Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anybody try these? http://www.shinybox.com/index.php (click on condenser
mikes.) Whether you have or not, I have afew questions that may relate to ribbons in general. 1. A load of 1000 ohms is recommended. Can I obtain this simply by paralleling the pre's input with a 1000 ohm resistor? 2. No load capacitance is specified. ??? Wouldn't it be critical to this dynamical system? 3. Shiny Box offers installation of a transformer in the mic body, as a rather expensive mod, which allegedly smooths the frequency response. Is there a generic rationale for this, or just something funny he's pulling with these mics? I don't see how it would be productive to change the output impedance. 4. The "46" has a smaller body than a "23", and allegedly extended frequency response, with less proximity effect. a. Is there a generic fact about the size of ribbon mic bodies that applies here? b. I assume that with a transducer as delicate as a ribbon, this type of mic is best used for distance miking. Wouldn't it be crazy to risk use of one at a distance where the proximity effect is active? 5. As passive devices with large surface transducers, the self noise is probably not significant. However, the low output does emphasize pre noise. In use, how do ribbons compare to condensers as far as noise measured at the pre out:? 6. Is there a criticality to construction of ribbons, exceeding that of German condenser knockoffs, that limits how good they can be for $150 ? TIA, Bob Morein |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Proper care & feeding of ribbon mics | Pro Audio | |||
The drum-mic question, yet again | Pro Audio | |||
Condenser mics | Pro Audio | |||
Condenser mics | Pro Audio | |||
Weather-proofing outdoor condenser mics | Pro Audio |