This explains why Sockpuppet "Ol'chicken" Yustabe has left the left. ;-)

http://www.redcoat.net/pics/worldconspiracy.jpg

Thanks for the link Paul.
I guess Sandman will like it.

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
This explains why Sockpuppet "Ol'chicken" Yustabe has left the left. ;-)

http://www.redcoat.net/pics/worldconspiracy.jpg

Thanks for the link Paul.
I guess Sandman will like it.


The reasons I left the 'left' were its hatreds, hypocricy, and
its insisitence on adhering to the means rather than focusing
on the ends. Also, its intolerance of dissent and lack of diversity
of opinion. Heretics will be punished.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Sockpuppet Yustabe wrote:
"Lionel" wrote in message
...

This explains why Sockpuppet "Ol'chicken" Yustabe has left the left. ;-)

http://www.redcoat.net/pics/worldconspiracy.jpg

Thanks for the link Paul.
I guess Sandman will like it.



The reasons I left the 'left' were its hatreds, hypocricy, and
its insisitence on adhering to the means rather than focusing
on the ends. Also, its intolerance of dissent and lack of diversity
of opinion. Heretics will be punished.

I'm waiting foo you Ol' Chicken :
http://www.redcoat.net/pics/bigcactus.jpg

Sockpuppet Yustabe wrote:

I voted for Bush in the 2000 election. It was the first time in
my life I ever voted for a Republican for President. I voted for
McGovern, Carter, Mondale and Dukakis.

You've finally found your way Ol' Chicken...
....The way of the lie and the war. You excel in defending G.W. Bush,
Sandman is right you would have defend Mussolini with the same enthusiasm.

Mr. Middius said:

Socky said:

I voted for Bush in the 2000 election.

And you're STILL not ashamed?


Even I didn't vote for him, and I'm a Republican.

Boon

Mr. Phillips wrote:


Mr. Middius said:

Socky said:

I voted for Bush in the 2000 election.

And you're STILL not ashamed?


Even I didn't vote for him, and I'm a Republican.

Boon








Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaa ! (sorry, I couldn't resist).



Bruce J. Richman

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
Sockpuppet Yustabe wrote:

I voted for Bush in the 2000 election. It was the first time in
my life I ever voted for a Republican for President. I voted for
McGovern, Carter, Mondale and Dukakis.

You've finally found your way Ol' Chicken...
...The way of the lie and the war. You excel in defending G.W. Bush,
Sandman is right you would have defend Mussolini with the same
enthusiasm.

We find you defending Saddam with such enthusiasm.

ScottW

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
Mr. Middius said:

Socky said:

I voted for Bush in the 2000 election.

And you're STILL not ashamed?


Even I didn't vote for him, and I'm a Republican.

I couldn't vote for Gore after the Chinese money
from the monks stupidity.

I really wish someone within the Republican ranks would
have stepped up to have a meaningful primary.
It might have allowed republicans unhappy with Bush a
chance to have their views and issues addressed.

BTW, I bet Hilary is really kicking herself for passing
up this election. If Kerry should win, she is done
as a presidential hopeful. A silver lining in
every cloud.

ScottW

ScottW said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
Mr. Middius said:

Socky said:

I voted for Bush in the 2000 election.

And you're STILL not ashamed?


Even I didn't vote for him, and I'm a Republican.

I couldn't vote for Gore after the Chinese money
from the monks stupidity.

I really wish someone within the Republican ranks would
have stepped up to have a meaningful primary.
It might have allowed republicans unhappy with Bush a
chance to have their views and issues addressed.

BTW, I bet Hilary is really kicking herself for passing
up this election. If Kerry should win, she is done
as a presidential hopeful. A silver lining in
every cloud.

I didn't vote in 2000 because I was sent out of town on an emergency on
Election Day. At the time, however, I was very disappointed with the choice of
either Gore or Bush. I really have no idea who I would have voted for; it
probably would have been a last-minute impulse. I indulge myself sometimes by
thinking I would have written in John McCain, but I've never been one to throw
my vote away.

Now, in 2004, I'm almost at the same place. There's no way I will vote for
Bush, but I'm not that excited by John "Don't You Know Who I Am?" Kerry.

Boon

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
Mr. Middius said:

Socky said:

I voted for Bush in the 2000 election.

And you're STILL not ashamed?


Even I didn't vote for him, and I'm a Republican.

Boon

Did you just not vote, or vote for Gore? or Nader?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
Sockpuppet Yustabe wrote:

I voted for Bush in the 2000 election. It was the first time in
my life I ever voted for a Republican for President. I voted for
McGovern, Carter, Mondale and Dukakis.

You've finally found your way Ol' Chicken...
...The way of the lie and the war. You excel in defending G.W. Bush,
Sandman is right you would have defend Mussolini with the same enthusiasm.

I wouldn't support any dictator.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Yustabe said:


"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
Mr. Middius said:

Socky said:

I voted for Bush in the 2000 election.

And you're STILL not ashamed?


Even I didn't vote for him, and I'm a Republican.

Boon

Did you just not vote, or vote for Gore? or Nader?

I explained this about five minutes later, but in another thread, so you may
not have seen it. I was sent out of town for work at the last minute on
Election Day. I was kind of ****ed because I tried to arrange some way to cast
my vote where I was at (in the Bay Area), but I missed the deadline.

But honestly, I was becoming apathetic about having to choose between Bush and
Gore. I liked Bradley and McCain much more than either one. I don't know who
I would have wound up voting for.

Boon

ScottW wrote:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...

Mr. Middius said:


Socky said:


I voted for Bush in the 2000 election.

And you're STILL not ashamed?


Even I didn't vote for him, and I'm a Republican.


I couldn't vote for Gore after the Chinese money
from the monks stupidity.

I really wish someone within the Republican ranks would
have stepped up to have a meaningful primary.
It might have allowed republicans unhappy with Bush a
chance to have their views and issues addressed.

This got to me too - ust because he is the incumbent
he automatically gets the nomination from his party?

No matter how many better people there out there to
do the job in his party? That's a sure sign that the
entire system needs to be overhauled, IMO.

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...



I voted for Bush in the 2000 election. It was the first time in
my life I ever voted for a Republican for President. I voted for
McGovern, Carter, Mondale and Dukakis.

Let's just assume for argument's sake that I believe you, which I don't.

If 2000 was the first time you voted Republican in your life, and Dukakis
was the last Democrat you voted for, there's an 8 year gap (remember the
18
1/2 minute gap?) - you omitted the years 1992 and 1996. I'll bet you
didn't
vote Democrat (for Clinton) in those years (you appear to admit as much by
omission).


In 1992 I voted for Perot. In 1996 I voted for another guy with big ears.
I wrote in Micky Mouse.

So, continuing to assume for argument's sake that you voted Democrat until
1992, there's only one possible explanation: you had a car accident
sometime
prior to that election, hurt your back, gained weight, and suffered a
sever
concussion - so severe that all of your political beliefs went straight
out
the window, and your brain turned 180 degrees in your skull, and you began
voting Republican. I mean, how else, assuming the truth of your
statement,
can one explain that someone would vote against Reagan's "trickle-down
economics" twice (and that dumbass greed theory was thoroughly discredited
early in his administration since it led to layoffs, deficits, and
recession), yet by 2000 you're voting for another Republican dumbass who
promises to raise that discredited "trickle-down" **** from the dead - and
does so even more brazenly, leading to even more severe job losses,
deficits, and recession, and by 2004 you're crazy enough to plan on voting
for five more years of that same ****?

Try to make some sense, Wormtongue. I know it's hard, but a little
forthrightness might help.


Sorry, man, you forgot all about Perot.
And I made one inadvertant error in my list. So let me correct it.
I sat out the Dukakis race, didn't vote for President.





----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...



I voted for Bush in the 2000 election. It was the first time in
my life I ever voted for a Republican for President. I voted for
McGovern, Carter, Mondale and Dukakis.

Let's just assume for argument's sake that I believe you, which I
don't.

If 2000 was the first time you voted Republican in your life, and
Dukakis
was the last Democrat you voted for, there's an 8 year gap (remember
the
18
1/2 minute gap?) - you omitted the years 1992 and 1996. I'll bet you
didn't
vote Democrat (for Clinton) in those years (you appear to admit as much
by
omission).


In 1992 I voted for Perot. In 1996 I voted for another guy with big ears.
I wrote in Micky Mouse.

So, continuing to assume for argument's sake that you voted Democrat
until
1992, there's only one possible explanation: you had a car accident
sometime
prior to that election, hurt your back, gained weight, and suffered a
sever
concussion - so severe that all of your political beliefs went straight
out
the window, and your brain turned 180 degrees in your skull, and you
began
voting Republican. I mean, how else, assuming the truth of your
statement,
can one explain that someone would vote against Reagan's "trickle-down
economics" twice (and that dumbass greed theory was thoroughly
discredited
early in his administration since it led to layoffs, deficits, and
recession), yet by 2000 you're voting for another Republican dumbass
who
promises to raise that discredited "trickle-down" **** from the dead -
and
does so even more brazenly, leading to even more severe job losses,
deficits, and recession, and by 2004 you're crazy enough to plan on
voting
for five more years of that same ****?

Try to make some sense, Wormtongue. I know it's hard, but a little
forthrightness might help.


Sorry, man, you forgot all about Perot.
And I made one inadvertant error in my list. So let me correct it.
I sat out the Dukakis race, didn't vote for President.

Have you figured you why Sanders feels the need to go off with
this irrational hate speech?

With him as a liberal, do we even need conservatives?

ScottW

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:ST93c.84$Nj.29@fed1read01

Have you figured you why Sanders feels the need to go off with
this irrational hate speech?

Anybody who lived through Sanders past life as an audiophile knows that he
is driven by hate and ignorance.

George M. Middius wrote in message . ..

That's sort of right. Dubya is Big Money's incumbent. You'd need a
scandal the size of Watergate to overcome that advantage.

Here's a fun site:

http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/RAYFAIR/PDF/2002DHTM.HTM

This Yale economist has calculated an equation that explains all the
elections back to 1916 using two variables: the growth rate and the
inflation rate in the year of the election. This model says that
Nixon would get 59.4 percent based on 6.1 percent growth and 4.8
percent inflation in 1972. In fact he got 61.8 percent.

In other words, Watergate didn't stop him.

It predicts 58.7 percent for Dubya in 2004 based on estimated data,
btw.

Jacob Kramer wrote:

George M. Middius wrote in message . ..


That's sort of right. Dubya is Big Money's incumbent. You'd need a
scandal the size of Watergate to overcome that advantage.


Here's a fun site:

http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/RAYFAIR/PDF/2002DHTM.HTM

This Yale economist has calculated an equation that explains all the
elections back to 1916 using two variables: the growth rate and the
inflation rate in the year of the election. This model says that
Nixon would get 59.4 percent based on 6.1 percent growth and 4.8
percent inflation in 1972. In fact he got 61.8 percent.

In other words, Watergate didn't stop him.

It predicts 58.7 percent for Dubya in 2004 based on estimated data,
btw.

There are exceptions, though. If Bush shoots his own foot off,
which is fairly likely, it's going to be razor-thin.

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message ...


In 1992 I voted for Perot. In 1996 I voted for another guy with big ears.
I wrote in Micky Mouse.


If that ain't a sig file waiting to happen I don't know what is.