Scientists Say Administration Distorts Facts
By JAMES GLANZ

Published: February 19, 2004

More than 60 influential scientists, including 20 Nobel laureates, issued a
statement yesterday asserting that the Bush administration had systematically
distorted scientific fact in the service of policy goals on the environment,
health, biomedical research and nuclear weaponry at home and abroad.

The sweeping accusations were later discussed in a conference call organized by
the Union of Concerned Scientists, an independent organization that focuses on
technical issues and has often taken stands at odds with administration policy.
On Wednesday, the organization also issued a 38-page report detailing its
accusations.

The two documents accuse the administration of repeatedly censoring and
suppressing reports by its own scientists, stacking advisory committees with
unqualified political appointees, disbanding government panels that provide
unwanted advice and refusing to seek any independent scientific expertise in
some cases.

Socko Van Puppet wrote:
Scientists Say Administration Distorts Facts
By JAMES GLANZ

Published: February 19, 2004

More than 60 influential scientists, including 20 Nobel laureates, issued a
statement yesterday asserting that the Bush administration had systematically
distorted scientific fact in the service of policy goals on the environment,
health, biomedical research and nuclear weaponry at home and abroad.

The sweeping accusations were later discussed in a conference call organized by
the Union of Concerned Scientists, an independent organization that focuses on
technical issues and has often taken stands at odds with administration policy.
On Wednesday, the organization also issued a 38-page report detailing its
accusations.

The two documents accuse the administration of repeatedly censoring and
suppressing reports by its own scientists, stacking advisory committees with
unqualified political appointees, disbanding government panels that provide
unwanted advice and refusing to seek any independent scientific expertise in
some cases.

This is the typical behaviour of a dictature...
In the end Bush looks like Saddam Hussein, the only difference is that
he uses to commit his crimes outside of his own country.

"Socko Van Puppet" wrote in message
...
Scientists Say Administration Distorts Facts
By JAMES GLANZ

Published: February 19, 2004

More than 60 influential scientists, including 20 Nobel laureates, issued
a
statement yesterday asserting that the Bush administration had
systematically
distorted scientific fact in the service of policy goals on the
environment,
health, biomedical research and nuclear weaponry at home and abroad.

The sweeping accusations were later discussed in a conference call
organized by
the Union of Concerned Scientists, an independent organization that
focuses on
technical issues and has often taken stands at odds with administration
policy.

They often take stands that are at odds with reality and common sense.

On Wednesday, the organization also issued a 38-page report detailing its
accusations.

The two documents accuse the administration of repeatedly censoring and
suppressing reports by its own scientists, stacking advisory committees
with
unqualified political appointees, disbanding government panels that
provide
unwanted advice and refusing to seek any independent scientific expertise
in
some cases.

From: "Michael McKelvy"

They often take stands that are at odds with reality and common sense.

Now who you going to believe? The ever factual Mike McKelvy, or sixty lying
liberal red-diaper-doper-baby Nobel Laureates who probably got head from Monica
Lewinsky?

I just don't know. This is a tough one. This is a real frickin' poser, I tell
ya...

Socko

Mr. (or perhaps Dr.) Van Puppet wrote:


From: "Michael McKelvy"

They often take stands that are at odds with reality and common sense.

Now who you going to believe? The ever factual Mike McKelvy, or sixty lying
liberal red-diaper-doper-baby Nobel Laureates who probably got head from
Monica
Lewinsky?

I just don't know. This is a tough one. This is a real frickin' poser, I tell
ya...

Socko







Frequent RAO poster Mike McKelvy has recently proudly claimed on RAO the
following:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
scoring=d&selm=102o00fq8l3li9e%40corp.supernews.co m

"I never knowingly say anything I know to be untrue."

This really raises a lot of questions about what he knows or doesn't know.

Perhaps he *should* have said "I never knowingly say anything I know to be
true".

I'll let the RAO readers decide which statement would better describe him.

(Rumor has it that he's a former polygrapher !!! - but that's just an
"opinion", of course.






Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Mr. (or perhaps Dr.) Van Puppet wrote:


From: "Michael McKelvy"

They often take stands that are at odds with reality and common sense.

Now who you going to believe? The ever factual Mike McKelvy, or sixty
lying
liberal red-diaper-doper-baby Nobel Laureates who probably got head from
Monica
Lewinsky?

I just don't know. This is a tough one. This is a real frickin' poser, I
tell
ya...

Socko







Frequent RAO poster Mike McKelvy has recently proudly claimed on RAO the
following:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
scoring=d&selm=102o00fq8l3li9e%40corp.supernews.co m

"I never knowingly say anything I know to be untrue."

This really raises a lot of questions about what he knows or doesn't know.

Perhaps he *should* have said "I never knowingly say anything I know to be
true".

I'll let the RAO readers decide which statement would better describe him.

(Rumor has it that he's a former polygrapher !!! - but that's just an
"opinion", of course.






Bruce J. Richman


Rumor has it you're a beancounter, with a library card.

Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Mr. (or perhaps Dr.) Van Puppet wrote:


From: "Michael McKelvy"

They often take stands that are at odds with reality and common sense.

Now who you going to believe? The ever factual Mike McKelvy, or sixty
lying
liberal red-diaper-doper-baby Nobel Laureates who probably got head from
Monica
Lewinsky?

I just don't know. This is a tough one. This is a real frickin' poser, I
tell
ya...

Socko







Frequent RAO poster Mike McKelvy has recently proudly claimed on RAO the
following:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
scoring=d&selm=102o00fq8l3li9e%40corp.supernews.co m

"I never knowingly say anything I know to be untrue."

This really raises a lot of questions about what he knows or doesn't know.

Perhaps he *should* have said "I never knowingly say anything I know to be
true".

I'll let the RAO readers decide which statement would better describe him.

(Rumor has it that he's a former polygrapher !!! - but that's just an
"opinion", of course.






Bruce J. Richman


Rumor has it you're a beancounter, with a library card.










An opinion and lie you get to have and make. Let's let the RAO readership
decide who's telling the truth and who is lying, shall we?



Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Mr. (or perhaps Dr.) Van Puppet wrote:


From: "Michael McKelvy"

They often take stands that are at odds with reality and common
sense.

Now who you going to believe? The ever factual Mike McKelvy, or sixty
lying
liberal red-diaper-doper-baby Nobel Laureates who probably got head
from
Monica
Lewinsky?

I just don't know. This is a tough one. This is a real frickin' poser,
I
tell
ya...

Socko







Frequent RAO poster Mike McKelvy has recently proudly claimed on RAO
the
following:


http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
scoring=d&selm=102o00fq8l3li9e%40corp.supernews.co m

"I never knowingly say anything I know to be untrue."

This really raises a lot of questions about what he knows or doesn't
know.

Perhaps he *should* have said "I never knowingly say anything I know to
be
true".

I'll let the RAO readers decide which statement would better describe
him.

(Rumor has it that he's a former polygrapher !!! - but that's just an
"opinion", of course.






Bruce J. Richman


Rumor has it you're a beancounter, with a library card.










An opinion and lie you get to have and make. Let's let the RAO readership
decide who's telling the truth and who is lying, shall we?

Let's not. I don't think it matters who you are.
Let your posts stand on their own merit.

ScottW

ScottW wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Mr. (or perhaps Dr.) Van Puppet wrote:


From: "Michael McKelvy"

They often take stands that are at odds with reality and common
sense.

Now who you going to believe? The ever factual Mike McKelvy, or sixty
lying
liberal red-diaper-doper-baby Nobel Laureates who probably got head
from
Monica
Lewinsky?

I just don't know. This is a tough one. This is a real frickin' poser,
I
tell
ya...

Socko







Frequent RAO poster Mike McKelvy has recently proudly claimed on RAO
the
following:


http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
scoring=d&selm=102o00fq8l3li9e%40corp.supernews.co m

"I never knowingly say anything I know to be untrue."

This really raises a lot of questions about what he knows or doesn't
know.

Perhaps he *should* have said "I never knowingly say anything I know to
be
true".

I'll let the RAO readers decide which statement would better describe
him.

(Rumor has it that he's a former polygrapher !!! - but that's just an
"opinion", of course.






Bruce J. Richman


Rumor has it you're a beancounter, with a library card.










An opinion and lie you get to have and make. Let's let the RAO readership
decide who's telling the truth and who is lying, shall we?

Let's not. I don't think it matters who you are.

It would never have become an issue if McKelvy had not launched a 7 year smear
campaign of lies and false claims about my professional credentials, background
and activities.

I have no intention of letting him continue his smear campaign without
discrediting him whenever he chooses to spread more lies about me.

His credibility, not my identity, is the real issue here.


Let your posts stand on their own merit.


Let McKelvy's posts stand - or fall - on their own merit - or lack thereof.



ScottW












Bruce J. Richman