[George M. Middius[_2_]]

Well well well... Turns out Wikipedia has a "liberal bias". Too many
articles rely on science, which is, as we all know, the Devil's
playground. Conservatroids needn't worry, though -- now you all have your
very own version of Wikipedia that's pre-filtered and pre-digested for
"conservative only" diets. It's called "Conservapedia". The NYTimes
reports on this new wellspring of Conservative Knowledge:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

According to Wired, the Conservapedia project leader, Andrew Schlafly,
“started the site in late November 2006 in conjunction with 58
high-school-level, home-schooled students from the New Jersey area”
because he was frustrated by what he sees as the liberal bias in
Wikipedia. Shawn Zeller at CQPolitics tells us:

Schlafly says his bias suspicions took firm hold when his own edits to
a Wikipedia entry on the controversy over teaching evolution in Kansas
schools — which simply recorded statements, he says, from advocates of
creationism — were repeatedly removed.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Read all about it he
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/200...d-says-it-all/


It's my supposition that Scottie is perusing the "Conservapedia"
voraciously to learn all that the mainstream, liberal, anti-God media
suppress, and that's why we on RAO haven't been blessed with his presence
lately.





--


Krooscience: the antidote to education, experience, and excellence

[ScottW]

On Mar 8, 11:11 am, George M. Middius
wrote:
, and that's why we on RAO haven't been blessed with his presence
lately.

You're simply not worthy of my presence, dhimmi. You poor saps have
nothing to discuss but your own pathetic efforts at thought control so
here's something for your cud.

How do you think you would do...in a muslim court? Shall we call it
the silver lining should that day ever come?

http://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php...system/0013143

or

http://tinyurl.com/2dotaa


But if you can't get your feeble brain around that....this one is
right up your alley.

http://www.queerty.com/queer/matt-sanchez/

I never knew the left shared the same view of liberals gone
conservative that many Muslims hold of apostates. The hypocrisy
ridiculing Sanchez gay history shows the real depth of their own
shallow convictions. Those gay conservatives....is there a more vile
and despicable creature on the planet?

But I can't leave unmentioned the poor loon from mediamatters who sees
a homophobic conspiracy behind every Fox broadcast. That poor fool
has some serious issues to which I'm sure you can relate.

ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 8, 2:27 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

Did toopid's links say anything? I'll never know... LOL!

I never knew the left shared the same view of liberals gone
conservative that many Muslims hold of apostates. The hypocrisy
ridiculing Sanchez gay history shows the real depth of their own
shallow convictions. Those gay conservatives....is there a more vile
and despicable creature on the planet?

Um, the point was not his gay history, toopid.

No surprise that you missed it though.

But I can't leave unmentioned the poor loon from mediamatters who sees
a homophobic conspiracy behind every Fox broadcast. That poor fool
has some serious issues to which I'm sure you can relate.

Are they similar to your serious issues, toopid?

I listened to conservative talk radio yesterday for the first time in
a few weeks. Here's what I learned:

Clinton lied to a grand jury first, so Libby should win an appeal.
Further, a blow job is worse than a blown cover.

A republican Congressman has been voting with the Dems on some issues.
He is a turncoat. The host attributed his move toward the center to
"pandering" to his district, which has been electing Dems to local
office recently. The host felt that this Congressman should vote
republican no matter what. He was ****ed, and he wasn't going to take
it any more!

Anyone who sells their social security card should not go to trial and
jail. Apparently, a $3 bullet would work better and be less expensive.
Another caller pointed out that you can get bullets far cheaper than
that.

With 'logic' like that, is it any wonder that the morally and
intellectually bankrupt conservative movement is getting their asses
handed to them? LOL!

BTW, toopid, have you been following GEN Petreus? Let's see what he
has to say:

"He said that "any student of history recognizes there is no military
solution to a problem like that in Iraq, to the insurgency in Iraq."

(i.e. But we all know how you feel about history, toopid... It's for
losers, right? After all, there was that one successful
counterinsurgency! LOL!)

"Military force alone is not sufficient to end the violence in
Iraq and political talks must eventually include some militant groups
now opposing the U.S.-backed government, the new commander of U.S.
forces in Iraq said Thursday. "This is critical," Gen. David Petraeus
said in his first news conference since taking over command last
month. He noted that such political negotiations "will determine in
the long run the success of this effort."

(i.e. This will be news to bushie...)

And how do you feel about "supporting the troops" like the injured
ones at Walter Reed?

Imbecile.

[George M. Middius[_2_]]

Witlessmongrel yapped:

dhimmi

At first I thought this was another "interesting" blob of Scottie-speak,
but then I googled it. Wiki says:

The word dhimmi ... literally means 'protection, care, custody,
covenant of protection, compact; responsibility, answerableness;
financial obligation, liability, debt; inviolability, security of life
and property; safeguard, guarantee, security; conscience' and
ahl-dhimmi is "the free non-Muslim subjects living in Muslim countries
who, in return for paying the capital tax, enjoyed protection and
safety

GOK what you're "thinking" about, Scooter.

[snip more anti-Muslim, anti-Gay, and anti-reason ranting]

BTW, your beloved Conthervopedia doesn't know what "dhimmi" means. You
better get your highly educated kid to beef it up right away.




--


Krooscience: the antidote to education, experience, and excellence

[MiNe 109]

In article . com,
"ScottW" wrote:

http://www.queerty.com/queer/matt-sanchez/

Matt Sanchez jokes are so yesterday.

Stephen

[Clyde Slick]

ScottW a scris:
On Mar 8, 11:11 am, George M. Middius
wrote:
, and that's why we on RAO haven't been blessed with his presence
lately.

You're simply not worthy of my presence, dhimmi. You poor saps have
nothing to discuss but your own pathetic efforts at thought control so
here's something for your cud.

How do you think you would do...in a muslim court? Shall we call it
the silver lining should that day ever come?


http://www.queerty.com/queer/matt-sanchez/


ScottW

Goerge would like living under Sharia, he could have four male
husbands.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 8, 2:58 pm, "Clyde Slick" wrote:

Goerge would like living under Sharia, he could have four male
husbands.

And you and toopid could live together and have half a brain.

[John Atkinson]

On Mar 8, 3:52 pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
your beloved Conthervopedia doesn't know what "dhimmi"
means. You better get your highly educated kid to beef it
up right away.

The Conservapedia seems to have deleted its entry on the
Northwestern Arboreal Octopus. But its entry on the
kangaroo -- http://www.conservapedia.com/Kangaroo -- contains
much that I did not know, such as the fact that "after the Flood,
kangaroos bred from the Ark passengers migrated to Australia.
There is debate whether this migration happened over land...or
if they rafted on mats of vegetation torn up by the receding flood
waters."

Who knew?

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[George M. Middius[_2_]]

John Atkinson said:

The Conservapedia seems to have deleted its entry on the
Northwestern Arboreal Octopus. But its entry on the
kangaroo -- http://www.conservapedia.com/Kangaroo -- contains
much that I did not know, such as the fact that "after the Flood,
kangaroos bred from the Ark passengers migrated to Australia.
There is debate whether this migration happened over land...or
if they rafted on mats of vegetation torn up by the receding flood
waters."

Who knew?

You were cheated of this valuable information by the evil science-based
education in which you were indoctrinated. I feel your pain.




--


Krooscience: the antidote to education, experience, and excellence

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 8, 7:41 pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
John Atkinson said:

The Conservapedia seems to have deleted its entry on the
Northwestern Arboreal Octopus. But its entry on the
kangaroo --http://www.conservapedia.com/Kangaroo-- contains
much that I did not know, such as the fact that "after the Flood,
kangaroos bred from the Ark passengers migrated to Australia.
There is debate whether this migration happened over land...or
if they rafted on mats of vegetation torn up by the receding flood
waters."
Who knew?

You were cheated of this valuable information by the evil science-based
education in which you were indoctrinated. I feel your pain.

I'm told that Stephen Hawking is a member of the "rafted on mats of
vegetation torn up by the receding flood
waters" crowd.

That's how the elephants floated to Africa, too. 5,000-year-old
fossilized elephant dung has been found on the ocean floor, proving
this scientific theory to be correct.

[Clyde Slick]

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a scris:

That's how the elephants floated to Africa, too. 5,000-year-old
fossilized elephant dung has been found on the ocean floor, proving
this scientific theory to be correct.

In 5,000 years, maybe they can track Arny's eventual migration to
Sarasota.

[George M. Middius[_2_]]

Shhhh! said:

I'm told that Stephen Hawking is a member of the "rafted on mats of
vegetation torn up by the receding flood waters" crowd.

Good thing he's a scientist, else he might tell us that the ancients had
better wheelchairs than we have today.

That's how the elephants floated to Africa, too. 5,000-year-old
fossilized elephant dung has been found on the ocean floor, proving
this scientific theory to be correct.

You know, it's possible to get carried away with this "proof" thing.
Sometimes a real scientist has to take a beat, step back for a minute,
draw a deep breath, pound a tom-tom, re-examine the evidence, and sign up
for a refresher course in poopology.




--


Krooscience: the antidote to education, experience, and excellence

[George M. Middius[_2_]]

I have a new, improved guess as to why Scottie Terrierdork is lying low.
It's because of the new round of scandals rocking his beloved Republican
regime. There's the indefensible horror show at the Army medical centers,
the conviction of Libby and the coming conflagration when Dumbya pardons
him, the pressure from Congress to tell the truth about Iraq, the ongoing
shame of the disaster in New Orleans, the shameful prostituting of junk
science to serve politics... Even Scottie, dumb as he is, is smart enough
to see how hopeless it is to defend the worst presidency in U.S. history.




--


Krooscience: the antidote to education, experience, and excellence

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 9, 9:21 am, "Clyde Slick" wrote:
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a scris:

That's how the elephants floated to Africa, too. 5,000-year-old
fossilized elephant dung has been found on the ocean floor, proving
this scientific theory to be correct.

In 5,000 years, maybe they can track Arny's eventual migration to
Sarasota.

By his fossilized dung?

[ScottW]

On Mar 9, 7:37 am, George M. Middius
wrote:
I have a new, improved guess .....

but still 100% wrong. Face reality George, you're just
too dumb to figure that out...even when I tell you straight up.

So why do you think Sssshhead broke his vow and followed my link?
Poor boy just can't control himself.

I'm sure the nutroots choke hold on the democratic party has him
praising Allah this day of prayer.

http://opinionjournal.com/columnists.../?id=110009767

ScottW

[George M. Middius[_2_]]

Witlessmongrel has a bone to chew.

I have a new, improved guess as to why Scottie Terrierdork is lying low.
It's because of the new round of scandals rocking his beloved Republican
regime. There's the indefensible horror show at the Army medical centers,
the conviction of Libby and the coming conflagration when Dumbya pardons
him, the pressure from Congress to tell the truth about Iraq, the ongoing
shame of the disaster in New Orleans, the shameful prostituting of junk
science to serve politics... Even Scottie, dumb as he is, is smart enough
to see how hopeless it is to defend the worst presidency in U.S. history.

but still 100% wrong.

Who's the dum-dum on RAO, anyway? ;-)

So why do you think Sssshhead broke his vow[sic] and followed my link?

Boredom would be my guess.

Poor boy just can't control himself.

Didn't you "vow" to stop feeding the Krooborg's need for punishment?
Oopsie!

I'm sure the nutroots[sic] choke[sic] hold on the democratic[sic] party

You still sound like a 3rd-grader, Scooter. Tell us again how you're
responsible for Serious Business Documents at your "job".




--


Krooscience: the antidote to education, experience, and excellence

[ScottW]

On Mar 9, 10:37 am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Witlessmongrel has a bone to chew.

I have a new, improved guess as to why Scottie Terrierdork is lying low.
It's because of the new round of scandals rocking his beloved Republican
regime. There's the indefensible horror show at the Army medical centers,
the conviction of Libby and the coming conflagration when Dumbya pardons
him, the pressure from Congress to tell the truth about Iraq, the ongoing
shame of the disaster in New Orleans, the shameful prostituting of junk
science to serve politics... Even Scottie, dumb as he is, is smart enough
to see how hopeless it is to defend the worst presidency in U.S. history.
but still 100% wrong.

Who's the dum-dum on RAO, anyway? ;-)

So why do you think Sssshhead broke his vow[sic] and followed my link?

Boredom would be my guess.

Poor boy just can't control himself.

Didn't you "vow" to stop feeding the Krooborg's need for punishment?
Oopsie!

I'm sure the nutroots[sic] choke[sic] hold on the democratic[sic] party

You still sound like a 3rd-grader, Scooter.

and this explains why my comments still go over your head?

Here's a bone to fill your pleasure void this weekend
since your economic collapse has put your favorite
entertainment beyond your means.
The Toronto Star thinks the 300 is a
movie right up your alley.

http://www.thestar.com/artsentertainment/article/189962

When was the last time you had a Spartan spanking?

ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 9, 12:28 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

So why do you think Sssshhead broke his vow and followed my link?
Poor boy just can't control himself.

What link of yours did I follow?

I did follow a link from Stephen recently, and one from John Atkinson.
I have not followed any of yours, toopid.

I'm sure the nutroots choke hold on the democratic party has him
praising Allah this day of prayer.

Unlike the nutroots in the conservative movement advocating shooting
people...

BTW, did your link say anything interesting? LOL!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Poor toopid is lonely:

On Mar 9, 1:45 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

When was the last time you had a Spartan spanking?

Why are you offering to spank George? I mean, I don't care, and it's
your business and all, but with all of your anti-gay ranting I'm just
a little surprised.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 9, 12:37 pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Witlessmongrel has a bone to chew.

Witlessmongrel is an imbecile.

So why do you think Sssshhead broke his vow[sic] and followed my link?

Boredom would be my guess.

I'm still trying to figure out what link of his he supposes I
followed.

Do you have any idea?

[ScottW]

On Mar 9, 12:12 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
Poor toopid is lonely:

On Mar 9, 1:45 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

When was the last time you had a Spartan spanking?

Why are you offering to spank George?

Don't be jealous....it's just an inside joke.
You have to follow a link to understand.

I mean, I don't care, and it's
your business and all, but with all of your anti-gay ranting I'm just
a little surprised.

You didn't expect George to be monogamous did you?
Boy...you're really dumb.

ScottW

[George M. Middius[_2_]]

Somebody should give our Special Person a refresher in Conversational
Continuity.

You still sound like a 3rd-grader, Scooter.

and this explains why my comments still go over your head?

Oh no, not again. Last time you said something like that, it turns out you
were beating yourself because you couldn't figure out your kid's homework
assignment. I hope you're not still swimming in shame, Scooter.




--


Krooscience: the antidote to education, experience, and excellence

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 9, 2:37 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
On Mar 9, 12:12 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
Poor toopid is lonely:

On Mar 9, 1:45 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

When was the last time you had a Spartan spanking?

Why are you offering to spank George?

Don't be jealous....it's just an inside joke.
You have to follow a link to understand.

Supposedly I already did, but you won't tell me which one that was.

Probably because you're lying?

I mean, I don't care, and it's
your business and all, but with all of your anti-gay ranting I'm just
a little surprised.

You didn't expect George to be monogamous did you?

A variant of IKYABWAI.

Boy...you're really dumb.

Lame, toopid, lame.

Imbecile.

[George M. Middius[_2_]]

Shhhh! said:

Witlessmongrel has a bone to chew.

Witlessmongrel is an imbecile.

duh-woof!

So why do you think Sssshhead broke his vow[sic] and followed my link?

Boredom would be my guess.

I'm still trying to figure out what link of his he supposes I
followed.
Do you have any idea?

Hmmm.... Apparently dear little Scooter was confused. This is very
Krooger-like of him. Many times has Mr. **** averred that all the Normals
sound indistinguishable to him.




--


Krooscience: the antidote to education, experience, and excellence

[ScottW]

On Mar 9, 1:02 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Mar 9, 2:37 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

On Mar 9, 12:12 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
Poor toopid is lonely:

On Mar 9, 1:45 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

When was the last time you had a Spartan spanking?

Why are you offering to spank George?

Don't be jealous....it's just an inside joke.
You have to follow a link to understand.

Supposedly I already did, but you won't tell me which one that was.

The one you said I had wrong but you didn't read.
You know...the one you knew what it said in spite of not
having read it.

This is like a who dunnit....how could that be?....I know, I know.
George read it to you in the cloak room with a flashlight.

Probably because you're lying?

You can only hope.


I mean, I don't care, and it's
your business and all, but with all of your anti-gay ranting I'm just
a little surprised.

You didn't expect George to be monogamous did you?

A variant of IKYABWAI.

I didn't know you were gay....
But then again...you probably don't know yourself.

ScottW

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 9, 3:38 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
On Mar 9, 1:02 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"





wrote:
On Mar 9, 2:37 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

On Mar 9, 12:12 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
Poor toopid is lonely:

On Mar 9, 1:45 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

When was the last time you had a Spartan spanking?

Why are you offering to spank George?

Don't be jealous....it's just an inside joke.
You have to follow a link to understand.

Supposedly I already did, but you won't tell me which one that was.

The one you said I had wrong but you didn't read.
You know...the one you knew what it said in spite of not
having read it.

Is that like the one where you admitted you were stupid? You know, the
one you said you posted after blowing a donkey.

Actually, I don't know what you are talking about, toopid. How about a
message ID, like you always ask for?

That would be eversohelpful.

TIA.

This is like a who dunnit....how could that be?....I know, I know.
George read it to you in the cloak room with a flashlight.

I still have no idea what the **** you are talkiing about, toopid. Do
you?

Probably because you're lying?

You can only hope.

Let's see the message ID, toopid. Then I can tell if you're only
hallucinating or if you're lying...again.

I mean, I don't care, and it's
your business and all, but with all of your anti-gay ranting I'm just
a little surprised.

You didn't expect George to be monogamous did you?

A variant of IKYABWAI.

I didn't know you were gay....
But then again...you probably don't know yourself.

Duh. Do try to keep up, OK?

Imbecile.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 9, 3:35 pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

Witlessmongrel has a bone to chew.
Witlessmongrel is an imbecile.

duh-woof!

So why do you think Sssshhead broke his vow[sic] and followed my link?
Boredom would be my guess.
I'm still trying to figure out what link of his he supposes I
followed.
Do you have any idea?

Hmmm.... Apparently dear little Scooter was confused. This is very
Krooger-like of him. Many times has Mr. **** averred that all the Normals
sound indistinguishable to him.

Poor little fool is really melting down now.

I think you're right about the reason: all of his 'moral' and
'intellectually-driven' conservatism is tumbling down all around him.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

It appears that a response got lost. If it shows up, sorry for the
redundancy.

On Mar 9, 3:38 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
On Mar 9, 1:02 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Mar 9, 2:37 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

On Mar 9, 12:12 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
Poor toopid is lonely:

On Mar 9, 1:45 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

When was the last time you had a Spartan spanking?

Why are you offering to spank George?

Don't be jealous....it's just an inside joke.
You have to follow a link to understand.

Supposedly I already did, but you won't tell me which one that was.

The one you said I had wrong but you didn't read.
You know...the one you knew what it said in spite of not
having read it.

I'm not sold, toopid, unless that was like the one where you posted
that you were a client of the gay prostitute in Denver, but you
stopped patronizing him, not because it was wrong, but because you
found a better source for your crack habit. You know, the one where
you said you had sex with a camel at the San Diego zoo.

Perhaps you could provide a message ID? That might help your case more
than "You know, that one where you said..."

This is like a who dunnit....how could that be?....I know, I know.
George read it to you in the cloak room with a flashlight.

Or (more likely) it is a figment of your imagination. Or a lie.

Message ID?

Probably because you're lying?

You can only hope.

Hope plus your post equals proof, toopid. Remember that one post where
you said that you liked to lick the spincters of small furry animals?
Or that one where you definitely stated you missed playing quarterback
because it gave you the opportunity to tickle the center's balls?

I mean, I don't care, and it's
your business and all, but with all of your anti-gay ranting I'm just
a little surprised.

You didn't expect George to be monogamous did you?

A variant of IKYABWAI.

I didn't know you were gay....
But then again...you probably don't know yourself.

And once again, firm evidence that toopid cannot understand the world
around him.

Imbecile.