[Jenn]

I think that I found at least part of the problem with the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length. (2.4 MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this? If the file you pointed me to is 1.8 seconds, I believe
that you owe me an apology for saying that the file is longer and I lied
about it.

[Eeyore]

Jenn wrote:

I think that I found at least part of the problem with the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length. (2.4 MB)

That must be the 24/96 one.

It's 760kB for -2 version.


When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

311kB acc to the Opera browser


Why is this? If the file you pointed me to is 1.8 seconds, I believe
that you owe me an apology for saying that the file is longer and I lied
about it.

You are 100% correct Jenn.

I just listened to the 311kB version and it unquestionably has a truncated
reverb tail !

ARNY KRUEGER !!!!!!!!!!!

Get you sorry ass over here and .....

GIVE JENN AN APLOGY !

Graham

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in
message


I think that I found at least part of the problem with
the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length. (2.4 MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been updated since year
2000. You probably found it using a search engine, and not by following
specific instructions from me.

I just checked goggle and found that every reference to the pcabx triangle
file that I've made on RAO in the past year (including the past 3 weeks) has
always been to this specific file:

http://64.41.69.21/technical/referen...e-2_1644ds.wav

Note that this is a file that will download as triangle-2_1644ds.wav, not
triangle.wav

If the file you pointed me to is 1.8
seconds, I believe that you owe me an apology for saying
that the file is longer and I lied about it.

That never happened. Google searching of the RAO archives says that I
always pointed you at the triangle-2 file. You somehow managed to go your
own way, and apparently never followed my specific instructions.

[Eeyore]

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message


I think that I found at least part of the problem with
the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length. (2.4 MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been updated since year
2000. You probably found it using a search engine, and not by following
specific instructions from me.

I just checked goggle and found that every reference to the pcabx triangle
file that I've made on RAO in the past year (including the past 3 weeks) has
always been to this specific file:

http://64.41.69.21/technical/referen...e-2_1644ds.wav

Note that this is a file that will download as triangle-2_1644ds.wav, not
triangle.wav

If the file you pointed me to is 1.8
seconds, I believe that you owe me an apology for saying
that the file is longer and I lied about it.

That never happened. Google searching of the RAO archives says that I
always pointed you at the triangle-2 file. You somehow managed to go your
own way, and apparently never followed my specific instructions.

SHAME ON YOU ARNY !

You objected to replacing your idiotic synthesiser samples with real ones because
it would 'disrupt the site' or some such feeble objection.

Yet you happily maintain wholly defective files any way.

HANG YOUR HEAD IN SHAME ARNY !

Graham

[Arny Krueger]

"Eeyore" wrote in
message
Arny Krueger wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message


I think that I found at least part of the problem with
the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length. (2.4
MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been
updated since year 2000. You probably found it using a
search engine, and not by following specific
instructions from me.

I just checked goggle and found that every reference to
the pcabx triangle file that I've made on RAO in the
past year (including the past 3 weeks) has always been
to this specific file:

http://64.41.69.21/technical/referen...e-2_1644ds.wav

Note that this is a file that will download as
triangle-2_1644ds.wav, not triangle.wav

If the file you pointed me to is 1.8
seconds, I believe that you owe me an apology for saying
that the file is longer and I lied about it.

That never happened. Google searching of the RAO
archives says that I always pointed you at the
triangle-2 file. You somehow managed to go your own way,
and apparently never followed my specific instructions.

Note that Graham's following comments are completely irrelevant to Jenns
problem with downloading the wrong file even though the right file was
clearly described to her:

SHAME ON YOU ARNY !

You objected to replacing your idiotic synthesiser
samples with real ones because it would 'disrupt the
site' or some such feeble objection.

The PCABX site has literally 100s of files that are based on the original
set of samples. I produced most of them over a period of a few years. If I
change the original samples, I have to go back change all of those other
files.

[Eeyore]

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote

Note that Graham's following comments are completely irrelevant to Jenns
problem with downloading the wrong file even though the right file was
clearly described to her:

SHAME ON YOU ARNY !

You objected to replacing your idiotic synthesiser
samples with real ones because it would 'disrupt the
site' or some such feeble objection.

The PCABX site has literally 100s of files that are based on the original
set of samples. I produced most of them over a period of a few years. If I
change the original samples, I have to go back change all of those other
files.

Go to hell Arny. It's *YOUR* damn site. Fix it if it's broken !

If you're too feeble to offer a decent apology I wish to have nothing more to do with
you.


Graham

[Arny Krueger]

"Eeyore" wrote in
message
Arny Krueger wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote

Note that Graham's following comments are completely
irrelevant to Jenns problem with downloading the wrong
file even though the right file was clearly described to
her:

SHAME ON YOU ARNY !

You objected to replacing your idiotic synthesiser
samples with real ones because it would 'disrupt the
site' or some such feeble objection.

The PCABX site has literally 100s of files that are
based on the original set of samples. I produced most of
them over a period of a few years. If I change the
original samples, I have to go back change all of those
other files.

Go to hell Arny.

Please chill

It's *YOUR* damn site.

Your command of the obvious is pretty good at this instant, Graham.

Fix it if it's broken !

It is what it is, and what it is has been pretty effective.

If you're too feeble to offer a decent apology I wish to
have nothing more to do with you.

It's not about being feeble, its about being reasonable, which you most
definately are not.

It's fine with me if you chose to not have anything to do with me, Graham.
Anybody who starts out a response to a polite explanation with "Go to hell"
is way out of control as far as myself or most people would be concerned.

[Eeyore]

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote in
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote

Note that Graham's following comments are completely
irrelevant to Jenns problem with downloading the wrong
file even though the right file was clearly described to
her:

SHAME ON YOU ARNY !

You objected to replacing your idiotic synthesiser
samples with real ones because it would 'disrupt the
site' or some such feeble objection.

The PCABX site has literally 100s of files that are
based on the original set of samples. I produced most of
them over a period of a few years. If I change the
original samples, I have to go back change all of those
other files.

Go to hell Arny.

Please chill

Go **** yourself.


It's *YOUR* damn site.

Your command of the obvious is pretty good at this instant, Graham.

Fix it if it's broken !

It is what it is, and what it is has been pretty effective.

It's crap. Like the house built on sand.


If you're too feeble to offer a decent apology I wish to
have nothing more to do with you.

It's not about being feeble, its about being reasonable, which you most
definately are not.

Nope.

I'm fed up with being 'reasonable' with you.

You have shown not even the tiniest sign of 'remorse' for lack of a better word
about your intentional misleading.


It's fine with me if you chose to not have anything to do with me, Graham.
Anybody who starts out a response to a polite explanation with "Go to hell"
is way out of control as far as myself or most people would be concerned.

If you can't admit your mistakes you can indeed "go to hell".

The nature of your response suggests to me that you're just an
attention-seeking whore.

Graham

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message


I think that I found at least part of the problem with
the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length. (2.4 MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been updated since year
2000. You probably found it using a search engine, and not by following
specific instructions from me.

I just checked goggle and found that every reference to the pcabx triangle
file that I've made on RAO in the past year (including the past 3 weeks) has
always been to this specific file:

http://64.41.69.21/technical/referen...e-2_1644ds.wav

Note that this is a file that will download as triangle-2_1644ds.wav, not
triangle.wav

If the file you pointed me to is 1.8
seconds, I believe that you owe me an apology for saying
that the file is longer and I lied about it.

That never happened. Google searching of the RAO archives says that I
always pointed you at the triangle-2 file. You somehow managed to go your
own way, and apparently never followed my specific instructions.

OK, I think that I see what happened. When I clicked on your link back
when we first started discussing this, I got an error message. So I did
what I could to get to the file. I loaded the address into Safari and
shortened it to 64.41.69.21/technical/reference, because that's what I
could get to work. That took me to the page with the shorter triangle
file.

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message


I think that I found at least part of the problem with
the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length. (2.4
MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been
updated since year 2000. You probably found it using a
search engine, and not by following specific
instructions from me.

I just checked goggle and found that every reference to
the pcabx triangle file that I've made on RAO in the
past year (including the past 3 weeks) has always been
to this specific file:

http://64.41.69.21/technical/referen...e-2_1644ds.wav

Note that this is a file that will download as
triangle-2_1644ds.wav, not triangle.wav

If the file you pointed me to is 1.8
seconds, I believe that you owe me an apology for saying
that the file is longer and I lied about it.

That never happened. Google searching of the RAO
archives says that I always pointed you at the
triangle-2 file. You somehow managed to go your own way,
and apparently never followed my specific instructions.

OK, I think that I see what happened. When I clicked on
your link back when we first started discussing this, I
got an error message. So I did what I could to get to
the file. I loaded the address into Safari and shortened
it to 64.41.69.21/technical/reference, because that's
what I could get to work. That took me to the page with
the shorter triangle file.

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple incompetence suffices.

[dave weil]

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 06:30:39 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

When I clicked on
your link back when we first started discussing this, I
got an error message. So I did what I could to get to
the file. I loaded the address into Safari and shortened
it to 64.41.69.21/technical/reference, because that's
what I could get to work. That took me to the page with
the shorter triangle file.

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple incompetence suffices.

OK, you weren't malelovent, you were just incompetent with your web
site.

Feel better now?

[Powell]

"Eeyore" wrote

Go to hell Arny.

Please chill

Go **** yourself.

Oh my, how the worm does turn!

Will this mean that you're no longer Arny's lap dog,
Graham?

[George M. Middius]

dave weil said:

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple incompetence suffices.

OK, you weren't malelovent, you were just incompetent with your web site.
Feel better now?

Faint muttering heard from Goose Puke: "Wait a second here...."




--

"Christians have to ... work to make the world as loving, just, and supportive as is possible."
A. Krooger, Aug. 2006

[George M. Middius]

Powell said:

Go to hell Arny.

Please chill

Go **** yourself.

Oh my, how the worm does turn!
Will this mean that you're no longer Arny's lap dog,
Graham?

No comment needed.



--

"Christians have to ... work to make the world as loving, just, and supportive as is possible."
A. Krooger, Aug. 2006

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
com

I think that I found at least part of the problem with
the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length. (2.4
MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been
updated since year 2000. You probably found it using a
search engine, and not by following specific
instructions from me.

I just checked goggle and found that every reference to
the pcabx triangle file that I've made on RAO in the
past year (including the past 3 weeks) has always been
to this specific file:

http://64.41.69.21/technical/referen...e-2_1644ds.wav

Note that this is a file that will download as
triangle-2_1644ds.wav, not triangle.wav

If the file you pointed me to is 1.8
seconds, I believe that you owe me an apology for saying
that the file is longer and I lied about it.

That never happened. Google searching of the RAO
archives says that I always pointed you at the
triangle-2 file. You somehow managed to go your own way,
and apparently never followed my specific instructions.

OK, I think that I see what happened. When I clicked on
your link back when we first started discussing this, I
got an error message. So I did what I could to get to
the file. I loaded the address into Safari and shortened
it to 64.41.69.21/technical/reference, because that's
what I could get to work. That took me to the page with
the shorter triangle file.

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple incompetence suffices.

What was incompetent about what I did?

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
com

I think that I found at least part of the problem with
the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length. (2.4
MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been
updated since year 2000. You probably found it using
a search engine, and not by following specific
instructions from me.

I just checked goggle and found that every reference to
the pcabx triangle file that I've made on RAO in the
past year (including the past 3 weeks) has always been
to this specific file:

http://64.41.69.21/technical/referen...e-2_1644ds.wav

Note that this is a file that will download as
triangle-2_1644ds.wav, not triangle.wav

If the file you pointed me to is 1.8
seconds, I believe that you owe me an apology for
saying that the file is longer and I lied about it.

That never happened. Google searching of the RAO
archives says that I always pointed you at the
triangle-2 file. You somehow managed to go your own
way, and apparently never followed my specific
instructions.

OK, I think that I see what happened. When I clicked on
your link back when we first started discussing this, I
got an error message. So I did what I could to get to
the file. I loaded the address into Safari and
shortened it to 64.41.69.21/technical/reference,
because that's what I could get to work. That took me
to the page with the shorter triangle file.

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple
incompetence suffices.

What was incompetent about what I did?

Not use the provided URL, which worked for everybody else.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
com
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

y.
com

I think that I found at least part of the problem with
the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length. (2.4
MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been
updated since year 2000. You probably found it using
a search engine, and not by following specific
instructions from me.

I just checked goggle and found that every reference to
the pcabx triangle file that I've made on RAO in the
past year (including the past 3 weeks) has always been
to this specific file:

http://64.41.69.21/technical/referen...e-2_1644ds.wav

Note that this is a file that will download as
triangle-2_1644ds.wav, not triangle.wav

If the file you pointed me to is 1.8
seconds, I believe that you owe me an apology for
saying that the file is longer and I lied about it.

That never happened. Google searching of the RAO
archives says that I always pointed you at the
triangle-2 file. You somehow managed to go your own
way, and apparently never followed my specific
instructions.

OK, I think that I see what happened. When I clicked on
your link back when we first started discussing this, I
got an error message. So I did what I could to get to
the file. I loaded the address into Safari and
shortened it to 64.41.69.21/technical/reference,
because that's what I could get to work. That took me
to the page with the shorter triangle file.

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple
incompetence suffices.

What was incompetent about what I did?

Not use the provided URL, which worked for everybody else.

It didn't work for me. If I downloaded it in the usual way, would could
be "incompetent" about my actions?

[dave weil]

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:26:57 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple
incompetence suffices.

What was incompetent about what I did?

Not use the provided URL, which worked for everybody else.

It didn't work for me. If I downloaded it in the usual way, would could
be "incompetent" about my actions?

According to the wording of his statement, he was obviously concerned
with his OWN incompetence.

Of course, he always has problems with the English language...

[dave weil]

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:20:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

OK, I think that I see what happened. When I clicked on
your link back when we first started discussing this, I
got an error message. So I did what I could to get to
the file. I loaded the address into Safari and
shortened it to 64.41.69.21/technical/reference,
because that's what I could get to work. That took me
to the page with the shorter triangle file.

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple
incompetence suffices.

What was incompetent about what I did?

Not use the provided URL, which worked for everybody else.

According to her, she DID use the provided URL.

You lose.

Again.

[Eeyore]

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Jenn" wrote

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple incompetence suffices.

Yup. Incompetently made samples.

Graham

[Eeyore]

Powell wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote

Go to hell Arny.

Please chill

Go **** yourself.

Oh my, how the worm does turn!

Will this mean that you're no longer Arny's lap dog,
Graham?

I never was in the first place.

Graham

[Eeyore]

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in

What was incompetent about what I did?

Not use the provided URL, which worked for everybody else.

You reckon she invented it ?

Graham

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
com
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

y.
com

I think that I found at least part of the problem
with the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length.
(2.4 MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been
updated since year 2000. You probably found it
using a search engine, and not by following specific
instructions from me.

I just checked goggle and found that every reference
to the pcabx triangle file that I've made on RAO in
the past year (including the past 3 weeks) has
always been to this specific file:

http://64.41.69.21/technical/referen...e-2_1644ds.wav

Note that this is a file that will download as
triangle-2_1644ds.wav, not triangle.wav

If the file you pointed me to is 1.8
seconds, I believe that you owe me an apology for
saying that the file is longer and I lied about it.

That never happened. Google searching of the RAO
archives says that I always pointed you at the
triangle-2 file. You somehow managed to go your own
way, and apparently never followed my specific
instructions.

OK, I think that I see what happened. When I clicked
on your link back when we first started discussing
this, I got an error message. So I did what I could
to get to the file. I loaded the address into Safari
and shortened it to 64.41.69.21/technical/reference,
because that's what I could get to work. That took me
to the page with the shorter triangle file.

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple
incompetence suffices.

What was incompetent about what I did?

Not use the provided URL, which worked for everybody
else.

It didn't work for me.

Properly typed URLs just work. If they didn't, the web would crash in a
heartbeat.

If I downloaded it in the usual
way, would could be "incompetent" about my actions?

If you get the proper results with minimal ado, that's competetence.

[paul packer]

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:06:26 -0400, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:



Powell said:

Go to hell Arny.

Please chill

Go **** yourself.

Oh my, how the worm does turn!
Will this mean that you're no longer Arny's lap dog,
Graham?

No comment needed.

None indeed.

To be honest, I kind of feel sorry for Graham. Though he was never
Arnie's 'lap dog', he did make the not unreasonable assumption that
someone of such technical knowledge and skill, who was often
surprisingly lucid and energetic in debate, and who in more rational
moments (however few) appeared to suffer nothing worse than an
inferiority complex and an argumentative streak, could not be "barking
mad". Now that he knows better, he's probably looking around
suspiciously at his relatives and friends. :-)

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
com
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

y.
com
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

ig
y.
com

I think that I found at least part of the problem
with the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length.
(2.4 MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been
updated since year 2000. You probably found it
using a search engine, and not by following specific
instructions from me.

I just checked goggle and found that every reference
to the pcabx triangle file that I've made on RAO in
the past year (including the past 3 weeks) has
always been to this specific file:

http://64.41.69.21/technical/referen...e-2_1644ds.wav

Note that this is a file that will download as
triangle-2_1644ds.wav, not triangle.wav

If the file you pointed me to is 1.8
seconds, I believe that you owe me an apology for
saying that the file is longer and I lied about it.

That never happened. Google searching of the RAO
archives says that I always pointed you at the
triangle-2 file. You somehow managed to go your own
way, and apparently never followed my specific
instructions.

OK, I think that I see what happened. When I clicked
on your link back when we first started discussing
this, I got an error message. So I did what I could
to get to the file. I loaded the address into Safari
and shortened it to 64.41.69.21/technical/reference,
because that's what I could get to work. That took me
to the page with the shorter triangle file.

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple
incompetence suffices.

What was incompetent about what I did?

Not use the provided URL, which worked for everybody
else.

It didn't work for me.

Properly typed URLs just work. If they didn't, the web would crash in a
heartbeat.

I just clicked on your link, Arny.


If I downloaded it in the usual
way, would could be "incompetent" about my actions?

If you get the proper results with minimal ado, that's competetence.

[Harry Lavo]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
com
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

y.
com
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

ig
y.
com

I think that I found at least part of the problem
with the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length.
(2.4 MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been
updated since year 2000. You probably found it
using a search engine, and not by following specific
instructions from me.

I just checked goggle and found that every reference
to the pcabx triangle file that I've made on RAO in
the past year (including the past 3 weeks) has
always been to this specific file:

http://64.41.69.21/technical/referen...e-2_1644ds.wav

Note that this is a file that will download as
triangle-2_1644ds.wav, not triangle.wav

If the file you pointed me to is 1.8
seconds, I believe that you owe me an apology for
saying that the file is longer and I lied about it.

That never happened. Google searching of the RAO
archives says that I always pointed you at the
triangle-2 file. You somehow managed to go your own
way, and apparently never followed my specific
instructions.

OK, I think that I see what happened. When I clicked
on your link back when we first started discussing
this, I got an error message. So I did what I could
to get to the file. I loaded the address into Safari
and shortened it to 64.41.69.21/technical/reference,
because that's what I could get to work. That took me
to the page with the shorter triangle file.

So that issue seems to be solved. Nothing nefarious.

As they say, why presume malevolvence when simple
incompetence suffices.

What was incompetent about what I did?

Not use the provided URL, which worked for everybody
else.

It didn't work for me.

Properly typed URLs just work. If they didn't, the web would crash in a
heartbeat.

I just clicked on your link, Arny.

You know, Jenne, that's just the trouble, Jen, you "incompetently" clicked
on the link, Jenn. Had you "competently" clicked on the link, Jnne, then
you would have found the correct file. It's clearly your fault, Jenne.

[Jenn]

In article ,
Signal wrote:

Jenn wrote:

What was incompetent about what I did?

Not use the provided URL, which worked for everybody
else.

It didn't work for me.

Properly typed URLs just work. If they didn't, the web would crash in a
heartbeat.

I just clicked on your link, Arny.

Yes but did you click on the link competently?

lol

[dave weil]

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 03:10:20 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

Properly typed URLs just work. If they didn't, the web would crash in a
heartbeat.

I just clicked on your link, Arny.

Well, there you go. Heck, sometimes he can't even spell google.

[paul packer]

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:25:36 -0500, dave weil
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 03:10:20 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

Properly typed URLs just work. If they didn't, the web would crash in a
heartbeat.

I just clicked on your link, Arny.

Well, there you go. Heck, sometimes he can't even spell google.


Don't be ridiculous, Dave--it's goggle.

[Ladypilot]

Eeyore wrote in
:


The nature of your response suggests to me that you're just an
attention-seeking whore.

Pot, meet kettle.

[Jenn]

In article ,
(paul packer) wrote:

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:25:36 -0500, dave weil
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 03:10:20 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

Properly typed URLs just work. If they didn't, the web would crash in a
heartbeat.

I just clicked on your link, Arny.

Well, there you go. Heck, sometimes he can't even spell google.


Don't be ridiculous, Dave--it's goggle.

I wear a pair of those when swimming in the ocean.

[George M. Middius]

Jenn said:

Don't be ridiculous, Dave--it's goggle.

I wear a pair of those when swimming in the ocean.

Did the ocean lie to Krooger?





--

"Christians have to ... work to make the world as loving, just, and supportive as is possible."
A. Krooger, Aug. 2006

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message

Jenn said:

Don't be ridiculous, Dave--it's goggle.

I wear a pair of those when swimming in the ocean.

Did the ocean lie to Krooger?

No but apparently the web lied to Jenn. That's the essence of what she is
saying.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message

Jenn said:

Don't be ridiculous, Dave--it's goggle.

I wear a pair of those when swimming in the ocean.

Did the ocean lie to Krooger?

No but apparently the web lied to Jenn. That's the essence of what she is
saying.

No it isn't, but thanks for your views.

[George M. Middius]

Jenn said:

Did the ocean lie to Krooger?

No but apparently the web lied to Jenn. That's the essence of what she is
saying.

No it isn't, but thanks for your views.

OK, you've eyeballed it. Now you can flush.




--

"Christians have to ... work to make the world as loving, just, and supportive as is possible."
A. Krooger, Aug. 2006

[Eeyore]

Arny Krueger wrote:

apparently the web lied to Jenn.

Don't be so stupid.

Graham

[Bertie the Bunyip]

Eeyore wrote in
:



Arny Krueger wrote:

apparently the web lied to Jenn.

Don't be so stupid.

Wht, or you'll netkkkop him to the stupid police?





Fjukkwit



Bertie

[Powell]

"Arny Krueger" wrote

I think that I found at least part of the problem with
the triangle file.

When I download it from he
http://www.pcabx.com/technical/reference/
I get a file that is about 4.5 seconds in length. (2.4 MB)

When I download it from he
http://64.41.69.21/technical/reference/
(this is the one you pointed me to, IIRC)
I get a file of about 1.8 seconds (310 KB)

Why is this?

You managed to find an obsolete page that hasn't been
updated since year 2000. You probably found it using
a search engine, and not by following specific instructions
from me.

Hint Hint Hint, Arny You have two active "reference"
subdirectories that search engines are picking up on. You
need to erase one subdirectory or remove all files from
the container or add a do not publish lock. If you do this
when the search engines update they will find the
changes in you file structure and automatically eliminate
the links like Jenn used.

Who is mastering your web site... a 12 year old?