has anyone seen this?
http://www.vintagemicrophone.com/JSh...t.php?xProd=45

it must be new. at that price I'm going to order one and try it out.

Nate

Nate Najar wrote:
has anyone seen this?
http://www.vintagemicrophone.com/JSh...t.php?xProd=45

it must be new. at that price I'm going to order one and try it out.

Nate

I'd love to hear your thoughts on it when you've tried it out

John

I wonder how it compares to the Lomo?

On 5 Jun 2006 16:33:05 -0700, "Nate Najar" wrote:

it must be new. at that price I'm going to order one and try it out.

wrote:
I wonder how it compares to the Lomo?

_Much_ better, I hope.

FWIW, I don't think I've ever seen a sensitivity as high as 50 mV/Pa
(-26 dB) before. Don't send one of these into an MD or DAT!

That's 7.9 Vrms (22.4 Vpp) at it's rated 136 dB max SPL!


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote in
:

snip...snip

FWIW, I don't think I've ever seen a sensitivity as high as 50 mV/Pa
(-26 dB) before. Don't send one of these into an MD or DAT!

That's 7.9 Vrms (22.4 Vpp) at it's rated 136 dB max SPL!
Bob

Only if your calculator is broken, or, in your case, your brain. Also, 50mV
corresponds to -26dBV and 50mV/Pa corresponds to -26dB re 1V/Pa, you
ignoramus.

Bob Cain wrote in
:

snip...snip

FWIW, I don't think I've ever seen a sensitivity as high as 50 mV/Pa
(-26 dB) before. Don't send one of these into an MD or DAT!

That's 7.9 Vrms (22.4 Vpp) at it's rated 136 dB max SPL!
Bob

Only if your calculator is broken, or, in your case, your brain. Also,
50mV corresponds to -26dBV and 50mV/Pa corresponds to -26dB re 1V/Pa,
you ignoramus.

Please be advised that the following was posted by Bob Cain via giganews
using falsified headers and using my real name.




Gary Sokolich wrote in
:

Bob Cain wrote in
:

snip...snip

FWIW, I don't think I've ever seen a sensitivity as high as 50 mV/Pa
(-26 dB) before. Don't send one of these into an MD or DAT!

That's 7.9 Vrms (22.4 Vpp) at it's rated 136 dB max SPL!
Bob

Only if your calculator is broken, or, in your case, your brain. Also,
50mV corresponds to -26dBV and 50mV/Pa corresponds to -26dB re 1V/Pa,
you ignoramus.

Gary Sokolich wrote:
Bob Cain wrote in
:

snip...snip

FWIW, I don't think I've ever seen a sensitivity as high as 50 mV/Pa
(-26 dB) before. Don't send one of these into an MD or DAT!

That's 7.9 Vrms (22.4 Vpp) at it's rated 136 dB max SPL!
Bob

Only if your calculator is broken, or, in your case, your brain. Also,
50mV corresponds to -26dBV and 50mV/Pa corresponds to -26dB re 1V/Pa,
you ignoramus.

Yes, I made an error. I misremembered 1 Pa to be 92 dB SPL when it is
actually 94 dB SPL. 94 dB SPL is 42 dB below the rated max SPL of the
mic and 42 dB above 50 mV is 6.3 V rather than 7.9 V. Still rather a lot.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote in
:

Gary Sokolich wrote:
Bob Cain wrote in
:

snip...snip

FWIW, I don't think I've ever seen a sensitivity as high as 50 mV/Pa
(-26 dB) before. Don't send one of these into an MD or DAT!

That's 7.9 Vrms (22.4 Vpp) at it's rated 136 dB max SPL!
Bob

Only if your calculator is broken, or, in your case, your brain.
Also, 50mV corresponds to -26dBV and 50mV/Pa corresponds to -26dB re
1V/Pa, you ignoramus.

Yes, I made an error. I misremembered 1 Pa to be 92 dB SPL when it is
actually 94 dB SPL. 94 dB SPL is 42 dB below the rated max SPL of the
mic and 42 dB above 50 mV is 6.3 V rather than 7.9 V. Still rather a
lot.
Bob


It isn't your first error and, given your track record, I doubt that it
will be your last. Accordingly, while you continue to assault me with your
ad-homimem attacks, I will continue call attention to your gross technical
incompetence.