Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Other than buying a preamp with such a switch, it would seem a
relatively easy device to design. Needs to be completely inaudible, and avoid switching "pops". My ears are very sensitive to correct polarity (in some recordings) but my pre-amp does not have a switch, and its a royal pain to reverse the speaker leads. -- |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
uson wrote:
Other than buying a preamp with such a switch, it would seem a relatively easy device to design. Needs to be completely inaudible, and avoid switching "pops". The actual device need be nothing more complex than a double-pole, double-throw switch for each channel. However, your desire for it to be "completely inaudible and avoid[ing] switch pops" is an impossibility. Only if you switch during absolute silnce is this possible. At any point where there is signal voltage, no matter HOW you do it, there MUST be an abrupt change in the signal, and and the result WILL be a switching transient of some level. The degree of audibility is dependent, of course, on the instantaneous signal at the moment of the switch and the spectral density of the music. It'd be harder to hear it on thrash metal than it would on a recorder solo, for example, because any switching transient is going to cause a fairly wide-band, spectrally dense signal, and already having a lot of energy throughout the spectrum is likely to mask it. It's certainly possible, given sufficient sophistication, to build a curcuit with soft switching: instead of the transition happening at a specific instant, it's xpread out over a few milliseconds with a "fade" between the two states: that'll reduce substantially the potential audible impact of switching but has some costs, the major one being that, technically, it's far more complicated than a simple switch. There are, undoubtedly, also those that might argue that such sophistication MUST have deleterious audio impact, though, as an a priori argument, this is simply speculation. -- |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Apr 2006 15:43:18 GMT, uson wrote:
Other than buying a preamp with such a switch, it would seem a relatively easy device to design. Needs to be completely inaudible, and avoid switching "pops". My ears are very sensitive to correct polarity (in some recordings) but my pre-amp does not have a switch, and its a royal pain to reverse the speaker leads. The gadget can be a simple but good quality switch IF your preamp-to-power amp connections are balanced. If not, you need a way to invert polarity, either an active circuit or a transformer. Kal -- |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , uson
wrote: Other than buying a preamp with such a switch, it would seem a relatively easy device to design. Needs to be completely inaudible, and avoid switching "pops". My ears are very sensitive to correct polarity (in some recordings) but my pre-amp does not have a switch, and its a royal pain to reverse the speaker leads. -- Why not put a reversing switch in the speaker leads? Isaac -- |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"uson" wrote in message
... Other than buying a preamp with such a switch, it would seem a relatively easy device to design. Needs to be completely inaudible, and avoid switching "pops". My ears are very sensitive to correct polarity (in some recordings) but my pre-amp does not have a switch, and its a royal pain to reverse the speaker leads. If you want to swap the leads at most points in the circuit, you have a problem with grounding. Speaker leads are a good point at which to do the swapping. Simply use an SPDT switch, as follows: Middle 2 terminals: Output to the speaker. Left 2 terminals: Red and black. Right 2 terminals: Black and red. That is, the switch connects the speaker to its cable with the wires in either of the 2 orientations. -- |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absolute polarity would not be a consideration unless a recording was
made with only two microphones. When multi-microphones are used, any polarity considerations are destroyed. Proper polarity between speakers is altogether different however. ---MIKE--- In the White Mountains of New Hampshire (44=B0 15' N - Elevation 1580') -- |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kalman Rubinson wrote:
On 22 Apr 2006 15:43:18 GMT, uson wrote: Other than buying a preamp with such a switch, it would seem a relatively easy device to design. Needs to be completely inaudible, and avoid switching "pops". My ears are very sensitive to correct polarity (in some recordings) but my pre-amp does not have a switch, and its a royal pain to reverse the speaker leads. The gadget can be a simple but good quality switch IF your preamp-to-power amp connections are balanced. If not, you need a way to invert polarity, either an active circuit or a transformer. Kal -- Or switch at the loudspeaker inputs (assuming you don't have active speakers) using a pair of two-input to one-output relays or mechanical switches. This requires very low on-resistance in the switch/relay, but it is possible. -- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio | |||
DNC Schedule of Events | Pro Audio |