Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Jenn Jenn is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 457
Default Mics

When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST

Thanks for any input.
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Harry Lavo Harry Lavo is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,243
Default Mics


"Jenn" wrote in message
...
When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST



Many folks on rec.audio.pro (professional engineers form the core) believe
the following to be the best-sounding value under about $500....many of whom
are familiar with the CAD's and other inexpensive mics. The 2020 in
particular is an outstanding budget mic, and the 2021 an average budget
small-diaphragm. Total cost (hold your hat) - $150 plus shipping (or
perhaps not if you can get a deal).

http://www.bswusa.com/proditem.asp?item=AT2041SP


  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Jenn Jenn is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 457
Default Mics

In article ,
"Harry Lavo" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST



Many folks on rec.audio.pro (professional engineers form the core) believe
the following to be the best-sounding value under about $500....many of whom
are familiar with the CAD's and other inexpensive mics. The 2020 in
particular is an outstanding budget mic, and the 2021 an average budget
small-diaphragm. Total cost (hold your hat) - $150 plus shipping (or
perhaps not if you can get a deal).

http://www.bswusa.com/proditem.asp?item=AT2041SP


Thanks!
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
soundhaspriority soundhaspriority is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 711
Default Mics


"Jenn" wrote in message
...
When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST

Thanks for any input.


Jenn,
The pencil mikes look identical to the MXL603s, which has a magical
reputation with guitar. Others have used it for all kinds of acoustic
instrument miking. It has a high frequency peak that makes a poor choice for
high hats. See Harmony Central reviews for more.

I can't contradict Harry Lavo's advice, but I would point out that on
paper, at least, the cheaper AT mikes are noisier than mics in the same
price range from MXL, Studio Projects, and a few others. Also, with the AT
choice, you miss out on the luscious choice of omnis, which provide better
frequency response and no proximity effect. Here's my choice:

From http://www.mxlmics.com/Artists/artists_index.html, an MXL 604, and an
MXL 2003.

From B&H, the 604 at $100
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...x=7&image.y=10
giving you a choice of omni/cardioid by switching the capsules,
and The 2003 at $150
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont....x=6&image.y=7


  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Jenn Jenn is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 457
Default Mics

In article ,
"soundhaspriority" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST

Thanks for any input.


Jenn,
The pencil mikes look identical to the MXL603s, which has a magical
reputation with guitar. Others have used it for all kinds of acoustic
instrument miking. It has a high frequency peak that makes a poor choice for
high hats. See Harmony Central reviews for more.

I can't contradict Harry Lavo's advice, but I would point out that on
paper, at least, the cheaper AT mikes are noisier than mics in the same
price range from MXL, Studio Projects, and a few others. Also, with the AT
choice, you miss out on the luscious choice of omnis, which provide better
frequency response and no proximity effect. Here's my choice:

From http://www.mxlmics.com/Artists/artists_index.html, an MXL 604, and an
MXL 2003.

From B&H, the 604 at $100
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...cLRCF!-1198276
125!1152579685462?ci=1&sb=ps&pn=1&sq=desc&InitialS earch=yes&O=RootPage.jsp&A=s
earch&Q=*&bhs=t&shs=MXL604&image.x=7&image.y=10
giving you a choice of omni/cardioid by switching the capsules,
and The 2003 at $150
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...sq=desc&Initia
lSearch=yes&O=productlist.jsp&A=search&Q=*&bhs=t&s hs=MXL2003&image.x=6&image.y
=7


Thanks to you as well!


  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Harry Lavo Harry Lavo is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,243
Default Mics


"soundhaspriority" wrote in message
...

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST

Thanks for any input.


Jenn,
The pencil mikes look identical to the MXL603s, which has a magical
reputation with guitar. Others have used it for all kinds of acoustic
instrument miking. It has a high frequency peak that makes a poor choice
for high hats. See Harmony Central reviews for more.

I can't contradict Harry Lavo's advice, but I would point out that on
paper, at least, the cheaper AT mikes are noisier than mics in the same
price range from MXL, Studio Projects, and a few others. Also, with the AT
choice, you miss out on the luscious choice of omnis, which provide better
frequency response and no proximity effect. Here's my choice:

From http://www.mxlmics.com/Artists/artists_index.html, an MXL 604, and an
MXL 2003.

From B&H, the 604 at $100
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...x=7&image.y=10
giving you a choice of omni/cardioid by switching the capsules,
and The 2003 at $150
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont....x=6&image.y=7

I certainly agree with you that 3-pattern mics are much more versatile. But
I think in Jenn's case that may be superfluous, as she has a set ("classic")
way of recording her guitar, and that entails two cardioid mics. I also
agree with you about the reputation of A-T microphones, but apparently the
2020 is an exeption. And again, the proposed use needs to be taken into
account. Noise level is almost moot when close micing....it becomes a major
issue when choosing room mics or mics for purist recording of ensembles from
a distance.


  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Harry Lavo Harry Lavo is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,243
Default Mics


"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Harry Lavo" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do
(quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST



Many folks on rec.audio.pro (professional engineers form the core)
believe
the following to be the best-sounding value under about $500....many of
whom
are familiar with the CAD's and other inexpensive mics. The 2020 in
particular is an outstanding budget mic, and the 2021 an average budget
small-diaphragm. Total cost (hold your hat) - $150 plus shipping (or
perhaps not if you can get a deal).

http://www.bswusa.com/proditem.asp?item=AT2041SP


Thanks!


Another possibility if you want to take a chance on giving up the large
diaphragm mic in favor of a second small mic....a pair of Rode NT-5's.
These would set you back $400, but they have an excellent reputation as
guitar mics, and also as room mics. So you could use them close, and you
could also use the matched pair for recording at a distance if you so chose.

http://www.swee****er.com/store/detail/NT5

In any case, you should try to get the dealer to agree to a return within 15
days if you can't audition them at a store. Ultimately, mic choice is to
some degree a matter of preference, and after the basic parameters are set,
it comes down to auditioning and listening.


  #8   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Jenn Jenn is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 457
Default Mics

In article ,
"Harry Lavo" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Harry Lavo" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do
(quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST



Many folks on rec.audio.pro (professional engineers form the core)
believe
the following to be the best-sounding value under about $500....many of
whom
are familiar with the CAD's and other inexpensive mics. The 2020 in
particular is an outstanding budget mic, and the 2021 an average budget
small-diaphragm. Total cost (hold your hat) - $150 plus shipping (or
perhaps not if you can get a deal).

http://www.bswusa.com/proditem.asp?item=AT2041SP


Thanks!


Another possibility if you want to take a chance on giving up the large
diaphragm mic in favor of a second small mic....a pair of Rode NT-5's.
These would set you back $400, but they have an excellent reputation as
guitar mics, and also as room mics. So you could use them close, and you
could also use the matched pair for recording at a distance if you so chose.

http://www.swee****er.com/store/detail/NT5

In any case, you should try to get the dealer to agree to a return within 15
days if you can't audition them at a store. Ultimately, mic choice is to
some degree a matter of preference, and after the basic parameters are set,
it comes down to auditioning and listening.


Great, thanks. I've heard of these.
  #9   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Walt Walt is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 239
Default Mics

Jenn wrote:

When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST


You can do better. CAD buys commodity (read: cheap) condenser mic
elements from China and puts them in a fancy expensive-looking housing.
So it *looks* like a quality studio mic (e.g. U87, KM84) , but it
sounds like a $49 Radio Shack Mr Microphone.

//Walt

  #10   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Eeyore Eeyore is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,297
Default Mics



Jenn wrote:

When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST

Thanks for any input.


You might also want to look at some nice dynamic mics.

I'd say ignore Shure but for the fact that many ppl consider the SM57 to be ok
on instruments ( although I utterly loathe the Shure SMs for my part ).

Graham




  #11   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Clyde Slick Clyde Slick is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 497
Default Mics


"Eeyore" wrote in
message ...


Jenn wrote:

When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST

Thanks for any input.


You might also want to look at some nice dynamic mics.

I'd say ignore Shure but for the fact that many ppl consider the SM57 to
be ok
on instruments ( although I utterly loathe the Shure SMs for my part ).

Graham


Eyesore is right here, they make me earsore.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
John Atkinson John Atkinson is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 462
Default Mics


Jenn wrote:
When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST


I don't have any experience of the CAD mikes, Jenn. I do like
and recommend the Shure SM81 1/2" cardioid, though a pair
will cost more than the CD package.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

  #13   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
soundhaspriority soundhaspriority is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 711
Default Mics


"Walt" wrote in message
...
Jenn wrote:

When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small diaphragm
at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment in mics for
the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300. The
recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a vocalist
joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality wise) on
this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST


You can do better. CAD buys commodity (read: cheap) condenser mic
elements from China and puts them in a fancy expensive-looking housing. So
it *looks* like a quality studio mic (e.g. U87, KM84) , but it sounds like
a $49 Radio Shack Mr Microphone.

//Walt

Chinese mikes are confusing. MXL and Studio Projects have two grades of
mikes. I recommended the higher grade.


  #14   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Jenn Jenn is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 457
Default Mics

In article . com,
"John Atkinson" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST


I don't have any experience of the CAD mikes, Jenn. I do like
and recommend the Shure SM81 1/2" cardioid, though a pair
will cost more than the CD package.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile


Thanks, John. I'll look into it.
  #15   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Jenn Jenn is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 457
Default Mics

In article ,
Eeyore wrote:

Jenn wrote:

When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST

Thanks for any input.


You might also want to look at some nice dynamic mics.

I'd say ignore Shure but for the fact that many ppl consider the SM57 to be ok
on instruments ( although I utterly loathe the Shure SMs for my part ).

Graham


Yeah, I have a SM57 for general live purposes. Thanks for the info.


  #16   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Jenn Jenn is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 457
Default Mics

In article ,
Walt wrote:

Jenn wrote:

When I want to record myself (various guitars), I usually borrow some
very good mics from the college. I record acoustic guitars in a common
way: large diaphragm condenser near the soundhole, and a small
diaphragm at the 12th fret. I'm thinking of making a small investment
in mics for the sake of convenience. I only want to spend around $300.
The recordings are just for myself and friends. I sometimes have a
vocalist joining me. Is this package about as good as I can do (quality
wise) on this tiny budget?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--CADGXL3000PKST


You can do better. CAD buys commodity (read: cheap) condenser mic
elements from China and puts them in a fancy expensive-looking housing.
So it *looks* like a quality studio mic (e.g. U87, KM84) , but it
sounds like a $49 Radio Shack Mr Microphone.

//Walt


Ah! Thanks.
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some Recording Techniques kevindoylemusic Pro Audio 19 February 16th 05 07:54 PM
Recording Drums Matrixmusic Pro Audio 10 February 12th 05 03:23 AM
best way to match mics? Jonny Durango Pro Audio 6 December 14th 04 04:07 PM
Condenser mics Matthew Coffay Pro Audio 44 May 23rd 04 05:43 AM
Condenser mics Matthew Coffay Pro Audio 0 May 15th 04 10:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"