Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny, you recently posted:
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To summarize, I've done about 100 recordings of about 250 musical works played by about 90 vocal and instrumental groups in just the past maybe 30 days. All but one of those recordings were done in rooms that had really pretty good acoustics (one was truely exceptional), and all were done with the same coincident pair, really pretty good preamps, and a CD recorder with a portable digital recorder as safety backup. There are a number of prerequisites for minimal micing. One of them is a good-sounding room. That wasn't my situation on the day I used 18 mics. Use 18 if it floats your boat, but some damn fine performances have been captured pretty damn well with no more than two well chosen & well placed mics. Of course, and as I've shown above, I do minmal micing when I can. Contrary to your rediculous claim, I don't get my rocks off muling around mic stands, pulling over 1,000 feet of mic cables and doing time-consuming multichannel mixdowns. It's just that this is what was required in the particular situation to get an acceptable result because the room acoustics basically sucked, big time. BTW, the 18 mics included 4 coincident pairs, mostly hypercardioids. The non-coincident mics were almost all cardioids. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- and you recommended the MXL603 as a good instrument mic. I've taken your advice, and purchased a trial pair. These are subcardiods. You mention also that you used some hypercardiods, which I believe I know as shotguns. May I have the specifics on these? IME, good shotguns are extremely expensive. I would appreciate further detail on what mics were represented in this collection of 18. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"soundhaspriority"
wrote in message and you recommended the MXL603 as a good instrument mic. I bought a pair on the recommendation of Harvey Gerst and liked them, and now have three pair. I've taken your advice, and purchased a trial pair. These are subcardiods. Yes, MXL 603s are what I call "fat cardioids". Typical MI mics. Because they are less directional they also have less proximity effect than the cardioids normally used for vocals. This makes them more predictable. One of my pairs is a matched pair with shock mounts. Since 603s have a lot of bass, the shock mounts can be helpful. My other main cardioid MI mics are Rode NT1A in Rode shock mounts. I use a 603 as a vocal mic with an external foam pop filter. It just happens to work well with our pianist's voice. You mention also that you used some hypercardiods, which I believe I know as shotguns. May I have the specifics on these? IME, good shotguns are extremely expensive. I would appreciate further detail on what mics were represented in this collection of 18. Most of my hypercardiods are Audix dynamics, mostly OM5s and OM6s. They are not shotgun mics but look like traditional vocal mics. The two exceptions are a Shure WL184 lav and a pair of Samson C01s that I use for the choir. Samson C01s are cheap but cheerful side-address with sexy blue LEDs that shine on things in their pickup pattern. I use them in Samson's shock mounts because of their sensitivity to vibration from the floor. You have to watch the shock mount if you use it on its side because the inner cage tends to sag and touch. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question regarding Phantom Power | Pro Audio | |||
Question regarding Phantom Power | Pro Audio | |||
newbie question - aardvark q10 + external mixer? | Pro Audio | |||
GT44 Question to Owners | Pro Audio | |||
RCA out and Speaker Question in 2004 Ranger Edge Question | Car Audio |