Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Date: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:29 pm
Subject: HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY http://www.moderateindependent.com/v2i4retirees.htm HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY? Republicans Unanimously Vote To Allow Employers To Rip Promised Retiree Health Benefits Out From Under Everyone’s Nose by John S. Ashton APRIL 23, 2004 - "Retirees who qualify for Medicare would see their health benefits cut or eliminated under a proposal approved Thursday by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. "The commission voted 3 to 1 in approval of the proposed rule, with three Republicans in favor and one Democrat opposing it." So reports CBS News (see: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in613305.shtml ) This election is about morality, plain and simple. The Republican Party has entirely lost its conscience. Promised, expected retiree health benefits are one of the most vital things a person depends on. Currently it is illegal for companies to go back on their word and eliminate them. The Republicans – unanimously – want to change that, allowing any employer who feels like it to simply go back on their word. What employer won’t? In an age when "cost cutting" and "downsizing" has squeezed current workers without mercy or morals while executive compensation has grown exponentially, there is no incentive at all for companies – en masse – to not choose to go back on their word and eliminate the health care benefits so many depend on or were planning on. There is no downside for the companies – what can a retiree do, quit in protest when they don’t even work for the company? Today, the 3 Republicans appointed by President Bush to a board that exists not to deal with healthcare in the first place but only discrimination in the workplace had no problem, no moral values whatsoever, to stand in the way of them using what is supposed to be a minority protecting entity for the sake of assaulting the basic safety and security of millions upon millions and Americans – all for the sake of corporate profits. The EEOC. This is the tool that President Bush used to attack all retired or retiring Americans who had counted on promised health benefits, this is the tool that President Bush is using to stick America with something our elected officials in the Congress just voted down. As CBS reports, "…the new rule is identical to Section 631 of the Senate’s version of the Medicare Rx bill, which was killed by Congress "after hearing from tens of thousands of AARP members." But President Bush doesn’t care about the will of the people and the votes of their elected representatives. He has no moral code and doesn’t value either any American people or democracy. Coldly and entirely without conscience, he moved against the will of the people to rip the health coverage away from a seventy year old woman being treated for cancer, an eighty year old man with a heart ailment, men and women with diabetes – suddenly, they’ll lose their coverage. And the President was so determined to commit this horrible atrocity against millions of Americans that he went around Congress and used what is supposed to be a commission that protects workers from racism and discrimination to commit his entirely amoral, coldly brutal ends. As CBS reports, "Unfortunately, the EEOC has turned a deaf ear to those same concerns and is now trying to accomplish through the backdoor what Congress refused to do directly in the law." The EEOC commission appointed by President Bush. Except for the one Democrat on the panel, who voted against this nonsense, pointing out, as CBS reports, ""I came to the commission as a civil rights lawyer," Ishimaru told the Times. "Before making an exemption to a major civil rights law, you need a compelling reason, which I have not seen." Another example of why no good American, why no one who believes in Democracy, why no one with even the most basic moral values, can support President Bush and his brand of Bush/Limbaugh Republican scum. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.644 / Virus Database: 412 - Release Date: 3/26/2004 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "clamnebula" wrote in message ... Date: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:29 pm Subject: HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY http://www.moderateindependent.com/v2i4retirees.htm HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY? Republicans Unanimously Vote To Allow Employers To Rip Promised Retiree Health Benefits Out From Under Everyone's Nose by John S. Ashton APRIL 23, 2004 - "Retirees who qualify for Medicare would see their health benefits cut or eliminated under a proposal approved Thursday by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. "The commission voted 3 to 1 in approval of the proposed rule, with three Republicans in favor and one Democrat opposing it." So reports CBS News (see: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in613305.shtml ) This election is about morality, plain and simple. The Republican Party has entirely lost its conscience. Promised, expected retiree health benefits are one of the most vital things a person depends on. Currently it is illegal for companies to go back on their word and eliminate them. The Republicans - unanimously - want to change that, allowing any employer who feels like it to simply go back on their word. What employer won't? In an age when "cost cutting" and "downsizing" has squeezed current workers without mercy or morals while executive compensation has grown exponentially, there is no incentive at all for companies - en masse - to not choose to go back on their word and eliminate the health care benefits so many depend on or were planning on. There is no downside for the companies - what can a retiree do, quit in protest when they don't even work for the company? Today, the 3 Republicans appointed by President Bush to a board that exists not to deal with healthcare in the first place but only discrimination in the workplace had no problem, no moral values whatsoever, to stand in the way of them using what is supposed to be a minority protecting entity for the sake of assaulting the basic safety and security of millions upon millions and Americans - all for the sake of corporate profits. The EEOC. This is the tool that President Bush used to attack all retired or retiring Americans who had counted on promised health benefits, this is the tool that President Bush is using to stick America with something our elected officials in the Congress just voted down. As CBS reports, ".the new rule is identical to Section 631 of the Senate's version of the Medicare Rx bill, which was killed by Congress "after hearing from tens of thousands of AARP members." But President Bush doesn't care about the will of the people and the votes of their elected representatives. He has no moral code and doesn't value either any American people or democracy. Coldly and entirely without conscience, he moved against the will of the people to rip the health coverage away from a seventy year old woman being treated for cancer, an eighty year old man with a heart ailment, men and women with diabetes - suddenly, they'll lose their coverage. And the President was so determined to commit this horrible atrocity against millions of Americans that he went around Congress and used what is supposed to be a commission that protects workers from racism and discrimination to commit his entirely amoral, coldly brutal ends. As CBS reports, "Unfortunately, the EEOC has turned a deaf ear to those same concerns and is now trying to accomplish through the backdoor what Congress refused to do directly in the law." The EEOC commission appointed by President Bush. Except for the one Democrat on the panel, who voted against this nonsense, pointing out, as CBS reports, ""I came to the commission as a civil rights lawyer," Ishimaru told the Times. "Before making an exemption to a major civil rights law, you need a compelling reason, which I have not seen." Another example of why no good American, why no one who believes in Democracy, why no one with even the most basic moral values, can support President Bush and his brand of Bush/Limbaugh Republican scum. They believe that avarice, bigotry, gluttony, and cruelty *are* basic moral values. It's hard to believe that these people came from this country. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The EEOC has really dealt seniors a harmful blow here. This ruling is
unfair and bogus. At least AARP is trying to remedy the situation. They are trying to encourage seniors to speak out against this ruling and have stated that they will be trying their hardest to alter this in the near future. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "clamnebula" wrote in message ... Date: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:29 pm Subject: HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY http://www.moderateindependent.com/v2i4retirees.htm HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY? Republicans Unanimously Vote To Allow Employers To Rip Promised Retiree Health Benefits Out From Under Everyone's Nose by John S. Ashton APRIL 23, 2004 - "Retirees who qualify for Medicare would see their health benefits cut or eliminated under a proposal approved Thursday by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. "The commission voted 3 to 1 in approval of the proposed rule, with three Republicans in favor and one Democrat opposing it." So reports CBS News (see: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in613305.shtml ) This election is about morality, plain and simple. The Republican Party has entirely lost its conscience. Promised, expected retiree health benefits are one of the most vital things a person depends on. Currently it is illegal for companies to go back on their word and eliminate them. The Republicans - unanimously - want to change that, allowing any employer who feels like it to simply go back on their word. What employer won't? In an age when "cost cutting" and "downsizing" has squeezed current workers without mercy or morals while executive compensation has grown exponentially, there is no incentive at all for companies - en masse - to not choose to go back on their word and eliminate the health care benefits so many depend on or were planning on. There is no downside for the companies - what can a retiree do, quit in protest when they don't even work for the company? Today, the 3 Republicans appointed by President Bush to a board that exists not to deal with healthcare in the first place but only discrimination in the workplace had no problem, no moral values whatsoever, to stand in the way of them using what is supposed to be a minority protecting entity for the sake of assaulting the basic safety and security of millions upon millions and Americans - all for the sake of corporate profits. The EEOC. This is the tool that President Bush used to attack all retired or retiring Americans who had counted on promised health benefits, this is the tool that President Bush is using to stick America with something our elected officials in the Congress just voted down. As CBS reports, ".the new rule is identical to Section 631 of the Senate's version of the Medicare Rx bill, which was killed by Congress "after hearing from tens of thousands of AARP members." But President Bush doesn't care about the will of the people and the votes of their elected representatives. He has no moral code and doesn't value either any American people or democracy. Coldly and entirely without conscience, he moved against the will of the people to rip the health coverage away from a seventy year old woman being treated for cancer, an eighty year old man with a heart ailment, men and women with diabetes - suddenly, they'll lose their coverage. And the President was so determined to commit this horrible atrocity against millions of Americans that he went around Congress and used what is supposed to be a commission that protects workers from racism and discrimination to commit his entirely amoral, coldly brutal ends. As CBS reports, "Unfortunately, the EEOC has turned a deaf ear to those same concerns and is now trying to accomplish through the backdoor what Congress refused to do directly in the law." The EEOC commission appointed by President Bush. You left out some pertinent details, why am I not surprised. "Such benefits are provided on a voluntary basis at the discretion of each employer and the Commission is acting to preserve these valuable benefits for retirees," Commission Chair Cari Dominguez, a Republican, said in a statement. The Times reports that several commission members argued that employers are more likely to continue providing health benefits to retirees under 65 if they are allowed to reduce or eliminate benefits for those 65 and older. The rule change has the backing of the American Benefits Council - a trade group representing large employers - as well as the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers. The language of the rule adopted by the panel says that it "is not intended to encourage employers to eliminate any retiree health benefits they may currently provide." Before it becomes final, the proposed rule must go through further review by federal agencies and the White House Office of Management and Budget. Another example of why no good American, why no one who believes in Democracy, why no one with even the most basic moral values, can support President Bush and his brand of Bush/Limbaugh Republican scum. Another excample of how democrats lie and distort. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.644 / Virus Database: 412 - Release Date: 3/26/2004 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Before it becomes final, the proposed rule must go through further review
by federal agencies and the White House Office of Management and Budget. After which time it will be approved quietly and deniably so as not to affect Dubya's re-election. ****ing crooks. WS |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bernard spilman" wrote in message om... Before it becomes final, the proposed rule must go through further review by federal agencies and the White House Office of Management and Budget. After which time it will be approved quietly and deniably so as not to affect Dubya's re-election. ****ing crooks. WS OSAF |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OSAF
Man, you're one literate son-of-a-bitch! I'm impressed. WS |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "clamnebula" wrote in message ... : Date: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:29 pm : Subject: HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY : : http://www.moderateindependent.com/v2i4retirees.htm : : HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY? : Republicans Unanimously Vote To Allow Employers To Rip Promised Retiree Health : Benefits Out From Under Everyone's Nose : by John S. Ashton : : APRIL 23, 2004 - "Retirees who qualify for Medicare would see their health : benefits cut or eliminated under a proposal approved Thursday by the Equal : Employment Opportunity Commission. : : "The commission voted 3 to 1 in approval of the proposed rule, with three : Republicans in favor and one Democrat opposing it." : : So reports CBS News (see: : http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in613305.shtml ) : : This election is about morality, plain and simple. The Republican Party has : entirely lost its conscience. Promised, expected retiree health benefits are one : of the most vital things a person depends on. Currently it is illegal for : companies to go back on their word and eliminate them. The Republicans - : unanimously - want to change that, allowing any employer who feels like it to : simply go back on their word. : : What employer won't? In an age when "cost cutting" and "downsizing" has squeezed : current workers without mercy or morals while executive compensation has grown : exponentially, there is no incentive at all for companies - en masse - to not : choose to go back on their word and eliminate the health care benefits so many : depend on or were planning on. There is no downside for the companies - what can : a retiree do, quit in protest when they don't even work for the company? : : Today, the 3 Republicans appointed by President Bush to a board that exists not : to deal with healthcare in the first place but only discrimination in the : workplace had no problem, no moral values whatsoever, to stand in the way of : them using what is supposed to be a minority protecting entity for the sake of : assaulting the basic safety and security of millions upon millions and : Americans - all for the sake of corporate profits. : : The EEOC. This is the tool that President Bush used to attack all retired or : retiring Americans who had counted on promised health benefits, this is the tool : that President Bush is using to stick America with something our elected : officials in the Congress just voted down. : : As CBS reports, ".the new rule is identical to Section 631 of the Senate's : version of the Medicare Rx bill, which was killed by Congress "after hearing : from tens of thousands of AARP members." : : But President Bush doesn't care about the will of the people and the votes of : their elected representatives. He has no moral code and doesn't value either any : American people or democracy. Coldly and entirely without conscience, he moved : against the will of the people to rip the health coverage away from a seventy : year old woman being treated for cancer, an eighty year old man with a heart : ailment, men and women with diabetes - suddenly, they'll lose their coverage. : And the President was so determined to commit this horrible atrocity against : millions of Americans that he went around Congress and used what is supposed to : be a commission that protects workers from racism and discrimination to commit : his entirely amoral, coldly brutal ends. : : As CBS reports, "Unfortunately, the EEOC has turned a deaf ear to those same : concerns and is now trying to accomplish through the backdoor what Congress : refused to do directly in the law." The EEOC commission appointed by President : Bush. : : Except for the one Democrat on the panel, who voted against this nonsense, : pointing out, as CBS reports, ""I came to the commission as a civil rights : lawyer," Ishimaru told the Times. "Before making an exemption to a major civil : rights law, you need a compelling reason, which I have not seen." : : Another example of why no good American, why no one who believes in Democracy, : why no one with even the most basic moral values, can support President Bush and : his brand of Bush/Limbaugh Republican scum. Excellent post. Keep on. : : : : : --- : Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. : Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). : Version: 6.0.644 / Virus Database: 412 - Release Date: 3/26/2004 : : |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message link.net... : : "clamnebula" wrote in message : ... : Date: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:29 pm : Subject: HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY : : http://www.moderateindependent.com/v2i4retirees.htm : : HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY? : Republicans Unanimously Vote To Allow Employers To Rip Promised Retiree : Health : Benefits Out From Under Everyone's Nose : by John S. Ashton : : APRIL 23, 2004 - "Retirees who qualify for Medicare would see their health : benefits cut or eliminated under a proposal approved Thursday by the Equal : Employment Opportunity Commission. : : "The commission voted 3 to 1 in approval of the proposed rule, with three : Republicans in favor and one Democrat opposing it." : : So reports CBS News (see: : http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in613305.shtml ) : : This election is about morality, plain and simple. The Republican Party : has : entirely lost its conscience. Promised, expected retiree health benefits : are one : of the most vital things a person depends on. Currently it is illegal for : companies to go back on their word and eliminate them. The Republicans - : unanimously - want to change that, allowing any employer who feels like it : to : simply go back on their word. : : What employer won't? In an age when "cost cutting" and "downsizing" has : squeezed : current workers without mercy or morals while executive compensation has : grown : exponentially, there is no incentive at all for companies - en masse - to : not : choose to go back on their word and eliminate the health care benefits so : many : depend on or were planning on. There is no downside for the companies - : what can : a retiree do, quit in protest when they don't even work for the company? : : Today, the 3 Republicans appointed by President Bush to a board that : exists not : to deal with healthcare in the first place but only discrimination in the : workplace had no problem, no moral values whatsoever, to stand in the way : of : them using what is supposed to be a minority protecting entity for the : sake of : assaulting the basic safety and security of millions upon millions and : Americans - all for the sake of corporate profits. : : The EEOC. This is the tool that President Bush used to attack all retired : or : retiring Americans who had counted on promised health benefits, this is : the tool : that President Bush is using to stick America with something our elected : officials in the Congress just voted down. : : As CBS reports, ".the new rule is identical to Section 631 of the Senate's : version of the Medicare Rx bill, which was killed by Congress "after : hearing : from tens of thousands of AARP members." : : But President Bush doesn't care about the will of the people and the votes : of : their elected representatives. He has no moral code and doesn't value : either any : American people or democracy. Coldly and entirely without conscience, he : moved : against the will of the people to rip the health coverage away from a : seventy : year old woman being treated for cancer, an eighty year old man with a : heart : ailment, men and women with diabetes - suddenly, they'll lose their : coverage. : And the President was so determined to commit this horrible atrocity : against : millions of Americans that he went around Congress and used what is : supposed to : be a commission that protects workers from racism and discrimination to : commit : his entirely amoral, coldly brutal ends. : : As CBS reports, "Unfortunately, the EEOC has turned a deaf ear to those : same : concerns and is now trying to accomplish through the backdoor what : Congress : refused to do directly in the law." The EEOC commission appointed by : President : Bush. : : : You left out some pertinent details, why am I not surprised. Such as? I can't begin to fathom what it take to surprise an asshole like you. : : : "Such benefits are provided on a voluntary basis at the discretion of each : employer and the Commission is acting to preserve these valuable benefits : for retirees," Commission Chair Cari Dominguez, a Republican, said in a : statement. : : The Times reports that several commission members argued that employers are : more likely to continue providing health benefits to retirees under 65 if : they are allowed to reduce or eliminate benefits for those 65 and older. : : The rule change has the backing of the American Benefits Council - a trade : group representing large employers - as well as the National Education : Association and the American Federation of Teachers. : : The language of the rule adopted by the panel says that it "is not intended : to encourage employers to eliminate any retiree health benefits they may : currently provide." : : Before it becomes final, the proposed rule must go through further review by : federal agencies and the White House Office of Management and Budget. : : : : Another example of why no good American, why no one who believes in : Democracy, : why no one with even the most basic moral values, can support President : Bush and : his brand of Bush/Limbaugh Republican scum. : : : Another excample of how democrats lie and distort. Another example of how know-it-all repigs regularly put their stupidity, bigotry, and ignorance on display for all to see. : : : : --- : Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. : Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). : Version: 6.0.644 / Virus Database: 412 - Release Date: 3/26/2004 : : : : |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bernard spilman" wrote in message news ![]() OSAF Man, you're one literate son-of-a-bitch! I'm impressed. WS Good that we have something in common. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "SkyModem" wrote in message .. . "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message link.net... : : "clamnebula" wrote in message : ... : Date: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:29 pm : Subject: HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY : : http://www.moderateindependent.com/v2i4retirees.htm : : HAVE THEY NO SOULS OR BASIC MORALITY? : Republicans Unanimously Vote To Allow Employers To Rip Promised Retiree : Health : Benefits Out From Under Everyone's Nose : by John S. Ashton : : APRIL 23, 2004 - "Retirees who qualify for Medicare would see their health : benefits cut or eliminated under a proposal approved Thursday by the Equal : Employment Opportunity Commission. : : "The commission voted 3 to 1 in approval of the proposed rule, with three : Republicans in favor and one Democrat opposing it." : : So reports CBS News (see: : http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in613305.shtml ) : : This election is about morality, plain and simple. The Republican Party : has : entirely lost its conscience. Promised, expected retiree health benefits : are one : of the most vital things a person depends on. Currently it is illegal for : companies to go back on their word and eliminate them. The Republicans - : unanimously - want to change that, allowing any employer who feels like it : to : simply go back on their word. : : What employer won't? In an age when "cost cutting" and "downsizing" has : squeezed : current workers without mercy or morals while executive compensation has : grown : exponentially, there is no incentive at all for companies - en masse - to : not : choose to go back on their word and eliminate the health care benefits so : many : depend on or were planning on. There is no downside for the companies - : what can : a retiree do, quit in protest when they don't even work for the company? : : Today, the 3 Republicans appointed by President Bush to a board that : exists not : to deal with healthcare in the first place but only discrimination in the : workplace had no problem, no moral values whatsoever, to stand in the way : of : them using what is supposed to be a minority protecting entity for the : sake of : assaulting the basic safety and security of millions upon millions and : Americans - all for the sake of corporate profits. : : The EEOC. This is the tool that President Bush used to attack all retired : or : retiring Americans who had counted on promised health benefits, this is : the tool : that President Bush is using to stick America with something our elected : officials in the Congress just voted down. : : As CBS reports, ".the new rule is identical to Section 631 of the Senate's : version of the Medicare Rx bill, which was killed by Congress "after : hearing : from tens of thousands of AARP members." : : But President Bush doesn't care about the will of the people and the votes : of : their elected representatives. He has no moral code and doesn't value : either any : American people or democracy. Coldly and entirely without conscience, he : moved : against the will of the people to rip the health coverage away from a : seventy : year old woman being treated for cancer, an eighty year old man with a : heart : ailment, men and women with diabetes - suddenly, they'll lose their : coverage. : And the President was so determined to commit this horrible atrocity : against : millions of Americans that he went around Congress and used what is : supposed to : be a commission that protects workers from racism and discrimination to : commit : his entirely amoral, coldly brutal ends. : : As CBS reports, "Unfortunately, the EEOC has turned a deaf ear to those : same : concerns and is now trying to accomplish through the backdoor what : Congress : refused to do directly in the law." The EEOC commission appointed by : President : Bush. : : : You left out some pertinent details, why am I not surprised. Such as? I can't begin to fathom what it take to surprise an asshole like you. : : : "Such benefits are provided on a voluntary basis at the discretion of each : employer and the Commission is acting to preserve these valuable benefits : for retirees," Commission Chair Cari Dominguez, a Republican, said in a : statement. : : The Times reports that several commission members argued that employers are : more likely to continue providing health benefits to retirees under 65 if : they are allowed to reduce or eliminate benefits for those 65 and older. : : The rule change has the backing of the American Benefits Council - a trade : group representing large employers - as well as the National Education : Association and the American Federation of Teachers. : : The language of the rule adopted by the panel says that it "is not intended : to encourage employers to eliminate any retiree health benefits they may : currently provide." : : Before it becomes final, the proposed rule must go through further review by : federal agencies and the White House Office of Management and Budget. : : : : Another example of why no good American, why no one who believes in : Democracy, : why no one with even the most basic moral values, can support President : Bush and : his brand of Bush/Limbaugh Republican scum. : : : Another excample of how democrats lie and distort. Another example of how know-it-all repigs regularly put their stupidity, bigotry, and ignorance on display for all to see. Things you should know: A: I'm not a Republican, nor am I a Democrat. B. I'm not a bigot, unless you count hating hypocricy and bull****. C. I don't claim to be a know-it-all, just someone who can spot distortion and lies from either side of the aisle. : : : : --- : Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. : Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). : Version: 6.0.644 / Virus Database: 412 - Release Date: 3/26/2004 : : : : |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Things you should know:
A: I'm not a Republican, nor am I a Democrat. B. I'm not a bigot, unless you count hating hypocricy and bull****. C. I don't claim to be a know-it-all, just someone who can spot distortion and lies from either side of the aisle. Bull-****ing-****! You have yourself been distorting and lying in nearly every post you've made. WS |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Man, you're one literate son-of-a-bitch! I'm impressed.
WS Good that we have something in common. ZING! Your superior wit has again bested me. WS PS: I think there is a "remedial" group you might like better than this one, not so many big words. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bernard spilman" wrote in message . com... Man, you're one literate son-of-a-bitch! I'm impressed. WS Good that we have something in common. ZING! Your superior wit has again bested me. WS PS: I think there is a "remedial" group you might like better than this one, not so many big words. And miss all your on target responses! I'll stay here. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bernard spilman" wrote in message . com... Things you should know: A: I'm not a Republican, nor am I a Democrat. B. I'm not a bigot, unless you count hating hypocricy and bull****. C. I don't claim to be a know-it-all, just someone who can spot distortion and lies from either side of the aisle. Bull-****ing-****! You have yourself been distorting and lying in nearly every post you've made. WS It only seems that way because you've have a belief system that is a mountain of lies. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Upgrading to Basic Component System | Audio Opinions | |||
On a mission : finding a basic radio | General | |||
Basic Speaker Replacement Quesiton | Audio Opinions | |||
does this exist? basic receiver only head unit | Car Audio | |||
Basic deck / integrated amplifier topology questions | Car Audio |