Jenn wrote:

In article kyy7g.21479$fG3.5399@dukeread09,
"ScottW" wrote:

ScottW

George or Arny?

George.

Inexcusable.

Wait... we haven't even started on Middius the Misogynist. What do you
think about Middius referring to women as "bitches", bringing up the
"Virgin Mary's pubic hair" to me recently, insulting my dying mother
then accusing me of murdering her, and referring to Arny's wife as "the
Kroobitch", and calling her a "cheap whore who gives blowjobs in an
alley for 50 cents"... about a hundred times over? That's only the
beginning of George's respect for women. I could go on. Here are a few
examples. The next time you think George is such a sweet nice guy, I
want you to know who you're dealing with.....

-------------------------------------------------------------------
From: George M. Middius - view profile
Date: Tues, Jun 1 2004 7:03 am
Email: George M. Middius
Groups: rec.audio.opinion

La Salope whined:

(n.b.: George's "La Salope" comnment is French for "The Bitch"):

and *you* have insulted my family.

I've never been clear on this claim you keep making, Slut. How is it
possible to "insult" the family of gutter-trash like you? You've
already
admitted your father is a pedophile and your mother is a whore. And
you've told us you aspire to have children with a whore yourself and
you
want them to follow in your footsteps as sewer cleaners. What insult
could be meaningful when tossed at the dregs of society like your
family?
-------------------------------------------------------------------


George M. Middius wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------------------
I forgot to ask whether you're going to bid against Rev. Wikkee so
you can retain the right to whore out the Kroobitch. That would be
Question 3, a number that corresponds nicely to the number of
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------
From: George M. Middius - view profile
Date: Wed, Nov 15 2000 12:00 am
Email: George M. Middius
Groups: rec.audio.opinion

Paul D. said:

Do you deny calling your wife a ho, Arnii?
George.. I think what you mean is ho-bitch. A ho is just a ho, from
'round the way.. perhaps a bit easy, but not an out and out bitch.
However a Kroobitch ho, is a ho-bitch cock-sucking back-alley whore..
[..apparantly]

Good point to bring out on.

George M. Middius
-------------------------------------------------------------------



Arny's legitimate reaction to Middius misogynist bile, and commentary
of George's heinous behaviour from others on the group:

-------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Arny Krueger - view profile
Date: Wed, Nov 15 2000 12:00 am
Email: "Arny Krueger"
Groups: rec.audio.opinion

Author:George M. Middius wrote:

"As Arnii has explained, he often loses track of her because she's a
"back-alley cock-sucking whore". I guess her clientele would get an
eyeful of her coiffure, now that you mention it."

Obviously this post grieves me very much.

I'd like to see comments from Paul Bamborough Marc Phillips, Jeff
Adams, and Stephen McElroy about their reactions to it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------
From: tony loban
Date: Wed, Nov 15 2000 12:00 am
Email: tony loban
Groups: rec.audio.opinion

arny krueger wrote:

Subject: Infringement of voters' rights

Date:11/15/2000

Author:George M. Middius

"As Arnii has explained, he often loses track of her because she's a
"back-alley cock-sucking whore". I guess her clientele would get an
eyeful of her coiffure, now that you mention it."

Obviously this post grieves me very much.

I'd like to see comments from Paul Bamborough Marc Phillips, Jeff
Adams, and Stephen McElroy about their reactions to it.

i fail to see how anyone can align themselves with a vile, loathsome,
hateful, bilious, lying piece of human solid waste such as 'george'.

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------

wrote in message
oups.com...

Jenn wrote:

In article kyy7g.21479$fG3.5399@dukeread09,
"ScottW" wrote:

ScottW

George or Arny?

George.

Inexcusable.

Wait... we haven't even started on Middius the Misogynist. What do you
think about Middius referring to women as "bitches", bringing up the
"Virgin Mary's pubic hair" to me recently, insulting my dying mother
then accusing me of murdering her,

None of this happened, Dr. Richard Graham. Your imagination is very fertile
ground.
Luv,
SHP

Crazy Robert Morein takes a new form of narcotics so wacked out, that
it makes him think he's "Robert Morein" today, instead of
"soundhaspriority":

wrote in message
oups.com...

Jenn wrote:

In article kyy7g.21479$fG3.5399@dukeread09,
"ScottW" wrote:

ScottW

George or Arny?

George.

Inexcusable.

Wait... we haven't even started on Middius the Misogynist. What do you
think about Middius referring to women as "bitches", bringing up the
"Virgin Mary's pubic hair" to me recently, insulting my dying mother
then accusing me of murdering her,

None of this happened, Dr. Richard Graham. Your imagination is very fertile
ground.
Luv,
SHP

That's very funny, considering that you're RAO's answer to Charlie
Manson, whom no one takes seriously. Kind of hard to take you seriously
since for one thing, you're a psychostalking troll who believed you
were me up until today, and now you seem to have "rediscovered" your
original trolling name. What's the matter, Pscho Bob? Did you scrounge
enough money to pay for your Ritalin?

Of course, you've shown your imagination is most definitely NOT
"fertile ground" since you can't even come up with a good alias instead
of stealing someone else's. I call it "engineer's disease". That's also
why your on-topic posts are far less interesting than your kooky
off-topic insane ramblings, like the above. Looks like the morphic
message, "soundhaspriority", was stronger than you are. You know what I
did? I put the message on my monitor yesterday, believing that it would
stop you from using it. And guess what happened, fool?! Ha! Like I
said, its stronger than you are, and sales have -never- been better.

Anyway, enough with the chit chat. I just wanted to thank you for the
opportunity to keep on showing what a misogynist your friend George is.
If I can kill two boards and show what an insane pathological liar you
are at the same time, beautiful! Here we go, let's see your clown post
response to this

(BTW, no it didnt take me but a few moments and I enjoy illustrating
George's lying hypocrisy, as I do yours. So I wasn't doing anything I
didn't want to do):


---------------------------------------------------------
From: George M. Middius - view profile
Date: Fri, Apr 28 2006 12:04 pm

Whom did you murder, Shovie? Aside from your poor old mum, that is.
---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------
From: - view profile
Date: Wed, Mar 22 2006 11:19 pm

Toss some oats in a bowl, add the appropriate amount of water. Add
peanut butter, cocoa powder, sugar as desired, and a pinch of cinammon
(optional). Microwave til the oatmeal is done, and mix. Gooey
delicious!

George M. Middius (the "M" is for "Misogynist") wrote:

How revolting. Have you tried poisoning your poor old mum with this slop?

Gosh, you're just SO cruel, Georgie. Unfathomably cruel. I try to
help people fix themselves a decent snack _and_ improve their audio
system at the same time, and for this, I get a "disgusting" attack of
intolerable cruelty from you. And as if that does not go far enough,
you even attack my poor old mum, who is currently dying of liver
disease. Which is just.... distastefully cruel. I hope nobody tries to
help you after you fall down, because you would probably stab them in
the leg, as a thank you gesture.
---------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------
From: George M. Middius - view profile
Date: Tues, Mar 21 2006 10:33 pm

How revolting. Have you tried poisoning your poor old mum with this
slop?
---------------------------------------------------------


Here's about 250 examples of George uttering "bitch":

---------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=bi...06&safe =off&
---------------------------------------------------------

George wrote:

---------------------------------------------------------
"Ah, but now you've admitted that you do practice a voodoo version of
anglicanism, which includes, sad to say, indulging in rituals entailing
the
use of holy oil, blessed tweezers, and some ratty old ashes you
purchased in
the belief they were genuine remains of the virgin mary's pubic hairs.
"

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...b965dfef6a1706
---------------------------------------------------------

wrote in message
oups.com...
Crazy Robert Morein takes a new form of narcotics so wacked out, that
it makes him think he's "Robert Morein" today, instead of
"soundhaspriority":

Different machine, Richard.
Luv,
SHP

In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:

In article kyy7g.21479$fG3.5399@dukeread09,
"ScottW" wrote:

ScottW

George or Arny?

George.

Inexcusable.

Wait... we haven't even started on Middius the Misogynist. What do you
think about Middius referring to women as "bitches", bringing up the
"Virgin Mary's pubic hair" to me recently, insulting my dying mother
then accusing me of murdering her, and referring to Arny's wife as "the
Kroobitch", and calling her a "cheap whore who gives blowjobs in an
alley for 50 cents"... about a hundred times over? That's only the
beginning of George's respect for women. I could go on. Here are a few
examples. The next time you think George is such a sweet nice guy, I
want you to know who you're dealing with.....

I've already commented on George's post that Scott brought up; speaks
for itself, I think. But your straw man argument is also noted, as I've
never said that George is a "sweet nice guy".

Jenn said to Shovels:

The next time you think George is such a sweet nice guy

But your straw man argument is also noted, as I've
never said that George is a "sweet nice guy".

God forbid! :-)

I think Shovie wants you to unleash an over-the-top screeching tirade of
profanity and insults. If you don't do that, according to Kroologic
and/or Shovelslogic, that means you admire and endorse everything I say.





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

In article ,
George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
wrote:

Jenn said to Shovels:

The next time you think George is such a sweet nice guy

But your straw man argument is also noted, as I've
never said that George is a "sweet nice guy".

God forbid! :-)

I think Shovie wants you to unleash an over-the-top screeching tirade of
profanity and insults. If you don't do that, according to Kroologic
and/or Shovelslogic, that means you admire and endorse everything I say.

Of course. He and Arny seem remarkably similar in that way.

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
wrote:

Jenn said to Shovels:

The next time you think George is such a sweet nice guy

But your straw man argument is also noted, as I've
never said that George is a "sweet nice guy".

God forbid! :-)

I think Shovie wants you to unleash an over-the-top screeching tirade of
profanity and insults. If you don't do that, according to Kroologic
and/or Shovelslogic, that means you admire and endorse everything I say.

Of course.

Sorry to inform you, but this too is a form of character attack, Jenn.
Middius writes a slew of defamatory lies (" I think Shovie wants you to
unleash an over-the-top screeching tirade of profanity and insults, if
you don't do that, that means you admire and endorse everything I
say."), attributes them to me, you politely agree with him, hence
attributing George's defamatory lies to me yourself.

He and Arny seem remarkably similar in that way.

Funny you say that, because you seem remarkably similar to Arny, to me,
in your replies. Anyway, you're no longer a RAO virgin. You certainly
can't say you haven't made unprovoked character attacks and/or joined
in the mudslinging (see ABOVE).
You say you avoid these sorts of posts, yet you seem to be very much
involved with attack posts lately. For me, it means there are no
exceptions on RAO. Everyone is the same. As far as attacking goes,
George is far worse than Arny ever was, to me. Arny has a greater sense
of ethics than George, and I've never seen him write **** like this
title that George wrote in this thread:

" Shovels the Jamie-Bitch**** "

As a woman, do you have any comments on it, and as you claim to have a
sense of ethics, why are you talking to George here like he's your best
friend, and not condemning him for bringing the group down to the level
of where it is now acceptable to write such hateful misogynist things?
If everyone were as much of a sick lowlife as George as to write such
violently distasteful things about women on this group, how much longer
would you stay here?

In article . com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
wrote:

Jenn said to Shovels:

The next time you think George is such a sweet nice guy

But your straw man argument is also noted, as I've
never said that George is a "sweet nice guy".

God forbid! :-)

I think Shovie wants you to unleash an over-the-top screeching tirade of
profanity and insults. If you don't do that, according to Kroologic
and/or Shovelslogic, that means you admire and endorse everything I say.

Of course.

Sorry to inform you, but this too is a form of character attack, Jenn.

Sigh. No, just an opinion about an observation. Feel free to ignore
it; I'm wasting no more time on it.

Middius writes a slew of defamatory lies (" I think Shovie wants you to
unleash an over-the-top screeching tirade of profanity and insults, if
you don't do that, that means you admire and endorse everything I
say."), attributes them to me, you politely agree with him, hence
attributing George's defamatory lies to me yourself.

He and Arny seem remarkably similar in that way.

Funny you say that, because you seem remarkably similar to Arny, to me,
in your replies. Anyway, you're no longer a RAO virgin. You certainly
can't say you haven't made unprovoked character attacks and/or joined
in the mudslinging (see ABOVE).
You say you avoid these sorts of posts, yet you seem to be very much
involved with attack posts lately. For me, it means there are no
exceptions on RAO. Everyone is the same. As far as attacking goes,
George is far worse than Arny ever was, to me. Arny has a greater sense
of ethics than George, and I've never seen him write **** like this
title that George wrote in this thread:

" Shovels the Jamie-Bitch**** "

As a woman, do you have any comments on it, and as you claim to have a
sense of ethics, why are you talking to George here like he's your best
friend,

Where?

and not condemning him for bringing the group down to the level
of where it is now acceptable to write such hateful misogynist things?
If everyone were as much of a sick lowlife as George as to write such
violently distasteful things about women on this group, how much longer
would you stay here?

Look, I'm going to say this one last time, and I hope that you get it
this time: I DON'T COMMENT on everything that I deplore that is written
in this group. I do point out obvious hypocritical attitudes. For
example, if George had been critical of other people using foul names
from women, and then did it himself, I would have commented. Get it?
Otherwise, everyone can post every stupid thing that they want, I don't
care.

Damned PMS. Even a "man" like ****face Shovels suffers.

" Shovels the Jamie-Bitch**** "

Should that be "Jamie the Shovels-Bitch****"? Please elucidate, you
filthy dripping harridan.

As a woman, do you have any comments on it, and as you claim to have a
sense of ethics, why are you talking to George here like he's your best
friend, and not condemning him for bringing the group down to the level
of where it is now acceptable to write such hateful misogynist things?

Boy, that is one dumb question. You must really be desperate to bait
people, Shovie.

If everyone were as much of a sick lowlife as George as to write such
violently distasteful things about women on this group, how much longer
would you stay here?

blush

Is your IUD rusted or something, ****face? You seem even crankier than
usual.




--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

Jenn wrote:

In article . com,
wrote:

Sorry to inform you, but this too is a form of character attack, Jenn.

No, just an opinion about an observation.

If George observed that you were a "Bitch ****" and I said "Of course"
in reply, I suppose you would think that I wasn't making a character
attack against you, just having an "opinion about an observation".
Right. And you wonder why people call you a "hypocrite".

Feel free to ignore
it

As you feel free to ignore what Middius is doing to this group with his
vile, degrading pejoratives against women? Sorry, I have a conscience
and a respect for womankind, so no thanks, I won't take your coward's
way out. I'll speak out against the behaviour of misogynists like
Middius, just as I spoke out against George's foul racism years ago, or
Morein's anti-semitism.

As a woman, do you have any comments on it, and as you claim to have a
sense of ethics, why are you talking to George here like he's your best
friend,

Where?

What are you talking about "Where"?? What do you think I'm referring to
in this post here? In this very reply I'm responding to, where you are
seen agreeing with Middius in his baseless defamatory lies about me, by
saying "Of course". That's only one example. I've seen a slew of recent
replies to George and you did not condemn anything he said at all about
women, me or anyone else in any of them.
However, you did seem to find the courage to tell Arny that something
George said was "inexcusable", but you certainly never said anything to
"George's face", so to speak, that I saw.

and not condemning him for bringing the group down to the level
of where it is now acceptable to write such hateful misogynist things?
If everyone were as much of a sick lowlife as George as to write such
violently distasteful things about women on this group, how much longer
would you stay here?

Look, I'm going to say this one last time, and I hope that you get it
this time: I DON'T COMMENT on everything that I deplore that is written
in this group.

Correction: you don't comment on anything you deplore. There isn't any
one else writing the kind of misogynist remarks that George makes.
Since you seem to have full open lines of communication with him while
he's making these remarks, why wouldn't you mention your feelings about
his hateful remarks against women to him?Unless you were afraid of
George? You're not a fraid of George, are you? Because I can assure
you, he's nothing but a little yapping chihuaua. Meaning his bark is
much worse than his bite. You alone could make a difference in the
degree of acceptable standards on this group by voicing your protest
against George's recent spasms of misogeny. But you're not. Kind of
silly then to be protesting far more trivial things that go on around
here, in my view.

I do point out obvious hypocritical attitudes.

Other than in yourself, you mean?

For
example, if George had been critical of other people using foul names
from women, and then did it himself, I would have commented. Get it?

Not quite. Because George -was- critical of other people using foul
names (I take it you meant "for") women. And then did it himself. Why
don't YOU get THIS: He claimed Arny called his own wife a "back-alley
whore" who gives blowjobs in an alley for $5 or whatever. He did this
about 300 hundred times. Look up George's name in Google with that
phrase, and you'll see what I mean. But then George called Krueger's
wife a whore, a bitch and all kinds of nasty things. Comments from you
against George? None. None ever, far as I can tell.

wrote in message
oups.com...

?

Not quite. Because George -was- critical of other people using foul
names (I take it you meant "for") women. And then did it himself. Why
don't YOU get THIS: He claimed Arny called his own wife a "back-alley
whore" who gives blowjobs in an alley for $5 or whatever. He did this
about 300 hundred times. Look up George's name in Google with that
phrase, and you'll see what I mean. But then George called Krueger's
wife a whore, a bitch and all kinds of nasty things. Comments from you
against George? None. None ever, far as I can tell.


Hello??????
Jenn wasn't here way back then. But we all know that's no
excuse for not commenting.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

****face Shovels wrote:

Mr. ****face sir, your performance is bravura.

Jenn said to Shovels:

The next time you think George is such a sweet nice guy

But your straw man argument is also noted, as I've
never said that George is a "sweet nice guy".

God forbid! :-)

I think Shovie wants you to unleash an over-the-top screeching tirade of
profanity and insults. If you don't do that, according to Kroologic
and/or Shovelslogic, that means you admire and endorse everything I say.


Excellent! Can we please see a video of your head spinning 'round with
pea soup spewing from your pie-hole?

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
.. .

wrote in message
oups.com...

?

Not quite. Because George -was- critical of other people using foul
names (I take it you meant "for") women. And then did it himself. Why
don't YOU get THIS: He claimed Arny called his own wife a "back-alley
whore" who gives blowjobs in an alley for $5 or whatever. He did this
about 300 hundred times. Look up George's name in Google with that
phrase, and you'll see what I mean. But then George called Krueger's
wife a whore, a bitch and all kinds of nasty things. Comments from you
against George? None. None ever, far as I can tell.


Hello??????
Jenn wasn't here way back then. But we all know that's no
excuse for not commenting.
If this is an attempt to drive a wedge between George and Arny, it won't
work.

"Jenn" wrote in message


Look, I'm going to say this one last time, and I hope
that you get it this time: I DON'T COMMENT on everything
that I deplore that is written in this group.

Jenn shows that she is too weak, spineless and cowardly to say even one word
about what she claims to deplore on this group.

I do point out obvious hypocritical attitudes.

Hypocisy is far from being the worst problem there is Jenn. What about going
to someone's house uninvited in the middle of the night? That's OK with you,
right? Not according to you. Thanks for showing that your moral compass is
broken, Jenn.

Yes that's right, Jenn whined long and loud about a person that she had
attacked on Usenet who showed up on her front porch and scared the dickens
out of her. I'll bet money that he was not the least bit hypocritical about
it. So much for Jenns claim that only hypocrisy merits negative comments
from her. When it is her problem, then its a big problem.

For example, if
George had been critical of other people using foul names
from women, and then did it himself, I would have
commented.

Yup, in Jenns book, lying and brutalizing women is just fine as long as you
don't do it hypocritcally. It's fine with here that George libels my wife,
as long as George doesn't complain when someone libels his wife.

Get it? Otherwise, everyone can post every
stupid thing that they want, I don't care.

Unfortunately Jenn can't live by these rules herself. She has complained
about far more than just hypocrisy in the past. No, this is just her
back-pedaling rather then criticize George for his lies and libelous claims.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Yup, in Jenns book, lying and brutalizing women is just fine as long as
you don't do it hypocritcally. It's fine with here that George libels my
wife, as long as George doesn't complain when someone libels his wife.


George, do I have permission to libel your wife?



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Clyde Slick said:

Yup, in Jenns book, lying and brutalizing women is just fine as long as
you don't do it hypocritcally. It's fine with here that George libels my
wife, as long as George doesn't complain when someone libels his wife.

George, do I have permission to libel your wife?

No, but you may brutalize her at your pleasure.





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Yup, in Jenns book, lying and brutalizing women is just
fine as long as you don't do it hypocritcally. It's fine
with here that George libels my wife, as long as George
doesn't complain when someone libels his wife.

George, do I have permission to libel your wife?

Art, I thought you *were* George's wife!

He's a polygamist?????

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message


Look, I'm going to say this one last time, and I hope
that you get it this time: I DON'T COMMENT on everything
that I deplore that is written in this group.

Jenn shows that she is too weak, spineless and cowardly to say even one word
about what she claims to deplore on this group.

Arny shows that he has such a small life that he cares what I think is
deplorable.


I do point out obvious hypocritical attitudes.

Hypocisy is far from being the worst problem there is Jenn.

Who said that it was, Arny?

What about going
to someone's house uninvited in the middle of the night? That's OK with you,
right? Not according to you. Thanks for showing that your moral compass is
broken, Jenn.
Yes that's right, Jenn whined long and loud about a person that she had
attacked on Usenet who showed up on her front porch and scared the dickens
out of her. I'll bet money that he was not the least bit hypocritical about
it. So much for Jenns claim that only hypocrisy merits negative comments
from her. When it is her problem, then its a big problem.

Good LORD you're odd.
A. I didn't "whine" about it.
B. What could you possibly know about "long and hard"?
C. Who says that I attacked the guy? You are so fond of making things
up, Arny.
D. Who says that hypocrisy is the only thing that bothers me? I
thought that "scientists" were supposed to be logical thinkers.


For example, if
George had been critical of other people using foul names
from women, and then did it himself, I would have
commented.

Yup, in Jenns book, lying and brutalizing women is just fine as long as you
don't do it hypocritcally.

Stop making things up, Arny. You are the least logical thinker in this
group. Or, you simply make things up.

It's fine with here that George libels my wife,
as long as George doesn't complain when someone libels his wife.

Get it? Otherwise, everyone can post every
stupid thing that they want, I don't care.

Unfortunately Jenn can't live by these rules herself. She has complained
about far more than just hypocrisy in the past.

Where did I say that I'll only comment on hypocrisy, Arny?

No, this is just her
back-pedaling rather then criticize George for his lies and libelous claims.

You're a big boy, Arny. It's up to YOU to defend YOU; a giant task, I
admit.

Shovels trolls for pity.

If George observed that you were a "Bitch ****" and I said "Of course"
in reply, I suppose you would think that I wasn't making a character
attack against you, just having an "opinion about an observation".
Right. And you wonder why people call you a "hypocrite".

You're the ****, Shovie. Jenn is a sincere audio poster who tolerates or shrugs
off the most inane attacks ever seen on RAO. She rises above your terribly low
standards of conduct. Whereas you alternate between wallowing in self-pity and
dumping tankfuls of vitriol on all and sundry, Jenn has consistently been
interested in talking about audio and music.

The fact that you can't figure out why Jenn doesn't hate me speaks volumes about
your twisted psyche, Shovels.


--


A day without Krooger is like a day without radiation poisoning.

Jenn said to Turdborg:

Arny shows that he has such a small life that he cares what I think is
deplorable.

Well, to be fair, you were talking about Arnii himself. ;-)

So much for Jenns claim that only hypocrisy merits negative comments
from her. When it is her problem, then its a big problem.

Good LORD you're odd.
A. I didn't "whine" about it.
B. What could you possibly know about "long and hard"?
C. Who says that I attacked the guy? You are so fond of making things
up, Arny.
D. Who says that hypocrisy is the only thing that bothers me? I
thought that "scientists" were supposed to be logical thinkers.

What, no credit for Arnii's bouts with Kroologic? It's almost impossible for
humans to shake that virus, let alone 'borgs, who are hardwired for idiocy.

Yup, in Jenns book, lying and brutalizing women is just fine as long as you
don't do it hypocritcally.

Stop making things up, Arny. You are the least logical thinker in this
group. Or, you simply make things up.

Arnii is, as he will be the first to tell you, a "master of the debating trade".
Although he has yet to receive his first paycheck or royalty payment for his
mastery of this important craft, he has earned himself more than a million busts
for lying.

No, this is just her
back-pedaling rather then criticize George for his lies and libelous claims.

You're a big boy, Arny. It's up to YOU to defend YOU; a giant task, I
admit.

Yes, he's on his own of late -- no support from duh-Mikey or Thing, and he's
burned all the other Kroopologists so bad they've given up. Maybe Shovels will
ride in to rescue Arnii from Jenn the Big Bad Wolf. ;-)


--


A day without Krooger is like a day without radiation poisoning.

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message


Look, I'm going to say this one last time, and I hope
that you get it this time: I DON'T COMMENT on
everything that I deplore that is written in this group.

Jenn shows that she is too weak, spineless and cowardly
to say even one word about what she claims to deplore on
this group.

Arny shows that he has such a small life that he cares
what I think is deplorable.

Sue me for slipping into sincerity while dealing with you Jenn.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Jenn" wrote in message
..

Sue me for slipping into sincerity while dealing with you Jenn.


Thats 984 on my list of reasons.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Yup, in Jenns book, lying and brutalizing women is just
fine as long as you don't do it hypocritcally. It's fine
with here that George libels my wife, as long as George
doesn't complain when someone libels his wife.

George, do I have permission to libel your wife?

Art, I thought you *were* George's wife!


as well as Jenn's husband.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:

In article kyy7g.21479$fG3.5399@dukeread09,
"ScottW" wrote:

ScottW

George or Arny?

George.

Inexcusable.

Wait... we haven't even started on Middius the Misogynist. What do you
think about Middius referring to women as "bitches", bringing up the
"Virgin Mary's pubic hair" to me recently, insulting my dying mother
then accusing me of murdering her, and referring to Arny's wife as "the
Kroobitch", and calling her a "cheap whore who gives blowjobs in an
alley for 50 cents"... about a hundred times over? That's only the
beginning of George's respect for women. I could go on. Here are a few
examples. The next time you think George is such a sweet nice guy, I
want you to know who you're dealing with.....

I've already commented on George's post that Scott brought up; speaks
for itself, I think. But your straw man argument is also noted, as I've
never said that George is a "sweet nice guy".

But you've never said he's a revolting piece of pig ****, which is the
only fair way to describe him.

In article .com,
" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:

In article kyy7g.21479$fG3.5399@dukeread09,
"ScottW" wrote:

ScottW

George or Arny?

George.

Inexcusable.

Wait... we haven't even started on Middius the Misogynist. What do you
think about Middius referring to women as "bitches", bringing up the
"Virgin Mary's pubic hair" to me recently, insulting my dying mother
then accusing me of murdering her, and referring to Arny's wife as "the
Kroobitch", and calling her a "cheap whore who gives blowjobs in an
alley for 50 cents"... about a hundred times over? That's only the
beginning of George's respect for women. I could go on. Here are a few
examples. The next time you think George is such a sweet nice guy, I
want you to know who you're dealing with.....

I've already commented on George's post that Scott brought up; speaks
for itself, I think. But your straw man argument is also noted, as I've
never said that George is a "sweet nice guy".

But you've never said he's a revolting piece of pig ****, which is the
only fair way to describe him.

When I want advice on how and when to post my opinions, I'll be sure to
contact you.

On Tue, 09 May 2006 14:31:01 GMT, Jenn
wrote:


Good LORD you're odd.

Stop making things up, Arny. You are the least logical thinker in this
group. Or, you simply make things up.

Now you're getting the picture, Jenn.

The amazing thing is that no matter how many people say it, in almost
exactly those words, Arnie never gets it.

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message


Look, I'm going to say this one last time, and I hope
that you get it this time: I DON'T COMMENT on
everything that I deplore that is written in this group.

Jenn shows that she is too weak, spineless and cowardly
to say even one word about what she claims to deplore on
this group.

Arny shows that he has such a small life that he cares
what I think is deplorable.

Sue me for slipping into sincerity while dealing with you Jenn.

I'm not responding to your trash any further, Arny. Say whatever you
wish. The vast majority of the readers seem to consider the source when
they read you.

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message



Arny shows that he has such a small life that he cares
what I think is deplorable.

Sue me for slipping into sincerity while dealing with
you Jenn.

I'm not responding to your trash any further, Arny.

Ah! Free at last.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message



Arny shows that he has such a small life that he cares
what I think is deplorable.

Sue me for slipping into sincerity while dealing with
you Jenn.

I'm not responding to your trash any further, Arny.

Ah! Free at last.



I'll take over, gratis



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Wed, 10 May 2006 07:34:47 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message



Arny shows that he has such a small life that he cares
what I think is deplorable.

Sue me for slipping into sincerity while dealing with
you Jenn.

I'm not responding to your trash any further, Arny.

Ah! Free at last.

Rejected by one more, eh, Arnie? How many is that now?

"paul packer" wrote in message

On Wed, 10 May 2006 07:34:47 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message



Arny shows that he has such a small life that he cares
what I think is deplorable.

Sue me for slipping into sincerity while dealing with
you Jenn.

I'm not responding to your trash any further, Arny.

Ah! Free at last.

Rejected by one more, eh, Arnie?

You mean, just like you *rejected* me, Paulie? ;-)

How many is that now?

Zero - they all seem to come back for more.

On Wed, 10 May 2006 08:35:45 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message

On Wed, 10 May 2006 07:34:47 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message



Arny shows that he has such a small life that he cares
what I think is deplorable.

Sue me for slipping into sincerity while dealing with
you Jenn.

I'm not responding to your trash any further, Arny.

Ah! Free at last.

Rejected by one more, eh, Arnie?

You mean, just like you *rejected* me, Paulie? ;-)

Yes, because you were a pompous ass once too often, Arnold. You should
look into doing something about that.

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
" wrote:

Jenn, when you're done with the "r.a.o. training course", you will have
complete control of the orchestra. No clarinetist will dare mess with you

Robert Morein said:

Jenn, when you're done with the "r.a.o. training course", you will have
complete control of the orchestra. No clarinetist will dare mess with you

The Kroopologism Army is fully staffed once again: duh-Mikey on the right and
Shovels the Parrot on the left.


--


A day without Krooger is like a day without radiation poisoning.

George Middius wrote:
Robert Morein said:

Jenn, when you're done with the "r.a.o. training course", you will have
complete control of the orchestra. No clarinetist will dare mess with you

The Church of Arnytology: complete with ABX-meters, blind auditing,
and bullbaiting. And like Phatard, an obsession with female
dysfunctionality.

In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
" wrote:

Jenn, when you're done with the "r.a.o. training course", you will have
complete control of the orchestra. No clarinetist will dare mess with you

LOL Too late! ;-)

Jenn wrote:
I'm not responding to your trash any further, Arny. Say whatever you
wish. The vast majority of the readers seem to consider the source when
they read you.

Said source pictured here at HE2005:
http://forum.stereophile.com/photopo...cat/509/page/1

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

John Atkinson said:

The vast majority of the readers seem to consider the source when
they read you.

Said source pictured here at HE2005:
http://forum.stereophile.com/photopo...cat/509/page/1

He looks like Grandpa Munster after embalming.


--


A day without Krooger is like a day without radiation poisoning.

"John Atkinson" said:


Jenn wrote:
I'm not responding to your trash any further, Arny. Say whatever you
wish. The vast majority of the readers seem to consider the source when
they read you.


Said source pictured here at HE2005:
http://forum.stereophile.com/photopo...cat/509/page/1

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile


Eeek!

Don't you ever dare to do that again without a proper warning in the
headers!

--

- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -