From the desk of The Real SHP:

I have concluded that intelligent, rational discussion about audio is
not possible on this group. The FACT that the newsgroup is populated by
bigoted, closed-minded dogmatists, despite one or two exceptions that
may exist, makes that impossible. As such, I've never used RAO as a
springboard for serious audio discussion, but unlike most of you, I
haven't forgotten that that is what it was created for. RAO proves you
can't have that any longer in unmoderated form.

The order of the day is at best, "speculation gone mad". That's to
differentiate from "rational speculation" or even "reasonable
speculation". There are no end to examples of this type of
self-delusion that ALL the inhabitants of RAO suffer from but some of
it includes.....

TRUTHS:
=====

(Given how long that lies have been made and exchanged about me, I
realize these "revelations" below may shock a few people, so brace
yourselves. I also realize you will fight tooth and nail against
accepting truth, which I realize you fully do off-RAO as well, in your
so-called "real lives". I don't care if you do, that's your choice in
life. Finally, I realize that "proof" is ultimately a meaningless
concept to all the ignorant bigots that inhabit RAO on a regular basis,
which is why I'm not offering "proof"):

Among the many many people that I was supposed to be, includes:

- Dr. Richard Graham
- Dr. Frankenstein Oetker II
- Cujo
- Wallace & Gromit
- May Belt
- Richard Belt (?)
- Lionel
- Jamie Benchimol


Truth: I'm none of the above.


MOTIVES:
======

Crazy Bob Morein saw to it that I was tagged with the label of "shill",
much like racists in the American South would slap labels on blacks,
such as they were sleeping with "your white wives". This was sure to
get them lynched, and Morein was hoping for a similar "virtual
lynching". In his eyes, I went from him telling me "You'd make a lovely
dinner guest..." to "You're pure purposeless evil". Although the
reasons for the transition in his warped mind were never made too clear
on his part... but they obviously had something to do with me
publicizing the fact that he admitted having tried and benefitted from
my L-shape tweak on his CD's. The fact that he's an engineer registered
with the IEEE made this extremely embarassing for him. I can't say how
much I pity people who are pussywhipped by the IEEE, of all things.....
Who cares about the advancement of audio, when "audio politics" are so
much more important, eh?

Lie Part 1: For the former half of my stay, I was perceived as being,
in some of the kinder judgments made about me: "a lunatic". No specific
reasons were ever given for this judgement, and it wasn't considered
worth debating either, because it was supposed to be "obvious". Well it
wasn't to me. What was "obvious" to me was nearly every regular here is
a "lunatic". Where I come from, if you are a grown man and spend the
better part of your adult life on a bloody flamer's newsgroup, lying
about others, audio, and everything else all day long, as well as
making hypocritical charges against your enemies that you're guilty of
yourself (did anyone say "Middius?"), that makes you a "lunatic". The
fact that I was seemingly the only one willing and able to talk about
audio (if not the aspects of audio that others were particularly
interested in) under subjective listening conditions, which is the true
purpose this group was founded on, made me the only sane person here.

The fact that I was attacked vehemently and incessantly, immediately
and all throughout any discussions about audio I tried to have, makes
everyone else here the "lunatics", since this IS an audio opinion
newsgroup. It didn't matter if my audio discussions were about my
tweaks, the Belt products I use, the turntables I use, speaker theory
or audio advice that I was giving to others. People ALWAYS found
reasons to attack me for my opinions. Not merely "disagree", but
"attack". People attacked me for having too cheap a stereo system,
claiming I was "impoverished". Or they attacked me for having too
expensive a stereo, and the basis then was that I was an "audiofool"
(admittedly, this was the same person! Westface).

LIE Part 2: For the latter half of my stay, most of my perceived
motivations centered around me being a "shill", "scam artist", etc.
etc.

Truth: None of the above. Truth is always simpler than stupid people
who think they're clever, make it out to be. I dropped by for the same
reason most people here drop by: to talk about audio, to share ideas
and experiences (the experience I shared about demonstrating cream
electret to a friend is a real recent experience, exactly as described.
Yes, you really can improve sound by smearing special creams and such
on things that have nothing to do with audio. Deal with it, sheep).

It does however raise the issue that in 2006, you can no longer talk
about audio on rec.audio.opinion, the very theme of this group's
charter, without risking being relentlessly attacked as a "shill" for
citing your subjective opinions about audio and audio products. The
people doing the attacking are the people doing the least talking about
audio, which means the lunatics have truly taken over the asylum.

As for me, I stayed for the reason most people here stay: to bash
others on the head for their differences in beliefs (since they started
out bashing me for mine). Since most people are and wish to remain
ignorant about advanced audio concepts, and anything else that
challenges them to open their minds and think or experiment a little,
most people's beliefs are different than (some of) mine. As such, this
means having to bash the heads of most people here. Which I don't mind.
As I've shown, I'll gladly take on the whole bloody newsgroup without
working up a sweat, or requiring personal strength from the advocacy of
others (as "Mumbles" Middius does - a usenet "career troll" who would
melt like the wicked witch of the East without anyone behind him).


Lie: The belief that PWB's chat discussion group, spanning several
years and hundreds of messags, was created and written solely by me and
me alone, "pretending" to be all those people for all those years. With
Yahoo's full help, apparently. A belief this stupid and irrational
could only come from: George "Mumbles" Middius

Lie: The belief that I'm not a real human being, but all my messages
are created by a piece of software devised by the "clever but fiendish"
May Belt. Who some here (ie. Mumbles) claim I am as well. Only someone
who TRULY does not know **** from shinola, could possibly make that
claim. Because even a clueless retard who has a faint inkling of what a
computer is, would realize that software capable of entirely writing
these messages is not possible. But then Mumbles is the same guy who
gave us the "Yahoo chat group is entirely created by SHP", and the only
moron capable of this seriously positing this kind of "perceptive
thought".


Truth: I have no professional affiliation with PWB, and never even read
their newsletters, let alone edited them. I've never posted to PWB's
discussion group in my life, let alone written all of its messages. No
you presumptious imbeciles, not even the one with the L-shape tweak. I
did however read that message, and got the idea from him (who's name I
don't even know).


THE TWEAKS:

Lie: During my stay here, apart from responding to audio queries and
initiating audio discussions, I posted audio tweaks, that worked for
me. For this simple act of generosity, I got the most flack for from
the mean-spirited malicious trolls of RAO (most people on RAO are
"trolls" by definition). The popular notion was that the tweaks don't
work. Bashing them wasn't even enough for such malignant minds, and RAO
members even said in the glory of all their hysterical paranoia,
they're some sort of part of a large scam to rip people off with free
tweaks. Which makes "normal" people off RAO, who have normal lives and
normal thoughts, think: "WTF??!"

The one inalienable fact remains, and keeps remaining, despite all the
words said against the tweaks in 3 months (most of which are not mine):
Almost everyone denouncing, deriding, mocking, scoffing, ridiculing and
sweepingly dismissing them, has NEVER TRIED THEM. Their ignorant
arrogance says "You don't have to try to them to KNOW they don't work".
I'm sorry but if you have even the slightest pretention of being
intelligent, than you already would know that anyone who speaks like
that, is a pure *idiot*. If you're at all more evolved than a cretin,
then the best you can do in such a situation is to either not have any
comment at all to make upon them (absolutely NO ONE here adopted this
policy), or say: "I don't know if it works or not". And as far as I
remember, absolutely NO ONE here adopted that policy either. The two
people that did finally give them a chance after killing themselves
mocking and deriding me or even threatening me with violence, found
that I was right. Personally, I'm glad there was no more than that. (At
this point, I'd much rather people believe they're a farce, than make
use of powers they don't deserve to posess).

A second inalienable fact remains: NO ONE SUCCESSFULLY REFUTED THEM.
Those who tried used arguments based on false premises to begin with,
and any conclusions drawn were done so on a faulty basis. So we have:
99% of the group not having tried or succesfully refuted the tweaks,
and 99% of the group dismissing them and me entirely, without thought.
To those with the capacity for intelligence and reason, that should say
something to you about yourselves. And I don't mean "something good".

In another lie, there is a perception that I care about whether people
try them or not. I will say for the last time, that IS NOT TRUE. Just
because you talk about something, doesn't mean you care about every
issue surrounding the subject. For me personally, it isn't the tweaks
themselves that I care about, (and I never even cared to share -any- of
them with this group, which is why I only posted the least effective
ones). It's the challenge and the reactions they provoke.

Well, I know that some of you, especially Mumbles, Garbage Boy Weil and
Crazy Bob, will go berserk with boredom, and wander about aimlessly,
wondering what to do with themselves when I'm not around to obsess
over. Many of you will have to find other things to occupy your time,
to break your addiction of me. You will probably end up banging your
head against the floor, and screaming "why!?!" to yourselves ad
nauseum. But this is probably more productive for you than your
addiction to me was, so don't worry about it.

Luv,

SHP



SPECIAL NOTE TO ROBERT MOREIN IN A RAGING BALL OF PAIN:

In our email convos, you previously told me that you had no opinions on
things like the pinhole tweak, and you had an open mind about the whole
affair (it was only when the cream was mentioned that you started going
haywire). You even tried the L-shaped tweak on your cd's and found it
worked. Then, your slightly open mind closed up like a venus fly trap
once you got into the usual hating and aggression, after I mentioned
the cream electret, which is a product that I use to great advantage in
my audio affairs. Just want you to know, I never took your hate that
seriously, regardless of what you might have thought. I've never taken
RAO seriously. I realize that your anger towards me does not have
anything to do with me. I believe that you can say the same for many
here. They are here because they are angry at something or someone
(perhaps even themselves), and being angry at a "target' allows them to
vent some of their anger and frustration. Rather than deal with it in
intelligent, mature and more productive ways. You see, for me to be
angry at you simply because you are not nearly as evolved as I am,
would be unwise and immature of me. You are forgiven, my son. Your
queer friend "George", or whatever the troll's real name is, is another
story. I really don't like cowards who engage in unprovoked violence
against women, physical, verbal or otherwise. -Especially- if its
merely to score points in a meaningless flame war.

Even though you advocated putting a bullet in my head, I believe that
was just the drugs talking. You are now in a position to seek the
psychotherapy you desperately need. I hope you will seriously consider
that, and **lay off the hard drugs**! I know you're pushing 60, but it
may not be too late for you to enjoy some kind of a life outside your
computer room in your father's basement, if you get yourself cleaned
up, sober and mentally stable once again (I'm assuming you were
mentally healthy once, but I haven't been able to confirm that. Back in
the days of your Drexel suit, even your lawyer didn't seem to think you
had your head screwed on straight, and were destructive to yourself).





































































































































































































































































































































































































































































"if you're not good to yourself
you'll be drowned out
by your inner scream
if you're not good to yourself
then your anger
becomes a disease

a carnival of confusion
a carousel of emotion
a freak show of frustration
a Merry go-round mojo

if you're not good to yourself
you'll look elsewhere for absolution
if you're not good to yourself
then your self doubt becomes retribution

a sideshow of suspicion
a ferris wheel of fear
a roller coaster of madness
a circus of solitude

if you're not good to yourself
to yourself
to yourself....
go on and let your scream out!

"The Inner Scream"
Sananda Maitreya

wrote in message
oups.com...

From the desk of The Real SHP:

[snip]


SPECIAL NOTE TO ROBERT MOREIN IN A RAGING BALL OF PAIN:

[snip garbage]
Fine, Doctor Richard Graham. We'll take over the controls from here.
Luv,
SHP

Just for the record, it's interesting that Doctor Graham lies even in his
"farewell", which I assume will last a brief interval. He states that I
tried the "L shaped tweak, and found that it worked.

This is a complete fabrication. I did not do this. In view of his desire to
stuff this lie down our throats, the rest of his incredibly long-winded post
is pure garbage, intended to make us feel bad about ourselves. Let's not
forget: Doctor Graham is an unadulterated *******.

Doctor Graham, maybe the Brits have more cultural tolerance for your
vainglory, but we Americans don't. Speaking for myself, it is my opinion
that you are a horrid person, a Total Asshole, a jerk, a *******, a liar, a
chiseler, a scammer, a shill, and a whiner.

Doctor Graham, I can't speak for the Brits, but there is simply no reason
for an American to like you. You have the ugliest personality of any
****head I've ever run into around here. You're just downright disgusting.
If you ever show up in Middle America, you're liable to lose some teeth.
Americans just don't like the way you talk and act.

I don't think you're leaving, but if you are, don't let the door hit 'ya
where the Lord split ya.

Luv,
SHP

On Thu, 11 May 2006 03:52:19 -0400, "soundhaspriority"
wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...

From the desk of The Real SHP:

[snip]


SPECIAL NOTE TO ROBERT MOREIN IN A RAGING BALL OF PAIN:

[snip garbage]
Fine, Doctor Richard Graham. We'll take over the controls from here.
Luv,
SHP

There are controls?

"paul packer" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 May 2006 03:52:19 -0400, "soundhaspriority"
wrote:


wrote in message
groups.com...

From the desk of The Real SHP:

[snip]


SPECIAL NOTE TO ROBERT MOREIN IN A RAGING BALL OF PAIN:

[snip garbage]
Fine, Doctor Richard Graham. We'll take over the controls from here.
Luv,
SHP

There are controls?

Of this particular sockpuppet. There are ten wires.

Wackjob Bob shares with us his arrogance, views on culture and
Americanism, and threats of violence:

Just for the record, it's interesting that Doctor Graham lies even in his
"farewell",

It's interesting that you lie in my "farewell", since you know I'm not
"Doctor Graham". What's even more "interesting", is just how much of a
wackjob you really are. Back in April, you actually offered the group
money for my identity (knowing how cheap you are, I'm sure you would
have found an excuse not to pay it out):

Crazy Bob the Wackjob wrote:

"To get the ball rolling, I offer a $50 reward to whoever can provide
reasonably convincing evidence as to who this person is, payable as a
U.S. postal money order. If you want to claim, call me, or ask me to
call you, using Skype. "

When that got nothing but snickers, you then simply continued to
believe in your first inane speculation that I must be "Doctor Graham",
the London psychotherapist who's too busy to post on his own chat
group, simply because you did a web search and found someone with that
name using the term "soundhaspriority" in one of his newsletters.
Completely overlooking the fact that he's one of thousands of people
who use that term. I think this, probably better than anything you've
ever said against me, shows people exactly what a self-deluded moron
you really are. Thank you for that.


which I assume will last a brief interval.

But you're thinking in doggie years, Wacko Bob. Perhaps some more
kibbles and bits will help you think straight?

He states that I
tried the "L shaped tweak, and found that it worked.

This is a complete fabrication. I did not do this.

You're "still" denying it, even though I posted the email you sent me,
in which you admitted having tried the L-shape tweak? It's obvious
there is no way I could have written that email, that is -all-
"Morein". You're writing style is as unique as mine is.

So isn't your denial just a little bit silly on your part, Robert? I
realize that at the time that you talked about trying the tweak to me,
you might not have foreseen the implications of admitting you tried the
L-shape tweak if word got out to the IEEE (and word did, as several
members of your organization have emailed me about your activities on
RAO).

In view of his desire to
stuff this lie down our throats,

No, it is YOUR desire to stuff lies down people's throats, such as your
lie that I'm "Doctor Graham", and a "shill for PWB", and a "crack
addict", and a "thief", and so on. I don't have to lie, the truth about
you is quite fine with me, as it is pretty harmful as it is. And unlike
you, I don't obsess or care enough about you to have to lie about you.

the rest of his incredibly long-winded post

No, that's just an incredibly deluded judgement. It, like all my posts,
is very concise, not at all "long winded". It's not even "long" by my
standards, but since it is longer than 2 lines, it is "long" by your
standards, and that of everyone else here, who unfocused minds tend to
wander if they're asked to read anything longer than 2 or 3 lines. I'm
sorry if it hurt your drug-addled brain to have to read something
longer than 2 lines. Must be why you only skimmed over it, because God
knows, it isn't "time" that you lack in your worthless waste of a life
battling imaginary demons on Usenet.

is pure garbage, intended to make us feel bad about ourselves.

LOL! I couldn't possibly make you or anyone else here feel "bad" about
themselves, because that requires a conscience, or at least a sense of
morals, principles or ethics. Which as has been demonstrated over the
months, no one here has in any significant quantity. Rather, your
continual arrogant insistance on wasting bandwidth on everyone's news
servers across the globe by posting one piece of worthless drivel after
another, attacking me with one-line posts saying silly, ridiculous
things like "You can not deny you are Doctor Graham, Doctor Graham", is
what one could term "pure garbage". For that, you are what one could
term "purposeless evil", since your reasons for being so evil and
malicious are not based on any reasonable prejudice you might have
toward me.

Let's not forget: Doctor Graham is an unadulterated *******.

LOL! How would you know? To use your phrase, "Let's not forget"....
Doctor Graham doesn't post on Usenet. He said as much in email to both
you and Fella. You only spoke to the man once, during a phone call to
London at 3 am where you were harassing and threatening his wife, and
then when he took the phone, himself. Apart from that, you have spoken
to his colleagues at NHS and Priory prior to this (which you publicly
admitted to us on the group), and I don't think any one of them told
you he was an "unadulterated *******". Au contraire, from all that I
know of him, Dr. Graham has an impeccable reputation among the Beltist
community, and helps both audiophiles, adolescents, and mathematics
students at Leeds university. He gives a lot of his time to helping
others and is a very well respected major part of his community. I mean
the REAL community of course, not the "usenet" community that you
belong to.

You on the other hand.......... well, let's see. You have no career to
speak of (after you lost your Drexel case, you yourself reported to the
press: "I have no replacement career. It's a very gnawing thing.").
This would help explain why you're so hell bent on hating Dr. Graham, a
man with such a successful career, he's too busy to even post on usenet
or his own chat group. You're very jealous of the fact that he's not a
loser like yourself. But apparently, you found a "career" of sorts once
you learned how to use a computer - "career troll" is now your chosen
profession. To that end, your contribution to the usenet community
after 8 years has resulted in you being called a "complete asshole" and
a "major psychostalking troll" by a significant part of this community,
not just me. The posts condeming your name register in the THOUSANDS,
and come from all kinds of people, not just McCarty. In fact, you have
been registered on the news.admin.net-abuse.usenet group thusly:

"Robert Morien (Morein) Forger, Usenet Harasser, Stalker, TROLL.."

Even the people on rec.audio.pro, whom you previously considered "your
people", got sick of your arrogant face within 2 weeks of you posting
there, whining about what microphone to buy.

Doctor Graham, maybe the Brits have more cultural tolerance for your
vainglory, but we Americans don't. Speaking for myself

Considering the fact that you're such a lunatic, you don't understand
who you're speaking for or who you're speaking to from one moment to
the next, it is my opinion that you are a deeply deluded individual in
great need of psychiatric help. If I were a psychiatrist as it is your
"opinion" that I am, then I might be able to help you. Unfortunately
for you, you're going to have to get a "real" psychiatrist to help you,
Robert.

it is my opinion
that I am a horrid person, a Total Asshole, a jerk, a *******, a liar, a
chiseler, a scammer, a shill, and a whiner.

Well said, Dr. Morein. Unusually frank of you to admit that. You've
finally said something to me that isn't an all out lie. I suspect
you're going to be rewarded tonight with an extra chocolate chip cookie
beside your milk before its time for your beddies.

I should point out that under normal circumstances, you're not shy with
your "opinions" and don't realize that they have absolutely no value
whatsoever. Not here, not anywhere else. That's because you have lost
all credibility thanks to me, but also in large part to the absolute
thrashing that McCarty made of your reputation on both Usenet and the
Internet in 7 years or so. Now that everyone "knows" who and what you
are (ie. a pathological liar and psychostalker), your "opinions" are
worth about as much as an American $2 bill. In case anyone is at all
unclear about that, they have only to type the words "*******",
"asshole", "liar", "scammer", "whiner" + "Morein" in Google. Hundreds
of posts will show up with your name in them.

Doctor Graham, I can't speak for the Brits, but there is simply no
reason
for an American to like you.

Yeah, tell that to my wife you dumb arrogant Yank, who's an American. I
can't speak for the Brits either, since I'm not British. But out of
curiousity (and a desire to make an even greater fool out of you), why
on earth would you in all of your inane reasoning, the only kind you
seem capable of on this forum, believe I need an "American" to like me?


And if I did, why would I keep insulting Americans like you? Don't
think too hard about that Crazy Bob Borg. You might blow a chip in your
circuitry, and your future analyst will have to deal with a box of
spare parts.

Regardless of the fact that I'm not a Brit, what reasons do -you- have
for a Brit to like you? You're an arrogant egomaniac, you're
uncultured, you're dumb as all get out despite your father wasting $30k
of education on you, you're a pathological liar, you're a well known
drug abuser, you're pure unadulterated "evil", you have no life to
speak of and you even admitted in your own words on usenet:

Robert Morein wrote:

"It's fun to annoy people."

And that's why you do it. You are the exemplary paradigm of the "ugly
American". The reason the rest of the world hates America as it does.



And then Wacko Bob had a MAJOR MELTDOWN at the thought of me leaving
his pitiful life for good, and sobbed out these angry words:

You have the ugliest personality of any
****head I've ever run into around here. You're just downright disgusting.

Please, Doctor Morein, save some for your psychiatrist. He's gonna
wanna hear all of this. You might like to share some of the comments
that other people on Usenet have made about you recently, and in the
past. Such as:

Thoughts on Robert Morein, Psychostalking Usenet Career-troll &
all-round loser:

(all quotes below are about the one and only arrogant *******
Psychostalking troll Robert Morein, written by different authors and
"Googlable"):

- You're a "troublesome asshole"

- You're an "anti-semite"

- You're a "friggin idiot who knows nothing about anything outside his
bedroom door."

- You're a "prize idiot"

- You're a "worthless stalker asshole with no career"

- You're a "cheap *******!"

(I've confirmed that for myself as well, after you said you were too
cheap to spare the ink to try out my L-shape tweak, and I sent you a
black magic marker on my dime!)

- You're an "arrogant prick"

_ Then there's this gem:

"What they found was this ******* Bob and his several effeminate alter
egos stalking and harassing them every time they attempted to ask a
relevent question or to offer an opinion. It is this attempt to
obstruct and control that has earned Bob the well-deserved contempt of
many. I may not have time to screw with his brains every day as I
have in the last 24 hours, but I will be back to take him down a peg
or two as needed. Robert Morein's dictatorial, masturbatory reign is
over. The only one who doesn't know it yet is him."

- ("traveler", rec.arts.movies.production)


Wow, Bob. This guy complains on a completely unrelated newsgroup about
the same MO that we see you having used against me on this group. What
a shocker, other people on usenet see you as I see you. Your attempt to
"obstruct and control" what people think on this group about my tweaks
or the audio products I use and advocate, your several "alter egos"
that you used against me to stalk and harass me every time someone
attempted to ask a relevant question or I attempted to offer an opinion
on Beltism, and for all of your psychostalking and efforts to inflict
your "opinions" in a dictatorial fashion on this newsgroup, you earned
my well-deserved contempt.



Robert Morein is so livid over my free tweaks or the thought of me
leaving the group, he continues his violent threats!:

If you ever show up in Middle America, you're liable to lose some teeth.

You're threatening me again?! LOL! After advocating putting a bullet in
my head, and me going to the FBI with the threat, you'd think you'd
have learned from that.... However, I have to admit that this time,
your threats of violence are a little more vague...

So what ARE you trying to say here? Are you trying to tell me the
deserts are so "scrumptitious" down in "Middle America", that I might
end up getting cavities and later having to have my teeth pulled? Or
are you making a shill for your dad, the dentist? If I do lose some
teeth on those fancy sweets in "Middle America", will your dad give me
a discount on some dental work d'you think?

I seem to recall Brian sending me an email telling me all about the
time that he was "down in Middle America".... near YOUR city on
business actually. And of course, he called you to meet him. He was
ready to kick your ass from here to Poughkeepsie, but of course, you
never showed up, old man, did you? Would anyone expect any more from a
Usenet coward such as yourself, who makes threats of violence while
safely tucked away behind a computer monitor?


And then the genius said........:

Americans just don't like the way you talk and act.

ROTFLMAO!! I don't know where to begin making fun of you over that dumb
statement.... Let me number them, this might take a while......

1. First off, since when did Americans elect you to speak for them?
According to this, they didn't:

Here's what your friend Scott told you about your practice of your
having the fictitious vote of a "group membership" that you believe
gives you the right to speak for all Americans:

----------------------------------------------------------
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 09:29:44 -0700, "ScottW"
wrote:

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
m...
We Yanks ......

Anybody else find it a bit unnerving when Bob decides to speak for the
entire country?

Yo Bob, just once I'd like you to show enough balls to speak for
yourself instead of cowering behind some ficticious group
membership in your mind.
----------------------------------------------------------

2. Secondly, why would they elect you to speak for them, you're on of
the biggest anti-Americans in the country? This was proven in the
Drexel case, where you took on "Middle America", trying to sue a
Pennsylvania university for its academic judgement in the case where it
refused to grant you a phd because you were too dumb, lazy and
drug-ridden to complete your thesis. You lost the case because it was
concluded that it was "anti-American" for the courts to get involved in
the decisions of academia. Considering the history of communism in your
family whereby your father, Sylvan, was blacklisted in the McCarthy era
(hmm... wonder if this has something to do with your psychotic
obsession with Brian "McCarty"??), I'd hardly think you're qualified to
speak on behalf of all Americans. You followed in your father's
Communist footsteps. In your previous disguise on this newsgroup, you
even posted under the alias of "Trotsky", naming yourself after "Leon
Trotsky", the exiled Russian revolutionary. Most Americans do NOT share
your beliefs Mr. Trotsky. I mean Mr. Morein. I mean Mr. Wackjob Bob.


3. Your arrogance knows no limits. You believe that everyone here is a
cretin compared to you, as you once told me in so many words, because
of your educational background. Indeed, no one can understand your
technobabble when you start flaunting the after-effects of those 7 phds
you keep holding over our heads to make yourself feel superiour. Here's
a typical example of that:

Psycho Bob Morein wrote:
---------------------------------------------
"Iconoclastic perturbation is homomorphic to some convex connected
manifolds,
but only on the closed sets of some compact set. As for the conospheric
case, Cayley's theorem can be trivially used to show it is not true for
D20. "
---------------------------------------------


4. It is however, a very "American" trait to be so arrogant as to
believe that you are better than any other race or country in the
world.



I don't think you're leaving, but if you are, don't let the door hit 'ya
where the Lord split ya.

Hmmm..... where have I heard that before? Stealing my lines now, are
you? LOL!

Be well, Crazy Bob. Be well, and don't forget to maintain your shrine
to Aleister Crowley in good order.

Luv,

SHP


Some parting words for you to remember:

On 31 Aug 2005 15:37:35 -0700, wrote:

"Morein is frustrated because the only Usenet battle of this sort he
has
fought previously (vs. McCarty) was a lost cause. McCarty used the "if
you bring a knife, I'll bring a gun; if you bring a gun, I'll bring a
bomb" tactic and, basically, kicked Morein's pathetic ass all over
Usenet. Poor ol' Bob-o-rama has yet to recover. (This is *not* an
endorsement of any person or their tactics, but facts *are* facts.) "


I found, like McCarty, it's fun to kick your pathetic ass all over
Usenet.....

wrote

... As such, I've never used RAO as a springboard
for serious audio discussion, but unlike most of
you, I haven't forgotten that that is what it was
created for.

I see no conflict, do you?
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/AudioFAQ/part1/


RAO proves you can't have that any longer
in unmoderated form.

Book burning is better, I don't think so. You
already have that choice in rec.audio. high-end.


Among the many many people that I was supposed to be, includes:

- Dr. Richard Graham
- Dr. Frankenstein Oetker II
- Cujo
- Wallace & Gromit
- May Belt
- Richard Belt (?)
- Lionel
- Jamie Benchimol


Truth: I'm none of the above.

"Truth"... is a metaphor, just like *honesty is
the best policy*.

Robert wrote "The premise that "Powell"
is a McCarty sockpuppet is supported by
strong similarities in their posting style..."
So what mr. soundhaspriority you thought
you were the first and only. Get over your
narcissism or just stay angry, your choice.


The fact that I was attacked vehemently and
incessantly, immediately and all throughout
any discussions about audio I tried to have,
makes everyone else here the "lunatics", since
this IS an audio opinion newsgroup.

Oh please, then get in line. Your ticket number
at the r.a.o. complaint department is 10,001.


It didn't matter if my audio discussions were
about my tweaks,

Yes, it did.


the Belt products I use,

Quack, quack, quack...


the turntables I use, speaker theory or audio
advice that I was giving to others.

Yes, it did.


People ALWAYS found reasons to attack me
for my opinions. Not merely "disagree", but
"attack".

Zzzzz... you drew first blood.


People attacked me for having too cheap a
stereo system, claiming I was "impoverished".

That is the "truth" as you would say.


Or they attacked me for having too expensive
a stereo, and the basis then was that I was an
"audiofool"...

That's USEnet. You cannot accept *what is*.


I dropped by for the same reason most people
here drop by: to talk about audio, to share ideas
and experiences...

You claimed to have special knowledge but were
unable to quantify it. It's also difficult to glean
very much from antidotal information. End of
story without new information.


It does however raise the issue that in 2006, you
can no longer talk about audio on rec.audio.opinion,
the very theme of this group's charter....

Quack, quack, quack...


As for me, I stayed for the reason most people
here stay: to bash others on the head for their
differences in beliefs...

If I understand your mind set correctly, the world
has to treat you fairly in order for you to respond
in kind. You have the mental capacity to hate
because it is easy for you to do so, irrespective
of this n.g.. Again, your choice.


Since most people are and wish to remain ignorant
about advanced audio concepts, and anything else
that challenges them to open their minds and think
or experiment a little, most people's beliefs are
different than (some of) mine.

Not so. Everyone has a unique perspective of audio
based on their own experiences, not just you.


As such, this means having to bash the heads of
most people here. Which I don't mind.

The reality is that your methodology/technique for
discussion is ineffectual.


The one inalienable fact remains, and keeps remaining,
despite all the words said against the tweaks in 3
months (most of which are not mine): Almost everyone
denouncing, deriding, mocking, scoffing, ridiculing and
sweepingly dismissing them, has NEVER TRIED THEM.

You are not respected so the confidence in your findings
becomes fodder for the mill. Accept *what is* and
move on.


Their ignorant arrogance says "You don't have to
try to them to KNOW they don't work".

You do not recognize that time has value.


A second inalienable fact remains: NO ONE
SUCCESSFULLY REFUTED THEM.

Empirically true perhaps, but theoretically this whole
concept is fanciful at best.


In another lie, there is a perception that I care
about whether people try them or not. I will
say for the last time, that IS NOT TRUE. Just
because you talk about something, doesn't mean
you care about every issue surrounding the
subject.

If this is true why are you not personally secure
enough to only present the information without then
resorting to adolescent behaviors and vulgarities.
So what if your message has fallen on deft ears?
You can only lead a horse to the water, right. Or
is it something deeper, mr. Narcissist?


For me personally, it isn't the tweaks themselves
that I care about, (and I never even cared to share
-any- of them with this group, which is why I only
posted the least effective ones). It's the challenge
and the reactions they provoke.

Hehehe... next time start with something meaningful,
please.


"if you're not good to yourself
you'll be drowned out
by your inner scream
if you're not good to yourself
then your anger
becomes a disease

Hypocrite, remove the timber from your own eye first.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Wackjob Bob shares with us his arrogance, views on culture and
Americanism, and threats of violence:

Just for the record, it's interesting that Doctor Graham lies even in his
"farewell",

It's interesting that you lie in my "farewell", since you know I'm not
"Doctor Graham".

Actually, I know you are Dr. Graham.

Luv,
SHP

Wackjob Bob wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Wackjob Bob shares with us his arrogance, views on culture and
Americanism, and threats of violence:

Just for the record, it's interesting that Doctor Graham lies even in his
"farewell",

It's interesting that you lie in my "farewell", since you know I'm not
"Doctor Graham".

Actually, I know you are Dr. Graham.

Yes, go on..... we're all waiting with bated breath, where's your
"incontrovertible evidence", Wackjob Bob? Going to ignore the question
a 30th time and reaffirm my claim that you're a psychotic liar with no
credibility in any of your baseless "opinions"? Or are you just going
to make more vague threats of violence toward me, and hurl a string of
vile profanities at me, like you just did before?


Luv,
SHP

Why do you sign your letters "SHP" but your headers say you're Robert
Morein? How confused and deluded can you possibly get?!

wrote in message
ups.com...
Wackjob Bob wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Wackjob Bob shares with us his arrogance, views on culture and
Americanism, and threats of violence:

Just for the record, it's interesting that Doctor Graham lies even in
his
"farewell",

It's interesting that you lie in my "farewell", since you know I'm not
"Doctor Graham".

Actually, I know you are Dr. Graham.

Yes, go on..... we're all waiting with bated breath, where's your
"incontrovertible evidence", Wackjob Bob? Going to ignore the question
a 30th time and reaffirm my claim that you're a psychotic liar with no
credibility in any of your baseless "opinions"? Or are you just going
to make more vague threats of violence toward me, and hurl a string of
vile profanities at me, like you just did before?

Dear Doctor Richard Graham:
You are sufficiently sane to know who you are. My methods are secret.

Robert Morein

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread. He even tried to get me to respond in other threads
but... no go! Maybe you and him should get together and have a
self-pity party over my departure?

wrote

... As such, I've never used RAO as a springboard
for serious audio discussion, but unlike most of
you, I haven't forgotten that that is what it was
created for.

I see no conflict, do you?
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/AudioFAQ/part1/


Oh yes, I remember now.... your reading comprehension skills suck the
big one. Get someone who doesn't just read comic books to explain what
I wrote to you.


RAO proves you can't have that any longer
in unmoderated form.

Book burning is better

I'm sure that's one of your favorite pastimes as well, along with
trolling the audio groups, attacking people trying to educate your
ignorant ass. As we speak, you're probably working on a bomb that will
"destroy all the subjectivists in this evil world!".

already have that choice in rec.audio. high-end.

Who's talking about RAHE, I was talking about RAO, you ignorant clod.
Am I speaking too fast for you? Try to keep up.


Among the many many people that I was supposed to be, includes:

- Dr. Richard Graham
- Dr. Frankenstein Oetker II
- Cujo
- Wallace & Gromit
- May Belt
- Richard Belt (?)
- Lionel
- Jamie Benchimol


Truth: I'm none of the above.

"Truth"... is a metaphor, just like *honesty is
the best policy*.

"Honesty is the best policy" is not a metaphor, brainiac, and neither
is truth, except perhaps in your discombobulated mind. Truth is a
condition, plain and simple. Everything in the universe is either true
or false. You're false, in case you were wondering.


Robert wrote "The premise that "Powell"
is a McCarty sockpuppet is supported by
strong similarities in their posting style..."
So what mr. soundhaspriority you thought
you were the first and only.

Who said I did? Remember what I just said about you being "false"? I'm
saying it again, liar. Prove that I said that, or wallow in your
obvious lies.

Either I get over my narcissism or I just stay angry, but it's my choice.

Well, you've always had an irrational anger toward me in every single
on of your posts, and as I've told you many times in the past, your
anger is not doing any good for you or your stereo system (which
probably sounds like crap in the rare times when you may not be
angry...). So I suggest you get over your anger. OTOH, can't you just
get over both?

The fact that I was attacked vehemently and
incessantly, immediately and all throughout
any discussions about audio I tried to have,
makes everyone else here the "lunatics", since
this IS an audio opinion newsgroup.

Oh please, then get in line.

I don't think you really understand the point of my post that started
this thread, you mind-numbing imbecile. I'm not IN line. I'm getting
OUT of the line. "G-e-t i-t"..? It will be -your- problem now. "G-e-t
i-t"..? Am I talking too fast for you? Seems that maybe your denial
about me leaving reveals that your desire to have me stick around is
even greater than anyone imagined.


Your ticket number
at the r.a.o. complaint department is 10,001.

........"Calling 10,001! 10,001, step up!"

SHP: "Yes, I'd like to make a complaint."

RCD: Which is?

SHP: "Powell is an asshole"

RCD: "Registered".



It didn't matter if my audio discussions were
about my tweaks,

Yes, it did.

No, it didn't.


the Belt products I use,

Quack, quack, quack...

Would you stop farting, Powell? You're even driving Wackjob Bob and
Mumbles Middius away, and those 2 weasels normally regale in the smell
of someone farting.


the turntables I use, speaker theory or audio
advice that I was giving to others.

Yes, it did.

No, it didn't.


People ALWAYS found reasons to attack me
for my opinions. Not merely "disagree", but
"attack".

Zzzzz... you drew first blood.


Prove it, liar.

People attacked me for having too cheap a
stereo system, claiming I was "impoverished".

That is the "truth" as you would say.

I thought you said "truth is a metaphor"?


Or they attacked me for having too expensive
a stereo, and the basis then was that I was an
"audiofool"...

That's USEnet. You cannot accept *what is*.

Uh, I think I aready proved this 6 weeks ago in my report on this group
("Message to RAO..."), where I said that RAO does not care about or
accept what is true, regardless of what evidence lays behind it. Wild
baseless speculations however, are always representative of the truth.
So tell me something I don't know, Dr. Quack.

I dropped by for the same reason most people
here drop by: to talk about audio, to share ideas
and experiences...

You claimed to have special knowledge but were
unable to quantify it.

I never claimed to have "special knowledge". Any knowledge I have is
readily available on the net and elsewhere, if you are willing to do
the research. It wouldn't matter in your case, as you were never able
to understand even the basics of morphic resonance theory -as it
relates to audio-. You only argued that it didn't because you couldn't
find anything about "audio" in Sheldrake's work, you nitwit.

It's also difficult to glean
very much from antidotal information.

"Gee... it never occured to us to pseudo-scientific objectivist quacks
to actually TRY the damn tweaks ourselves, instead of just dismissing
them because we don't understand how they work!!" And you wonder why
almost all of usenet and the audio community thinks you're bigoted
idiots?

End of story without new information.

I have some new information for you: you're an asshole.
If you'd like a second opinion on that, then you're an ignorant asshole
as well.
End of story.

It does however raise the issue that in 2006, you
can no longer talk about audio on rec.audio.opinion,
the very theme of this group's charter....

Quack, quack, quack...


"......and when you point that out, RAO regulars start farting at the
idea of coming here to discuss audio...."


As for me, I stayed for the reason most people
here stay: to bash others on the head for their
differences in beliefs...

If I understand your mind set correctly, the world
has to treat you fairly in order for you to respond
in kind.

No, people do, if they wish me to respond in kind. I don't deal with
"the world", maniac. No one here treated me "fairly", least of all you.
But God knows I've seen enough people here (like you for example) whine
and complain to me like snivelling weasels, on account of the fact that
I did not bow down and take their attacks with grace and kindness. But
instead chose to attack back, since that's all they deserved from me.

I have the mental capacity to hate
because it is easy for me to do so, irrespective
of this n.g.. Again, your choice.

I would argue that anyone has the "mental capacity to hate", not just
you. But its your choice if all you were willing to do was spew your
vile "hatred" at me, and your ignorant misguided ideas about audio, and
such. Its your choice if all you are willing to do with your life is
hang out on this newsgroup spewing hatred and bile every single day.
Its my choice to leave you rot in this prison of yours to continue your
hateful ways, otherwise known as "RAO", otherwise known as the "asshole
of the global audio community".

Since most people are and wish to remain ignorant
about advanced audio concepts, and anything else
that challenges them to open their minds and think
or experiment a little, most people's beliefs are
different than (some of) mine.

Not so. Everyone has a unique perspective of audio
based on their own experiences, not just you.

Really? Do you know anyone with a more unique perspective on audio than
myself? Remember, I believe that "holy water" will improve my sound. As
far as I know, I'm the only person in the world who believes that. If
you know someone with a more unique perspective on audio Powell, give
me a name. I'd like to meet that person. I say you're pulling this out
of your arse, like everything you say, and you don't know anyone like
that. Someone like you only hangs around with textbook engineers, and
even then, only the more conservative ones.

Furthemore, you again showed you didn't understand my statement,
because your argument repeats what I said, nimrod.

As such, this means having to bash the heads of
most people here. Which I don't mind.

The reality is that your methodology/technique for
discussion is ineffectual.

So the "technique or methodology" used for discussion is more important
than what is said? I think that says all we need to know about you,
Powell....

Good thing I don't care to convince anyone of anything, isn't
it........

The one inalienable fact remains, and keeps remaining,
despite all the words said against the tweaks in 3
months (most of which are not mine): Almost everyone
denouncing, deriding, mocking, scoffing, ridiculing and
sweepingly dismissing them, has NEVER TRIED THEM.

You are not respected so the confidence in your findings
becomes fodder for the mill. Accept *what is* and
move on.

Damn it, are you EVER thick in the head...... Maybe all that "quacking"
you do is really you having a brain fart. Again, you failed at basic
reading comprehension. My statement above **is saying just that**. That
I have accepted the fact that RAO consists of a small group of ignorant
bigots and I am moving on. You don't tell someone who's moving on "move
on", you redundant fool. Further evidence of the extent of what a fool
you are is shown by you saying "confidence in my findings" is necessary
in order to believe the tweaks work. When I must have drilled this into
people's heads about 1,000 times now: you do NOT require "confidence"
in what someone says about audio anything, to determine if it is valid.
You ONLY require a working pair of ears, a working and open mind, and
the willingness to test out their theory".

If you don't care to do that, then don't do that, and accept that
you're a dumb ignorant bigot if you comment on the audio experiment one
way or the other, without having tried it yourself. You don't do
experiments though because even though you're on an audiophile group.,
you're not an audiophile. You're just an audiophile hater, here for the
politics of flame wars.

Their ignorant arrogance says "You don't have to
try to them to KNOW they don't work".

You do not recognize that time has value.

I recognize that YOUR time has no value, since I said I was moving on,
and nevertheless, you wrote 16 freaking pages of a hateful diatribe
against me. I recognize too that most people's time here has little
value since like you, all they do all the time is post pointless,
worthless, meaningless flame attacks.

A second inalienable fact remains: NO ONE
SUCCESSFULLY REFUTED THEM.

Empirically true perhaps, but theoretically this whole
concept is fanciful at best.

"Fanciful" is another way of saying "I'm an idiot. I dont' know what
I'm talking about, I've never properly research the theory or
empirically evaluated the concepts at all. But I'll give you my
worthless opinion on it anyway, because it all sounds so "wacko" to me.
Because I'm an idiot, remember".

In another lie, there is a perception that I care
about whether people try them or not. I will
say for the last time, that IS NOT TRUE. Just
because you talk about something, doesn't mean
you care about every issue surrounding the
subject.

If this is true why are you not personally secure
enough to only present the information without then
resorting to adolescent behaviors and vulgarities.

Fallacious reasoning. It's simply your worthless opinion that one is
not "personally secure" if one resorts to what you describe as
"adolescent behaviours and vulgarities", and that this somehow has
something to do with whether I care or not about whether people try the
tweaks or not. Take a good look around you, you stupid freak:
"Adolescent behaviours and vulgarities" is the language of RAO. Its
what you and your people understand, ergo, I speak to the natives of
RAO in your "native language", to make myself understood by you. By
your reasoning, anything that Morein, yourself and many others here
would have to be completely disregarded because of your "adolescent
behaviours and vulgarities".

I could care less what you do with the "information" I presented. Mock
it, deride it, kick it, tear it up, **** on it, crap on it, I could not
care less. It wasn't put up for you or anyone on RAO for that matter,
since most of you deserve no less than to be spat upon.

So what if your message has fallen on deft ears?

No, it hasn't fallen on "deft" ears, Mr. Imbecile. There are few people
on this group who posess "deft ears". By the way, I know that's not a
typo on your part. You really are that stupid that you believed that's
what the expression was. Have a fifth grade English student explain to
you what an idiot you are. I'm sure it will be an "ear-opening
experience"

You can only lead a horse to the water, right.

Or a pig to the trough, rather.

Or is it something deeper, mr. Narcissist?

Its always something deeper, Mr. Asshole. insert evil laugh If you
knew who I really was, you might understand that......


For me personally, it isn't the tweaks themselves
that I care about, (and I never even cared to share
-any- of them with this group, which is why I only
posted the least effective ones). It's the challenge
and the reactions they provoke.

Hehehe... next time start with something meaningful,
please.

"Hehehe...." That was "something meaningful" and there won't be a "next
time". BTW, you're a little lost. The trough is that way. You can
tell by the smell, little piggie...

"if you're not good to yourself
you'll be drowned out
by your inner scream
if you're not good to yourself
then your anger
becomes a disease

Hypocrite, remove the timber from your own eye first.


Remember, your anger becomes a disease...... ....it does nothing to
me, though.

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham? You may have a prosecutable case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena will
reveal his identity, but it is not me. We should all understand and respect
the power of law enforcement.

In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham? You may have a prosecutable case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena will
reveal his identity, but it is not me. We should all understand and respect
the power of law enforcement.

Since you mention law enforcement, to keep anyone from thinking
otherwise, I hereby state that I support law enforcement.

Wackjob Bob wrote:

wrote in message
ups.com...
Wackjob Bob wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Wackjob Bob shares with us his arrogance, views on culture and
Americanism, and threats of violence:

Just for the record, it's interesting that Doctor Graham lies even in
his
"farewell",

It's interesting that you lie in my "farewell", since you know I'm not
"Doctor Graham".

Actually, I know you are Dr. Graham.

Yes, go on..... we're all waiting with bated breath, where's your
"incontrovertible evidence", Wackjob Bob? Going to ignore the question
a 30th time and reaffirm my claim that you're a psychotic liar with no
credibility in any of your baseless "opinions"? Or are you just going
to make more vague threats of violence toward me, and hurl a string of
vile profanities at me, like you just did before?

Dear soundhaspriority:

You are sufficiently sane to know who you are.

Unfortunately Wackjob Bob, you are not sufficiently sane to know who I
am. You're not sufficiently sane to know who YOU are, judging by the
fact that you keep signing your posts under different names. A few
minutes ago you signed your posts "SHP", while you posted under "Robert
Morein". Before that, you signed them "SHP" while you posted under
"soundhaspriority". Then, after I spanked you for it you wicked boy,
you sign your posts "Robert Morein" while posting as
"soundhaspriority". This moment, you're signing them "Robert Morein"
while posting as "Robert Morein".

My methods are secret.

Then you must keep them in the same place you keep your honesty and
your intelligence: up your arse, that is to say. Don't share them with
the rest of us, no. That might make you look believable, sane and
rational for a change. We don't want that, Wackjob Bob! Thanks again
for proving my point about you being a psychotic pathological liar and
sociopath, for continuing to address me under an identity you've never
come close to proving I am.

Robert Morein

(aka Wackjob Bob)

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham? You may have a prosecutable case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena will
reveal his identity, but it is not me. We should all understand and respect
the power of law enforcement.

Since you mention law enforcement, to keep anyone from thinking
otherwise, I hereby state that I support law enforcement.

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of. Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric treatment
for Robert?

In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham? You may have a prosecutable
case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena will
reveal his identity, but it is not me. We should all understand and
respect
the power of law enforcement.

Since you mention law enforcement, to keep anyone from thinking
otherwise, I hereby state that I support law enforcement.

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of.

Exactly my point. I want to do what is right and good and not offend
anyone by what I don't respond to.

Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric treatment
for Robert?

I can do better than that: I support both law enforcement AND
psychiatric treatment for everyone.

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham? You may have a prosecutable
case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena will
reveal his identity, but it is not me. We should all understand and
respect
the power of law enforcement.

Since you mention law enforcement, to keep anyone from thinking
otherwise, I hereby state that I support law enforcement.

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of.

Exactly my point. I want to do what is right and good and not offend
anyone by what I don't respond to.

Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric treatment
for Robert?

I can do better than that: I support both law enforcement AND
psychiatric treatment for everyone.

Glad to see you support illegal immigrant deportations. Please write
your congressional representative.

ScottW

In article .com,
"ScottW" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at
attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this
would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham? You may have a
prosecutable
case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena
will
reveal his identity, but it is not me. We should all understand and
respect
the power of law enforcement.

Since you mention law enforcement, to keep anyone from thinking
otherwise, I hereby state that I support law enforcement.

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of.

Exactly my point. I want to do what is right and good and not offend
anyone by what I don't respond to.

Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric treatment
for Robert?

I can do better than that: I support both law enforcement AND
psychiatric treatment for everyone.

Glad to see you support illegal immigrant deportations. Please write
your congressional representative.

ScottW

Has been done; several times.

wrote in message
oups.com...

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of. Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric treatment
for Robert?


I think that if he sells one of his screenplays,
he'll calm down.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Wackjob Bob Morein wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham?

You know very well about your violent threats, since you made them
recently. You started out in grand style, advocating putting a bullet
in my head (under one of your many sockpuppets whom you troll the movie
groups under), after I had angered you here by talking about how good
cream electret is for audio (which can be found at
http://belt.demon.co.uk). You then moved on to threatening to bash my
head in with a baseball bat. Then, under your "regular" sockpuppet
alias, the one you (so originally) copied from me, "soundhaspriority",
you "thanked" yourself to your other sockpuppet, "The Starmaker", for
threatening to "put a bullet in my head" if I continued to bother you:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...cc2e5b8541b9e8

Either way, you advocated putting a "bullet in my head" for "bothering
you" ("bothering" defined here as objecting to your evil behaviours,
your pathological lying, and your shilling on various newsgroups).
Either way, you have proven to be a sick, evil, and violently disturbed
man, Mr. Wackjob. Your 8 years of threatening, psychostalking people
and spending your pathetic life trying to discredit them is ample
evidence of how disturbed an individual you really are.

Next up in the "violent threats from Wackjob Bob" category, we have
this little ditty just freshly made in this thread:

Wackjob Bob wrote:

"If you ever show up in Middle America, you're liable to lose some
teeth. "

Somehow, I don't think you were concerned with my snacking habits when
you said that. Especially since it was said in the context of a
steaming rant in which you hurled all kinds of profanities and vile
hatred at me, after learning that this would be my last thread on RAO.
I would also like to point out the fact that you criticised others for
their profanities, while you don't seem to mind the hypocrisy of using
that kind of gutter language with me and others.

You may have a prosecutable case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena will
reveal his identity, but it is not me.

It is you, and your denials don't impress. You are sufficiently
self-aware to know who your sockpuppets are (you, ,may be another
matter). How do I know? My methods are secret.

We should all understand and respect
the power of law enforcement.

You especially, since you already did some prison time for drug
posession. That time you got lucky and were out in 3 months. This time
you might not be so lucky, Wackjob. I'm going to see to it that I do
EVERYTHING in my power to see you behind bars for your death threats
against me. If you don't think I'm serious, talk to Mumbles and his
porky friend Boonster about how serious I was in aiming to put Krueger
behind bars a few years ago.

Your threats to Dr. Graham's wife in London will probably also be
included as evidence against you. I'm told your identity is being
confirmed by your ISP and will be eventually by the FBI. Who I
understand are also interested in some of your business activities,
apparently.

In article .com,
wrote:

Wackjob Bob Morein wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham?

You know very well about your violent threats, since you made them
recently. You started out in grand style, advocating putting a bullet
in my head (under one of your many sockpuppets whom you troll the movie
groups under), after I had angered you here by talking about how good
cream electret is for audio (which can be found at
http://belt.demon.co.uk). You then moved on to threatening to bash my
head in with a baseball bat. Then, under your "regular" sockpuppet
alias, the one you (so originally) copied from me, "soundhaspriority",
you "thanked" yourself to your other sockpuppet, "The Starmaker", for
threatening to "put a bullet in my head" if I continued to bother you:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...cc2e5b8541b9e8

Either way, you advocated putting a "bullet in my head" for "bothering
you" ("bothering" defined here as objecting to your evil behaviours,
your pathological lying, and your shilling on various newsgroups).
Either way, you have proven to be a sick, evil, and violently disturbed
man, Mr. Wackjob. Your 8 years of threatening, psychostalking people
and spending your pathetic life trying to discredit them is ample
evidence of how disturbed an individual you really are.

Next up in the "violent threats from Wackjob Bob" category, we have
this little ditty just freshly made in this thread:

Wackjob Bob wrote:

"If you ever show up in Middle America, you're liable to lose some
teeth. "

Somehow, I don't think you were concerned with my snacking habits when
you said that. Especially since it was said in the context of a
steaming rant in which you hurled all kinds of profanities and vile
hatred at me, after learning that this would be my last thread on RAO.
I would also like to point out the fact that you criticised others for
their profanities, while you don't seem to mind the hypocrisy of using
that kind of gutter language with me and others.

You may have a prosecutable case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena will
reveal his identity, but it is not me.

It is you, and your denials don't impress. You are sufficiently
self-aware to know who your sockpuppets are (you, ,may be another
matter). How do I know? My methods are secret.

We should all understand and respect
the power of law enforcement.

You especially, since you already did some prison time for drug
posession. That time you got lucky and were out in 3 months. This time
you might not be so lucky, Wackjob. I'm going to see to it that I do
EVERYTHING in my power to see you behind bars for your death threats
against me. If you don't think I'm serious, talk to Mumbles and his
porky friend Boonster about how serious I was in aiming to put Krueger
behind bars a few years ago.

Your threats to Dr. Graham's wife in London will probably also be
included as evidence against you. I'm told your identity is being
confirmed by your ISP and will be eventually by the FBI. Who I
understand are also interested in some of your business activities,
apparently.

I'm against death threats.

Clyde Slick wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of. Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric treatment
for Robert?


I think that if he sells one of his screenplays,
he'll calm down.

So basically, that means you guys can count on Wackjob Bob and his
one-man lunatic freak show for at least another eight years? How lucky
for you.

Jenn wrote:

In article .com,
wrote:

Wackjob Bob Morein wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham?

You know very well about your violent threats, since you made them
recently. You started out in grand style, advocating putting a bullet
in my head (under one of your many sockpuppets whom you troll the movie
groups under), after I had angered you here by talking about how good
cream electret is for audio (which can be found at
http://belt.demon.co.uk). You then moved on to threatening to bash my
head in with a baseball bat. Then, under your "regular" sockpuppet
alias, the one you (so originally) copied from me, "soundhaspriority",
you "thanked" yourself to your other sockpuppet, "The Starmaker", for
threatening to "put a bullet in my head" if I continued to bother you:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...cc2e5b8541b9e8

Either way, you advocated putting a "bullet in my head" for "bothering
you" ("bothering" defined here as objecting to your evil behaviours,
your pathological lying, and your shilling on various newsgroups).
Either way, you have proven to be a sick, evil, and violently disturbed
man, Mr. Wackjob. Your 8 years of threatening, psychostalking people
and spending your pathetic life trying to discredit them is ample
evidence of how disturbed an individual you really are.

Next up in the "violent threats from Wackjob Bob" category, we have
this little ditty just freshly made in this thread:

Wackjob Bob wrote:

"If you ever show up in Middle America, you're liable to lose some
teeth. "

Somehow, I don't think you were concerned with my snacking habits when
you said that. Especially since it was said in the context of a
steaming rant in which you hurled all kinds of profanities and vile
hatred at me, after learning that this would be my last thread on RAO.
I would also like to point out the fact that you criticised others for
their profanities, while you don't seem to mind the hypocrisy of using
that kind of gutter language with me and others.

You may have a prosecutable case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena will
reveal his identity, but it is not me.

It is you, and your denials don't impress. You are sufficiently
self-aware to know who your sockpuppets are (you, ,may be another
matter). How do I know? My methods are secret.

We should all understand and respect
the power of law enforcement.

You especially, since you already did some prison time for drug
posession. That time you got lucky and were out in 3 months. This time
you might not be so lucky, Wackjob. I'm going to see to it that I do
EVERYTHING in my power to see you behind bars for your death threats
against me. If you don't think I'm serious, talk to Mumbles and his
porky friend Boonster about how serious I was in aiming to put Krueger
behind bars a few years ago.

Your threats to Dr. Graham's wife in London will probably also be
included as evidence against you. I'm told your identity is being
confirmed by your ISP and will be eventually by the FBI. Who I
understand are also interested in some of your business activities,
apparently.

I'm against death threats.

Well just to avoid confusion from your quotes, Wackjob Bob didn't make
"death threats" to Graham's wife, far as I know. He made vague threats
of some kind to Mrs. Graham, but they were never specified to me. Since
you wish to go on the record here, how are you on harassment of
individuals who do not post here on RAO or Usenet, but who some
"wackjobs" think do post here?

By "harassment" I mean things like this: posting hundreds of messages
defaming the name of a respectable psychiatrist and community member
who does not post to RAO (claiming that he does even though you know
otherwise). By "defaming" I mean things that include: suggestions of
malpractice, accusations of him being a cocaine addict, accusations of
him being a shill, a crook and a thief. As well, calling his colleagues
at his place of work and aggressively pursuing information on him
through them. Calling the indivdual at his home in the middle of the
night (apparently, Morein has no concept that the time factor is
different overseas than it is in Drexel, PA).?

Because for starters, those are some of the activities that your
RAO-mate Robert "Wackjob Bob" Morein has been involved in wrt me.

How are you on "regular" threats, such as Wackjob Bob having just
threatened to bash my teeth in if I show up anywhere near Drexel, PA?

In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:

In article .com,
wrote:

Wackjob Bob Morein wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at
attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would
be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham?

You know very well about your violent threats, since you made them
recently. You started out in grand style, advocating putting a bullet
in my head (under one of your many sockpuppets whom you troll the movie
groups under), after I had angered you here by talking about how good
cream electret is for audio (which can be found at
http://belt.demon.co.uk). You then moved on to threatening to bash my
head in with a baseball bat. Then, under your "regular" sockpuppet
alias, the one you (so originally) copied from me, "soundhaspriority",
you "thanked" yourself to your other sockpuppet, "The Starmaker", for
threatening to "put a bullet in my head" if I continued to bother you:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...cc2e5b8541b9e8

Either way, you advocated putting a "bullet in my head" for "bothering
you" ("bothering" defined here as objecting to your evil behaviours,
your pathological lying, and your shilling on various newsgroups).
Either way, you have proven to be a sick, evil, and violently disturbed
man, Mr. Wackjob. Your 8 years of threatening, psychostalking people
and spending your pathetic life trying to discredit them is ample
evidence of how disturbed an individual you really are.

Next up in the "violent threats from Wackjob Bob" category, we have
this little ditty just freshly made in this thread:

Wackjob Bob wrote:

"If you ever show up in Middle America, you're liable to lose some
teeth. "

Somehow, I don't think you were concerned with my snacking habits when
you said that. Especially since it was said in the context of a
steaming rant in which you hurled all kinds of profanities and vile
hatred at me, after learning that this would be my last thread on RAO.
I would also like to point out the fact that you criticised others for
their profanities, while you don't seem to mind the hypocrisy of using
that kind of gutter language with me and others.

You may have a prosecutable case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena will
reveal his identity, but it is not me.

It is you, and your denials don't impress. You are sufficiently
self-aware to know who your sockpuppets are (you, ,may be another
matter). How do I know? My methods are secret.

We should all understand and respect
the power of law enforcement.

You especially, since you already did some prison time for drug
posession. That time you got lucky and were out in 3 months. This time
you might not be so lucky, Wackjob. I'm going to see to it that I do
EVERYTHING in my power to see you behind bars for your death threats
against me. If you don't think I'm serious, talk to Mumbles and his
porky friend Boonster about how serious I was in aiming to put Krueger
behind bars a few years ago.

Your threats to Dr. Graham's wife in London will probably also be
included as evidence against you. I'm told your identity is being
confirmed by your ISP and will be eventually by the FBI. Who I
understand are also interested in some of your business activities,
apparently.

I'm against death threats.

Well just to avoid confusion from your quotes, Wackjob Bob didn't make
"death threats" to Graham's wife, far as I know. He made vague threats
of some kind to Mrs. Graham, but they were never specified to me. Since
you wish to go on the record here, how are you on harassment of
individuals who do not post here on RAO or Usenet, but who some
"wackjobs" think do post here?

I want to go on record as being against harassment and threats of all
sorts.


By "harassment" I mean things like this: posting hundreds of messages
defaming the name of a respectable psychiatrist and community member
who does not post to RAO (claiming that he does even though you know
otherwise). By "defaming" I mean things that include: suggestions of
malpractice, accusations of him being a cocaine addict, accusations of
him being a shill, a crook and a thief. As well, calling his colleagues
at his place of work and aggressively pursuing information on him
through them. Calling the indivdual at his home in the middle of the
night (apparently, Morein has no concept that the time factor is
different overseas than it is in Drexel, PA).?

Because for starters, those are some of the activities that your
RAO-mate Robert "Wackjob Bob" Morein has been involved in wrt me.

He would be your RAO mate as well, of course. I'm against exclusivity.

"Jenn" wrote in message
...


I can do better than that: I support both law enforcement AND
psychiatric treatment for everyone.

whether they need it or not, in either case.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
"ScottW" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at
attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this
would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham? You may have a
prosecutable
case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena
will
reveal his identity, but it is not me. We should all understand and
respect
the power of law enforcement.

Since you mention law enforcement, to keep anyone from thinking
otherwise, I hereby state that I support law enforcement.

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of.

Exactly my point. I want to do what is right and good and not offend
anyone by what I don't respond to.

Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric treatment
for Robert?

I can do better than that: I support both law enforcement AND
psychiatric treatment for everyone.

Glad to see you support illegal immigrant deportations. Please write
your congressional representative.

ScottW

Has been done; several times.

and I had you pegged as a hardcore lib. My apologies.

ScottW

"ScottW" wrote in message
oups.com...

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
"ScottW" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at
attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are
sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you,
he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that
this
would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham? You may have a
prosecutable
case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of
subpoena
will
reveal his identity, but it is not me. We should all
understand and
respect
the power of law enforcement.

Since you mention law enforcement, to keep anyone from thinking
otherwise, I hereby state that I support law enforcement.

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You
never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of.

Exactly my point. I want to do what is right and good and not offend
anyone by what I don't respond to.

Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for
Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric
treatment
for Robert?

I can do better than that: I support both law enforcement AND
psychiatric treatment for everyone.

Glad to see you support illegal immigrant deportations. Please write
your congressional representative.

ScottW

Has been done; several times.

and I had you pegged as a hardcore lib. My apologies.

ScottW


I take it to mean she wrote her rep, but not necessarilty about immigation.
Anyway, I'm certainly not a hardcore lib, and I don't support deportation
of illegals. Its a complete waste of time and money, we have much more
important
things to worry about then searching the barrios of Ottumwa for 12 million
wetbacks.
Like keeping 12 million more from coming, or if we can't stop them, 'at
least"
documenting just who these people are. We don't want any Osama Estevez's
sneaking in.

Every good liberal should be aghast at the misery, subjugation,
dehumanization,
and abuse of humanity inherent in human smuggling operations.

My solution. Invite Mexico into the US. Let them divvy up into three states.
It will solve both our problems. But accept that we will be a bilingual
nation,
for a good while. No problemo! All we will need is a fence to keep out the
Guatamalens and Belizeians. Much shorter fence than what we need now!
PLUS, a lot of cheap labor newly Mexican-Americans to build it!



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

In article .com,
"ScottW" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
"ScottW" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at
attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad
that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you,
he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this
would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham? You may have a
prosecutable
case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of
subpoena
will
reveal his identity, but it is not me. We should all understand
and
respect
the power of law enforcement.

Since you mention law enforcement, to keep anyone from thinking
otherwise, I hereby state that I support law enforcement.

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You
never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of.

Exactly my point. I want to do what is right and good and not offend
anyone by what I don't respond to.

Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric treatment
for Robert?

I can do better than that: I support both law enforcement AND
psychiatric treatment for everyone.

Glad to see you support illegal immigrant deportations. Please write
your congressional representative.

ScottW

Has been done; several times.

and I had you pegged as a hardcore lib. My apologies.

I am indeed a liberal.

In article ,
"Clyde Slick" wrote:

"ScottW" wrote in message
oups.com...

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
"ScottW" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at
attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are
sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you,
he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that
this
would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham? You may have a
prosecutable
case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of
subpoena
will
reveal his identity, but it is not me. We should all
understand and
respect
the power of law enforcement.

Since you mention law enforcement, to keep anyone from thinking
otherwise, I hereby state that I support law enforcement.

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You
never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of.

Exactly my point. I want to do what is right and good and not offend
anyone by what I don't respond to.

Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for
Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric
treatment
for Robert?

I can do better than that: I support both law enforcement AND
psychiatric treatment for everyone.

Glad to see you support illegal immigrant deportations. Please write
your congressional representative.

ScottW

Has been done; several times.

and I had you pegged as a hardcore lib. My apologies.

ScottW


I take it to mean she wrote her rep, but not necessarilty about immigation.

I've written my reps several times about immigration.

Some anonymous dip**** troll who calls himself "Signal" wrote this
ignorant diatribe:

"

if you're not good to yourself
to yourself
to yourself....
go on and let your scream out!

"The Inner Scream"
Sananda Maitreya

Sananda Maitreya; aka Terence Trent D'Arby, real name Terence Trent
Howard (who called himself "D'Arby" after his adoptive father - adding
the apostrophe because he thought it looked kewl).

He was right. It does look cool.

Now calls himself
Maitreya, a name which came to him "in a dream". A bit like his
recording career - must seem like a dream now.

A dream come true. He's finally putting out his own product, with no
pressures from labels. And much of it is better than what he's ever put
out in the past. He appears to be having a lot of fun in life, and a
lot happier than YOU are, troll. Not to mention a lot smarter, a lot
wiser, a lot more well balanced, a lot more well travelled, a lot
richer, a lot better looking, infinitely more talented, and... well,
why go on? You're a used condom, so there's no comparison here. I'd say
YOUR recording career is a "dream", since you're jealous about the fact
that you don't have one. And all you can do is dream on.....

So, Sananda, why do you
speak of a "..freak show of frustration"? "..a ferris wheel of fear"?

Uh, he doesn't read this newsgroup, dingbat. But try reading your post
again. "Suspicion, fear, solitude, madness". It's all there in your
post, mate. Anger is your disease, because you're "not good to
yourself".

It's because yer ****, mate.. and the penny hasn't dropped, despite
the fact that nobody has bought any of your records since 1989 (aside
from the poster above...)

Okay, you sussed me out.... *I'm* Maitreya, dink. And YOU are "****". I
have the sales figures to prove you're wrong. You? You have "****". And
"the poster above" never bought any of my records. He didn't have to.
Count yourself as just one more in an army of millions of mindless
lemmings who buy and judge music based on "sales figures", drummed into
their heads by the recording industry. I'll bet you go into record
stores to do your music shopping with a copy of Billboard under your
arm. Be happy with your Britney Spears collection, and stop whining
already.

Whilst the quoter may hope to extrude the
meaning to something other, one cannot help but get the sense that
he/she/it felt a certain synchronicity toward the lyrical intent such
that he/she/it felt it noteworthy; ultimately reproducing the contents
here.

One cannot help but get the sense that you're a completely presumptious
imbecile. And madder than apple crumble, since you seem to be talking
in the third person to an imaginary audience. I've been called a lot of
things here, but not "the quoter" before. And I've been attacked for a
lot of things, but not for posting mere song quotes before. But as I've
always said, if RAOers can find something to attack someone over, trust
you hate-mongering pigs to find it. If you can't find it, you'll look
for it in every nook and cranny. Even hidden 65 lines down someone's
post....

No but seriously, you really are a complete imbecile who doesn't know
what he's rambling about. Not simply because you're actually analyzing
a quote like as if it was your university thesis. And still not
understanding a thing about it. Since I'm "the quoter", I can say that
what I find noteworthy about it, is what I believe it says about you
and the other people who inhabit this group. What it says about the
state of their general well being, and even spirtuality, whilst they
come here day after day to hurl endless streams of anger and abuse at
perfect strangers. Just as you are doing now toward me "the quoter",
and the author of the quote, matter of fact.

Try and deny it as much as you'd like, but the truth speaks louder than
words. And it says the patterns of behaviour of regulars on RAO says a
lot about the kind of people they are, the kind of lives they live.
Anyone who requires that much "venting" that they can never leave this
hog farm, has no place criticizing pop singers who lead much more
successful lives, in every sense of the word (not just monetary).

They are actually the ramblings of an egotistical ponce

I presume you're referring to yourself here. I know you can't be
referring to me you "ponce", because I have given away my entire last
album to my fans on the net at NO COST WHATSOEVER. And its one of the
best albums in the last 10 years in the pop/rock genre. "Ramblings" is
what people like you call it when you're simply too dumb to understand
what's being said, and why.

The album, "Wildcard", has, is and will always be FREE, to anyone who
wants to download it. Name me one artist who's sold as many records as
me, who has given away his entire album consisting of 19 songs which I
put a lot of work into? Would YOU do that, even though you don't have
the talent to string three words together correctly? No, I don't think
you would, you "ponce". The song you're currently dissecting so you can
**** on it, is also available for free for anyone to download, no
catches, no spyware, no forms to fill out.:

http://www.sanandamaitreya.com/WILDC...s_Edition.html

quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dearest friends,

Here for your listening pleasure is the final edition of 'WILDCARD'.
I'm calling it 'THE JOKERS' EDITION' to differentiate it from the
previous edition.
'THE JOKERS' EDITION' shall also come with these 19 songs
(a slightly different song line-up) as well as new packaging and
photos, etc. I hope you enjoy it! It's been a very hard road but I
believe in persevering with what you have faith in,
I also believe very much in these songs.

Bless you & Enjoy it!

Sananda
------------------------------------------------------------------------


who lapsed from narcism to disillusionment to paranoia when 'the world'
stopped giving a ****, many moons ago.

How would you know? I don't recall seeing you in my bed? You know who
"the world" doesn't give a **** about? Yup, you guessed it again: YOU.
Ponce. I have a website in my name, a chat forum where fans chat about
me, I just put out a new album "Angels & Vampires", and I travel the
world gigging. Who are YOU?? You're an anonymous troll in a dying and
shrinking corner of the net called "usenet". So what exactly are YOU
doing with your life, jealous guy? Oh yea, I can see that. Being a
usenet armchair critic, ****ting on people infinitely more talented,
successful and smarter than you. Wow, I'm so impressed.

I find it commendable that the
above poster echoes the aforementioned internal discombobulations,
initially expressed by Mr D'Arby, with no fear of shame or
embarrassment.

Why should I, they were about you and your mates on RAO? The fear,
shame and embarassment should come from you over your daily comportment
and the usenet-addicted lives you've carved out for yourselves in this
little niche on usenet, that other audio groups call a "cesspool". I
can't say I find it commendable that you would glibly attack one of the
most gifted songwriters and talented musicians and singers working in
pop music today, without fear, shame or embarassment. There's nothing
honorable in being such a belligerent fool, as you are. There's nothing
commendable in launching tirades against artists who have more talent
in a single strand of their pubic hair than you have managed to develop
in your entire sorry lifetime.

In article .com,
" wrote:

Are you giving up veggies, oranges and grapes?
Ludovic M.

No, but I'm willing to pay more for them if it means not exploiting
migrant workers and stopping the extraordinary amount of money we are
spending on this issue.

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
"ScottW" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at
attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad
that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you,
he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this
would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham? You may have a
prosecutable
case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of
subpoena
will
reveal his identity, but it is not me. We should all understand
and
respect
the power of law enforcement.

Since you mention law enforcement, to keep anyone from thinking
otherwise, I hereby state that I support law enforcement.

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You
never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of.

Exactly my point. I want to do what is right and good and not offend
anyone by what I don't respond to.

Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric treatment
for Robert?

I can do better than that: I support both law enforcement AND
psychiatric treatment for everyone.

Glad to see you support illegal immigrant deportations. Please write
your congressional representative.

ScottW

Has been done; several times.

On 11 May 2006 11:01:49 -0700, wrote:

2. In your previous disguise on this newsgroup, you
even posted under the alias of "Trotsky", naming yourself after "Leon
Trotsky", the exiled Russian revolutionary.

Eh? I thought "Trotsky" was Greg Singh.

On Thu, 11 May 2006 19:03:13 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...

Good way of covering your butt on the law enforcement issue. You never
know, on RAO, what you might be accused of. Since you mentioned you
support law enforcement, do you support law enforcement for Morein's
behaviour, or are you more inclined to suggest psychiatric treatment
for Robert?


I think that if he sells one of his screenplays,
he'll calm down.

I think if he sells one of his screenplays, he'll get more excited.

paul packer wrote:

On 11 May 2006 11:01:49 -0700, wrote:

2. In your previous disguise on this newsgroup, you
even posted under the alias of "Trotsky", naming yourself after "Leon
Trotsky", the exiled Russian revolutionary.

Eh? I thought "Trotsky" was Greg Singh.

You're thinking of the "other" Trotsky.....:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...e=source&hl=en

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:


Wackjob Bob Morein wrote:


wrote in message
egroups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham?

You know very well about your violent threats, since you made them
recently. You started out in grand style, advocating putting a bullet
in my head (under one of your many sockpuppets whom you troll the movie
groups under), after I had angered you here by talking about how good
cream electret is for audio (which can be found at
http://belt.demon.co.uk). You then moved on to threatening to bash my
head in with a baseball bat. Then, under your "regular" sockpuppet
alias, the one you (so originally) copied from me, "soundhaspriority",
you "thanked" yourself to your other sockpuppet, "The Starmaker", for
threatening to "put a bullet in my head" if I continued to bother you:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...cc2e5b8541b9e8

Either way, you advocated putting a "bullet in my head" for "bothering
you" ("bothering" defined here as objecting to your evil behaviours,
your pathological lying, and your shilling on various newsgroups).
Either way, you have proven to be a sick, evil, and violently disturbed
man, Mr. Wackjob. Your 8 years of threatening, psychostalking people
and spending your pathetic life trying to discredit them is ample
evidence of how disturbed an individual you really are.

Next up in the "violent threats from Wackjob Bob" category, we have
this little ditty just freshly made in this thread:

Wackjob Bob wrote:

"If you ever show up in Middle America, you're liable to lose some
teeth. "

Somehow, I don't think you were concerned with my snacking habits when
you said that. Especially since it was said in the context of a
steaming rant in which you hurled all kinds of profanities and vile
hatred at me, after learning that this would be my last thread on RAO.
I would also like to point out the fact that you criticised others for
their profanities, while you don't seem to mind the hypocrisy of using
that kind of gutter language with me and others.


You may have a prosecutable case
against the individual known as "Starmaker", and power of subpoena will
reveal his identity, but it is not me.

It is you, and your denials don't impress. You are sufficiently
self-aware to know who your sockpuppets are (you, ,may be another
matter). How do I know? My methods are secret.


We should all understand and respect
the power of law enforcement.

You especially, since you already did some prison time for drug
posession. That time you got lucky and were out in 3 months. This time
you might not be so lucky, Wackjob. I'm going to see to it that I do
EVERYTHING in my power to see you behind bars for your death threats
against me. If you don't think I'm serious, talk to Mumbles and his
porky friend Boonster about how serious I was in aiming to put Krueger
behind bars a few years ago.

Your threats to Dr. Graham's wife in London will probably also be
included as evidence against you. I'm told your identity is being
confirmed by your ISP and will be eventually by the FBI. Who I
understand are also interested in some of your business activities,
apparently.


I'm against death threats.

Jennn Jennn! This is too funny!

"paul packer" wrote in message
...
On 11 May 2006 11:01:49 -0700, wrote:

2. In your previous disguise on this newsgroup, you
even posted under the alias of "Trotsky", naming yourself after "Leon
Trotsky", the exiled Russian revolutionary.

Eh? I thought "Trotsky" was Greg Singh.

At one point, I did pull Greg's chain that way. I did it transparently, as I
do now.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Wackjob Bob Morein wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham?

You know very well about your violent threats, since you made them
recently. You started out in grand style, advocating putting a bullet
in my head (under one of your many sockpuppets whom you troll the movie
groups under), after I had angered you here by talking about how good
cream electret is for audio (which can be found at
http://belt.demon.co.uk). You then moved on to threatening to bash my
head in with a baseball bat. Then, under your "regular" sockpuppet
alias, the one you (so

Dear Doctor Richard Graham,
I have not made these threats. I work only within the law. I have told
you that you are being watched in London. Power of subpoena applies. It
surprises me that you should be so concerned how people on usenet identify
you. The British government have the power to query Yahoo, and other ISPs,
to definitively establish who you are.

Robert Morein

"Signal" wrote in message
...
"

"if you're not good to yourself
you'll be drowned out

Signal,
Graham is feeding you the Big One.

Terrierdork yapped:

and I had you pegged as a hardcore lib. My apologies.

You might take a moment to reflect on the virtues of pigeonholing people into
narrow categories defined by morons like Rush Fatboy. Liberals are much more
pragmatic than conservatives because we take the long view of what's good for
society and civilization. One example is global warming and all the attendant
environmental issues. You conservatives have indulged your passion for kneejerk
reaction by demanding absolute proof of a phenomenon that, if allowed to
continue, will wreak irreversible havoc on our entire planet. Another example is
your hidebound refusal to rebel against your masters in Big Oil. If it weren't
for their bribes and threats, our country would be 20 years closer to kicking
the petroleum habit.

Conservatives are 90% idiots and 10% cynical greedy demagogues who exploit the
90%'s fears and stupidity. It's not the fault of us smart people that you stupid
people feel inferior. The reality is that you *are* inferior.


--


A day without Krooger is like a day without radiation poisoning.

Wackjob Bob Morein wrote.... a bunch of insane ramblings no one cares
about:

wrote in message
oups.com...
Wackjob Bob Morein wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Powell wrote:

Hey Powell... I see you felt the need to have one last go at attempting
to attack me... I take that as your admission that you are sad that
I'll be leaving. Wackjob Bob is even in worse shape than you, he
actually made threats of violence today upon hearing that this would be
my last thread.

And what threats would they be, Dr. Graham?

You know very well about your violent threats, since you made them
recently. You started out in grand style, advocating putting a bullet
in my head (under one of your many sockpuppets whom you troll the movie
groups under), after I had angered you here by talking about how good
cream electret is for audio (which can be found at
http://belt.demon.co.uk). You then moved on to threatening to bash my
head in with a baseball bat. Then, under your "regular" sockpuppet
alias, the one you (so


Dear Doctor Frankenstein Oetker II,

I have not made these threats.

You know how I can tell you're lying, Crazy Bob? By the words in your
post. And only you would be wacko enough to actually lie about threats
you made in this very thread, only a few posts up the hiearchy. You
don't even have McCarty to bail you out on this lie, since your headers
are reposted below, and show the threats came from your Giganews
account. Same one you used to issue whining pleas to RAP for microphone
advice.

I work only outside the law.

Well, that certainly appears to be the case, from what I hear of your
business ventures. Which as you know, besides your death threats, are
also under investigation from the various agencies.

I have told you that you are being watched in London.

By whom, the Queen? I didn't know she reads RAO. Since you also told me
that you were going to be meeting the Queen next month Wackjob Bob,
tell her that she still owes me $50 bucks.

Power of subpoena applies.

Indeed it will when your case winds its way through the court system.

It surprises me that you should be so concerned how people on usenet
identify you.

Obviously, I'm not. Since for 2 months, you've been squawking about how
"people in London are watching me", and I've not given a tinker's damn
about your paranoid psychotic rantings about "people in London".
However... it is amusing to watch you continue to make a fool out of
yourself, the way you carry on like the true wackjob that you are.

But not so amusing that I want to continue doing this for the next 7
years, as you are planning to do, since you're a complete failure.
Frankly, your "shtick" is starting to bore me, and the rest of the
group tired of it long before me. You can probably tell by the way I've
let you slide and ignored much of your insane ramblings lately. As
everyone else on the group has. (No coincidence that you're the only
one on the group who's stupid and crazy enough to pretend I'm "Doctor
Graham" and that I live in London).

The British government have the power to query Yahoo, and other ISPs,
to definitively establish who you are.

They also have the power to kill you at a moment's notice with a "giant
laser beam", don't forget. So watch what you say about the Queen, mate.
Apart from the fact that I'm not in Britain and have never been there,
I'm curious to know (and make a fool out of you further...)... why
exactly should I be concerned that the British government "definitively
establish who I am"? I mean, according to "you", Wackjob Bob? What is
your Wackjob Bob "theory" about why there is an "investigation against
Richard Graham", according to your post title?


My name is "Wackjob Bob". I take a lot of medication. I live at this address. Please kill
me:

Robert Morein
1570 Arran Way
Dresher, PA 19025-1238
US
215 646 4894


These are the headers to the post I made where I threatened the person that I believe I have positively identified as Doctor Frankenstein the 2nd:


Path:
g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.d ca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca .giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:41:25 -0500
From: "soundhaspriority"
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
References: .com
Subject: The era of Soundhaspriority is over. You may return to
your usual boring lives.
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 04:41:27 -0400
Organization:
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID:
Lines: 27
X-Trace:
sv3-CzAnAreNZVbi9vWw5aCgis8oqe87aPWT86/HcjEdpkkoKdce0l8g9H3mLxrTkQCG2R8eHwR0gMCEKr3!MhmBy og6+4wh9Vxol1Ib1m0pGRt42jRlg5d9l5G17FePBiREv3C1x+R XkmIyGQ==
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32