Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
I thought it would be a good time to invest in a decent all-round condenser microphone. Since the Neumann stuff is out of my price range currently, I've leaned towards the Audio Technica 40xx -series. From what I've heard, many people seem to be happy with them..! Basically I'm considering something like the AT-4033, 4040 or 4050. Which one do you recommend I should try first? The 4040 is very attractively priced, so the first thing that springs to my mind is: what kind of differences are there between the 4040 and 4050? Anyone compared the 4033 to those two? On the AT website there's not much information about these mics' application purposes, and since I'm looking for an all-rounder (well, vocals and acoustic guitar are maybe somewhat prioritized), this makes it difficult to decide. Thanks, as always. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 06:01:44 -0500, Tommi wrote
(in article ) : Hi all, I thought it would be a good time to invest in a decent all-round condenser microphone. Since the Neumann stuff is out of my price range currently, I've leaned towards the Audio Technica 40xx -series. From what I've heard, many people seem to be happy with them..! Basically I'm considering something like the AT-4033, 4040 or 4050. Which one do you recommend I should try first? The 4040 is very attractively priced, so the first thing that springs to my mind is: what kind of differences are there between the 4040 and 4050? Anyone compared the 4033 to those two? On the AT website there's not much information about these mics' application purposes, and since I'm looking for an all-rounder (well, vocals and acoustic guitar are maybe somewhat prioritized), this makes it difficult to decide. Thanks, as always. The 4050 will give you the most flexibility due to its three patterns. I have reviews of it and others on my site. Help yourself. Regards, Ty Ford -- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric stuff are at www.tyford.com |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tommi wrote:
Anyone compared the 4033 to those two? On the AT website there's not much information about these mics' application purposes, and since I'm looking for an all-rounder (well, vocals and acoustic guitar are maybe somewhat prioritized), this makes it difficult to decide. I have not, but I will say the top end on the 4051 is far, far cleaner than the 4033. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hello Tommi. if i were you i would also consider the AT-4047/SV which
is great on vocals and kick drum especially but shines on most every application. they are a steal at $550 USD and you really should hear one before you commit to any certain mic. i like the 4047/SV over any other microphone under $1000 USD. JMHO, of course. cheers J.D. Tommi wrote: Hi all, I thought it would be a good time to invest in a decent all-round condenser microphone. Since the Neumann stuff is out of my price range currently, I've leaned towards the Audio Technica 40xx -series. From what I've heard, many people seem to be happy with them..! Basically I'm considering something like the AT-4033, 4040 or 4050. Which one do you recommend I should try first? The 4040 is very attractively priced, so the first thing that springs to my mind is: what kind of differences are there between the 4040 and 4050? Anyone compared the 4033 to those two? On the AT website there's not much information about these mics' application purposes, and since I'm looking for an all-rounder (well, vocals and acoustic guitar are maybe somewhat prioritized), this makes it difficult to decide. Thanks, as always. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
J.D. Justice wrote:
hello Tommi. if i were you i would also consider the AT-4047/SV which is great on vocals and kick drum especially but shines on most every application. they are a steal at $550 USD and you really should hear one before you commit to any certain mic. i like the 4047/SV over any other microphone under $1000 USD. JMHO, of course. The 4047 is phenomenally peaky on the top end, which might be a thing you will like on vocals. The low end changes a lot as you move off-axis, which can be useful too because moving the vocalist off-axis can get you a wide variety of different sounds. But it's WAY too colored for me to consider it an "all-round" microphone, and the off-axis wackiness makes it impossible to use as an ambient mike. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Take a listen to the 3060 while you're at it. The 4050 is a good all
around microphone that doesn't suck. Tommi wrote: Hi all, I thought it would be a good time to invest in a decent all-round condenser microphone. Since the Neumann stuff is out of my price range currently, I've leaned towards the Audio Technica 40xx -series. From what I've heard, many people seem to be happy with them..! Basically I'm considering something like the AT-4033, 4040 or 4050. Which one do you recommend I should try first? The 4040 is very attractively priced, so the first thing that springs to my mind is: what kind of differences are there between the 4040 and 4050? Anyone compared the 4033 to those two? On the AT website there's not much information about these mics' application purposes, and since I'm looking for an all-rounder (well, vocals and acoustic guitar are maybe somewhat prioritized), this makes it difficult to decide. Thanks, as always. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tommi wrote: Hi all, I thought it would be a good time to invest in a decent all-round condenser microphone. Since the Neumann stuff is out of my price range currently, I've leaned towards the Audio Technica 40xx -series. From what I've heard, many people seem to be happy with them..! Basically I'm considering something like the AT-4033, 4040 or 4050. Which one do you recommend I should try first? The 4040 is very attractively priced, so the first thing that springs to my mind is: what kind of differences are there between the 4040 and 4050? Anyone compared the 4033 to those two? On the AT website there's not much information about these mics' application purposes, and since I'm looking for an all-rounder (well, vocals and acoustic guitar are maybe somewhat prioritized), this makes it difficult to decide. Thanks, as always. The 4050 is the one you want. I have a 4040, which is cardioid only. I have two 4050's for various reasons, such as stereo and m-s recording. They are great microphones. And when you put them through a good tube pre, well, they become something altogether different (not better, necessarily, but very nice indeed). I have used the 4050 on guitar, both electric and acoustic, vocals, both male and female, "Bluegrass" configuration, which is one mic covering multiple instruments (players required to create balance there), and it sounds good on many other applications, too. --Fletch |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been using the Audio Technica AE5400 in my travels, at Ty's
recommendation, and he's right, it's great! I think it's basically a 4040 in a different shaped package, correct me if that's inaccurate, Ty. It looks like a handheld dynamic mic, but is actually condenser with the diaphram and guts of a 4040. Cardioid only, but it does have a pad and roll-off, and sounds great on male & female vox, guitar and uke. And dig this; it's only @US $250! Even for non-travelers, the price difference should make it worth checking out. Cheers, Rick. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:16:21 -0500, rickymix wrote
(in article .com): I've been using the Audio Technica AE5400 in my travels, at Ty's recommendation, and he's right, it's great! I think it's basically a 4040 in a different shaped package, correct me if that's inaccurate, Ty. It looks like a handheld dynamic mic, but is actually condenser with the diaphram and guts of a 4040. Cardioid only, but it does have a pad and roll-off, and sounds great on male & female vox, guitar and uke. And dig this; it's only @US $250! Even for non-travelers, the price difference should make it worth checking out. Cheers, Rick. Hi Rick, They told me it was half of a 4050 capsule. Not as tight as a KMS 105, but you can eat the AE5400 if you use the hi pass filter. The 4050, though, and its three patterns is VERY handy. Put it in omni and cooch it up to an acoustic guitar. Put it in figure of eight in a nice room and do vocals. Put it in cardioid and out it on amps, drum overheads, vocals, pretty much anything. Regards, Ty -- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric stuff are at www.tyford.com |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() rickymix wrote: I've been using the Audio Technica AE5400 in my travels, at Ty's recommendation, and he's right, it's great! I think it's basically a 4040 in a different shaped package, correct me if that's inaccurate, Ty. It looks like a handheld dynamic mic, but is actually condenser with the diaphram and guts of a 4040. Cardioid only, but it does have a pad and roll-off, and sounds great on male & female vox, guitar and uke. And dig this; it's only @US $250! Even for non-travelers, the price difference should make it worth checking out. Cheers, Rick. We use the AE5400 on stage for vocals and they are great. The element is supposed to be from the 4050, though, not the 4040. --Fletch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
It's amazing what you can find when you look. | Audio Opinions | |||
OT Political | Pro Audio |