I'm just curious if anyone here has used the CAD C195 condenser, i
don't have the money for beta87s. Any opinions would be great. I'm
only asking because i have several other CAD mics. Please reply to my
email, i don't check the forums to often. In case my email isn't
showing up its jon.spam@tv. Just take off the spam off. thanks


Jon

In article , Jon wrote:
I'm just curious if anyone here has used the CAD C195 condenser, i
don't have the money for beta87s. Any opinions would be great. I'm
only asking because i have several other CAD mics. Please reply to my
email, i don't check the forums to often. In case my email isn't
showing up its jon.spam@tv. Just take off the spam off. thanks

Well, the first question here is to ask what you want to record....
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

"Jon" wrote in message
...
I'm just curious if anyone here has used the CAD C195 condenser, i
don't have the money for beta87s. Any opinions would be great. I'm
only asking because i have several other CAD mics. Please reply to my
email, i don't check the forums to often. In case my email isn't
showing up its jon.spam@tv. Just take off the spam off. thanks

Similar question he what about Samson microphones? I know they probably
don't qualify for "Pro" use, but still, any experience is welcome.

I bought 4 C15's to record a school musical and they turned out to be quite
noisy. Ok, what can you expect for 49 euro ex vat. But.... I also bought a
C05 for even less (45 euro ex vat) which turned out to be much quieter.

I know I would be better of with a couple of Sennheiser, but I cannot afford
four of them yet....

Meindert

"Jon" wrote in message


I'm just curious if anyone here has used the CAD C195
condenser,

I have about a half-dozen CAD C95s, the predecessor. Not bad.

i don't have the money for beta87s.

I don't see the question - CAD C195s are cardioids, while the Beat87s are
supercardiods.

This is like saying what's the comparison between apples and oranges.

Any opinions would be great.

Cheap supercardiods?

Cheap cardiods?

What is the question, again?

Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article , Jon wrote:
Please reply to my
email, i don't check the forums to often. In case my email isn't
showing up its jon.spam@tv. Just take off the spam off. thanks

Well, the first question here is to ask what you want to record....
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Of course, you know he's not going to see this since he doesn't check
the forums too often ...


Gerry

--
John Ivan Greilick
Cradle Wave Music
Lansing MI.
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Jon" wrote in message


I'm just curious if anyone here has used the CAD C195
condenser,

I have about a half-dozen CAD C95s, the predecessor. Not bad.

i don't have the money for beta87s.

I don't see the question - CAD C195s are cardioids, while the Beat87s are
supercardiods.

This is like saying what's the comparison between apples and oranges.

Any opinions would be great.

Cheap supercardiods?

Cheap cardiods?

What is the question, again?




Hi all,
The Bata 87-A is supercardioid. The 87-C is Cardioid.

I LOVE the 87-A as a stage voval mic. It sounds wonderful and the reject
feedback great too.

"Ivis" wrote in message

"Jon" wrote in message


I'm just curious if anyone here has used the CAD C195
condenser,

I have about a half-dozen CAD C95s, the predecessor. Not
bad.
i don't have the money for beta87s.

I don't see the question - CAD C195s are cardioids,
while the Beat87s are supercardiods.

This is like saying what's the comparison between apples
and oranges.
Any opinions would be great.

Cheap supercardiods?

Cheap cardiods?

What is the question, again?




Hi all,
The Bata 87-A is supercardioid. The 87-C is Cardioid.

Please immediately forward your correction to Shure Inc. so that they can
repair their web site:

http://www.shure.com/pdf/specsheets/...cs/beta87a.pdf

This page is titled "Beta 87A Supercardiod Condensor Microphone".

Arny,

The Beta 87a is super-cardioid. The Beta 87 C IS a cardioid mic.
Some quotes from Shure, Inc:

"The Beta 87A has consistently been a top choice of performers and
audio technicians around the world due to its superb accuracy and
detail, and rich vocal production. This long-standing favorite now
incorporates a cardioid polar pattern and has been named the Beta 87C
TM" SNIP

"The uniform cardioid polar pattern of the Beta 87C ..."

these are from: http://www.shure.com/microphones/models/beta87c.asp

There wasn't much reason to get snippy with the guy when his info
could have been easily verified.

-glenn

"geezer" wrote in message
ups.com
Arny,

The Beta 87a is super-cardioid. The Beta 87 C IS a
cardioid mic. Some quotes from Shure, Inc:

"The Beta 87A has consistently been a top choice of
performers and audio technicians around the world due to
its superb accuracy and detail, and rich vocal
production. This long-standing favorite now incorporates
a cardioid polar pattern and has been named the Beta 87C
TM" SNIP

"The uniform cardioid polar pattern of the Beta 87C ..."

these are from:
http://www.shure.com/microphones/models/beta87c.asp

There wasn't much reason to get snippy with the guy when
his info could have been easily verified.

Actually, I owe him a big apology on the grounds that I simply misread his
post.

That should be obvious from my response, because in essence I agreed with
his facts, but my post is written so that it looks like I disputed them.

There wasn't much reason to get snippy with the guy when his info
could have been easily verified.

Imagine that
arni just being a prick without reason or rhyme
whod a thunk it
george