[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

....exactly what is it that you "bring to the party" that makes it so,
in your 'mind,' your posts don't "suck"?

You keep avoiding this one. I think it's because your hypocrisy is so
egregious that it penetrates even your thick armor of stupidity. You
know haw wrong you are, yet you won't admit it.

Avoid, avoid, avoid...

Insert toopid's next lame "IKYABWAI" response here

LOL!

toopid's downward spiral continues...

[ScottW]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
...exactly what is it that you "bring to the party" that makes it so,
in your 'mind,' your posts don't "suck"?

Let's see....over the history of time I've argued to make RAO
audio oriented and less Arny oriented. Many...well there aren't
many left who will endure the Middiot ridicule,
but many of those left that perceive themselves to be
audio posters devote most of their time to Arny squabbling.
Some are only Arny bashing.
So I lost, surrendered, gave up, however you wish to describe it.
You see the audio content here...not much. But I did try...once
upon a time.

Arny bashing is to me a ridiculous and wholly boring endeavor.
I just don't get it.

But the political discussions (when they actually involve the
exchange of ideas and information rather than just the ridicule
response of which you seem only capable)
is more interesting to me. The inability of the leftists here
to show any tolerance for differing points of view is disappointing,
but that is the achilles of the left. I don't know if its the maturity
level of the people drawn to the panacea view or what...but they
just can't accept someone refusing to see things their way.
They hate it...literally.
Anyway, I digress.
When I toss a new off-topic post, I always include a link to a
current article, event etc. that reflects something going on in the
real world. It's not the Arny sucks or the Krooborg is insane
childish mantra. When compared to that, or your ridicule responses,
I don't think my posts suck.
Just my opinion, but you set the bar so very low its really hard
not to suck.

ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 11, 12:48 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

But the political discussions (when they actually involve the
exchange of ideas and information rather than just the ridicule
response of which you seem only capable)
is more interesting to me. The inability of the leftists here
to show any tolerance for differing points of view is disappointing,
but that is the achilles of the left. I don't know if its the maturity
level of the people drawn to the panacea view or what...but they
just can't accept someone refusing to see things their way.
They hate it...literally.

BTW, do not confuse "hate" (a pretty strrong emotion) with amusement.

I reserve the right to mock your viewpoint, no matter how dear it is
to you, in the same way that I reserve the right to mock most anything
that Pat Robertson says (no matter how dear his viewpoint is to him).

Indeed, not all viewpoints are created equal.;-)

When compared to that, or your ridicule responses,
I don't think my posts suck.
Just my opinion, but you set the bar so very low its really hard
not to suck.

So you admit that your posts are pretty low. It's just that there are
some lower. It is my fault that your posts are as low as they are.

Is that about it?

[ScottW]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 11, 12:48 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

But the political discussions (when they actually involve the
exchange of ideas and information rather than just the ridicule
response of which you seem only capable)
is more interesting to me. The inability of the leftists here
to show any tolerance for differing points of view is disappointing,
but that is the achilles of the left. I don't know if its the maturity
level of the people drawn to the panacea view or what...but they
just can't accept someone refusing to see things their way.
They hate it...literally.

BTW, do not confuse "hate" (a pretty strrong emotion) with amusement.

I reserve the right to mock your viewpoint, no matter how dear it is
to you, in the same way that I reserve the right to mock most anything
that Pat Robertson says (no matter how dear his viewpoint is to him).

Indeed, not all viewpoints are created equal.;-)

Nice confession...this reveals all the following wonderful
traits of yours.... bigotry, prejudice, arrogance, ignorance....
The list goes on, but I don't want to rub your nose in it like
a puppy who needs to be house broken.


When compared to that, or your ridicule responses,
I don't think my posts suck.
Just my opinion, but you set the bar so very low its really hard
not to suck.

So you admit that your posts are pretty low. It's just that there are
some lower. It is my fault that your posts are as low as they are.

In some part...yes. You inspire me and your arrogant childish
tirades certainly don't dissuade.

http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/D...lticulturalism


ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 11, 5:06 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in ooglegroups.com...





On Mar 11, 12:48 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

But the political discussions (when they actually involve the
exchange of ideas and information rather than just the ridicule
response of which you seem only capable)
is more interesting to me. The inability of the leftists here
to show any tolerance for differing points of view is disappointing,
but that is the achilles of the left. I don't know if its the maturity
level of the people drawn to the panacea view or what...but they
just can't accept someone refusing to see things their way.
They hate it...literally.

BTW, do not confuse "hate" (a pretty strrong emotion) with amusement.

I reserve the right to mock your viewpoint, no matter how dear it is
to you, in the same way that I reserve the right to mock most anything
that Pat Robertson says (no matter how dear his viewpoint is to him).

Indeed, not all viewpoints are created equal.;-)

Nice confession...

Confession? It's stating the obvious, toopid.

Unless we should all give the same weight to the ravings of Robertson
as, say, Nelson Mandela.

To put it another way: do the viewpoints of a KKK leader carry the
same weight as Mahatma Gandhi?

this reveals all the following wonderful
traits of yours.... bigotry, prejudice, arrogance, ignorance....

You forgot intelligence, toopid. Because this post of yours reveals
that one, overwhelming trait of yours that we all know and love so
well.

The list goes on, but I don't want to rub your nose in it like
a puppy who needs to be house broken.

So in your opinion, all viewpoints are created equal, and deserve
equal weight? LOL!

When compared to that, or your ridicule responses,
I don't think my posts suck.
Just my opinion, but you set the bar so very low its really hard
not to suck.

So you admit that your posts are pretty low. It's just that there are
some lower. It is my fault that your posts are as low as they are.

In some part...yes. You inspire me and your arrogant childish
tirades certainly don't dissuade.

I've always wondered what intelligence looked like to an imbecile. Now
I know: arrogance. LOL!

[ScottW]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 11, 5:06 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
ooglegroups.com...





On Mar 11, 12:48 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

But the political discussions (when they actually involve the
exchange of ideas and information rather than just the ridicule
response of which you seem only capable)
is more interesting to me. The inability of the leftists here
to show any tolerance for differing points of view is disappointing,
but that is the achilles of the left. I don't know if its the maturity
level of the people drawn to the panacea view or what...but they
just can't accept someone refusing to see things their way.
They hate it...literally.

BTW, do not confuse "hate" (a pretty strrong emotion) with amusement.

I reserve the right to mock your viewpoint, no matter how dear it is
to you, in the same way that I reserve the right to mock most anything
that Pat Robertson says (no matter how dear his viewpoint is to him).

Indeed, not all viewpoints are created equal.;-)

Nice confession...

Confession? It's stating the obvious, toopid.

Yes your anointed judgeship...


Unless we should all give the same weight to the ravings of Robertson
as, say, Nelson Mandela.

To put it another way: do the viewpoints of a KKK leader carry the
same weight as Mahatma Gandhi?

Which one am I?


this reveals all the following wonderful
traits of yours.... bigotry, prejudice, arrogance, ignorance....

You forgot intelligence, toopid.

Considered and excluded...intentionally.

But I find it amusing to see you think you're intelligent.


Because this post of yours reveals
that one, overwhelming trait of yours that we all know and love so
well.

The list goes on, but I don't want to rub your nose in it like
a puppy who needs to be house broken.

So in your opinion, all viewpoints are created equal, and deserve
equal weight? LOL!

The extremists argument...not all viewpoints equate to KKK
or Ghandi. You have a significant excluded middle.


When compared to that, or your ridicule responses,
I don't think my posts suck.
Just my opinion, but you set the bar so very low its really hard
not to suck.

So you admit that your posts are pretty low. It's just that there are
some lower. It is my fault that your posts are as low as they are.

In some part...yes. You inspire me and your arrogant childish
tirades certainly don't dissuade.

I've always wondered what intelligence looked like to an imbecile. Now
I know: arrogance. LOL!

Truly intelligent people manage not to appear arrogant.
You fail for obvious reasons.

ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 11, 6:18 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in ooglegroups.com...





On Mar 11, 5:06 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
ooglegroups.com...

On Mar 11, 12:48 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

But the political discussions (when they actually involve the
exchange of ideas and information rather than just the ridicule
response of which you seem only capable)
is more interesting to me. The inability of the leftists here
to show any tolerance for differing points of view is disappointing,
but that is the achilles of the left. I don't know if its the maturity
level of the people drawn to the panacea view or what...but they
just can't accept someone refusing to see things their way.
They hate it...literally.

BTW, do not confuse "hate" (a pretty strrong emotion) with amusement.

I reserve the right to mock your viewpoint, no matter how dear it is
to you, in the same way that I reserve the right to mock most anything
that Pat Robertson says (no matter how dear his viewpoint is to him).

Indeed, not all viewpoints are created equal.;-)

Nice confession...

Confession? It's stating the obvious, toopid.

Yes your anointed judgeship...

Ah. The conservative plight. Education, the media, and everybody not
with us is against us. All those educated people think that they're so
damned smart!

Unless we should all give the same weight to the ravings of Robertson
as, say, Nelson Mandela.

To put it another way: do the viewpoints of a KKK leader carry the
same weight as Mahatma Gandhi?

Which one am I?

You're in the angry white male conservative group, which is far closer
to the KKK than it is to Mahatma Gandhi.

this reveals all the following wonderful
traits of yours.... bigotry, prejudice, arrogance, ignorance....

You forgot intelligence, toopid.

Considered and excluded...intentionally.

But I find it amusing to see you think you're intelligent.

Ah. An intelligence slam from toopid. LOL!

Because this post of yours reveals
that one, overwhelming trait of yours that we all know and love so
well.

The list goes on, but I don't want to rub your nose in it like
a puppy who needs to be house broken.

So in your opinion, all viewpoints are created equal, and deserve
equal weight? LOL!

The extremists argument...not all viewpoints equate to KKK
or Ghandi. You have a significant excluded middle.

cheney is way, way over by the KKK. Most true conservatives seem to be
there with him. Moderates are in the middle, toopid. You are not
moderate.

The right wing, as it stands in the US today, has more in common with
extremist Muslims than with Gandhi.

When compared to that, or your ridicule responses,
I don't think my posts suck.
Just my opinion, but you set the bar so very low its really hard
not to suck.

So you admit that your posts are pretty low. It's just that there are
some lower. It is my fault that your posts are as low as they are.

In some part...yes. You inspire me and your arrogant childish
tirades certainly don't dissuade.

I've always wondered what intelligence looked like to an imbecile. Now
I know: arrogance. LOL!

Truly intelligent people manage not to appear arrogant.
You fail for obvious reasons.

Again toopid gives another belly laugh. LOL!

So you really don't know how stupid you appear. Sad.

[paul packer]

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 10:48:22 -0700, "ScottW"
wrote:


Arny bashing is to me a ridiculous and wholly boring endeavor.
I just don't get it.


I''ll explain it. Arnie always bashes first. End of explanation.

[paul packer]

On 11 Mar 2007 06:42:51 -0700, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

You know haw wrong you are

Is that as in "Haw, haw, haw...."?

[ScottW]

"paul packer" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 10:48:22 -0700, "ScottW"
wrote:


Arny bashing is to me a ridiculous and wholly boring endeavor.
I just don't get it.


I''ll explain it. Arnie always bashes first. End of explanation.

First must have occurred in the previous decade or George is
a first strike offender...you choose.


ScottW

[paul packer]

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:09:30 -0700, "ScottW"
wrote:


"paul packer" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 10:48:22 -0700, "ScottW"
wrote:


Arny bashing is to me a ridiculous and wholly boring endeavor.
I just don't get it.


I''ll explain it. Arnie always bashes first. End of explanation.

First must have occurred in the previous decade or George is
a first strike offender...you choose.

Well, I found some biffo on Google the other day between Arnie and
George, dated nearly ten years ago. So you choose which decade.