Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been engaged in a debate about the "superiority" of LP over CD
over at headfi.org, I more or less dropped Vinyl in 1984 when a first gen silent 14x4 Marantz CD63 replaced my noisy Rega Planar 3 and havent really listened to vinyl at all since 1998, so I admit a preference for CD upfront. To me the measured stats (SNR/DR/FR/THD/Speed stability) all seem to make the CD case (pun) pretty strong but some contend that LP has some technical advantages and I am interested in how true this is. One topic that came up was that LP (supposedly) has a better transient response than CD. I was somewhat skeptical that this was the case but I am open to be convinced. As I understand it this refers to a finite lag before either system can response to rapidly rising or falling frequencies viz transients. AFAIK a good top flight MC cart will have a transient rise time of about 7 or 8 microseconds while CD is somewhat slower at around 23 microseconds thus LP is theoretically better at dealing with decay and such - does this make any audible difference in practice, both have finite lags I would not have thought that 16 x 10 to the minus 6 seconds would be a perceptible difference, or have I got this all wrong ? How would one go about measuring this in any case ? |