Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How are these machines for dubbing stereo recordings to ?
any opinions welcome, thanks |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 12:54 pm, "Soundhaspriority" wrote:
"elkhound" wrote in message ps.com... How are these machines for dubbing stereo recordings to ? any opinions welcome, thanks Terribly bad idea, seriously behind the times. Go digital. Bob Morein Dresher, PA (215) 646-4894 digital is too harsh, and too lossy if they made a SACD recorder, I would though |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 10:44 pm, "Bret Ludwig" wrote:
On Mar 19, 9:27 pm, "jailhouserock" wrote: On Mar 19, 12:54 pm, "Soundhaspriority" wrote: "elkhound" wrote in message ups.com... How are these machines for dubbing stereo recordings to ? any opinions welcome, thanks Terribly bad idea, seriously behind the times. Go digital. Bob Morein Dresher, PA (215) 646-4894 digital is too harsh, and too lossy As compared to 3 3/4 ips tape? Yerfulla****. Yerfulla**** yerfulla**** yerfulla****. Anjyaknowit. You obviously haven't done any back to back testing yourself... I've compared a brand new NOS 8-track cartridge, to a brand new CD- back to back, using the tape/source switch on my integrated amp. Both were Rolling Stones Get Your Ya-Ya's Out LP. Both had the same playlist, in the same order. Cued up to beginning on both, let them roll, listened with headphones, switched back and forth. At first, the CD is blatantly obvious, less background noise- but after about 4 minutes something interesting happens. There's a lot more ambience, air, even order harmonics, presence- in the 8-track cartridge at 3.75 IPS. 3.75 IPS on a 4-track 1/4" machine- there is no f-ing comparison. My Sony EL-7 Elcaset makes any of my CD"s sound like crap in comparison, and the Elky has better specs to back it up. It's a 3.75 IPS format as well, see it he http://i17.tinypic.com/2hsb0ao.jpg place your cursor on the spec sheet, and a box at lower right will appear- click on that box, to maximize and read the specs- we're talking a 3.75 IPS machine he 15 HZ TO 27,000 HZ with Type II tapes (FeCr) (NAB) 15 HZ TO 25,000 HZ with Type I tapes (standard FeO2) (NAB) I don't know how they did it, but they DID it- this deck sounds as good as/better than a reel to reel at 7.5 IPS- and the Elcaset does it with 3.75 IPS. It MUST be the FeCr tapes- and some really high-end circuits inside the unit. Specs at +/- 3 dB rating are somewhat less, but still quite impressive for 1/4" 4-track analog tape at 3.75 IPS, again NAB: 25 HZ TO 22,000 HZ TYPE II (FeCr) 25 HZ TO 20,000 HZ TYPE I (standard FeO2) The Elky accomplishes with standard tape, what a compact cassette gets with metal tape at 1-7/8" Recording/playback with analog tape isn't rocket science- there's nothing complicated about it- make the tracks wide as possible, and move it as fast as possible- to get maximum fidelity. The problem with the compact cassette Philips format is this- it was never maximized/hot rodded to its full potential in the first place. It would be a much better performer at 3.75 IPS, with proper EQ and biasing. "digital is better" is an IQ test, if you believe it, you flunked. The master studio techs listen to CD in public, then go home and play vinyl and analog tape. Basically CD quality or better, from 1/4" tape in a cartridge, at only 3.75 IPS. With the FeCr tapes, a better top end than a CD- from a home-made cartridge tape format. UNREAL ! |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 20, 10:11 am, "Soundhaspriority" wrote:
"jailhouserock" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 19, 10:44 pm, "Bret Ludwig" wrote: On Mar 19, 9:27 pm, "jailhouserock" wrote: On Mar 19, 12:54 pm, "Soundhaspriority" wrote: "elkhound" wrote in message ups.com... How are these machines for dubbing stereo recordings to ? any opinions welcome, thanks Terribly bad idea, seriously behind the times. Go digital. Bob Morein Dresher, PA (215) 646-4894 digital is too harsh, and too lossy As compared to 3 3/4 ips tape? Yerfulla****. Yerfulla**** yerfulla**** yerfulla****. Anjyaknowit. You obviously haven't done any back to back testing yourself... Sure have. It's crap. what deck, tape, etc. ?? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Old style recording - British tape machines. | Pro Audio | |||
Otari Tape Machines | Pro Audio | |||
Tascam DA-P1 chewed my DAT tape!! | Pro Audio | |||
TASCAM 34, 34B tape question | Pro Audio | |||
analog Tape Machines | Pro Audio |