[[email protected]]

I can't let this thrilling exchange die on the Google vine.

In the vanishing "Islamists..."thread II suggested that instead of
taking up the remote causes of remote people you concentrate on the
Latinos in the South- West of your country that you conquered and
settled.. You reprisal was that i should take up the cause of my local
Squamish band

I said
I'm not a fighter for anyone's "legitimate claims"- you are. I'm just
pointing to you a really big cause to fight for in your own home , not
miine or of the Israelis.. Who knows , the Squamish and the
Palestinians might be next in line once you set an example and settle
the fate of California , Texas and New Mexico with the new Mexican
President.

You answered:
There's that presumption again, and so soon after I told explicitly that
"pointing out flaws on one side isn't necessarily an endorsement of the
other." Perhaps in your line of work it's better to not listen to the
other side of the conversation, making you the Dr. House of audio and
world politics but without the miraculous track record.

I am relieved to hear (and so I am sure will be the government of
Israel) that deep, deep down you're merely pointing the faults of one
side without endorsing the other. I am sure that you will be able to
point me to where and when you pointed the faults of that other side
for balance. Otherwise you might appear to have a somewhat slanted
vision or would it be stunted expression?

Who is Dr. House and in what branch of human endeavour did he achieve a
"miraculous track record". And how exactly do you know what my track
record is. For all you know it may be just as miraculous as that of
your Dr. House.

When you're not too busy notify me of the start of your campaign to
free Arizona and New Mexico of Yankee opression.

Please don't stop this correspondence. I'm beginning to enjoy it.
Ludovic Mirabel




..

[MiNe 109]

In article .com,
" wrote:

I can't let this thrilling exchange die on the Google vine.

In the vanishing "Islamists..."thread II suggested that instead of
taking up the remote causes of remote people you concentrate on the
Latinos in the South- West of your country that you conquered and
settled.. You reprisal was that i should take up the cause of my local
Squamish band

I said
I'm not a fighter for anyone's "legitimate claims"- you are. I'm just
pointing to you a really big cause to fight for in your own home , not
miine or of the Israelis.. Who knows , the Squamish and the
Palestinians might be next in line once you set an example and settle
the fate of California , Texas and New Mexico with the new Mexican
President.

You answered:
There's that presumption again, and so soon after I told explicitly that
"pointing out flaws on one side isn't necessarily an endorsement of the
other." Perhaps in your line of work it's better to not listen to the
other side of the conversation, making you the Dr. House of audio and
world politics but without the miraculous track record.

I am relieved to hear (and so I am sure will be the government of
Israel) that deep, deep down you're merely pointing the faults of one
side without endorsing the other. I am sure that you will be able to
point me to where and when you pointed the faults of that other side
for balance. Otherwise you might appear to have a somewhat slanted
vision or would it be stunted expression?

Perhaps you missed my condemnation of Hezbollah rocket attacks as war
crimes.

Balance is a false value these days and can be a trap in a situation
like ours in which government propaganda leads to war.

Who is Dr. House and in what branch of human endeavour did he achieve a
"miraculous track record". And how exactly do you know what my track
record is. For all you know it may be just as miraculous as that of
your Dr. House.

Unlikely, as he has the advantage of being fictional. He's a
diagnostician who holds that face to face conversation with the patient
is unnecessary, instead relying on test results and medical histories
for information.

When you're not too busy notify me of the start of your campaign to
free Arizona and New Mexico of Yankee opression.

Please don't stop this correspondence. I'm beginning to enjoy it.

As you've enlightened me to the plighted of the oppressed aboriginals of
the northwest, I prefer to concentrate on the resurgence of the First
Nations.

Stephen

[ScottW]

MiNe 109 wrote:
In article .com,
" wrote:

I can't let this thrilling exchange die on the Google vine.

In the vanishing "Islamists..."thread II suggested that instead of
taking up the remote causes of remote people you concentrate on the
Latinos in the South- West of your country that you conquered and
settled.. You reprisal was that i should take up the cause of my local
Squamish band

I said
I'm not a fighter for anyone's "legitimate claims"- you are. I'm just
pointing to you a really big cause to fight for in your own home , not
miine or of the Israelis.. Who knows , the Squamish and the
Palestinians might be next in line once you set an example and settle
the fate of California , Texas and New Mexico with the new Mexican
President.

You answered:
There's that presumption again, and so soon after I told explicitly that
"pointing out flaws on one side isn't necessarily an endorsement of the
other." Perhaps in your line of work it's better to not listen to the
other side of the conversation, making you the Dr. House of audio and
world politics but without the miraculous track record.

I am relieved to hear (and so I am sure will be the government of
Israel) that deep, deep down you're merely pointing the faults of one
side without endorsing the other. I am sure that you will be able to
point me to where and when you pointed the faults of that other side
for balance. Otherwise you might appear to have a somewhat slanted
vision or would it be stunted expression?

Perhaps you missed my condemnation of Hezbollah rocket attacks as war
crimes.

I must have missed that one as well.


Balance is a false value these days and can be a trap in a situation
like ours in which government propaganda leads to war.

I agree.....so many want to sit on the sidelines simply assuring that
its
a fair fight with no commitment to the outcome.
Take a side, and stand and be counted.

ScottW

[MiNe 109]

In article .com,
"ScottW" wrote:

MiNe 109 wrote:
In article .com,
" wrote:

I can't let this thrilling exchange die on the Google vine.

In the vanishing "Islamists..."thread II suggested that instead of
taking up the remote causes of remote people you concentrate on the
Latinos in the South- West of your country that you conquered and
settled.. You reprisal was that i should take up the cause of my local
Squamish band

I said
I'm not a fighter for anyone's "legitimate claims"- you are. I'm
just
pointing to you a really big cause to fight for in your own home ,
not
miine or of the Israelis.. Who knows , the Squamish and the
Palestinians might be next in line once you set an example and settle
the fate of California , Texas and New Mexico with the new Mexican
President.

You answered:
There's that presumption again, and so soon after I told explicitly
that
"pointing out flaws on one side isn't necessarily an endorsement of the
other." Perhaps in your line of work it's better to not listen to the
other side of the conversation, making you the Dr. House of audio and
world politics but without the miraculous track record.

I am relieved to hear (and so I am sure will be the government of
Israel) that deep, deep down you're merely pointing the faults of one
side without endorsing the other. I am sure that you will be able to
point me to where and when you pointed the faults of that other side
for balance. Otherwise you might appear to have a somewhat slanted
vision or would it be stunted expression?

Perhaps you missed my condemnation of Hezbollah rocket attacks as war
crimes.

I must have missed that one as well.

Oh, well. It was in reply to you.

Balance is a false value these days and can be a trap in a situation
like ours in which government propaganda leads to war.

I agree.....so many want to sit on the sidelines simply assuring that
its a fair fight with no commitment to the outcome.
Take a side, and stand and be counted.

Election day coming soon.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:
MiNe 109 wrote:
In article .com,
" wrote:

I can't let this thrilling exchange die on the Google vine.

In the vanishing "Islamists..."thread II suggested that instead of
taking up the remote causes of remote people you concentrate on the
Latinos in the South- West of your country that you conquered and
settled.. You reprisal was that i should take up the cause of my local
Squamish band

I said
I'm not a fighter for anyone's "legitimate claims"- you are. I'm just
pointing to you a really big cause to fight for in your own home , not
miine or of the Israelis.. Who knows , the Squamish and the
Palestinians might be next in line once you set an example and settle
the fate of California , Texas and New Mexico with the new Mexican
President.

You answered:
There's that presumption again, and so soon after I told explicitly that
"pointing out flaws on one side isn't necessarily an endorsement of the
other." Perhaps in your line of work it's better to not listen to the
other side of the conversation, making you the Dr. House of audio and
world politics but without the miraculous track record.

I am relieved to hear (and so I am sure will be the government of
Israel) that deep, deep down you're merely pointing the faults of one
side without endorsing the other. I am sure that you will be able to
point me to where and when you pointed the faults of that other side
for balance. Otherwise you might appear to have a somewhat slanted
vision or would it be stunted expression?

Perhaps you missed my condemnation of Hezbollah rocket attacks as war
crimes.

I must have missed that one as well.


Balance is a false value these days and can be a trap in a situation
like ours in which government propaganda leads to war.

I agree.....so many want to sit on the sidelines simply assuring that
its
a fair fight with no commitment to the outcome.

I thought that I'd heard this somewhere else...

http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/2003/s...srsept03.shtml

republospeak: "Stand and be counted."

Where did this phrase come from? Hm.

Why, it's directly from the bible! (And toopid claims not to be
religious!)

http://www.padfield.com/1997/goodmen.html

Note the last paragraph: "Do not allow evil to triumph. Do not do sit
by and do nothing. Stand up and be counted, speak up against evil and
speak out against evil men and their sinful deeds."

They forgot the disclaimer: except when the evil is perpetrated by a
certain political party. Then speaking out is misdirected or
unpatriotic or traitorous or even worse. LOL!

Take a side, and stand and be counted.

Yes, dear.

[[email protected]]

MiNe 109 wrote:
In article .com,
" wrote:

I can't let this thrilling exchange die on the Google vine.

In the vanishing "Islamists..."thread II suggested that instead of
taking up the remote causes of remote people you concentrate on the
Latinos in the South- West of your country that you conquered and
settled.. You reprisal was that i should take up the cause of my local
Squamish band

I said
I'm not a fighter for anyone's "legitimate claims"- you are. I'm just
pointing to you a really big cause to fight for in your own home , not
miine or of the Israelis.. Who knows , the Squamish and the
Palestinians might be next in line once you set an example and settle
the fate of California , Texas and New Mexico with the new Mexican
President.

You answered:
There's that presumption again, and so soon after I told explicitly that
"pointing out flaws on one side isn't necessarily an endorsement of the
other." Perhaps in your line of work it's better to not listen to the
other side of the conversation, making you the Dr. House of audio and
world politics but without the miraculous track record.

I am relieved to hear (and so I am sure will be the government of
Israel) that deep, deep down you're merely pointing the faults of one
side without endorsing the other. I am sure that you will be able to
point me to where and when you pointed the faults of that other side
for balance. Otherwise you might appear to have a somewhat slanted
vision or would it be stunted expression?

Perhaps you missed my condemnation of Hezbollah rocket attacks as war
crimes.

Balance is a false value these days and can be a trap in a situation
like ours in which government propaganda leads to war.

Who is Dr. House and in what branch of human endeavour did he achieve a
"miraculous track record". And how exactly do you know what my track
record is. For all you know it may be just as miraculous as that of
your Dr. House.

Unlikely, as he has the advantage of being fictional. He's a
diagnostician who holds that face to face conversation with the patient
is unnecessary, instead relying on test results and medical histories
for information.

When you're not too busy notify me of the start of your campaign to
free Arizona and New Mexico of Yankee opression.

Please don't stop this correspondence. I'm beginning to enjoy it.

As you've enlightened me to the plighted of the oppressed aboriginals of
the northwest, I prefer to concentrate on the resurgence of the First
Nations.

Stephen

=========================================

MNe strikes out:

" Perhaps you missed my condemnation of Hezbollah rocket attacks as
war
crimes.

I missed it and so apparently did Hezbollah. Do quote it again. It will
sure make them quake in their sandals and stop.
Ludovic Mirabel

[MiNe 109]

In article .com,
" wrote:

=========================================

MNe strikes out:

" Perhaps you missed my condemnation of Hezbollah rocket attacks as
war crimes.

I missed it and so apparently did Hezbollah. Do quote it again. It will
sure make them quake in their sandals and stop.
Ludovic Mirabel

Well, no pleasing Dr. House of International Affairs.

Stephen

[[email protected]]

MiNe 109 wrote:
In article .com,
" wrote:

MNe strikes out:

" Perhaps you missed my condemnation of Hezbollah rocket attacks as
war crimes.

I missed it and so apparently did Hezbollah. Do quote it again. It will
sure make them quake in their sandals and stop.
Ludovic Mirabel

Well, no pleasing Dr. House of International Affairs.
Stephen

======================================

You're right- watching you striving pathetically to be witty does not
raise spirits. .
Instead of making a spectacle of yourself shaking a clown's cap with
bells on it qive us that memorable admonition to Hezbollah you claim
you once made. Don't keep us on tenterhooks guessing: truth or
fiction?
Regards Ludovic M.
Ludovic Mirabel

[MiNe 109]

In article .com,
" wrote:

MiNe 109 wrote:
In article .com,
" wrote:

MNe strikes out:

" Perhaps you missed my condemnation of Hezbollah rocket attacks as
war crimes.

I missed it and so apparently did Hezbollah. Do quote it again. It will
sure make them quake in their sandals and stop.
Ludovic Mirabel

Well, no pleasing Dr. House of International Affairs.
Stephen

======================================

You're right- watching you striving pathetically to be witty does not
raise spirits.
Instead of making a spectacle of yourself shaking a clown's cap with
bells on it qive us that memorable admonition to Hezbollah you claim
you once made. Don't keep us on tenterhooks guessing: truth or
fiction?

If you're accusing me of lying, this conversation is over.

Stephen