Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio,
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My combo amp for my older workstation is leaving the planet.
Anyone with Mackie Big Knob comments or other options? Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RZJ9MptZmU |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 7:51 am, Ty Ford wrote:
My combo amp for my older workstation is leaving the planet. Anyone with Mackie Big Knob comments or other options? Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demoshttp://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RZJ9MptZmU Ty, I don't know what kind of functionality you need, but if it's just handy volume and speaker switching the big knob is great. I had one when they first came out, and only got rid of it when i got a real console. The thing about the big knob though is the whole unit is HUGE. but it's super handy. i liked that it had a master mute on it in easy reach. Nate |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Look into Cuebase IV. It has a new feature called the
control room. It will kill things like the big knob and it is in the box. Their new organization for plugs and the plugs that come with it are alone worth the price and it is just a little more than the big knob. But then again there is nothing like a big knob to reach for when the computer decides to go its own way. peace dawg "Ty Ford" wrote in message . .. : My combo amp for my older workstation is leaving the planet. : : Anyone with Mackie Big Knob comments or other options? : : Regards, : : Ty Ford : : : --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services : Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com : Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RZJ9MptZmU : |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ty Ford" wrote in message
. .. My combo amp for my older workstation is leaving the planet. Anyone with Mackie Big Knob comments or other options? Regards, Ty Ford Hi Ty, I know it's on the expensive side but I really love my Coleman Audio M3PH http://www.colemanaudio.com/ An alternative to the Mackie would be the NHT PVC pro http://nhthifi.com/2006/products/pro/pvcpro.html About $149 street and looks pretty nice (I haven't tried one) John L Rice |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 9:09 am, "Deputy Dumbya Dawg"
wrote: Look into Cuebase IV. It has a new feature called the control room. It will kill things like the big knob and it is in the box. Do you know what a Big Knob does? How can Cubase possibly do that in the box? The Big Knob provides multiple inputs and outputs as well as hands-on controls. I suppose that you could assign outputs of a multi- out sound card to different speakers and have on-screen buttons to mute and un-mute them, and have an on-screen volume and mute control, and what about the RIAA equalized phono input? And the headphone outputs? And talkback mic? |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Mar 2007 07:18:18 -0700, "Mike Rivers"
wrote: Look into Cuebase IV. It has a new feature called the control room. It will kill things like the big knob and it is in the box. Do you know what a Big Knob does? How can Cubase possibly do that in the box? The Big Knob provides multiple inputs and outputs as well as hands-on controls. I suppose that you could assign outputs of a multi- out sound card to different speakers and have on-screen buttons to mute and un-mute them, and have an on-screen volume and mute control, and what about the RIAA equalized phono input? And the headphone outputs? And talkback mic? Yeah. Like you say, if you ARE computer-based, Cubase 4's Control Room very likely does everything you'd use the Knob for. Not quite everything, and not necessarily in exactly the same way of course. But if your mind is open to computer solutions, it's well worth a look. CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:16:17 -0800, (hank alrich)
wrote: But then again there is nothing like a big knob to reach for when the computer decides to go its own way. Reads to me like you have not met a Big Knob, and also do not understand what's good about stuff that is not "in the box". I've never personally met a Big Knob. But I know about it, and its specifications are easy to understand. There may be occasions where a Big Knob is a godsend. But alongside a mixing desk, I find it over-featured. Is it possible that there are contributors to this thread who HAVEN'T even heard of Cubase 4's Control Room until today, but nevertheless have opinions about it? :-) CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rivers" wrote in message ups.com... : On Mar 19, 9:09 am, "Deputy Dumbya Dawg" : wrote: : Look into Cuebase IV. It has a new feature called the : control room. It will kill things like the big knob and : it is in the box. : : Do you know what a Big Knob does? How can Cubase possibly do that in : the box? It sure as hell does and more and more of what the big knob designers would wish it does. If you ever see the demo you will know. * Any output you setup in the DAW can be an input to the control room. * Multiple monitors can be selected and volume matched if desired, * Talkback mic and selectable routing * Sends and outputs for cue mixes with presets * It can also handle 2 tk, and every version of surround you may want to use for mixdown. * Single keystrokes to route surround to 2tk or mono and 2tk to mono * Single keystrokes to solo or mute speakers. (individualy and by group) * Volume controls that do not affect the mix level. * No switching noise ( except maybe when you switch the daw off and on. Very well thought out. The Big Knob provides multiple inputs and outputs as well as : hands-on controls. Like I said multiple inputs and outputs but no hardware for when the computer gets a mind of its own. That is the only advantage I see unless you want to use it with the computer off and another source or something. : I suppose that you could assign outputs of a multi- : out sound card to different speakers and have on-screen buttons to : mute and un-mute them, and have an on-screen volume and mute control, So did Charlie Steinberg, but he did something about it. THE CONTROL ROOM And the headphone outputs? Got it and with well thought out presets for what drives the phones and you can insert compression or limiters in the sends. And talkback mic? Can rout that too. : : and what about the RIAA equalized phono input? Just like every console used for this job. The control room assumes you have a phono stage for your moving magnet Grado Statement cartridge. The Big Knob does not have enough gain in it's phono input to handle the 0.5mV output of high quality cartridges. It needs 5-79mV input. But who has a turntable any more and the OP did not mention that. Hey Mike! Did ya find that speaker and the designers claims for the variovent to the another chamber? peace Dawg. : : : |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 12:05 pm, Romeo Rondeau wrote:
Doh! I guess you haven't looked at Cubase/ Nuendo's control room section! I guess you will now :-) No, I won't bother. For me, what the Big Knob and its brethren and sistern provide is more input and output jacks and hands-on controls. If your DAW hardware consists of a stereo audio interface, how's the Control Room section going to help you switch between two sets of monitors? Or connect a talkback mic? Or a turntable? If you can tell me how the software control room section replaces physical hardware, I'll take a look. Otherwise, I'll take a hike. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 11:29 am, Laurence Payne
There may be occasions where a Big Knob is a godsend. But alongside a mixing desk, I find it over-featured. That's probably true, but it's intended to be used by people who don't have a mixer. It answers the call from people who think they have a whole studio in their computer and can't figure out how to do something as simple as adjusting the listening volume without a few mouse clicks. Is it possible that there are contributors to this thread who HAVEN'T even heard of Cubase 4's Control Room until today, but nevertheless have opinions about it? :-) I haven't heard of it and I don't have an opinion about it. But I will question how it makes hardware where there's no hardware. That's the most significant feature of the Big Knob. If it can do that, please explain to me how. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Mar 2007 08:43:48 -0700, "Mike Rivers"
wrote: Doh! I guess you haven't looked at Cubase/ Nuendo's control room section! I guess you will now :-) No, I won't bother. For me, what the Big Knob and its brethren and sistern provide is more input and output jacks and hands-on controls. If your DAW hardware consists of a stereo audio interface, how's the Control Room section going to help you switch between two sets of monitors? Or connect a talkback mic? Or a turntable? If you can tell me how the software control room section replaces physical hardware, I'll take a look. Otherwise, I'll take a hike. You're striking a silly attitude. Unless you can show me how a Big Knob replaces your multitrack recorder? CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rivers" wrote in message ups.com... : On Mar 19, 12:05 pm, Romeo Rondeau wrote: : : Doh! I guess you haven't looked at Cubase/ Nuendo's control room : section! I guess you will now :-) : : No, I won't bother. For me, what the Big Knob and its brethren and : sistern provide is more input and output jacks and hands-on controls. : If your DAW hardware consists of a stereo audio interface, how's the : Control Room section going to help you switch between two sets of : monitors? Or connect a talkback mic? Or a turntable? : : If you can tell me how the software control room section replaces : physical hardware, I'll take a look. Otherwise, I'll take a hike. I have a hardware solution myself but a lot of people have lots of tracks in and as many outputs as inputs. In a stereo system only two outputs are configured. This means that if you have a 24 track DAW system, like I do you, have 22 spare outputs. ( I actuall have 23 spare outputs since I use the SPDIF out to a high end DAC and one out to run the midi click sounds back into the board so I can mix it into the headsets) You could make three 5.1 mixes and three stereo. Or lotsa headsets out and a few stereo and a surround. Get it? Peace. dawg : : |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hank alrich" wrote in message ... : Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote: : : Look into Cuebase IV. It has a new feature called the : control room. It will kill things like the big knob and : it is in the box. Their new organization for plugs and : the plugs that come with it are alone worth the price : and it is just a little more than the big knob. : : But then again there is nothing like a big knob to : reach for when the computer decides to go its own way. : : Reads to me like you have not met a Big Knob, and also do not understand : what's good about stuff that is not "in the box". : : -- : ha : Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam Read the review in either Recording or Tape op dude. I know exactly what it does and can't do. But don't worry you will be seeing every other DAW copying something just like it real soon. But of course the copies will claim to be the original and the first ones with this feature and they will have cooler sounding more original names. peace dawg |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Laurence Payne" lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote in message ... : : Is it possible that there are contributors to this thread who HAVEN'T : even heard of Cubase 4's Control Room until today, but nevertheless : have opinions about it? :-) I just got the demo earlier this month from the Steinberg Rep, Greg Ondo. They rolled it out at NAM last month. peace dawg |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
On Mar 19, 9:09 am, "Deputy Dumbya Dawg" wrote: Look into Cuebase IV. It has a new feature called the control room. It will kill things like the big knob and it is in the box. Do you know what a Big Knob does? How can Cubase possibly do that in the box? The Big Knob provides multiple inputs and outputs as well as hands-on controls. I suppose that you could assign outputs of a multi- out sound card to different speakers and have on-screen buttons to mute and un-mute them, and have an on-screen volume and mute control, and what about the RIAA equalized phono input? And the headphone outputs? And talkback mic? Doh! I guess you haven't looked at Cubase/ Nuendo's control room section! I guess you will now :-) |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote:
Look into Cuebase IV. It has a new feature called the control room. It will kill things like the big knob and it is in the box. Their new organization for plugs and the plugs that come with it are alone worth the price and it is just a little more than the big knob. But then again there is nothing like a big knob to reach for when the computer decides to go its own way. Reads to me like you have not met a Big Knob, and also do not understand what's good about stuff that is not "in the box". -- ha Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:00:30 GMT, "Deputy Dumbya Dawg"
wrote: : Is it possible that there are contributors to this thread who HAVEN'T : even heard of Cubase 4's Control Room until today, but nevertheless : have opinions about it? :-) I just got the demo earlier this month from the Steinberg Rep, Greg Ondo. They rolled it out at NAM last month. What took you so long? We've been using it since early October 2006. CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:58:12 +0000, Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote:
"hank alrich" wrote in message ... : Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote: : : Look into Cuebase IV. It has a new feature called the : control room. It will kill things like the big knob and : it is in the box. Their new organization for plugs and : the plugs that come with it are alone worth the price : and it is just a little more than the big knob. : : But then again there is nothing like a big knob to : reach for when the computer decides to go its own way. : : Reads to me like you have not met a Big Knob, and also do not understand : what's good about stuff that is not "in the box". : : -- : ha : Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam Read the review in either Recording or Tape op dude. I know exactly what it does and can't do. But don't worry you will be seeing every other DAW copying something just like it real soon. But of course the copies will claim to be the original and the first ones with this feature and they will have cooler sounding more original names. Can you solo input channels to the control room speakers without it affecting the headphone mixes? I've been using a Cubase4 rig for some mixing, but did not get into the new monitoring in any depth. peace dawg |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:06:15 -0800, (hank alrich)
wrote: Read the review in either Recording or Tape op dude. I have. There are no hardware connections provided by the software. There is no hardware phono preamp. Etc. Obviously the only meaningful comparison is between the BK and a DAW INCLUDING a multi-output soundcard. Didn't Mike establish this very early in this thread? Else we're just being silly. Like buying software and whining "But you didn't say I'd need a computer as well!" Or buying a radio mic and "What do you mean - I need an amp and speakers TOO?" (Actually, I've heard that last one more than once :-) CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote:
"Mike Rivers" wrote in message ups.com... : On Mar 19, 9:09 am, "Deputy Dumbya Dawg" : wrote: : Look into Cuebase IV. It has a new feature called the : control room. It will kill things like the big knob and : it is in the box. : : Do you know what a Big Knob does? How can Cubase possibly do that in : the box? It sure as hell does and more and more of what the big knob designers would wish it does. If you ever see the demo you will know. You have made it clear that you do not understand what the Big Knob offers. -- ha Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote:
Read the review in either Recording or Tape op dude. I have. There are no hardware connections provided by the software. There is no hardware phono preamp. Etc. -- ha Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Laurence Payne" lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote in message ... : I just got the demo earlier this month from the : Steinberg Rep, Greg Ondo. They rolled it out at NAM : last month. : : What took you so long? We've been using it since early October 2006. I do not need it. I monitor outside the box and have all the control I need for what I do. peace dawg |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "philicorda" wrote in message ... :: Can you solo input channels to the control room speakers without it : affecting the headphone mixes? I seemed liked those two functions would be seperate but I do not know for sure. I can even do that with Nuendo 2.0 if I were to put the phones out an aux, so long as the talent does not mind the ................................latency! : : I've been using a Cubase4 rig for some mixing, but did not get into the : new monitoring in any depth. Go for it dude. peace dawg |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hank alrich" wrote in message ... : You have made it clear that you do not understand what the Big Knob : offers. You are so observent and have great reading comprehension. You are my hero! peace dawg |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hank alrich" wrote in message ... : Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote: : : Read the review in either Recording or Tape op dude. : : I have. There are no hardware connections provided by the software. : There is no hardware phono preamp. Etc. I did not remember a phono in from the review of the big knob, so I just looked it up on the Mackie web page spec sheet and it sure as **** does have a phono input today on that spec sheet. And I do not recall any software in the big knob, it is hardware. If you do not understand the hardware connections of the Cuebase IV CONTROL ROOM I can not help you there but you need to understand that Control Room needs a multiple out soundcard(s) not an M-Box or other stereo, single mic at a time solution. peace dawg : : -- : ha : Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam |
#26
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
On Mar 19, 11:29 am, Laurence Payne There may be occasions where a Big Knob is a godsend. But alongside a mixing desk, I find it over-featured. That's probably true, but it's intended to be used by people who don't have a mixer. It answers the call from people who think they have a whole studio in their computer and can't figure out how to do something as simple as adjusting the listening volume without a few mouse clicks. The Big Knob does exactly what the monitor control module on a typical large format control does. If you're stuck mixing on something like a Mackie console that has no talkback and minimal monitor controls, it's a good addition. If you're on a DAW it's a very handy addition as well. If you're on an SSL it's totally superfluous. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#27
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 11:50 am, Laurence Payne lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom
wrote: You're striking a silly attitude. Unless you can show me how a Big Knob replaces your multitrack recorder? Talk about being silly! A Big Knob isn't intended to replace a multitrack recorder. Cubase might, and it might replace some functions of a mixing console (the MIXING part, not necessarily the CONSOLE part). |
#28
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 11:53 am, "Deputy Dumbya Dawg"
wrote: I have a hardware solution myself but a lot of people have lots of tracks in and as many outputs as inputs. In a stereo system only two outputs are configured. This means that if you have a 24 track DAW system, like I do you, have 22 spare outputs. ( I actuall have 23 spare outputs since I use the SPDIF out to a high end DAC and one out to run the midi click sounds back into the board so I can mix it into the headsets) Oh, well you don't need anything special to do that, well, except maybe for a couple of channels of headphone amplifier. Cubase's new control layout might make it easier, but you need the hardware first. A lot of people have only a stereo output. It's people like that who the Big Knob was made for. Actually, my Soundcraft console has only one set of control room outputs, but it does have a volume control for it, as well as a mute switch. The console was made in the day when engineers knew how to wire up a switch if they wanted to have two sets of speakers. Today if someone wanted to do that, they'd ask where on the web they could find a schematic. That's what working on a DAW too long will do to you. g |
#29
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 5:42 pm, Romeo Rondeau wrote:
Well, for starters you can assign any of your knobs from your controller surface to do anything in the control section. Don't have a control surface? My, my, my... however do you "mix with a mouse?" Well, I suppose one can wax philosophical about when does a computer with DAW software, a multi-channel audio interface, and a hardware control surface differ from a recorder and console? I suppose that someone who has several thousand dollars invested in a DAW system doesn't really have much use for a $300 switching accessory. Neither does someone wiht several thousand dollars invested in a console. But for the right kind of customer, one who doesn't have a multi- channel interface, a control surface, and doesn't use Cubase, it's the right kind of product. |
#30
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Romeo Rondeau wrote:
You forgot to add that if your DAW is the new Cubase or Nuendo and you have a real soundcard, not a toy, it's useless... unless you like to "spin them rekkid's, yo!" Oh wait... they do give you a big knob :-) Until something goes wrong with your software and the soundcard starts spitting out noise at 0dBFS. A real monitor panel gives you a quick place to shut it down, and also means you're using the D/A at much higher levels (since the gain control is after the D/A instead of before it). Also, of course, you get zero-latency monitoring through a real monitor panel, which you don't through any software. But then, I don't really like DAW systems at all and I much prefer having physical hardware to do any job. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#31
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
On Mar 19, 5:42 pm, Romeo Rondeau wrote: Well, for starters you can assign any of your knobs from your controller surface to do anything in the control section. Don't have a control surface? My, my, my... however do you "mix with a mouse?" Well, I suppose one can wax philosophical about when does a computer with DAW software, a multi-channel audio interface, and a hardware control surface differ from a recorder and console? I suppose that someone who has several thousand dollars invested in a DAW system doesn't really have much use for a $300 switching accessory. Neither does someone wiht several thousand dollars invested in a console. But for the right kind of customer, one who doesn't have a multi- channel interface, a control surface, and doesn't use Cubase, it's the right kind of product. Agreed. I knew you'd come around :-) |
#32
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Romeo Rondeau wrote: You forgot to add that if your DAW is the new Cubase or Nuendo and you have a real soundcard, not a toy, it's useless... unless you like to "spin them rekkid's, yo!" Oh wait... they do give you a big knob :-) Until something goes wrong with your software and the soundcard starts spitting out noise at 0dBFS. Oh yeah, good point.... that sure happens a lot.... NOT! :-) A real monitor panel gives you a quick place to shut it down, and also means you're using the D/A at much higher levels (since the gain control is after the D/A instead of before it). Also, of course, you get zero-latency monitoring through a real monitor panel, which you don't through any software. Direct monitoring doesn't go through software, as a matter of fact....wait... deja vu :-) But then, I don't really like DAW systems at all and I much prefer having physical hardware to do any job. --scott |
#33
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:14:12 +0000, Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote:
"philicorda" wrote in message ... :: Can you solo input channels to the control room speakers without it : affecting the headphone mixes? I seemed liked those two functions would be seperate but I do not know for sure. It would be nice if you can. One of the big annoyances I have with monitoring in the box is that most software assumes you are only recording yourself, and don't need to solo stuff while recording. I can even do that with Nuendo 2.0 if I were to put the phones out an aux, so long as the talent does not mind the ................................latency! How would you do it in Nuendo 2? Sends are not prefade+solo safe are they? (That's not rhetorical ![]() I can do the control room thing in some other DAWs with busses, but not the solo without somewhat tortuous routing. : : I've been using a Cubase4 rig for some mixing, but did not get into the : new monitoring in any depth. Go for it dude. peace dawg |
#34
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... : : Until something goes wrong with your software and the soundcard starts : spitting out noise at 0dBFS. A real monitor panel gives you a quick : place to shut it down, and also means you're using the D/A at much : higher levels (since the gain control is after the D/A instead of : before it). One of the reasons I have a physical gain control after my external DAC is so I can run my mix at the mixdown level regardless of my monitoring level. The Cuebase 4 Control Room gives you an attenuator (yes a software attenuator) after the master "fader" control so you can continue to mix at the desired mixdown level (what you would send to mastering) while adjusting the SPL of your monitors independantly----and also calibrating all your monitor speakers to speak at the same level when you switch between them. If I was using the Control Room I would still have my (audio power- seperate from computer) power switch close by to shut down the amps in the event 0dBFS noise happened. : : Also, of course, you get zero-latency monitoring through a real monitor : panel, which you don't through any software. This is why I still use my console for monitoring and for my cue mixes. peace dawg : : But then, I don't really like DAW systems at all and I much prefer having : physical hardware to do any job. : --scott : -- : "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#35
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
On Mar 19, 12:05 pm, Romeo Rondeau wrote: Doh! I guess you haven't looked at Cubase/ Nuendo's control room section! I guess you will now :-) No, I won't bother. For me, what the Big Knob and its brethren and sistern provide is more input and output jacks and hands-on controls. If your DAW hardware consists of a stereo audio interface, how's the Control Room section going to help you switch between two sets of monitors? Or connect a talkback mic? Or a turntable? Well, if you're monkeying around with toys... If you can tell me how the software control room section replaces physical hardware, I'll take a look. Otherwise, I'll take a hike. See above... |
#36
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "philicorda" wrote in message ... : : :: Can you solo input channels to the control room : speakers without it : : affecting the headphone mixes? : : I seemed liked those two functions would be seperate : but I do not know for sure. : : It would be nice if you can. One of the big annoyances I have with : monitoring in the box is that most software assumes you are only recording : yourself, and don't need to solo stuff while recording. Ask Greg Ondo the Steinberg Marketing Manager on this forum http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/c...nuendoatlanta/ http://www.moneygrow.com/cubase-nuendo/ Like I said I mix my cues and monitor the live room from a board. I think this is the only way to go. peace dawg |
#37
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
On Mar 19, 11:29 am, Laurence Payne There may be occasions where a Big Knob is a godsend. But alongside a mixing desk, I find it over-featured. That's probably true, but it's intended to be used by people who don't have a mixer. It answers the call from people who think they have a whole studio in their computer and can't figure out how to do something as simple as adjusting the listening volume without a few mouse clicks. Is it possible that there are contributors to this thread who HAVEN'T even heard of Cubase 4's Control Room until today, but nevertheless have opinions about it? :-) I haven't heard of it and I don't have an opinion about it. But I will question how it makes hardware where there's no hardware. That's the most significant feature of the Big Knob. If it can do that, please explain to me how. Well, for starters you can assign any of your knobs from your controller surface to do anything in the control section. Don't have a control surface? My, my, my... however do you "mix with a mouse?" |
#38
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Laurence Payne wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:00:30 GMT, "Deputy Dumbya Dawg" wrote: : Is it possible that there are contributors to this thread who HAVEN'T : even heard of Cubase 4's Control Room until today, but nevertheless : have opinions about it? :-) I just got the demo earlier this month from the Steinberg Rep, Greg Ondo. They rolled it out at NAM last month. What took you so long? We've been using it since early October 2006. CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect Nuendo has had it for awhile now... |
#39
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hank alrich wrote:
Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote: Read the review in either Recording or Tape op dude. I have. There are no hardware connections provided by the software. There is no hardware phono preamp. Etc. Oooh, now THAT's a feature that EVERYBODY needs :-) You sure told him... |
#40
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Mike Rivers wrote: On Mar 19, 11:29 am, Laurence Payne There may be occasions where a Big Knob is a godsend. But alongside a mixing desk, I find it over-featured. That's probably true, but it's intended to be used by people who don't have a mixer. It answers the call from people who think they have a whole studio in their computer and can't figure out how to do something as simple as adjusting the listening volume without a few mouse clicks. The Big Knob does exactly what the monitor control module on a typical large format control does. If you're stuck mixing on something like a Mackie console that has no talkback and minimal monitor controls, it's a good addition. If you're on a DAW it's a very handy addition as well. If you're on an SSL it's totally superfluous. --scott You forgot to add that if your DAW is the new Cubase or Nuendo and you have a real soundcard, not a toy, it's useless... unless you like to "spin them rekkid's, yo!" Oh wait... they do give you a big knob :-) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB: Dynaco Knob | Marketplace | |||
Mackie Big Knob? | Pro Audio | |||
treble knob morphs into vol knob?!?! | Vacuum Tubes | |||
$485.00 volume knob | High End Audio | |||
>--- INCREASE ---> knob | Vacuum Tubes |