The Devil said:

On 3 Jul 2004 01:11:19 -0700, (Michael Dennis)
wrote:

I simply dont understand wat the OP was all about,

That's your problem, not mine.

pile of nonsense if you ask me.

I didn't ask you. And since you say you don't know what it was about,
your comment looks rather foolish. Unless of course you're just
looking for a fight.

I'm looking for a fight, mother****er! Here's a hubcap for ya! Oof!

Boon

(Marc Phillips) said:

The Devil said:

On 3 Jul 2004 01:11:19 -0700, (Michael Dennis)
wrote:

I simply dont understand wat the OP was all about,

That's your problem, not mine.

pile of nonsense if you ask me.

I didn't ask you. And since you say you don't know what it was about,
your comment looks rather foolish. Unless of course you're just
looking for a fight.

I'm looking for a fight, mother****er! Here's a hubcap for ya! Oof!

Boon

Proove it mr. Vinylachachache or whatever your name is today.

If iron knees killed LOL ;-(

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy

Sander deWaal wrote:


(Marc Phillips) said:

The Devil said:

On 3 Jul 2004 01:11:19 -0700, (Michael Dennis)
wrote:

I simply dont understand wat the OP was all about,

That's your problem, not mine.

pile of nonsense if you ask me.

I didn't ask you. And since you say you don't know what it was about,
your comment looks rather foolish. Unless of course you're just
looking for a fight.

I'm looking for a fight, mother****er! Here's a hubcap for ya! Oof!

Boon

Proove it mr. Vinylachachache or whatever your name is today.

If iron knees killed LOL ;-(

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy








Thanks for stealing my material, Mr. Sandywall. As if you didn't now how to
spell Iarnii !!!! Been there, done that, LOT's! You tube and vinyl bigots
are filthy legacies left behind by the great technological advances of the
digital revolution. Perfect sound forever !!!! SACD's and DVD-A's are part of
the conspiracy of the record companies and the E.H.E.E. to take money by
selling snake oil!!!

Long live digitalis !!! At least it's useful for something.





Bruce J. Richman

On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 11:56:55 +0100, The Devil wrote:

On 3 Jul 2004 01:11:19 -0700, (Michael Dennis)
wrote:

I simply dont understand wat the OP was all about,

That's your problem, not mine.

pile of nonsense if you ask me.

I didn't ask you. And since you say you don't know what it was about,
your comment looks rather foolish. Unless of course you're just
looking for a fight.

--
td

Most likely he just wants to take you for a walk on a lead and stuff
like that. Yeah, that would be it, pal.

John's dad say: "J B post like man who sneeze while eating Cornflakes"

On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 18:32:23 +0100, The Devil wrote:

On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 16:52:03 GMT, ow
(Goofball_star_dot_etal) wrote:

Most likely he just wants to take you for a walk on a lead and stuff
like that.

I don't play doggie dominatrix.

You are lucky to have the choice, pal. Uncle Sam does whatever it
wants.

Yeah, that would be it, pal.

You seem to be on the edge of your collective seat, pal.

One is made scintillate by the fecal poetry of domestic politc policy
political politickers.


I am a
wrecking ball, and I will be coming all over you and your kind, caving
you in, pulling your legs off from below, besides which I have emerged
out from inside, with powerful lasers, two years henceforth, he said
spitefully, crashing his fist upon the air in a terrifying wrath which
made the ship's captain, Mary, jumpingly fall over to her knees in
fear.

Yes, ok then.

--
td

Are you Irish yet? Nobody waved as we hurtled down from Howth
(Hoe-t-th, note) although I had willies sensing your aura near-by.

My computer is ill. You may not hear from me again. . .

ow (Goofball_star_dot_etal) said:

My computer is ill. You may not hear from me again. . .

Shove an aspirin down the USB port and modem 911 in the morning, note.

On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 21:54:04 +0100, The Devil wrote:

On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 20:37:19 GMT, ow
(Goofball_star_dot_etal) wrote:

You are lucky to have the choice, pal. Uncle Sam does whatever it
wants.

Good point, Mr Goofball.

One is made scintillate by the fecal poetry of domestic politc policy
political politickers.

Another good point, Mr Goofball.

Are you Irish yet? Nobody waved as we hurtled down from Howth
(Hoe-t-th, note) although I had willies sensing your aura near-by.

Not Irish yet. Life keeps getting in the way. The She wants to buy a
house in LA.

Much the same NOT! Mr Drivel!
I may have to kill her and make a rose garden, you will
note.


I would.

You were probably feeling my tweako freako rays from afar, I will
note. I recently made a pair of all-tube power amps from snake oil
capacitors, snake oil resistors, snake oil tube and choke power
supplies, and snake oil stainless steel, hex-head screws. I have now
fallen out with my transistor amplifiers and in love with KT90
bottles. This shift in my audio energy state has produced x-ray-like
tweako flooby dust ripples across the eleven-dimensional audio
continuum, you will note.


No that was not it. There must be a bit of chicken**** in me.
http://www.wareing.dircon.co.uk/images/Wicklow.jpg

My computer is ill. You may not hear from me again. . .

I hope that is not so. What has happened to it?


Dreaded blue screen crashes all the time but I bought a HP tablet PC
and also a PDA HP4150 for navigation with a bluetooth GPS. I am in
love with that, you will note. I use those instead but not for
Usenet, note. Anyone know of a newsreader for a PDA (windows)?

On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 23:34:45 +0200, Keith Unterscheid
wrote:

(Goofball_star_dot_etal) said:

My computer is ill. You may not hear from me again. . .

Shove an aspirin down the USB port and modem 911 in the morning, note.

I'm moe of a sledgehammer person, note.

Sander said:

(Marc Phillips) said:

The Devil said:

On 3 Jul 2004 01:11:19 -0700, (Michael Dennis)
wrote:

I simply dont understand wat the OP was all about,

That's your problem, not mine.

pile of nonsense if you ask me.

I didn't ask you. And since you say you don't know what it was about,
your comment looks rather foolish. Unless of course you're just
looking for a fight.

I'm looking for a fight, mother****er! Here's a hubcap for ya! Oof!

Boon

Proove it mr. Vinylachachache or whatever your name is today.

If iron knees killed LOL ;-(

Thanks for admitting Sanders that you can't decide if you're an attorney or
from Holland.

Boon

The Devil said:

On 03 Jul 2004 16:22:48 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

I'm looking for a fight, mother****er! Here's a hubcap for ya! Oof!

You missed, in your usual roller-skating-spastic-on-a-treadmill way. I
fart a cloud of toilets in your general direction.

Silly Englishman. Flying toilets cannot possibly penetrate the layer of smog.
Hubcaps, with their aerodynamic superiority, cut right through.

Everybody's an amateur, I swear.

Boon

The Devil said:

On 3 Jul 2004 16:49:14 -0700, (Michael Dennis)
wrote:

Its not about looking for a fight . Itys about askinbg what is thge
point of writing a load of uninteligible nonsense???

The Queen's English, you say?


He's trying to be cute. No one's that big of a spaz.

Say, that reminds me. I hear Western Europe is a bit warm these days. Think
Lionel died?

Boon

Say, that reminds me. I hear Western Europe is a bit warm these days. Think
Lionel died?

Still happy to live in a desert Boon-boon ?
It reminds me that some Americans have also problem with excessive
temperature : ;-)
http://zenaa.com/cgi-bin/wtc.cgi?pic=10&lang=en

ow (Goofball_star_dot_etal) said:

On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 23:34:45 +0200, Keith Unterscheid
wrote:

(Goofball_star_dot_etal) said:

My computer is ill. You may not hear from me again. . .

Shove an aspirin down the USB port and modem 911 in the morning, note.

I'm moe of a sledgehammer person, note.

Thanks mr. Gofbull for, admitting you don;t now a ohm for a volt, LOL!

If irony killed, Id' be the unsung hero off the web, MucH !

;-(

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy

(Michael Dennis) said:

uncomprehensible yapping

Don't mess with the Devil, sonny.
He's out there in subspace lusting after you.
After he's done with Seven of Nine, you will note.

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy

The Devil said:

On 4 Jul 2004 01:41:53 -0700, (Michael Dennis)
wrote:

I simply ask what ALL this nonsensical uninteligible rubbish means?
WHATS THIS ABOUT BALD EAGLES AND BASEBALL HATS?????

Vwat arst yine spaken abeut? Rameval blet clackerhinter yam hyde
stinkerklinker unt papeldripper Vaselslicker phallukpleaser.

Just trozzle the nutgerators, advilve the drongle, and warth the
catugratory spulpasms for druefing offly.
Any time you want to grutz yer flarbrims aloog, evirt me and I'll slub
da snark to you. Skerg abrop!

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy

(Michael Dennis) said:

The Devil wrote in message news:3kqde0lpgfp6qliie4rg9lkfgd6qbo81t5@rdmzrnews txt.nz...
On 03 Jul 2004 16:22:48 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

I'm looking for a fight, mother****er! Here's a hubcap for ya! Oof!

You missed, in your usual roller-skating-spastic-on-a-treadmill way. I
fart a cloud of toilets in your general direction.

Its not about looking for a fight . Itys about askinbg what is thge
point of writing a load of uninteligible nonsense???

To quote something that shall remain unnamed:
"If irony killed......."

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy

(Marc Phillips) said:

Sander said:

(Marc Phillips) said:

The Devil said:

On 3 Jul 2004 01:11:19 -0700, (Michael Dennis)
wrote:

I simply dont understand wat the OP was all about,

That's your problem, not mine.

pile of nonsense if you ask me.

I didn't ask you. And since you say you don't know what it was about,
your comment looks rather foolish. Unless of course you're just
looking for a fight.

I'm looking for a fight, mother****er! Here's a hubcap for ya! Oof!

Boon

Proove it mr. Vinylachachache or whatever your name is today.

If iron knees killed LOL ;-(

Thanks for admitting Sanders that you can't decide if you're an attorney or
from Holland.

Boon

Denial isn't just a river etc., note.

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy

----------
The Artist wrote...

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" emitted :

Dreaded blue screen crashes all the time but I bought a HP tablet PC
and also a PDA HP4150 for navigation with a bluetooth GPS. I am in
love with that, you will note. I use those instead but not for
Usenet, note. Anyone know of a newsreader for a PDA (windows)?

http://www.newsreaders.com/others/clients.html

# InkSpot CE by DejaVu Software
# NewsForce by Ruksun (support this site!) * NewsForce tutorial
# PPCNewz by The Byte Foundry "is a freeware offline newsreader for
the PocketPC. It uses PCNewz (included in the download) to download
messages to the PC, which are then synchronized with the PocketPC,
either then or later (when the PocketPC is placed in the cradle)."
# Pocket PC NNTP Newsreader appears to be in development.
# Qusnetsoft NewsReader allows for multiple nntp servers.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

Thanks!
Testing...one,one,one

The Devil said:

Just trozzle the nutgerators, advilve the drongle, and warth the
catugratory spulpasms for druefing offly.
Any time you want to grutz yer flarbrims aloog, evirt me and I'll slub
da snark to you. Skerg abrop!

Hy men.

It finally got broken? Virgins galore!

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy

The Devil said:

On 04 Jul 2004 02:08:39 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

Say, that reminds me. I hear Western Europe is a bit warm these days.
Think
Lionel died?

What bit of him hasn't yet?

His typing finger seems to persevere without the rest of his faculties.

Boon

The Devil said:

On 04 Jul 2004 02:02:00 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

Bull****. YOU want to move to Los Angeles

I don't. Really, really I don't.

because you'd be closer to ME.

Oh yes. I do.

It's all about me. When will you learn?

Until you get Quads, I'm only interested in your burger war stories.

Big, serious Audio Question: can a 20wpc tube amp drive a pair of Quads?

Boon

Sander said:

(Marc Phillips) said:

Sander said:

(Marc Phillips) said:

The Devil said:

On 3 Jul 2004 01:11:19 -0700, (Michael Dennis)
wrote:

I simply dont understand wat the OP was all about,

That's your problem, not mine.

pile of nonsense if you ask me.

I didn't ask you. And since you say you don't know what it was about,
your comment looks rather foolish. Unless of course you're just
looking for a fight.

I'm looking for a fight, mother****er! Here's a hubcap for ya! Oof!

Boon

Proove it mr. Vinylachachache or whatever your name is today.

If iron knees killed LOL ;-(

Thanks for admitting Sanders that you can't decide if you're an attorney or
from Holland.

Boon

Denial isn't just a river etc., note.

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy







(Marc Phillips) said:

Sander said:

(Marc Phillips) said:

The Devil said:

On 3 Jul 2004 01:11:19 -0700, (Michael Dennis)
wrote:

I simply dont understand wat the OP was all about,

That's your problem, not mine.

pile of nonsense if you ask me.

I didn't ask you. And since you say you don't know what it was about,
your comment looks rather foolish. Unless of course you're just
looking for a fight.

I'm looking for a fight, mother****er! Here's a hubcap for ya! Oof!

Boon

Proove it mr. Vinylachachache or whatever your name is today.

If iron knees killed LOL ;-(

Thanks for admitting Sanders that you can't decide if you're an attorney or
from Holland.

Boon

Denial isn't just a river etc., note.

Been there done that, Mr. Sanderton. Just last week I rafted down the Nile
before climbing up Mount Sinai and I'm in pretty good shape for a man as young
as I am. All that and I was back posting on RAO by five in the morning the
next day.

Boon

The Devil said:

On 04 Jul 2004 02:06:40 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

Silly Englishman. Flying toilets cannot possibly penetrate the layer of
smog.
Hubcaps, with their aerodynamic superiority, cut right through.

My toilets, like my head, have wings. They also have spinning
pinwheels for eyes. Duel me and your ****ed-up Magic Roundabout
nightmares will seem real.

Yeah, real dumb. Even with wings, toilets will still crash to the ground
somewhere around Riverside.


Everybody's an amateur, I swear.

Terror speaking.

Oh, you want to be a fancy man, but you're nothing but a nancy boy.

Hah!

Boon

Mr. Middius said:

Marc Phillips said:

Until you get Quads, I'm only interested in your burger war stories.

Big, serious Audio Question: can a 20wpc tube amp drive a pair of Quads?

Five-speed or auto?

I can change on the fly!

Boon

In article ,
(Marc Phillips) wrote:

The Devil said:

On 04 Jul 2004 02:02:00 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

Bull****. YOU want to move to Los Angeles

I don't. Really, really I don't.

because you'd be closer to ME.

Oh yes. I do.

It's all about me. When will you learn?

Until you get Quads, I'm only interested in your burger war stories.

Big, serious Audio Question: can a 20wpc tube amp drive a pair of Quads?

I'm doing okay with 40 watts of solid state, so, maybe.

Stephen

MINe 109 said:

Big, serious Audio Question: can a 20wpc tube amp drive a pair of Quads?

Which Quads?
The original ESL ( 57 ) might do OK, I doubt if the 989 would come to
life with your (Scott or Fischer?) amp.
Also, remember that the 15 watts Quad II amps used heavy feedback
around the output transformer (cathode windings) , thereby being able
to deliver some current.
Your average UL or pentode tube amp could get in trouble.

I'm doing okay with 40 watts of solid state, so, maybe.

The 40 watts figure in itself is quite meaningless unless the amp is
able to maintain the same voltage in lower phase-shifting impedances.
My PP KT88-in-triode amps are able to create a very nice sound quality
in my Magnepans, but my hybrid MOSFET amp goes beyond that in terms of
subjective loudness and bass extension (punch).
I *know* that Maggies aren't Quads, but in my opinion Quads are a bit
harder to drive with mere UL or pentode amps.
Maybe PPP KT88 or KT90 in triode is the way to go, that would give you
about 40 watts and enough damping to control the lower end.

Maybe mr. Devil could enlighten us on what kind/configuration of
amplifiers he uses?

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy

Devil said:

On 04 Jul 2004 16:46:56 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

Big, serious Audio Question: can a 20wpc tube amp drive a pair of Quads?

Which one? I made a pair of 40 watt monoblocs to drive the 989s at my
office. KT88s sound stunning in my amps but lack bass extension and
dynamic impact at loud output levels. I replaced them with KT90s, same
cathode bias resistor (the bias current actually measured exactly the
same as the KT88s!), and now I'm back in familiar volume output
territory--that is to say, louder than I can stand, the way it used to
be with solid state and 63s at my office. My valve amps (called
'TittyTats', note) replaced a 200 watt per side Rotel RB-1080 and / or
Chord SPM1200C (both used at various times). The 989s now play
substantially louder, don't cut out, and sound much better than I've
ever heard them play anywhere else.

I don't think weedy or pretty 'valve-sounding' valves will do the job.
I've avoided using valve amps with Quads until now. I like big dynamic
swings, and little valves don't seem capable of doing that with Quads.

We're talking about a Scott LK-48 using 7189 tubes, which are close to EL-84s.

Boon

The Devil said:

On 04 Jul 2004 16:52:10 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:


My toilets, like my head, have wings. They also have spinning
pinwheels for eyes. Duel me and your ****ed-up Magic Roundabout
nightmares will seem real.

Yeah, real dumb. Even with wings, toilets will still crash to the ground
somewhere around Riverside.

As well as wings, my toilets have pulsing umbrella propulsion systems.
They look like jellyfish. You don't stand a chance.

I've heard of those. Highly unreliable. Go for it.


Oh, you want to be a fancy man, but you're nothing but a nancy boy.

You weren't saying that when you wanted me to duel you with my
testicles.

Please supply a Google reference stating that I wanted you to duel me with your
testicles. I bet you'll slink off into the woodwork as usual.

Boon

Mr. Middius said:



Marc Phillips said:

Until you get Quads, I'm only interested in your burger war stories.

Big, serious Audio Question: can a 20wpc tube amp drive a pair of
Quads?

Five-speed or auto?

I can change on the fly!


Its like you couldn't, change if the fly fits, LOt"S Mr. Pilhips. Proove
Mr. Pholop's if you, think I don't have as many watt's under the law
when you try to sue me. LOL! I love it when, the prooven liars start
lying about there audio system's. ROFLAMATO!

Perhaps, half-man, you are waiting for accoutrement. Tell us about the
firsting time you spent under the watching eye of RAO, then maybe we can answer
my question, mOrOn? :-)

Boon

The Devil said:

Maybe mr. Devil could enlighten us on what kind/configuration of
amplifiers he uses?

One pair of KT90s, 460 volts anode and 80mA bias, ultra-linear, 12dB
loop feedback, no cathode feedback. Driver is a pretty straightforward
affair (I'm keeping the tube secret though, cos it's special!) :-).

Don't tell me it's the ECF82/6AN8 phase splitter :-)
Your primary Ra-a would be about 5 k then?
If so, try the lowest secondary impedance taps you can find.
Your ears will thank you!

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy

The Devil said:

On 05 Jul 2004 05:23:13 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

We're talking about a Scott LK-48 using 7189 tubes, which are close to
EL-84s.

Hmmm. Well, many folks drive 63s and 988s with SETs. At the risk of
stating the obvious, I suggest you bring in some Quads and try your
amp with them, see if you like the results. I can't find a schematic
for the LK-48 to see how the output is configured (still looking). The
output transformers have a nice stack of lams, which is a promising
sign. Lemme know what you try.

I shall. Unless, of course, I choose to torture you by keeping mum. Perhaps
I've already owned a pair of 988s for years now, and I have them hooked up to
the Scott as we speak, and I'm testing you. Yes, Devil, that's it! I KNOW if
they work or not...but do you know? Hah! Take that! And that! You're flying
toilets mean nothing to me!

Boon

Mr. Middius said:

Marc Phillips said:

Five-speed or auto?

I can change on the fly!


Its like you couldn't, change if the fly fits, LOt"S Mr. Pilhips. Proove
Mr. Pholop's if you, think I don't have as many watt's under the law
when you try to sue me. LOL! I love it when, the prooven liars start
lying about there audio system's. ROFLAMATO!

Perhaps, half-man, you are waiting for accoutrement. Tell us about the
firsting time you spent under the watching eye of RAO, then maybe we can
answer
my question, mOrOn? :-)


Ah, ah, ah ! Choo ! You are using to demonstrate your loserness. Do you
pretending to know where my wife's clitoris is propounded ? LOL
Boon-Boon ! You have tell us when you are getting increased salaire,
no ? Perhaps in twenty-four years you will be able to afford some
French wines to pour on your table. In the mean-while, I am having good
chance when you stoloporate with so grand frequency. Good night little
Boon-Boon !

Ah, not so fasting half-man! Do you know the mean of the word enstoplement?
It fits you so perfect! ;-)

Perhaps you could looking it up in dictionnaire and finally know what I am
talking. Are you up to the challenge, half-man? :-)

Boon

The Devil wrote:


On 05 Jul 2004 17:55:25 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

I shall. Unless, of course, I choose to torture you by keeping mum.
Perhaps
I've already owned a pair of 988s for years now, and I have them hooked up
to
the Scott as we speak, and I'm testing you. Yes, Devil, that's it! I KNOW
if
they work or not...but do you know? Hah! Take that! And that! You're
flying
toilets mean nothing to me!

My amps, like my flying umbrella toilets with wings, are superior in
every way to the **** you have in your system. Your amps are crap and
couldn't drive a pair of crystal headphones without the transformer
windings popping apart and catching fire. Your amps homosexually
oscillate at a feminine 3K when they are in the company of fat, bald
men. Your turntable plays records backwards, your house is a
laundromat, you weave baskets in your spare time, wear flowery dresses
and sandals and 'Oh, poo!' with your neighbours about the weather, and
your hair is a pile of turds with bows in it.

--
td








As my esteemed contribution to this veritable cornucopia of Evil High End
Establishment falderol, let me add the following to this mortifying display of
tube bigotry - LOT'S!!!

For many years, I used to drive a pair of Quad ESL-57's with a vintage toobed
Fishe 400 receiver - 25 watts/channel - 4 7868 Pentodes. Plenty of volume and
good dynamics. Actually, there was even enough power to drive these in
combination with an M&K subwoofer specially designed to be used with original
Quads (called "The Bottom End"), where the Fisher provided the power for the
M&K as well ( run through a passive crossover matrix). Don't know how well the
Fisher would have done with 63's or 988's, however.

Been there, done that. Asked and answered.

If iron knees killed (trademarked creative expression).



Bruce J. Richman

Mr. Phillips wrote:


Mr. Middius said:

Marc Phillips said:

Five-speed or auto?

I can change on the fly!


Its like you couldn't, change if the fly fits, LOt"S Mr. Pilhips. Proove
Mr. Pholop's if you, think I don't have as many watt's under the law
when you try to sue me. LOL! I love it when, the prooven liars start
lying about there audio system's. ROFLAMATO!

Perhaps, half-man, you are waiting for accoutrement. Tell us about the
firsting time you spent under the watching eye of RAO, then maybe we can
answer
my question, mOrOn? :-)


Ah, ah, ah ! Choo ! You are using to demonstrate your loserness. Do you
pretending to know where my wife's clitoris is propounded ? LOL
Boon-Boon ! You have tell us when you are getting increased salaire,
no ? Perhaps in twenty-four years you will be able to afford some
French wines to pour on your table. In the mean-while, I am having good
chance when you stoloporate with so grand frequency. Good night little
Boon-Boon !

Ah, not so fasting half-man! Do you know the mean of the word enstoplement?
It fits you so perfect! ;-)

Perhaps you could looking it up in dictionnaire and finally know what I am
talking. Are you up to the challenge, half-man? :-)

Boon








Plasir! This exchangement remembers me of the writings of nationalistic
Americans Laurel & Hardy1 They were also comedies, wasn't they?






Bruce J. Richman

Dr. Richman said:

Mr. Phillips wrote:


Mr. Middius said:

Marc Phillips said:

Five-speed or auto?

I can change on the fly!


Its like you couldn't, change if the fly fits, LOt"S Mr. Pilhips. Proove
Mr. Pholop's if you, think I don't have as many watt's under the law
when you try to sue me. LOL! I love it when, the prooven liars start
lying about there audio system's. ROFLAMATO!

Perhaps, half-man, you are waiting for accoutrement. Tell us about the
firsting time you spent under the watching eye of RAO, then maybe we can
answer
my question, mOrOn? :-)


Ah, ah, ah ! Choo ! You are using to demonstrate your loserness. Do you
pretending to know where my wife's clitoris is propounded ? LOL
Boon-Boon ! You have tell us when you are getting increased salaire,
no ? Perhaps in twenty-four years you will be able to afford some
French wines to pour on your table. In the mean-while, I am having good
chance when you stoloporate with so grand frequency. Good night little
Boon-Boon !

Ah, not so fasting half-man! Do you know the mean of the word enstoplement?

It fits you so perfect! ;-)

Perhaps you could looking it up in dictionnaire and finally know what I am
talking. Are you up to the challenge, half-man? :-)

Boon








Plasir! This exchangement remembers me of the writings of nationalistic
Americans Laurel & Hardy1 They were also comedies, wasn't they?



Ah yes, Doctor, as if you could perform this particluar diagnoses for me and I
would appreciate! Laurel and Hardy are le merde, because it is encoutrement to
the discussion here! You are acting like Mssr. Beavior here! ;-)

Boon

The Devil said:

On 05 Jul 2004 17:55:25 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

I shall. Unless, of course, I choose to torture you by keeping mum.
Perhaps
I've already owned a pair of 988s for years now, and I have them hooked up
to
the Scott as we speak, and I'm testing you. Yes, Devil, that's it! I KNOW
if
they work or not...but do you know? Hah! Take that! And that! You're
flying
toilets mean nothing to me!

My amps, like my flying umbrella toilets with wings, are superior in
every way to the **** you have in your system. Your amps are crap and
couldn't drive a pair of crystal headphones without the transformer
windings popping apart and catching fire. Your amps homosexually
oscillate at a feminine 3K when they are in the company of fat, bald
men. Your turntable plays records backwards, your house is a
laundromat, you weave baskets in your spare time, wear flowery dresses
and sandals and 'Oh, poo!' with your neighbours about the weather, and
your hair is a pile of turds with bows in it.

dCS? Quad? SME? It's all crap. Crap that belongs in your precious winged
(pronounced wing-ED, not wing'd, you flowery ponce) toilets, flying through the
ozone, and missing their targets by hundreds of miles. I am not impressed.
Remember, I have the exact tonearm as you. I am almost as oscillatory as you.
If I got the Quads, then it would be too feminine. So stick that in your Ring
DAC and spin.

Boon

Dr. Richman said:

The Devil wrote:


On 05 Jul 2004 17:55:25 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

I shall. Unless, of course, I choose to torture you by keeping mum.
Perhaps
I've already owned a pair of 988s for years now, and I have them hooked up
to
the Scott as we speak, and I'm testing you. Yes, Devil, that's it! I KNOW
if
they work or not...but do you know? Hah! Take that! And that! You're
flying
toilets mean nothing to me!

My amps, like my flying umbrella toilets with wings, are superior in
every way to the **** you have in your system. Your amps are crap and
couldn't drive a pair of crystal headphones without the transformer
windings popping apart and catching fire. Your amps homosexually
oscillate at a feminine 3K when they are in the company of fat, bald
men. Your turntable plays records backwards, your house is a
laundromat, you weave baskets in your spare time, wear flowery dresses
and sandals and 'Oh, poo!' with your neighbours about the weather, and
your hair is a pile of turds with bows in it.

--
td








As my esteemed contribution to this veritable cornucopia of Evil High End
Establishment falderol, let me add the following to this mortifying display
of
tube bigotry - LOT'S!!!

For many years, I used to drive a pair of Quad ESL-57's with a vintage toobed
Fishe 400 receiver - 25 watts/channel - 4 7868 Pentodes. Plenty of volume
and
good dynamics. Actually, there was even enough power to drive these in
combination with an M&K subwoofer specially designed to be used with original
Quads (called "The Bottom End"), where the Fisher provided the power for the
M&K as well ( run through a passive crossover matrix). Don't know how well
the
Fisher would have done with 63's or 988's, however.

Been there, done that. Asked and answered.

If iron knees killed (trademarked creative expression).

A lot of people run Quads with 25-30 wpc, both SS and tubes, so I really wonder
if 20 is going to make or break it. Like the Devil said, I should borrow
another pair of 63s and see how it sounds. I think 988s are 87 or 88 dB
sensitive, so I think that's right on the border. My Spendor SP100s are 90 dB
sensitive and it's a perfect match, but the impedance stays fairly constant at
8 ohms. I think the Quads dip below 4 here and there.

Boon

Mr. Phillips wrote:


Dr. Richman said:

The Devil wrote:


On 05 Jul 2004 17:55:25 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

I shall. Unless, of course, I choose to torture you by keeping mum.
Perhaps
I've already owned a pair of 988s for years now, and I have them hooked up
to
the Scott as we speak, and I'm testing you. Yes, Devil, that's it! I
KNOW
if
they work or not...but do you know? Hah! Take that! And that! You're
flying
toilets mean nothing to me!

My amps, like my flying umbrella toilets with wings, are superior in
every way to the **** you have in your system. Your amps are crap and
couldn't drive a pair of crystal headphones without the transformer
windings popping apart and catching fire. Your amps homosexually
oscillate at a feminine 3K when they are in the company of fat, bald
men. Your turntable plays records backwards, your house is a
laundromat, you weave baskets in your spare time, wear flowery dresses
and sandals and 'Oh, poo!' with your neighbours about the weather, and
your hair is a pile of turds with bows in it.

--
td








As my esteemed contribution to this veritable cornucopia of Evil High End
Establishment falderol, let me add the following to this mortifying display
of
tube bigotry - LOT'S!!!

For many years, I used to drive a pair of Quad ESL-57's with a vintage
toobed
Fishe 400 receiver - 25 watts/channel - 4 7868 Pentodes. Plenty of volume
and
good dynamics. Actually, there was even enough power to drive these in
combination with an M&K subwoofer specially designed to be used with
original
Quads (called "The Bottom End"), where the Fisher provided the power for the
M&K as well ( run through a passive crossover matrix). Don't know how well
the
Fisher would have done with 63's or 988's, however.

Been there, done that. Asked and answered.

If iron knees killed (trademarked creative expression).

A lot of people run Quads with 25-30 wpc, both SS and tubes, so I really
wonder
if 20 is going to make or break it. Like the Devil said, I should borrow
another pair of 63s and see how it sounds. I think 988s are 87 or 88 dB
sensitive, so I think that's right on the border. My Spendor SP100s are 90
dB
sensitive and it's a perfect match, but the impedance stays fairly constant
at
8 ohms. I think the Quads dip below 4 here and there.

Boon








If I recall correctly, the Fisher had 4, 8 and 16 ohm taps. Somebody suggested
I try feeding the Quads off of the 16 ohm taps because of their impedance
variations. I tried it and it worked out very well.



Bruce J. Richman

Dr. Richman said:

Mr. Phillips wrote:


Dr. Richman said:

The Devil wrote:


On 05 Jul 2004 17:55:25 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
wrote:

I shall. Unless, of course, I choose to torture you by keeping mum.
Perhaps
I've already owned a pair of 988s for years now, and I have them hooked
up
to
the Scott as we speak, and I'm testing you. Yes, Devil, that's it! I
KNOW
if
they work or not...but do you know? Hah! Take that! And that! You're
flying
toilets mean nothing to me!

My amps, like my flying umbrella toilets with wings, are superior in
every way to the **** you have in your system. Your amps are crap and
couldn't drive a pair of crystal headphones without the transformer
windings popping apart and catching fire. Your amps homosexually
oscillate at a feminine 3K when they are in the company of fat, bald
men. Your turntable plays records backwards, your house is a
laundromat, you weave baskets in your spare time, wear flowery dresses
and sandals and 'Oh, poo!' with your neighbours about the weather, and
your hair is a pile of turds with bows in it.

--
td








As my esteemed contribution to this veritable cornucopia of Evil High End
Establishment falderol, let me add the following to this mortifying display
of
tube bigotry - LOT'S!!!

For many years, I used to drive a pair of Quad ESL-57's with a vintage
toobed
Fishe 400 receiver - 25 watts/channel - 4 7868 Pentodes. Plenty of volume
and
good dynamics. Actually, there was even enough power to drive these in
combination with an M&K subwoofer specially designed to be used with
original
Quads (called "The Bottom End"), where the Fisher provided the power for
the
M&K as well ( run through a passive crossover matrix). Don't know how well
the
Fisher would have done with 63's or 988's, however.

Been there, done that. Asked and answered.

If iron knees killed (trademarked creative expression).

A lot of people run Quads with 25-30 wpc, both SS and tubes, so I really
wonder
if 20 is going to make or break it. Like the Devil said, I should borrow
another pair of 63s and see how it sounds. I think 988s are 87 or 88 dB
sensitive, so I think that's right on the border. My Spendor SP100s are 90
dB
sensitive and it's a perfect match, but the impedance stays fairly constant
at
8 ohms. I think the Quads dip below 4 here and there.

Boon








If I recall correctly, the Fisher had 4, 8 and 16 ohm taps. Somebody
suggested
I try feeding the Quads off of the 16 ohm taps because of their impedance
variations. I tried it and it worked out very well.

Good idea. The Scott has 4, 8 and 16 ohm taps as well.

Boon

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Mr. Phillips wrote:



Mr. Middius said:


Marc Phillips said:


Five-speed or auto?

I can change on the fly!


Its like you couldn't, change if the fly fits, LOt"S Mr. Pilhips. Proove
Mr. Pholop's if you, think I don't have as many watt's under the law
when you try to sue me. LOL! I love it when, the prooven liars start
lying about there audio system's. ROFLAMATO!

Perhaps, half-man, you are waiting for accoutrement. Tell us about the
firsting time you spent under the watching eye of RAO, then maybe we can

answer

my question, mOrOn? :-)


Ah, ah, ah ! Choo ! You are using to demonstrate your loserness. Do you
pretending to know where my wife's clitoris is propounded ? LOL
Boon-Boon ! You have tell us when you are getting increased salaire,
no ? Perhaps in twenty-four years you will be able to afford some
French wines to pour on your table. In the mean-while, I am having good
chance when you stoloporate with so grand frequency. Good night little
Boon-Boon !

Ah, not so fasting half-man! Do you know the mean of the word enstoplement?
It fits you so perfect! ;-)

Perhaps you could looking it up in dictionnaire and finally know what I am
talking. Are you up to the challenge, half-man? :-)

Boon









Plasir! This exchangement remembers me of the writings of nationalistic
Americans Laurel & Hardy1 They were also comedies, wasn't they?



Good isn't it ?
Middius just has a problem when he starts to be serious, it sounds like
a human being parody. ;-)