Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently purchased a Kenwood KR 9600 to upgrade from a 7600 I had
previously purchased from the same shop,as I like vintage equipment. I was impressed with it bit noticed that the loudness switch, even though it has 2 settings, does not boost the bass nearly as much,even on the highest setting, as my 7600 or most other receivers I've listened to.Granted I have small speakers(Infinity RS9's, 6 1/2 inch woofer and small tweeter), but a have to use the loudness #2 setting and turn the bass up to about 4 to get adequate bass whereas with the 7600 loudness plus about 0 to 2 on the bass knob was adequate.I tried a comparison with Grado headphones and the same FM station, and the 7600's loudness definitely has more pronounced boost. I would like to find out if this is likely to be a defect or was it designed that way for some reason. The shop offers 6 months warranty so I'm not too worried, but it's just a hassle to lug it in to them if there's nothing wrong.(weighs about 60 pounds !!) Also, I havent' turned in the 7600 for my trade-up refund yet, but if I do, I will not be able to do the same with the 9600, should I desire to. So I'm kind of on the fence right now as to whether I should take the trade-in refund or treat this as a seperate purchase so I would have the option to trade the 9600 up within 6 months. I hear good things about the Pioneer "Super-receivers" and might consider one of them later. Thanks, Dave Arrabito |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Probably just a lower frequency range of operation of the loudness
compensation. They expect you to have full range or at least more capable loudspeakers to pair with that model. If you had, you would see that feature as an upgrade rather than a defect. As long as you can compensate with the bass contour control, you can at least cope with the situation. The ideal solution would be to upgrade the speakers. For that, you should move on from the megastores and listen to some at specialty audio shops. There you will find what you have been hoping to hear for years. - Bill www.uptownaudio.com Roanoke VA (540) 343-1250 "Fubar1000" wrote in message news:HaBSa.93760$GL4.26070@rwcrnsc53... I recently purchased a Kenwood KR 9600 to upgrade from a 7600 I had previously purchased from the same shop,as I like vintage equipment. I was impressed with it bit noticed that the loudness switch, even though it has 2 settings, does not boost the bass nearly as much,even on the highest setting, as my 7600 or most other receivers I've listened to.Granted I have small speakers(Infinity RS9's, 6 1/2 inch woofer and small tweeter), but a have to use the loudness #2 setting and turn the bass up to about 4 to get adequate bass whereas with the 7600 loudness plus about 0 to 2 on the bass knob was adequate.I tried a comparison with Grado headphones and the same FM station, and the 7600's loudness definitely has more pronounced boost. I would like to find out if this is likely to be a defect or was it designed that way for some reason. The shop offers 6 months warranty so I'm not too worried, but it's just a hassle to lug it in to them if there's nothing wrong.(weighs about 60 pounds !!) Also, I havent' turned in the 7600 for my trade-up refund yet, but if I do, I will not be able to do the same with the 9600, should I desire to. So I'm kind of on the fence right now as to whether I should take the trade-in refund or treat this as a seperate purchase so I would have the option to trade the 9600 up within 6 months. I hear good things about the Pioneer "Super-receivers" and might consider one of them later. Thanks, Dave Arrabito |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:54:45 GMT, "Uptown Audio"
wrote: Probably just a lower frequency range of operation of the loudness compensation. They expect you to have full range or at least more capable loudspeakers to pair with that model. Isn't that odd? I thought the loudness compensation was based on F&M curves describing our *hearing*, not our loudspeakers! Compensating for loudpeakers bad bass extension is a another kettle of fish, entierly, right? Per. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Re your comment:.
Isn't that odd? I thought the loudness compensation was based on F&M curves describing our *hearing*, not our loudspeakers! Compensating for loudpeakers bad bass extension is a another kettle of fish, entierly, right? Per. You are absolutely right, but all the average consumer knows about the loudness button is that if you push it you get more bass, and that's what they use it for. In the 80s I sold speakers kits that had good bass output. Our customers usually bought them as replacements for speakers that had that had weak bass response, and often called back complaining about the horrible boomy bass from their new speakers. Invariably we found that they had the loudness on and the bass all the way up. We asked them to set their controls flat for a week and report back, and we found that the problems disappeared. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Per,
That depends upon which kettle you are interested in observing. I'm not defending their decision to alter the frequency curve, but the curve that goes into the design of these amps does vary from maker to maker and from model to model. There are a lot of factors to consider when implementing that boost and one would be the loudspeaker system attached as that would effect the final output of the system, which is what actually the customer is listening to, not the amplifier itself. So to get any bass boost in a smaller speaker, you would have to shift those frequencies higher to get within it's range of reproduction. For a larger speaker, they can be lower and achieve the same effect. I guess there is also the matter of taste and the maker does not bind itself to that study to do what it feels improves the sound of it's products. I know what you are saying, but people buy what they like, not what you think they should like. So manufacturers may respond to that more so than to any scientific data that might suggest they do otherwise. We all know that they have no control of what speaker system the user will choose or how they will place them, or how they will use the tone controls or even an EQ, so it seems futile to try and hold up any standard and perhaps more sensible to attempt to improve the sound of their gear. You may not approve of the sound of their gear. I'm not rushing out to buy one either, I have just seen it done a lot on various models of amps. - Bill www.uptownaudio.com Roanoke VA (540) 343-1250 "Per Stromgren" wrote in message news:u7FSa.107801$ye4.80649@sccrnsc01... On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:54:45 GMT, "Uptown Audio" wrote: Probably just a lower frequency range of operation of the loudness compensation. They expect you to have full range or at least more capable loudspeakers to pair with that model. Isn't that odd? I thought the loudness compensation was based on F&M curves describing our *hearing*, not our loudspeakers! Compensating for loudpeakers bad bass extension is a another kettle of fish, entierly, right? Per. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Problem with Kenwood KDC-MP625 shutting off | Car Audio | |||
Problem With Alpine Head Unit/Type E Subs (Part 2) | Car Audio | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 1/5) | Car Audio | |||
Electrical noise problem, hard to pin down | Car Audio | |||
Loudness Compensation problem | General |