Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A couple of days ago I posed the question below to two newsgroups.
However to date the only replies I have received so far is that I should not "cross-post" to two newsgroups, and what actual price range I was seeking. I truly do not know why I should not be able to address a question to two, or perhaps even more, newsgroups in order to reach a larger number of people who might be able to provide me with suggestions? As far as the price range is concerned, I would like to stay within a top range of $3,000. Thanks again in advance to anyone who might have some recommendations for me. ************************************************** ********* Does anyone perhaps know of a "current" stereo preamp/linestage, solid state or partially tubed, that incorporates the following parameters, but is not in the stratosphere price class:- Balanced (XLR) and Unbalanced (RCA) Inputs Balanced (XLR) and Unbalanced (RCA) Inputs Remote Volume Control Remote BALANCE Control (very important!) If tubed, no more than two tubes Built-in phono stage would be preferred but is not mandatory Not a design where where an additional purchase of a $1,000, or more, separate power supply is recommended to make it really sound "good" Thank you in advance for your consideration and suggestions |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter" reply to newsgroup only wrote in message
Does anyone perhaps know of a "current" stereo preamp/linestage, solid state or partially tubed, that incorporates the following parameters, but is not in the stratosphere price class:- Balanced (XLR) and Unbalanced (RCA) Inputs Balanced (XLR) and Unbalanced (RCA) Inputs Remote Volume Control Remote BALANCE Control (very important!) That's a big deal breaker, all by itself. I agree that this is very important, but it seems like the vendors don't. The biggest potential deal-breaker is the requirement for remote controlled volume and balance. Here are some do-it-yourself solutions: http://www.welbornelabs.com/remote.htm http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_30559/article.html http://www.intervideo.com/jsp/WinDVDRemote_Profile.jsp The rest is easy - any old cheap (or expensive) small console. It's silly, but even my $89 Sherwood Stereo receiver has its own remote, but not my $10k 02R96. Of course I can control the 02R96 with a laptop on a wireless LAN. ;-) |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter reply to newsgroup only wrote:
As far as the price range is concerned, I would like to stay within a top range of $3,000. See, the problem is that you want something with balanced inputs and outputs, which pretty much means you're looking for something in the pro audio market. But you also want a remote control, which pretty much means you are looking for something in the consumer world. Creek makes some home stereo preamps that do what you want, but they will not have balanced inputs so you will need a bump box if you want to deal with long +4 lines. Broadcast Electronics make some router boxes that will do what you want, but they will not have any remote controls. Thanks again in advance to anyone who might have some recommendations for me. I think you're either going to have to change one of your constraints or go custom. A company that makes custom mastering consoles, like Crookwood or Manley, might be willing to make you something like this. It won't be under $3k, I suspect, because of all the labour in making a one-off. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Peter" reply to newsgroup only wrote: A couple of days ago I posed the question below to two newsgroups. However to date the only replies I have received so far is that I should not "cross-post" to two newsgroups, and what actual price range I was seeking. I truly do not know why I should not be able to address a question to two, or perhaps even more, newsgroups in order to reach a larger number of people who might be able to provide me with suggestions? As far as the price range is concerned, I would like to stay within a top range of $3,000. Thanks again in advance to anyone who might have some recommendations for me. ************************************************** ********* Does anyone perhaps know of a "current" stereo preamp/linestage, solid state or partially tubed, that incorporates the following parameters, but is not in the stratosphere price class:- Balanced (XLR) and Unbalanced (RCA) Inputs Balanced (XLR) and Unbalanced (RCA) Inputs Remote Volume Control Remote BALANCE Control (very important!) If tubed, no more than two tubes Built-in phono stage would be preferred but is not mandatory Not a design where where an additional purchase of a $1,000, or more, separate power supply is recommended to make it really sound "good" Thank you in advance for your consideration and suggestions The NAD M3 integrated amp has a balanced XLR input and balance control on the remote for under $3k. Stephen |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bret Ludwig wrote: There is no question but that you have two choices: have one built or DIY. Having one built if you go to the right place is going to be expensive. The wrong vendor will be even more expensive. The right vendor will fully document the product so that it can be fixed by any competent facility. It will look nice. People will be impressed. Unfortunately, it still will be nearly impossible to resell at any significant price. Building it yourself will provide hours of education and recreation you desperately need. Actually, you even more desperately need a good piece of ass, but that's beyond our power here. It probably won't look too impressive and gear snobs will sniff in contempt, and you won't get any money out of it, but you won't put that much into it, so who cares? Your choice. But now that you know, you will quit wasting bandwidth on this. You will. A naive question from technologically handicapped: L.M. How do you reconcile a remote balance control with the upscale, one per channel, volume controls such as stepped Alps or similar? Ludovic Mirabel |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ups.com... A naive question from technologically handicapped: L.M. How do you reconcile a remote balance control with the upscale, one per channel, volume controls such as stepped Alps or similar? Stepping motors. Peace, Paul |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" said:
A naive question from technologically handicapped: L.M. How do you reconcile a remote balance control with the upscale, one per channel, volume controls such as stepped Alps or similar? Think outside the box. Relays for input selection, a ladder attenuator with relays, and a balance control with relays. Simple driver circuits like ULN2803 with built-in snubber diodes. The actual RC can be made from off-the-shelf parts with RC5 code (Philips), the receiver can be a dedicated IC or a PIC with a suitable program. Philips has a special RC5 decoder in the PCF series that outputs i2c to interface with the logic- and driver circuits. I wouldn't use stepper motors. One doesn't have to re-invent the wheel, here's the ready-to-go solution: http://stiftsbogtrykkeriet.dk/~mcs/index.html -- - Ever seen someone with 5.1 ears? So, what does that tell you? - |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter" reply to newsgroup only wrote in message . .. A couple of days ago I posed the question below to two newsgroups. However to date the only replies I have received so far is that I should not "cross-post" to two newsgroups, and what actual price range I was seeking. I truly do not know why I should not be able to address a question to two, or perhaps even more, newsgroups in order to reach a larger number of people who might be able to provide me with suggestions? As far as the price range is concerned, I would like to stay within a top range of $3,000. Thanks again in advance to anyone who might have some recommendations for me. ************************************************** ********* Does anyone perhaps know of a "current" stereo preamp/linestage, solid state or partially tubed, that incorporates the following parameters, but is not in the stratosphere price class:- Balanced (XLR) and Unbalanced (RCA) Inputs Balanced (XLR) and Unbalanced (RCA) Inputs Remote Volume Control Remote BALANCE Control (very important!) If tubed, no more than two tubes Built-in phono stage would be preferred but is not mandatory Not a design where where an additional purchase of a $1,000, or more, separate power supply is recommended to make it really sound "good" Thank you in advance for your consideration and suggestions **Why do you want balanced in and out? Are you running 100Metre cables? Balanced in and out provides no advantages, unless you have problems with noise. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
David Rich | High End Audio | |||
KISS 121 by Andre Jute | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Why Stewart Pinkerton commits character assassination | Vacuum Tubes | |||
KISS Amp Score Card | Vacuum Tubes |