Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST Thanks for any input. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jenn" wrote in message ... When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST Many folks on rec.audio.pro (professional engineers form the core) believe the following to be the best-sounding value under about $500....many of whom are familiar with the CAD's and other inexpensive mics. The 2020 in particular is an outstanding budget mic, and the 2021 an average budget small-diaphragm. Total cost (hold your hat) - $150 plus shipping (or perhaps not if you can get a deal). http://www.bswusa.com/proditem.asp?item=AT2041SP |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Harry Lavo" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message ... When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST Many folks on rec.audio.pro (professional engineers form the core) believe the following to be the best-sounding value under about $500....many of whom are familiar with the CAD's and other inexpensive mics. The 2020 in particular is an outstanding budget mic, and the 2021 an average budget small-diaphragm. Total cost (hold your hat) - $150 plus shipping (or perhaps not if you can get a deal). http://www.bswusa.com/proditem.asp?item=AT2041SP Thanks! |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jenn" wrote in message ... When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST Thanks for any input. Jenn, The pencil mikes look identical to the MXL603s, which has a magical reputation with guitar. Others have used it for all kinds of acoustic instrument miking. It has a high frequency peak that makes a poor choice for high hats. See Harmony Central reviews for more. I can't contradict Harry Lavo's advice, but I would point out that on paper, at least, the cheaper AT mikes are noisier than mics in the same price range from MXL, Studio Projects, and a few others. Also, with the AT choice, you miss out on the luscious choice of omnis, which provide better frequency response and no proximity effect. Here's my choice: From http://www.mxlmics.com/Artists/artists_index.html, an MXL 604, and an MXL 2003. From B&H, the 604 at $100 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...x=7&image.y=10 giving you a choice of omni/cardioid by switching the capsules, and The 2003 at $150 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont....x=6&image.y=7 |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"soundhaspriority" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message ... When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST Thanks for any input. Jenn, The pencil mikes look identical to the MXL603s, which has a magical reputation with guitar. Others have used it for all kinds of acoustic instrument miking. It has a high frequency peak that makes a poor choice for high hats. See Harmony Central reviews for more. I can't contradict Harry Lavo's advice, but I would point out that on paper, at least, the cheaper AT mikes are noisier than mics in the same price range from MXL, Studio Projects, and a few others. Also, with the AT choice, you miss out on the luscious choice of omnis, which provide better frequency response and no proximity effect. Here's my choice: From http://www.mxlmics.com/Artists/artists_index.html, an MXL 604, and an MXL 2003. From B&H, the 604 at $100 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...cLRCF!-1198276 125!1152579685462?ci=1&sb=ps&pn=1&sq=desc&InitialS earch=yes&O=RootPage.jsp&A=s earch&Q=*&bhs=t&shs=MXL604&image.x=7&image.y=10 giving you a choice of omni/cardioid by switching the capsules, and The 2003 at $150 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...sq=desc&Initia lSearch=yes&O=productlist.jsp&A=search&Q=*&bhs=t&s hs=MXL2003&image.x=6&image.y =7 Thanks to you as well! |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "soundhaspriority" wrote in message ... "Jenn" wrote in message ... When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST Thanks for any input. Jenn, The pencil mikes look identical to the MXL603s, which has a magical reputation with guitar. Others have used it for all kinds of acoustic instrument miking. It has a high frequency peak that makes a poor choice for high hats. See Harmony Central reviews for more. I can't contradict Harry Lavo's advice, but I would point out that on paper, at least, the cheaper AT mikes are noisier than mics in the same price range from MXL, Studio Projects, and a few others. Also, with the AT choice, you miss out on the luscious choice of omnis, which provide better frequency response and no proximity effect. Here's my choice: From http://www.mxlmics.com/Artists/artists_index.html, an MXL 604, and an MXL 2003. From B&H, the 604 at $100 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...x=7&image.y=10 giving you a choice of omni/cardioid by switching the capsules, and The 2003 at $150 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont....x=6&image.y=7 I certainly agree with you that 3-pattern mics are much more versatile. But I think in Jenn's case that may be superfluous, as she has a set ("classic") way of recording her guitar, and that entails two cardioid mics. I also agree with you about the reputation of A-T microphones, but apparently the 2020 is an exeption. And again, the proposed use needs to be taken into account. Noise level is almost moot when close micing....it becomes a major issue when choosing room mics or mics for purist recording of ensembles from a distance. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jenn" wrote in message ... In article , "Harry Lavo" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message ... When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST Many folks on rec.audio.pro (professional engineers form the core) believe the following to be the best-sounding value under about $500....many of whom are familiar with the CAD's and other inexpensive mics. The 2020 in particular is an outstanding budget mic, and the 2021 an average budget small-diaphragm. Total cost (hold your hat) - $150 plus shipping (or perhaps not if you can get a deal). http://www.bswusa.com/proditem.asp?item=AT2041SP Thanks! Another possibility if you want to take a chance on giving up the large diaphragm mic in favor of a second small mic....a pair of Rode NT-5's. These would set you back $400, but they have an excellent reputation as guitar mics, and also as room mics. So you could use them close, and you could also use the matched pair for recording at a distance if you so chose. http://www.swee****er.com/store/detail/NT5 In any case, you should try to get the dealer to agree to a return within 15 days if you can't audition them at a store. Ultimately, mic choice is to some degree a matter of preference, and after the basic parameters are set, it comes down to auditioning and listening. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Harry Lavo" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message ... In article , "Harry Lavo" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message ... When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST Many folks on rec.audio.pro (professional engineers form the core) believe the following to be the best-sounding value under about $500....many of whom are familiar with the CAD's and other inexpensive mics. The 2020 in particular is an outstanding budget mic, and the 2021 an average budget small-diaphragm. Total cost (hold your hat) - $150 plus shipping (or perhaps not if you can get a deal). http://www.bswusa.com/proditem.asp?item=AT2041SP Thanks! Another possibility if you want to take a chance on giving up the large diaphragm mic in favor of a second small mic....a pair of Rode NT-5's. These would set you back $400, but they have an excellent reputation as guitar mics, and also as room mics. So you could use them close, and you could also use the matched pair for recording at a distance if you so chose. http://www.swee****er.com/store/detail/NT5 In any case, you should try to get the dealer to agree to a return within 15 days if you can't audition them at a store. Ultimately, mic choice is to some degree a matter of preference, and after the basic parameters are set, it comes down to auditioning and listening. Great, thanks. I've heard of these. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jenn wrote:
When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST You can do better. CAD buys commodity (read: cheap) condenser mic elements from China and puts them in a fancy expensive-looking housing. So it *looks* like a quality studio mic (e.g. U87, KM84) , but it sounds like a $49 Radio Shack Mr Microphone. //Walt |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jenn wrote: When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST Thanks for any input. You might also want to look at some nice dynamic mics. I'd say ignore Shure but for the fact that many ppl consider the SM57 to be ok on instruments ( although I utterly loathe the Shure SMs for my part ). Graham |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eeyore" wrote in message ... Jenn wrote: When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST Thanks for any input. You might also want to look at some nice dynamic mics. I'd say ignore Shure but for the fact that many ppl consider the SM57 to be ok on instruments ( although I utterly loathe the Shure SMs for my part ). Graham Eyesore is right here, they make me earsore. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jenn wrote: When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST I don't have any experience of the CAD mikes, Jenn. I do like and recommend the Shure SM81 1/2" cardioid, though a pair will cost more than the CD package. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Walt" wrote in message ... Jenn wrote: When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST You can do better. CAD buys commodity (read: cheap) condenser mic elements from China and puts them in a fancy expensive-looking housing. So it *looks* like a quality studio mic (e.g. U87, KM84) , but it sounds like a $49 Radio Shack Mr Microphone. //Walt Chinese mikes are confusing. MXL and Studio Projects have two grades of mikes. I recommended the higher grade. |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"John Atkinson" wrote: Jenn wrote: When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST I don't have any experience of the CAD mikes, Jenn. I do like and recommend the Shure SM81 1/2" cardioid, though a pair will cost more than the CD package. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile Thanks, John. I'll look into it. |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Eeyore wrote: Jenn wrote: When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST Thanks for any input. You might also want to look at some nice dynamic mics. I'd say ignore Shure but for the fact that many ppl consider the SM57 to be ok on instruments ( although I utterly loathe the Shure SMs for my part ). Graham Yeah, I have a SM57 for general live purposes. Thanks for the info. |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Walt wrote: Jenn wrote: When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on this tiny budget? http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST You can do better. CAD buys commodity (read: cheap) condenser mic elements from China and puts them in a fancy expensive-looking housing. So it *looks* like a quality studio mic (e.g. U87, KM84) , but it sounds like a $49 Radio Shack Mr Microphone. //Walt Ah! Thanks. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
Recording Drums | Pro Audio | |||
best way to match mics? | Pro Audio | |||
Condenser mics | Pro Audio | |||
Condenser mics | Pro Audio |