Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Camille Desmots wrote:
Can you give a link of a serious comparaison between the ATRAC3 (file audio format of SONY) and MP3-pro or WMA ? Thanks. I have not run across a listening comparison. I presume you are interested in a comparison at bitrates of about 64 or 128 kbit/s. You may have to perform your own comparison. You can freely download ATRAC3 software for windows (see the following page): http://www.minidisc.org/mdlpfaq.html#_q66 MP3-Pro and WMA encoders are also freely available for download (note that the latest Windows Media Encoder only works on Windows 2000 and later). Also, Microsoft doesn't supply a decoder, but dBPowerAmp works fine for this: http://www.dbpoweramp.com/ You can use this utility to perform comparisons: http://ff123.net/abchr/abchr.html I recommend encoding at least a dozen different samples of music that you like to listen to. You'll have to decode back to WAV to use the ABC/Hr utility. When you finish, you can run the results through this analyzer: http://ff123.net/friedman/stats.html to find out what your preference is for the test suite you constructed (choose Blocked Anova analysis), although you should probably have a pretty good idea of what you prefer without having to run it through a statistical analyzer. Sounds like a lot of work, eh? That's why it's hard to find serious comparisons out on the net. Darryl Miyaguchi |