[George M. Middius]

Scooter, you need to get this up on your Facebook page ASAP:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg




--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Apr 18, 11:18 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast .
net wrote:
Scooter, you need to get this up on your Facebook page ASAP:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg

That's a woman.

There's no indication that 2pid dreams of anything but men licking his
bung.

[George M. Middius]

Shhhh! said:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg

That's a woman.

Look in the foreground on the right side.

There's no indication that 2pid dreams of anything but men licking his
bung.

I was suggesting he's not the novice he claims.



--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[Eeyore]

"George M. Middius" wrote:

Shhhh! said:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg

That's a woman.

Look in the foreground on the right side.

At WHAT exactly ?

I know you're unfamiliar with girls' bits. That's what they look like.

Graham

[George M. Middius]

Poopie shows why he empathizes with duh-Scottie.

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg

That's a woman.

Look in the foreground on the right side.

At WHAT exactly ?

The non-human, of course.

In most of the civilized world, it's considered rude to barge into a
conversation without taking the time to apprise oneself of what went on
before one arrived. I'm not surprised you're unfamiliar with this basic
principle of social interaction.

How many handguns do you have in your collection, Poopie?



--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[Eeyore]

"George M. Middius" wrote:

Poopie shows why he empathizes with duh-Scottie.

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg

That's a woman.

Look in the foreground on the right side.

At WHAT exactly ?

The non-human, of course.

So you'd mistake a canine for a human ?


In most of the civilized world, it's considered rude to barge into a
conversation without taking the time to apprise oneself of what went on
before one arrived. I'm not surprised you're unfamiliar with this basic
principle of social interaction.

It never seems to have bothered you !


How many handguns do you have in your collection, Poopie?

I don't have a gun collection. Do you ?

Graham

[George M. Middius]

Poopie's well of wit runneth dry.

Poopie shows why he empathizes with duh-Scottie.

Look in the foreground on the right side.

At WHAT exactly ?

The non-human, of course.

So you'd mistake a canine for a human ?

IKYABWAI #1.

In most of the civilized world, it's considered rude to barge into a
conversation without taking the time to apprise oneself of what went on
before one arrived. I'm not surprised you're unfamiliar with this basic
principle of social interaction.

It never seems to have bothered you !

IKYABWAI #2.

How many handguns do you have in your collection, Poopie?

I don't have a gun collection. Do you ?

IKYABWAI #3.

Tell us about your latest amatory conquest of a 20-something with big
jiggling boobs and a silicon implant where her brain used to be.





--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[Eeyore]

"George M. Middius" wrote:

Tell us about your latest amatory conquest of a 20-something with big
jiggling boobs

I'm not really into big boobs actually. I find pert ones more to my liking. One
g/f of mine was virtually flat chested in fact and none have been hugely
endowed.


and a silicon implant where her brain used to be.

I like intelligent, articulate fiesty women. You're barking up totally the wrong
tree there. Couldn't be more wrong in fact.

Graham

[George M. Middius]

Poopie lays himself out on the slab.

Tell us about your latest amatory conquest of a 20-something with big
jiggling boobs

I'm not really into big boobs actually.

yawn

Nobody cares, you impotent old fart.




--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[Eeyore]

"George M. Middius" wrote:

Poopie lays himself out on the slab.

Tell us about your latest amatory conquest of a 20-something with big
jiggling boobs

I'm not really into big boobs actually.

yawn

Nobody cares, you impotent old fart.

That's the best you can offer as an insult ? I'm disappointed ! But most
certainly not impotent.

Graham

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Apr 19, 10:57 am, Eeyore
wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote:
Poopie lays himself out on the slab.

Tell us about your latest amatory conquest of a 20-something with big
jiggling boobs

I'm not really into big boobs actually.

yawn

Nobody cares, you impotent old fart.

That's the best you can offer as an insult ? I'm disappointed ! But most
certainly not impotent.

That's only your word.

Please send a photo of your not non-functional wienie to 2pid for
verification.

Who knows? You may be rewarded with a nice, firm ass-licking.

[Peter Wieck]

On Apr 19, 11:12 am, Eeyore
wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote:
Poopie shows why he empathizes with duh-Scottie.

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg

That's a woman.

Look in the foreground on the right side.

At WHAT exactly ?

The non-human, of course.

So you'd mistake a canine for a human ?

In most of the civilized world, it's considered rude to barge into a
conversation without taking the time to apprise oneself of what went on
before one arrived. I'm not surprised you're unfamiliar with this basic
principle of social interaction.

It never seems to have bothered you !

How many handguns do you have in your collection, Poopie?

I don't have a gun collection. Do you ?

Graham

Graham:

Consider the analogy of Antaeus & Heracles. Not that the "commander"
is any sort of giant, but the analogy is sound.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

[Eeyore]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote:
Poopie lays himself out on the slab.

Tell us about your latest amatory conquest of a 20-something with big
jiggling boobs

I'm not really into big boobs actually.

yawn

Nobody cares, you impotent old fart.

That's the best you can offer as an insult ? I'm disappointed ! But most
certainly not impotent.

That's only your word.

Please send a photo of your not non-functional wienie to 2pid for
verification.

Who knows? You may be rewarded with a nice, firm ass-licking.

LOL !


Graham

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Scooter, you need to get this up on your Facebook page ASAP:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg


Hi Jenn,
I see your friends are really raising your community to new moral low.
Aren't you proud?

ScottW

[Jenn]

In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Scooter, you need to get this up on your Facebook page ASAP:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg


Hi Jenn,
I see your friends are really raising your community to new moral low.
Aren't you proud?

ScottW

Hi Scott,
Gee, how's that? I'm afraid that you'll have to explain that to me.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Apr 21, 1:11 am, Jenn wrote:
In article ,

"ScottW" wrote:
"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
.. .

Scooter, you need to get this up on your Facebook page ASAP:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg

Hi Jenn,
I see your friends are really raising your community to new moral low.
Aren't you proud?

ScottW

Hi Scott,
Gee, how's that? I'm afraid that you'll have to explain that to me.

You see, Jenn, by being gay you are part of the "sexual perversion"
community. This obviously includes besiality, coprophilia, and
homosexuality.

In this photo, there are elements of bestiality and coprophilia (since
the dog is licking her ass) (which is why 2pid is mad. After all, what
is he? Chopped livah?). Further, since the woman is engaged in a sex
act, sans male, and not in the approved missionary position, she must
be gay. Therefore, your community standards have been lowered.

What 2pid doesn't know is that the woman is actually a hetero model
hired for this shot, so it actually reflects on the poor morals of his
wife.

[ScottW]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Scooter, you need to get this up on your Facebook page ASAP:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg


Hi Jenn,
I see your friends are really raising your community to new moral low.
Aren't you proud?

ScottW

Hi Scott,
Gee, how's that? I'm afraid that you'll have to explain that to me.

In one thread you enjoy the reassurance of popular thought,
in another you ignore how that popular position is achieved.

Howard....gone
Paul Wagner ...gone
Trotsky .....gone
JJ.... gone
Dick Pierce....gone
Stewart....gone
Arny ....?

The list is long. You've accept the comfort of the popular
position but you ignore the Usenet secular violence used to
achieve it.
Are you the proverbial "good person" allowing evil to flourish?
I'd say you're worse...you let it flourish because you enjoy the
results.

ScottW

[Jenn]

In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Scooter, you need to get this up on your Facebook page ASAP:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg


Hi Jenn,
I see your friends are really raising your community to new moral low.
Aren't you proud?

ScottW

Hi Scott,
Gee, how's that? I'm afraid that you'll have to explain that to me.

In one thread you enjoy the reassurance of popular thought,
in another you ignore how that popular position is achieved.

Howard....gone
Paul Wagner ...gone
Trotsky .....gone
JJ.... gone
Dick Pierce....gone
Stewart....gone
Arny ....?

The list is long. You've accept the comfort of the popular
position but you ignore the Usenet secular violence used to
achieve it.
Are you the proverbial "good person" allowing evil to flourish?
I'd say you're worse...you let it flourish because you enjoy the
results.

ScottW

How are they "my friends" in this matter? What do you mean by "your
community"?

[George M. Middius]

Jenn said to duh-Scottie:

I'd say you're worse...you let it flourish because you enjoy the
results.

How are they "my friends" in this matter?

Well, they're certainly not Scottie's friends.

What do you mean by "your community"?

That would be any group to which Scottie isn't entitled to belong. You
can start the list with non-racists, non-homophobes, non-morons, or
anywhere else you like. Just be aware that it's a very, very long list.




--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[ScottW]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Scooter, you need to get this up on your Facebook page ASAP:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg


Hi Jenn,
I see your friends are really raising your community to new moral low.
Aren't you proud?

ScottW

Hi Scott,
Gee, how's that? I'm afraid that you'll have to explain that to me.

In one thread you enjoy the reassurance of popular thought,
in another you ignore how that popular position is achieved.

Howard....gone
Paul Wagner ...gone
Trotsky .....gone
JJ.... gone
Dick Pierce....gone
Stewart....gone
Arny ....?

The list is long. You've accept the comfort of the popular
position but you ignore the Usenet secular violence used to
achieve it.
Are you the proverbial "good person" allowing evil to flourish?
I'd say you're worse...you let it flourish because you enjoy the
results.

ScottW

How are they "my friends" in this matter? What do you mean by "your
community"?

Every time you respond to them in a manner of demonstrating
common thought to claim superior position through numbers you
associate yourself with their position and methods, though you'd prefer
to deny the latter.
That is what I meant by friends and community.

Like here.

and here for recent examples.




ScottW

[George M. Middius]

Yapper barked:

How are they "my friends" in this matter? What do you mean by "your
community"?

Every time you respond to them in a manner of demonstrating
common thought to claim superior position through numbers you
associate yourself with their position and methods, though you'd prefer
to deny the latter.

Krooglish!




--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
net
...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Scooter, you need to get this up on your Facebook page ASAP:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg


Hi Jenn,
I see your friends are really raising your community to new moral
low.
Aren't you proud?

ScottW

Hi Scott,
Gee, how's that? I'm afraid that you'll have to explain that to me.

In one thread you enjoy the reassurance of popular thought,
in another you ignore how that popular position is achieved.

Howard....gone
Paul Wagner ...gone
Trotsky .....gone
JJ.... gone
Dick Pierce....gone
Stewart....gone
Arny ....?

The list is long. You've accept the comfort of the popular
position but you ignore the Usenet secular violence used to
achieve it.
Are you the proverbial "good person" allowing evil to flourish?
I'd say you're worse...you let it flourish because you enjoy the
results.

ScottW

How are they "my friends" in this matter? What do you mean by "your
community"?

Every time you respond to them in a manner of demonstrating
common thought to claim superior position through numbers

Except that's not why I posted what I did to them.

you
associate yourself with their position and methods, though you'd prefer
to deny the latter.
That is what I meant by friends and community.

Like here.

and here for recent examples.


Again, here's a newsflash for the real world: One can agree with a
point that someone else makes without indicating that you agree with all
they say or do.

[ScottW]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
net
...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Scooter, you need to get this up on your Facebook page ASAP:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg


Hi Jenn,
I see your friends are really raising your community to new moral
low.
Aren't you proud?

ScottW

Hi Scott,
Gee, how's that? I'm afraid that you'll have to explain that to me.

In one thread you enjoy the reassurance of popular thought,
in another you ignore how that popular position is achieved.

Howard....gone
Paul Wagner ...gone
Trotsky .....gone
JJ.... gone
Dick Pierce....gone
Stewart....gone
Arny ....?

The list is long. You've accept the comfort of the popular
position but you ignore the Usenet secular violence used to
achieve it.
Are you the proverbial "good person" allowing evil to flourish?
I'd say you're worse...you let it flourish because you enjoy the
results.

ScottW

How are they "my friends" in this matter? What do you mean by "your
community"?

Every time you respond to them in a manner of demonstrating
common thought to claim superior position through numbers

Except that's not why I posted what I did to them.

You often deny apparently obvious motive with no
alternative explanation.


you
associate yourself with their position and methods, though you'd prefer
to deny the latter.
That is what I meant by friends and community.

Like here.

and here for recent examples.


Again, here's a newsflash for the real world: One can agree with a
point that someone else makes without indicating that you agree with all
they say or do.

You're missing the point again.
You don't get that luxury when you try
to support your position by apparent popularity
when that very popularity come from the creation of a liberal
stronghold through ridicule and mockery.
You want to enjoy the benefits of a majority viewpoint while
being held innocent for the cleansing that created it.

ScottW

[MiNe 109]

In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

You want to enjoy the benefits of a majority viewpoint while
being held innocent for the cleansing that created it.

I doubt that anyone's interest in RAO politics is that deep.

Stephen

[Jenn]

In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
net
...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

gy.
net
...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in
message
...


Scooter, you need to get this up on your Facebook page ASAP:

http://crazycowmovies.com/content/cc1071/cc1071_6.jpg


Hi Jenn,
I see your friends are really raising your community to new moral
low.
Aren't you proud?

ScottW

Hi Scott,
Gee, how's that? I'm afraid that you'll have to explain that to me.

In one thread you enjoy the reassurance of popular thought,
in another you ignore how that popular position is achieved.

Howard....gone
Paul Wagner ...gone
Trotsky .....gone
JJ.... gone
Dick Pierce....gone
Stewart....gone
Arny ....?

The list is long. You've accept the comfort of the popular
position but you ignore the Usenet secular violence used to
achieve it.
Are you the proverbial "good person" allowing evil to flourish?
I'd say you're worse...you let it flourish because you enjoy the
results.

ScottW

How are they "my friends" in this matter? What do you mean by "your
community"?

Every time you respond to them in a manner of demonstrating
common thought to claim superior position through numbers

Except that's not why I posted what I did to them.

You often deny apparently obvious motive with no
alternative explanation.

Scott, it's called human conversation!
1. People say things
2. You agree with some things they say, you disagree with other things.



you
associate yourself with their position and methods, though you'd prefer
to deny the latter.

When did I ever indicate that I associate myself with their methods?
How many times have I indicated that I agree with their positions?

That is what I meant by friends and community.

Like here.

and here for recent examples.


Again, here's a newsflash for the real world: One can agree with a
point that someone else makes without indicating that you agree with all
they say or do.

You're missing the point again.
You don't get that luxury when you try
to support your position by apparent popularity
when that very popularity come from the creation of a liberal
stronghold through ridicule and mockery.
You want to enjoy the benefits of a majority viewpoint while
being held innocent for the cleansing that created it.

ScottW

Your rants are getting further and further out, Scott.