Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since I'm going to be recording without a control room, the optimal place
for monitoring may very well be out of sight of the performers. Much of the setup time will involve running back and forth between the board and the performers in order to position the microphones. I'm wondering if a wireless TV camera could be used in conjunction with cell phones or walkie talkies to cut some time off this process. I could give instructions to performers or an assistant in the room on mic placement. Has anyone tried this? Can anyone suggest a wireless camera system, preferably with a flat panel display, or with a usb converter in order to use the laptop as a monitor? |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sweet Christ...wireless cameras, cell phones...yes you _could_ do all
that. You're considering spending money on convenience before you have a good set of mics? Your priorities are out of whack. It's not that complicated. Good stereo pair in a good room with good performers. Worry about _THAT_. Worry about time of day to record in the space to minimize interruptions/traffic/other noise. Worry about being able to put together a schedule when all your performers are rested and in top shape. Worry about access to the A/C in the room. Worry about squeaky chairs/floors that the performers will sit on. Worry about the flute needing new pads because it's too clanky when solo. Worry about the damn piano being in tune on the recording day. Multi-mic setups, snakes, video communication, walkie talkies and the other crap will come later, when you realize that your gigs are getting too big/fast and you need technological or human help because otherwise you will LOSE the gigs in question. By the time you NEED to have this stuff, you will (or SHOULD) be making enough money on this to hire a competent assistant. Start with a good set of headphones and if your recorder doesn't have a good headphone amp, buy something decent (I like the OZ audio or the Rane can amps; the new Behringer is not too bad) to supplement it so you CAN crank it if you need to. You want to listen and move the mics? Make a long headphone extension cable. You're making up problems so far. Get two mics, a recorder and a set of cans and go record something. Listen to it at home and figure out what you don't like about it. Then figure out a way to change your method so that the next one comes out better. There is no way to foresee everything and there is certainly no way to transfer experience between people. You've gotten every bit of information a beginning recorder needs. Go get some of YOUR OWN experience, come back, share it, then we can talk. --Vas |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "vas" wrote in message oups.com... Sweet Christ...wireless cameras, cell phones...yes you _could_ do all that. You're considering spending money on convenience before you have a good set of mics? Your priorities are out of whack. It's not that complicated. Good stereo pair in a good room with good performers. Worry about _THAT_. Sorry, Vas. A stereo pair can provide a marvelous experience for the audiophile, but is insufficient to satisfy the needs of my associates. Worry about time of day to record in the space to minimize interruptions/traffic/other noise. Worry about being able to put together a schedule when all your performers are rested and in top shape. Vas, not my job. Worry about access to the A/C in the room. Vas, due to the particular relationship with my associates, they take on much of the responsibility the producer would normally have. Worry about squeaky chairs/floors that the performers will sit on. Actually, I've been through that, with a TV pilot I did. Worry about the flute needing new pads because it's too clanky when solo. Worry about the damn piano being in tune on the recording day. Not my problem, Vas. If it happens, I will mention it to the responsible person. Multi-mic setups, snakes, video communication, walkie talkies and the other crap will come later, when you realize that your gigs are getting too big/fast and you need technological or human help because otherwise you will LOSE the gigs in question. Did you read in a past thread that I'm not doing this for a fee? By the time you NEED to have this stuff, you will (or SHOULD) be making enough money on this to hire a competent assistant. Start with a good set of headphones and if your recorder doesn't have a good headphone amp, buy something decent (I like the OZ audio or the Rane can amps; the new Behringer is not too bad) to supplement it so you CAN crank it if you need to. I never crank the phones. My hearing is very good, and I want to keep it. .. You want to listen and move the mics? Make a long headphone extension cable. There is a very strong argument that it is impossible to be sufficiently isolated. You're making up problems so far. Get two mics, a recorder and a set of cans and go record something. Vas, I have ten channels of 24/96 to hard disk, and twenty mics. Listen to it at home and figure out what you don't like about it. Then figure out a way to change your method so that the next one comes out better. Vas, I've been doing film production sound since 2001 with an HHB Portadat and Sennheiser shotguns. There is no way to foresee everything and there is certainly no way to transfer experience between people. You've gotten every bit of information a beginning recorder needs. Go get some of YOUR OWN experience, come back, share it, then we can talk. I've done two film soundtracks, one chamber recital, and one TV show. So what about the camera? |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Robert Morein wrote: Since I'm going to be recording without a control room, the optimal place for monitoring may very well be out of sight of the performers. Much of the setup time will involve running back and forth between the board and the performers in order to position the microphones. I'm wondering if a wireless TV camera could be used in conjunction with cell phones or walkie talkies to cut some time off this process. PLOP! Maybe if you had a camera operator so you could actually see how a mic was set, that would work. I use a video camera sometimes on a remote when I'm out of view of the stage but that's just to give me an idea of what's going on - why I don't hear a mandolin because the mandolin player is playing harmonica into his vocal mic and such. I use an intercom (not wireless but I suppose it could be) to give instructions to the people in the studio - everybody does. You just tell the guitar player to move the mic a little this way or that and have him play a little while you listen on your monitors. Simple as that. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Morein wrote:
"vas" wrote in message oups.com... Sweet Christ...wireless cameras, cell phones...yes you _could_ do all that. You're considering spending money on convenience before you have a good set of mics? Your priorities are out of whack. It's not that complicated. Good stereo pair in a good room with good performers. Worry about _THAT_. Sorry, Vas. A stereo pair can provide a marvelous experience for the audiophile, but is insufficient to satisfy the needs of my associates. Ok, so what EXACTLY is the WHOLE problem? You give small tidbits, but what's the actual project? What specifically are you trying to accomplish? Multi-mic setups, snakes, video communication, walkie talkies and the other crap will come later, when you realize that your gigs are getting too big/fast and you need technological or human help because otherwise you will LOSE the gigs in question. Did you read in a past thread that I'm not doing this for a fee? No. But now I have. So you're doing this as a favor? As a learning experience? By the time you NEED to have this stuff, you will (or SHOULD) be making enough money on this to hire a competent assistant. Start with a good set of headphones and if your recorder doesn't have a good headphone amp, buy something decent (I like the OZ audio or the Rane can amps; the new Behringer is not too bad) to supplement it so you CAN crank it if you need to. I never crank the phones. My hearing is very good, and I want to keep it. You sometimes need to, for a short period of time; for instance, to evaluate something close to the noise floor, like a reverb tail. Regardless, it's nice to have the option. . You want to listen and move the mics? Make a long headphone extension cable. There is a very strong argument that it is impossible to be sufficiently isolated. Go do it, see if you can make good decisions on site, and then we can 'argue'. It all depends on the situation in question. You're making up problems so far. Get two mics, a recorder and a set of cans and go record something. Vas, I have ten channels of 24/96 to hard disk, and twenty mics. Great. What mics? What's the project? BTW, this mentioning of my name in every sentence is really ****ing annoying. Listen to it at home and figure out what you don't like about it. Then figure out a way to change your method so that the next one comes out better. Vas, I've been doing film production sound since 2001 with an HHB Portadat and Sennheiser shotguns. I don't really give a **** what gear you used. Plenty of people can afford expensive toys. So, are you a beginner or an experienced warrior or something in between? Your questions indicate the former, yet you now say you've done a bunch of stuff. What's the project, in detail? There is no way to foresee everything and there is certainly no way to transfer experience between people. You've gotten every bit of information a beginning recorder needs. Go get some of YOUR OWN experience, come back, share it, then we can talk. I've done two film soundtracks, one chamber recital, and one TV show. Congratulations. What did you learn from the chamber recital (seeing as that particular experience is the most applicable to the situation you have, not to discount the others)? What setup did you use, what advantages/disadvantages did it have, were you satisifed with the results and what would you do differently today if you could? So what about the camera? Wireless is expensive. Get a run of coax, you're already running cables anyway. Don't use the recording laptop for anything but recording, so forget about USB/Firewire unless you're planning to bring another machine for that purpose. Don't know a good cheap make/model off the top of my head, the video guys you did the TV/film work with would be much better equipped to help you with that. You could get a wired remote pan/tilt head for the tripod as well as a wired remote, or IR repeaters for the camera, so you could move/zoom/focus it from your monitoring location. Or you could just get an assistant who understands a thing or two about recording. --Vas |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
Robert Morein wrote: Since I'm going to be recording without a control room, the optimal place for monitoring may very well be out of sight of the performers. Much of the setup time will involve running back and forth between the board and the performers in order to position the microphones. I'm wondering if a wireless TV camera could be used in conjunction with cell phones or walkie talkies to cut some time off this process. PLOP! Maybe if you had a camera operator so you could actually see how a mic was set, that would work. I use a video camera sometimes on a remote when I'm out of view of the stage but that's just to give me an idea of what's going on - why I don't hear a mandolin because the mandolin player is playing harmonica into his vocal mic and such. I use an intercom (not wireless but I suppose it could be) to give instructions to the people in the studio - everybody does. You just tell the guitar player to move the mic a little this way or that and have him play a little while you listen on your monitors. Simple as that. The X10 stuff works passably well for this application...cheap enough as well. If you let them get your email addy, they'll never leave you alone, however. jak |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jakdedert" wrote in message . .. Mike Rivers wrote: Robert Morein wrote: Since I'm going to be recording without a control room, the optimal place for monitoring may very well be out of sight of the performers. Much of the setup time will involve running back and forth between the board and the performers in order to position the microphones. I'm wondering if a wireless TV camera could be used in conjunction with cell phones or walkie talkies to cut some time off this process. PLOP! Maybe if you had a camera operator so you could actually see how a mic was set, that would work. I use a video camera sometimes on a remote when I'm out of view of the stage but that's just to give me an idea of what's going on - why I don't hear a mandolin because the mandolin player is playing harmonica into his vocal mic and such. I use an intercom (not wireless but I suppose it could be) to give instructions to the people in the studio - everybody does. You just tell the guitar player to move the mic a little this way or that and have him play a little while you listen on your monitors. Simple as that. The X10 stuff works passably well for this application...cheap enough as well. If you let them get your email addy, they'll never leave you alone, however. jak Excellent. I'll have a look. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "vas"
wrote: Sweet Christ...wireless cameras, cell phones...yes you _could_ do all that. You're considering spending money on convenience before you have a good set of mics? Your priorities are out of whack. He's spending MY money for this new hobby. Just like that last few (movie producer, inventor, high-speed pump designer) he spends my hard-earned money to get all the right props, so he can pretend he's now a sound engineer. He'd rather do this than try to enroll in a school (he gets frustrated with educators that don't agree with his uneducated ideas) or actually apprentice at the feet of some well know professional, like his stalking victim Bryan McCarty. "OFFICIAL RAM BLUEBOOK VALUATION" is actually Robert Morein, a pest on rec.audio.marketplace, where he accuses innocent sellers of various misdeeds. He appears to be a pathological liar, with unknown motivations. Morein is the owner of websites http://www.studentsandthelaw.org, which have used fraudulent advertising in attempts to attract investors. Both have been unsuccessful. Morein is known to associate with sexual predators and pedophiles including Brian McCarty. http://tinyurl.com/dua95 Morein is an Israeli expatriate, originally from the Trenton area, where he went to college for 12 years without any degree ever being conferred. He then tried suing Drexel University for fraud, but the court rejected Morein's arguments. As everyone with a lick of sense does. Morein is known to associate with sexual predators and pedophiles including Brian McCarty. http://tinyurl.com/dua95 Morien is currently living in his daddy's house in Dresher Pennsylvania, where he manages to stalk a wide variety of people while swilling beer and ogling the neighbors. He has no job. He never has. He never will. Morein is known to associate with sexual predators and pedophiles including Brian McCarty. http://tinyurl.com/dua95 His daddy's house is located at 1570 Arran Way Dresher, PA 215-646-4894 Morien lives at 1570 Arran Way, Dresher Pennsylvania, a bit west of metropolitan Philadelphia. Morein is known to associate with sexual predators and pedophiles including Brian McCarty. http://tinyurl.com/dua95 Robert Morein can be contacted at |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Brian L. McCarty wrote in message ... In article , "vas" wrote: Sweet Christ...wireless cameras, cell phones...yes you _could_ do all that. You're considering spending money on convenience before you have a good set of mics? Your priorities are out of whack. He's spending MY money for this new hobby. Just like that last few (movie Brian, I have an idea. Your mike cabinet looks awfully ba http://coralseastudios.com/mics.html It's been that way every since 1995. Why don't you thow a bunch of Chinese mikes in there? Ya know, make it look like a more realistic scam? |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert Morein" wrote in message
Brian L. McCarty wrote in message ... In article , "vas" wrote: Sweet Christ...wireless cameras, cell phones...yes you _could_ do all that. You're considering spending money on convenience before you have a good set of mics? Your priorities are out of whack. He's spending MY money for this new hobby. Just like that last few (movie Brian, I have an idea. Your mike cabinet looks awfully ba http://coralseastudios.com/mics.html It's been that way every since 1995. Why don't you thow a bunch of Chinese mikes in there? Ya know, make it look like a more realistic scam? Bob, I think you ought to give him extra credit for using a wide variety of "under construction" graphics. ;-) |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "I. Care" wrote in message .net... In article , says... [snip] Well the obvious simple answer is DON'T give him any of YOUR money to spend. That will force him to get a job and pay his own way. An adult grown son/daughter has no "rights" to live with and be supported by you. -- I. Care Address fake until the SPAM goes away ;-} Dear "I Care", The post you are responding to is a forgery by Brian L. McCarty, an ex-sound man who runs the scams http://www.coralseastudios.com, and http://www.worldjazz.com . My father has never posted to usenet. Regards, Bob Morein |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anybody up on wireless in-ear monitor systems? | Pro Audio | |||
Polk Monitor Series 5.1 Speaker System Reviewed | General | |||
FS: Tannoy System 10 Studio Monitor Speakers | Marketplace | |||
Monitor Spec Query | Pro Audio |