Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
portable recording
hi folks... I wonder does anyone have an opinion to share on portable
devices such as M-Audio MicroTrack 24/96. I'm considering getting a macbook pro and I'm looking at options for portable recording (piano, street sounds, sfx etc). How would it compare to something like M-audio's firewire portable recorder? any insight you might have would be appreciated. thanks! -- my blog- http://sonolum.com/blog |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
portable recording
"musicandsound" wrote ...
hi folks... I wonder does anyone have an opinion to share on portable devices such as M-Audio MicroTrack 24/96. Suggesting searching the Google Groups archive. The MT2496 has been discussed extensively in this forum since shortly before it was available. I'm considering getting a macbook pro and I'm looking at options for portable recording (piano, street sounds, sfx etc). How would it compare to something like M-audio's firewire portable recorder? any insight you might have would be appreciated. thanks! What "M-audio firewire portable recorder" are you asking about? If you are talking about one of their adapter boxes that plugs into your laptop computer, you are comparing apples and bicycles. There should be no substantial "quality" difference between a portable recorder like the MT2496 and an audio interface box for a computer. But the difference in convienence, size, function, portability, etc. etc. are huge. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
portable recording
|
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
portable recording
On 21 Sep 2006 09:02:54 -0700, "musicandsound"
wrote: hi folks... I wonder does anyone have an opinion to share on portable devices such as M-Audio MicroTrack 24/96. I'm considering getting a macbook pro and I'm looking at options for portable recording (piano, street sounds, sfx etc). How would it compare to something like M-audio's firewire portable recorder? any insight you might have would be appreciated. thanks! Marantz PMD 660 or 670 |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
portable recording
"musicandsound" wrote in message oups.com... hi folks... I wonder does anyone have an opinion to share on portable devices such as M-Audio MicroTrack 24/96. A friend who is an experienced recordist played some of his recordings for me last weekend. These were essentially bootlegs made at a musical festival, made with the supplied microphone. The recordings seemed to be just fine given the casual micing. His major complaint was minor - he didn't like the boot time which was on the order of a medium-fast XP desktop. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
portable recording
musicandsound wrote: hi folks... I wonder does anyone have an opinion to share on portable devices such as M-Audio MicroTrack 24/96. I'm considering getting a macbook pro and I'm looking at options for portable recording (piano, street sounds, sfx etc). How would it compare to something like M-audio's firewire portable recorder? any insight you might have would be appreciated. thanks! -- my blog- http://sonolum.com/blog Hi, I just bought a Presonus Firepod. You can record 8 channels at once. You don't need a sound board or a sound card. You can run mics, line, or instruments directly into it. It works great. The only drawback is the Cubase software that comes with it can only record 4 tracks at once. I use a "special" version of Nuendo with it. Look on swee****er.com for more info on this and other recorders. Swee****er is great to deal with. I hope this helps. Drummer Dick |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
portable recording
"musicandsound" wrote:
hi folks... I wonder does anyone have an opinion to share on portable devices such as M-Audio MicroTrack 24/96. I'm considering getting a macbook pro and I'm looking at options for portable recording (piano, street sounds, sfx etc). How would it compare to something like M-audio's firewire portable recorder? any insight you might have would be appreciated. thanks! -- my blog- http://sonolum.com/blog I got an Edirol R09 last month, it seems quite clear, and incredibly convenient. There's a review in the current Sound On Sound magazine. I've got some (piano) recordings done with it at the site below. The R09 was placed on the floor in front of the piano, I used the internal mic. I think the Irish trad arranged for piano were all done with the R09, except the Providence Reel, which is double-tracked mono. Some of the Bach ones, and the Fats Waller, anything in stereo, all were the R09. gerry [http://homepage.eircom.net/~gerfmcc/audio.html] |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |