Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
[email protected] hciman77@gmail.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default Transient response of CD vs LP and does it matter ?

I have been engaged in a debate about the "superiority" of LP over CD
over at headfi.org, I more or less dropped Vinyl in 1984 when a first
gen silent 14x4 Marantz CD63 replaced my noisy Rega Planar 3 and havent
really listened to vinyl at all since 1998, so I admit a preference for
CD upfront. To me the measured stats (SNR/DR/FR/THD/Speed stability)
all seem to make the CD case (pun) pretty strong but some contend that
LP has some technical advantages and I am interested in how true this
is.

One topic that came up was that LP (supposedly) has a better transient
response than CD. I was somewhat skeptical that this was the case but I
am open to be convinced. As I understand it this refers to a finite lag
before either system can response to rapidly rising or falling
frequencies viz transients. AFAIK a good top flight MC cart will have a
transient rise time of about 7 or 8 microseconds while CD is somewhat
slower at around 23 microseconds thus LP is theoretically better at
dealing with decay and such - does this make any audible difference in
practice, both have finite lags I would not have thought that 16 x 10
to the minus 6 seconds would be a perceptible difference, or have I got
this all wrong ?

How would one go about measuring this in any case ?

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"