Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently picked up a couple of PE54. According to the documentation,
the internal transformer brings them to high impedance. Since people have been buzzing lately about taking the transformers out of SM57, I am considering a similar surgery on the 54. Could I expect similar results? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Patrick Covert wrote:
I recently picked up a couple of PE54. According to the documentation, the internal transformer brings them to high impedance. Since people have been buzzing lately about taking the transformers out of SM57, I am considering a similar surgery on the 54. Could I expect similar results? I think these mikes are basically SM57s with the stand mount and with a different transformer. The capsule should be an SM57 type pretty much. You have three options: 1. I think if you take the transformer out, it will sound pretty much like an SM57 with the transformer taken out. 2. I think if you keep the mike as-is, it will probably sound better into a cheap console preamp than an SM57 will. There will be some high end loss because of all those tiny little windings on the transformer secondary but it'll be a better match for a Mackie input than an SM-57 will. 3. I think that if you replace the transformer with one taken out of an SM57, it will sound just like an SM57. Shure did make an SM57 with the right-angle mount... I think it was called an SM56 and it was great for drum-miking. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|