that I have decided to slap your wrist, but only a
little bit though 'cause I know there might still be traces of
rational left inside your self-assured self to exploit. Your
willingness to respond promptly is appreciated. It shows
courage. Accordingly also, you are one high-spirited
poster that knows how to maintain happy marriage. That's
another plus. With regards to OT posting which you are
prone to do, well there's also crochet if you are bored.

[George M. Middius]

Scooter, are you drunk again?

Yapper yapped:

Come on George...ask him. You can do it.
What are you afraid of?

Now you sound like Ferstler.

I take it they'll be no call to Bob tonight?

Who is this "they" of whom you're yapping?

Clean up that mess or you'll get the newspaper again. Bad dog!





--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

Is that how you psych yourself up to pray that "science" will lead you
to the perfect $600 stereo?

"At least" Scott is willing to shell
out a good amount of money for wahtever it is he wants.

No, he's not "willing". He grits his yellow teeth and snaps at his
fleas, and grudgingly pays the outrageous, anti-science market prices of
the stuff he "thinks" he wants.




--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

ScottW wrote:
Soundhaspriority wrote
ScottW wrote




That bs-0-meter must be permanently pegged by Bobs stamp of
approval. Too bad to. I thought my approach is a reasonable balance
between
pure subjectivists and objectivists reasonably applying a bit of
each where you can. But you're not interested in any of that.



Actually, it showed that you apply your science where it fits your
bigotry.



ScottW

You might have a worthwhile message; compromise always has promise,
but I missed it in your torrent of political rants. Care to expound
a little?

The hint of a discussion...which Jr. quickly backed away from....
started ~ here.


Liar. What do you mean back away ?





ScottW

The thread above titled "Illumination..." is a continuation of this
thread pure and simple because MollyCoddle has not given response
to this point.


If you want to accuse, " back it up. "

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

HELLOooooo... HELLOOooo.

.........it'S PIZZZaaaaa time.... knock.... knock...

knockkk.... hellloooo!!!!!! anybody HOOooome ?







Please tell what you meant by saying that no science is like
listening to sticks on hollow logs with ... topless women ?

Please tell why you demand that hifi reviewers and RCL
selectors needs science to determine good audio ?

Please do tell why you needed science on side when "selling"
your opinion to select 'good audio.'?

Please do tell why you do not need science by admitting
instead that you simply determine good audio based on what
you like, as you confessed ?

Please tell why you would be 'mildly' interested if science comes
marching down claiming that some particular audio component(s)
sounds good.

Please explain your claim that science just tends to tell if components
has the potential to sound good.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 2, 9:34 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message

...







"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
.. .

Yapper barked:

You know Bob. It's stuff like this that shows me how truly full of
**** you are. Condoning someone who obviously
can't comprehend even comprehend simple statements and embarks on
an out of context rampant misinterpretation for purposes unknown
that tells me that you're no different than the Middiots and ssshhhhiees.
You don't want to discuss audio. You want to play the game and
be accepted by the nutters who give audio a bad name.
But you know....truly happy people don't need to do that for kicks, Bob.
So what's eating you? You've got deep-seated issues that need to be
resolved or you'll never get over Brian.

As far as the Whack-the-Scottie-Pinata stakes, I vote Robert the winner
for the entire month of July. That was a 24-karat rant and Robert
triggered it with only a reference to an '80s fad toy.

I'm sure Bob now feels complete.
Why don't you give him a call and make his year?

Better yet...invite him down to your place. I bet he'd jump
a plane or train and be there tomorrow if you'd ask.
Come on George...ask him. You can do it.
What are you afraid of?

It appears that the rant is not over.

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

HELLOooooo... HELLOOooo.

.........it'S PIZZZaaaaa time....


....your PIZZzzaa is getttinngg cold.

knock.... knock...

knockkk.... hellloooo!!!!!! anybody HOOooome ?


Arnii and MollyCoddle in the basement sitting on the
couch listening to various sounds of castanets
in Arnii's computer...


YO Arn, if I... if I.... slash my testicles and... and..
...staples each one above my .... my... forehead...
...how close do I need to sit to see how many castanets
you have on the screen ?

Arny says.... pretty close! About 3 or 4 feet....!!
........... give or take 5 inches...!

MollyCoddle stood up and smaccck Arnii in the... head!

......WHAcccKkk!!

..... I WON"T be able to see it you numbnut.... because..
.... because my balls will... cover both my .... eyes you pos.

Now let's hear some tympani for a change...

[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

knock.... knock...

knockkk.... hellloooo!!!!!! anybody HOOooome ?



Ferstler sitting at the end of the couch scratching his
scrotum ... and yell...


YOU two stop quarreling!

All this talk about... science... is making me itchy.
..... who really... needs science... who cares...???
...when you're a.....a ... ahem... a hack writer ....
now come over here....and help me scratch... hmmm,
..... I want hard broiled eggs...

[Arny Krueger]

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message


ScottW contends that science *decides* good audio.

Scott's ideas about audio and science are generally so poorly founded that
there is little or no connection between them and relaity. Therefore, he
can't possibly know whether or not science decides good audio.

The whole concept of science deciding good audio is nonsense, anyway.
Science doesn't itself decide much of anything. How things work out in
practical life is what decides just about everything important. Science is a
means, not an end.

[George M. Middius]

The Krooborg squats a pot-full.

Scott's ideas about audio and science are generally so poorly founded

Yes, hardly a trace of feces in anything he eats. What a looser™!




Everybody who humiliates Mr. **** turns out to be stupid or a liar.
Thousands and thousands of fully functional human beings are all
stupid or liars or both. And yet Arnii Krooger portrays himself as
an oracle of truth and a paragon of brilliance. What are the odds?

[ScottW]

On Jul 3, 9:29 am, "Soundhaspriority" wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message

...





"Soundhaspriority" wrote in message
...

"ScottW" wrote in message
...

"Soundhaspriority" wrote in message
news:ZO6dnUa2YIQQJRTbnZ2dnUVZ_r2onZ2d@giganews. com...

"ScottW" wrote in message
...

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
.net...
Soundhaspriority wrote:

Jborg,
Brilliant analysis! The conundrum that was Scotty is reduced to
a
Rubik's cube with stuck joints.

Bob Morein
Dresher, PA
(215) 646-4894

Thank you very much. The bs-o'-meter atop my head awaits his
reply.

That bs-0-meter must be permanently pegged by Bobs stamp of approval.

Too bad to. I thought my approach is a reasonable balance between
pure subjectivists and objectivists reasonably applying a bit of each
where you can. But you're not interested in any of that.

ScottW

You might have a worthwhile message; compromise always has promise, but
I missed it in your torrent of political rants. Care to expound a
little?

The hint of a discussion...which Jr. quickly backed away from....
started ~ here.
. com

ScottW
The "@" sign makes the above an email address. Please give me a valid
link and I'll follow it.

No..it makes it a message id. Paste into the advanced search....
nevermind, I'll do it for you.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...5f24dc945937af...

ScottW

It's mixed in with a lot of adhominem stuff, and a term is not defined. What
is an RCL?

Recommended Component List

ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 3, 11:29 am, "Soundhaspriority" wrote:

It's mixed in with a lot of adhominem stuff, and a term is not defined. What
is an RCL?

With 2pid's recent foray into the realm of science, I'm sure he means
resistance, capacitance and inductance. Frankly, I'm surprised: he's
not bright enough to understand what it all means.

Soon he'll be trotting out "Z" and "X" to impress us. He must've
gotten a hold of a copy of "Electronics for Dummies."

[ScottW]

On Jul 3, 12:54 pm, "Soundhaspriority" wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message

...





"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
. ..
ScottW wrote:
Soundhaspriority wrote

Jborg,

Brilliant analysis! The conundrum that was Scotty is reduced to
a Rubik's cube with stuck joints.

You know Bob. It's stuff like this that shows me how truly full of
**** you are. Condoning someone who obviously
can't comprehend

Bwahahahah !! LoL !! LoL!!

You are hurt, hurt, hurt !

Yup..it always sucks to think, if even for an instant,
someone wants to discuss audio...only to find out
the're just another gamer.

ScottW

Let's get serious. Here is my personal appeal to you: Reduce (not
eliminate, just reduce) the frequency of your "OT" postings.

You might have notice I did that. Now you quit sucking up to
the number one audioless arrogant impediment to civil discourse
around here (the middiot) and your request might have merit
instead of hypocrisy.

ScottW