http://news.yahoo.com/s/eo/20060522/en_music_eo/19088

that's not career ending. Hell I'm going to buy her CD right now.
Screw this admin.

wrote:

that's not career ending. Hell I'm going to buy her CD right now.
Screw this admin.


I bought the single, and will buy the CD too.

wrote in message
ups.com...
that's not career ending. Hell I'm going to buy her CD right now.
Screw this admin.


There's logic for ya.

Logic 7 Pro actually.

Phil Hadaway wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/eo/20060522/en_music_eo/19088

I haven't bought a new CD in years, but I may well buy this one. F*ck off!

jak

Is this the m.p.l.a
Or is this the u.d.a
Or is this the i.r.a
I thought it was the u.s.a. or just
another country?

In article ,
Phil Hadaway wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/eo/20060522/en_music_eo/19088

Last Dixie Chicks album soundscanned almost 6 million units. Their
career seems to be doing OK.

"Phil Hadaway" wrote in message

http://news.yahoo.com/s/eo/20060522/en_music_eo/19088

It all depends on who's career they're intent on helping to end. ;-)

Phil Hadaway schreef:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/eo/20060522/en_music_eo/19088

I doubt it will end their career, since a lot of people share their
sentiment.

RS

David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
"Phil Hadaway" wrote in message

http://news.yahoo.com/s/eo/20060522/en_music_eo/19088

It all depends on who's career they're intent on helping to end. ;-)


LOL.

I agree, this is a pathetic way to end a career. Bush will go out as
the worst president in history!

As for the Dixie Chicks, being right is the best revenge. And they had
the guts to say so at the time. Not like these people who have 'changed
their mind' on the war. You know, the moral ones.

How pathetic that anyone would pay so much attention to a complete airhead
like this Dixie Chick. Sure.. they sell albums but so did that Huang guy
from American Idol or whatever the **** his name was. This Dixie chick has
absolutely no credentials as far as I am concerned and paying her any more
attention than she deserves is downright silly. Let's see her get into
office and make some changes.. otherwise.. I wouldn't be bothered if she
shut the **** up and went on with her whiny voice on those horrible records.
She's merely someone who has let her fame go to her head, A lot of room in
that head apparently. I am not a Dixie Chicks fan by any stretch but I also
don't give a flying **** what she has to say about anything at all. She
could be praising Bush and I would still be convinced she has no ****ing
idea what she is talking about.


"Phil Hadaway" wrote in message
...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/eo/20060522/en_music_eo/19088

It looks like Bush has met his match then.
I'd buy Huangs cd as well if it help oust our great Marmoset-in-Chief

I thought the most inflamatory remark in the article was,
"I'm not ready to fly coach"

Tom


wrote in message
oups.com...
It looks like Bush has met his match then.
I'd buy Huangs cd as well if it help oust our great Marmoset-in-Chief

My wife bought the new CD today. We like the music. Moreover, it
doesn't matter to us what Natalie thinks of George Bush. This is
America and she's entitled to her opinion.

"rickymix" wrote in message
ups.com...
nap wrote:
I am not a Dixie Chicks fan by any stretch but I also
don't give a flying **** what she has to say about anything at all.

I'm sure they feel the same about you, nappy. :) Cover of Time
Magazine; apparently a lot of folks disagree with you.


hmm.. Bush has been on the cover.. man of the year also? So much for your
theory. I think Bin Laden was also on the cover wasn't he??And hitler? And
Castor, And Mick Jagger?

wrote in message...

This is America and she's entitled to her opinion.


However, if the cabal isn't stopped, that may not be true for much longer.

"nappy" wrote in message
om...

"rickymix" wrote in message
ups.com...
nap wrote:
I am not a Dixie Chicks fan by any stretch but I also
don't give a flying **** what she has to say about anything at all.

I'm sure they feel the same about you, nappy. :) Cover of Time
Magazine; apparently a lot of folks disagree with you.


hmm.. Bush has been on the cover.. man of the year also? So much for your
theory. I think Bin Laden was also on the cover wasn't he??And hitler? And
Castor, And Mick Jagger?



oops.. Castro..

At any rate.. got any idea how many people it takes to decide who gets on
the cover of TIme? I think it is about 12? So being on the cover of Time
only means you've impressed that certain group of assholes.

"David Morgan (MAMS)" wrote in message
news:6vMcg.4886$oA6.3297@trnddc06...

wrote in message...

This is America and she's entitled to her opinion.


However, if the cabal isn't stopped, that may not be true for much longer.

*rolls eyes*

rickymix wrote:

nap wrote:
I am not a Dixie Chicks fan by any stretch but I also
don't give a flying **** what she has to say about anything at all.

I'm sure they feel the same about you, nappy. :) Cover of Time
Magazine; apparently a lot of folks disagree with you.

She could be praising Bush and I would still be convinced she has
no ****ing idea what she is talking about.

Come on now, be honest. You'd love her.
Cheers, Rick.

At least he knows her name. I don't think he's on her radar.

--
ha

David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
wrote in message...

This is America and she's entitled to her opinion.


However, if the cabal isn't stopped, that may not be true for much longer.

They're fixing to start throwing journalists in jail for
whistleblowing, next you'll be getting a knock on the door by the men
in black if you post unfavorable messages. After all, it's a matter of
national security that everyone thinks the "right" way.

wrote in message
ups.com...

David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
wrote in message...

This is America and she's entitled to her opinion.


However, if the cabal isn't stopped, that may not be true for much
longer.

They're fixing to start throwing journalists in jail for
whistleblowing, next you'll be getting a knock on the door by the men
in black if you post unfavorable messages. After all, it's a matter of
national security that everyone thinks the "right" way.


no // not for whistleblowing but for compromising nation security by
aquiring and printing secure , classified information. Big difference. .
sheesh

In article ,
"nappy" wrote:


no // not for whistleblowing but for compromising nation security by
aquiring and printing secure , classified information. Big difference. .
sheesh

Actually, for being told the info but not publishing it. If you're
talking about the case of the agent's cover being blown, the journalist
was given the info and decided not to print it, but was threatened with
jail if she didn't give up her source, even though she never acted on
the information she was given.

"Romeo Rondeau" wrote in message . com...

"David Morgan (MAMS)" wrote in message
news:6vMcg.4886$oA6.3297@trnddc06...

wrote in message...

This is America and she's entitled to her opinion.


However, if the cabal isn't stopped, that may not be true for much longer.

*rolls eyes*


;-)

wrote in message...

After all, it's a matter of
national security that everyone thinks the "right" way.

And if you don't believe it, they can arrange for something
to make you a little more scared. ;-)

"nobody" wrote in message ...
In article ,
"nappy" wrote:


no // not for whistleblowing but for compromising nation security by
aquiring and printing secure , classified information. Big difference. .
sheesh

Actually, for being told the info but not publishing it. If you're
talking about the case of the agent's cover being blown, the journalist
was given the info and decided not to print it, but was threatened with
jail if she didn't give up her source, even though she never acted on
the information she was given.

That's an old one... for which C. Rove should be hanged
by the neck until dead.... the new thrust is to silence any
open dissent (without actually saying so, of course).

;-)

Tommy B wrote:
I thought the most inflamatory remark in the article was,
"I'm not ready to fly coach"

Yeah, I noticed the same thing. I guess we now know where the Dixie
Chicks lie on the spectrum of artistic integrity vs. fame and fortune.


Todd.

"Todd Bradley" wrote in message . ..
Tommy B wrote:
I thought the most inflamatory remark in the article was,
"I'm not ready to fly coach"

Yeah, I noticed the same thing. I guess we now know where the Dixie
Chicks lie on the spectrum of artistic integrity vs. fame and fortune.


It would seem that way... but isn't this actually a lyric?

"David Morgan (MAMS)" wrote in message
news:sgddg.59534$ge7.14987@trnddc01...

"nobody" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"nappy" wrote:


no // not for whistleblowing but for compromising nation security by
aquiring and printing secure , classified information. Big difference.
.
sheesh

Actually, for being told the info but not publishing it. If you're
talking about the case of the agent's cover being blown, the journalist
was given the info and decided not to print it, but was threatened with
jail if she didn't give up her source, even though she never acted on
the information she was given.

That's an old one... for which C. Rove should be hanged
by the neck until dead.... the new thrust is to silence any
open dissent (without actually saying so, of course).



It's K Rove for those of us who are paying attention. Maybe they aren't
aware of that in Cuba ?


;-)

"Todd Bradley" wrote in message
. ..
Tommy B wrote:
I thought the most inflamatory remark in the article was,
"I'm not ready to fly coach"

Yeah, I noticed the same thing. I guess we now know where the Dixie
Chicks lie on the spectrum of artistic integrity vs. fame and fortune.

Be cautious, though -- it was a bandmate that's not ready to fly coach, not
the woman who dissed Bush.

Dave O'H, who's in another country anyhow...

"nappy" wrote in message et...

"David Morgan (MAMS)" wrote in message
news:sgddg.59534$ge7.14987@trnddc01...

"nobody" wrote in message
...

In article ,
"nappy" wrote:

no // not for whistleblowing but for compromising nation security by
aquiring and printing secure , classified information. Big difference.
sheesh

Actually, for being told the info but not publishing it. If you're
talking about the case of the agent's cover being blown, the journalist
was given the info and decided not to print it, but was threatened with
jail if she didn't give up her source, even though she never acted on
the information she was given.

That's an old one... for which C. Rove should be hanged
by the neck until dead.... the new thrust is to silence any
open dissent (without actually saying so, of course).

It's K Rove for those of us who are paying attention. Maybe they aren't
aware of that in Cuba ?


;-)

Ah, yes.... Herr Karl. A devastating error. I have no excuse.

Todd Bradley wrote:

Tommy B wrote:

I thought the most inflamatory remark in the article was,
"I'm not ready to fly coach"


Yeah, I noticed the same thing. I guess we now know where the Dixie
Chicks lie on the spectrum of artistic integrity vs. fame and fortune.


Todd.

Flying coach twice a year - not a problem. Flying coach
200 times a year - problem.

--
Les Cargill

Well if you really want to know what upset me,and if any of you guys are
married or living with woman, you might relate.
I cannot listen to one more woman telling me, "I'M NOT READY",
about anything!
;-)

Tom




"Les Cargill" wrote in message
.. .
Todd Bradley wrote:

Tommy B wrote:

I thought the most inflamatory remark in the article was,
"I'm not ready to fly coach"


Yeah, I noticed the same thing. I guess we now know where the Dixie
Chicks lie on the spectrum of artistic integrity vs. fame and fortune.


Todd.

Flying coach twice a year - not a problem. Flying coach
200 times a year - problem.

--
Les Cargill

"David Morgan (MAMS)" wrote in message
news:0Trdg.8407$Ar6.7564@trnddc02...
Ah, yes.... Herr Karl. A devastating error. I have no excuse.


I don't have a problem with Karl but he sure does remind me of one of the
Nazis in Raiders of the Lost Ark. The spellign of his name doesn't help..

;-)

Ah, yes.... Herr Karl. A devastating error. I have no excuse.

If you're gonna hate someone, for god's sake know how to spell their name
:-)

Todd Bradley wrote:

Tommy B wrote:
I thought the most inflamatory remark in the article was,
"I'm not ready to fly coach"

Yeah, I noticed the same thing. I guess we now know where the Dixie
Chicks lie on the spectrum of artistic integrity vs. fame and fortune.

Most folks who can afford not to fly coach do not fly coach. When people
start judging "integrity" on the basis of chosen transportation options
we are definitely down the ******** with the national brain cell cache.

--
ha

nappy wrote:

brassplyer wrote...

David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
psychodave.thomas wrote in message...

This is America and she's entitled to her opinion.

However, if the cabal isn't stopped, that may not be true for much
longer.

They're fixing to start throwing journalists in jail for
whistleblowing, next you'll be getting a knock on the door by the men
in black if you post unfavorable messages. After all, it's a matter of
national security that everyone thinks the "right" way.

no // not for whistleblowing but for compromising nation security by
aquiring and printing secure , classified information. Big difference. .
sheesh

While the prez and crew do exactly that attempting to discredit someone
who was telling the truth about WMD's.

Now they're gutting the CIA, and for the same reason: the CIA gave them
the info they needed about what was going on, and they chose not to pay
attention.

If those cats could handle anything like "national security" both towers
would still be standing. Meanwhile, Bin Laden rots in jail, right?

Clown.

--
ha

"hank alrich" wrote in message
.. .
nappy wrote:

brassplyer wrote...

David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
psychodave.thomas wrote in message...

This is America and she's entitled to her opinion.

However, if the cabal isn't stopped, that may not be true for much
longer.

They're fixing to start throwing journalists in jail for
whistleblowing, next you'll be getting a knock on the door by the men
in black if you post unfavorable messages. After all, it's a matter of
national security that everyone thinks the "right" way.

no // not for whistleblowing but for compromising nation security by
aquiring and printing secure , classified information. Big difference. .
sheesh

While the prez and crew do exactly that attempting to discredit someone
who was telling the truth about WMD's.

Now they're gutting the CIA, and for the same reason: the CIA gave them
the info they needed about what was going on, and they chose not to pay
attention.

If those cats could handle anything like "national security" both towers
would still be standing. Meanwhile, Bin Laden rots in jail, right?

Clown.


Hillbilly logic always scares me Hank. Gutting the CIA? You mean the CIA
that was neutered by the liberal Congress and has had its tail between its
legs ever since? That CIA? Do you even know about that? Naw.. I suspect you
did not. Remember who put The CIA director in office in the first place.

And if you think for one second that 8 years of Clinton and Allbright are
anything in comparison to a very short time in office for the Bush admin..
you're simply overly biased and your statement are erroneous and simply run
of the mill bull crap.

You sig is appropriate but you don't have to be so hard on youself Hank.

"hank alrich" wrote in message
. ..
Todd Bradley wrote:

Tommy B wrote:
I thought the most inflamatory remark in the article was,
"I'm not ready to fly coach"

Yeah, I noticed the same thing. I guess we now know where the Dixie
Chicks lie on the spectrum of artistic integrity vs. fame and fortune.

Most folks who can afford not to fly coach do not fly coach. When people
start judging "integrity" on the basis of chosen transportation options
we are definitely down the ******** with the national brain cell cache.

When people start making political alignments based on the rantings of some
female airhead pop-star.. the ******** is closer than you may think.