[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

So, toopid, we see you bailing out (as usual) when the going gets tough
for you. How utterly typical.

Where is your logic which supports your certainty that military
attacks, or killing someone, is justified? Those underlying,
non-relative truths that you base these decisions on?

What are the propositions in the argument that support a 'wise
conclusion' for such action?

What assumptions are you operating under?

Or are you prepared to admit that you base your intolerance and
bloodthirst on nothing more 'rational' (a word you use so frequently,
yet which is another of the endless words that you do not
understand...) than emotion? And that I am correct in saying that as a
militray officer you'd be a complete disaster.

In your very own words: Answer the question!