I couldn't help but notice after reading 525 messages on the subject in
the last couple of weeks, that Robert Morein and his little work mule
"Shovels", are on a high gear campaign to brand me as a "shill", a
"crack addict", a "cocaine user", a "murderer", and a "psychiatrist for
adolescents/newsletter editor" named Dr. R. Graham. (What can I say, I
wear many hats...).

Of course, not a grain of anything Robert says here about me or my
tweaks, is true. Robert knows that I'm not a cocaine user, because he's
on cocaine right now as we speak. He can tell when someone's a "user",
and I think most of us can tell that he's a drug addict (if he isn't,
it means he's crazier than we all thought). Robert knows I'm not Dr.
Graham, because he harassed Dr. Graham, his wife, and his colleagues in
phone calls and emails, including threats at 3 in the morning (he
admitted as much in one of his posts about contacting Graham's
colleagues at the NHS and Priory). He was quite firmly told that Dr.
Graham does not post to usenet and that he'd be arrested if he
continues to try to contact Graham or his colleagues. Dr. Graham
himself wrote about how he was too busy to post on PWB's site, let
alone the rest of Usenet. Robert also knows my FREE TWEAKS! are not a
"scam", because he tried one of them (the "L-Shape"), and found that it
did produce an audible difference. (see email below). He also knows
that I'm not a "shill" for PWB, and don't work for them, because
earlier on in email (back when he was still sane...), I told him what I
do for a living.

His phony "shill campaign", full of silly but malicious lies, is a
result of me mentioning in passing what he wrote to me in his email
(partially reprinted below), about trying the L-shape. It made Robert
feel very angry and very shameful and embarassed that I mentioned that
(whereas I thought he'd be proud to admit it....silly me!). He later
told me that it could harm his reputation with the IEEE, and even made
some laughable attempt at slapping "Dr. Richard Graham" (whom like the
fool he is, really did think I was at the time...) with a lawsuit, if
"he" continued to declare that Robert had tried the L-shape. I was very
tempted to tell Robert to go to hell and sue me, just to see how that
would play out in court.....:

Judge: "And so Mr. Morein, you say the person sitting here today, Dr.
Richard Graham, posting under the alias of a newsgroup contributor
who's email account is described as ", which
you are bringing suit for libelous behaviour towards you, for his
alleging that you tried an "L-shape tweak", whatever that is and I
won't ask, and that this has caused great harm to your reputation with
the IEEE, and SAG. And what is your evidence that the contributor
posting under the moniker " is in fact, Dr.
Richard Graham? You WHAT? You believe this "
is Dr. Graham simply because you did a search on the web for fifteen
seconds, and found the phrase "soundhaspriority" in a newsletter edited
by Dr. Graham?!? And that's it? That's all the evidence you have that
Mr. SHP is Dr. Richard Graham?!

courtroom breaks out into snickers and guffaws

Robert Morein: "Uh..... yes, your honor. But you see, there's also
these unmistakable similarities in the way they both write....."

Judge (indignant): "WHAT similarities...."

Robert: "Well... uhmmm I ..... uh.... well, they're both writing in
English, maybe?"

court burts out into giant laughter

Judge: "Bailiff, arrest this man at once and GET HIM OUT OF MY COURT
ROOM!!"

courtoom screaming in hysterical laughter at this point


.....But I didn't. Instead, I pretended that Robert never told me he'd
tried the L-shape, and
posted a retraction as he requested, simply because I'm a nice
philanthropist-type guy, and I felt sorry for Robert. He "seemed so
fragile and vulnerable, like a newborn deer". He also went on to
mention that "certain people" (ie. Brian McCarty) could use the
information of him trying the L-shape tweak against him. Apparently,
Robert tells me this is why he hides his web businesses under proxy
servers and such, so that Brian doesn't know about them...

From all the emails he wrote to me about Brian, its clear that our poor
Crazy Bob lives in absolute terror of Brian McCarty. To put it in terms
that Shovels can understand, Brian is to Robert Morein what Jabba The
Hut is to Luke Skywalker. Apparently, Brian is so vastly powerful and
omniscient, he can cause Robert's neighbours to suffer strokes and
heart attacks, and do great damage to Robert's friends. According to
Robert, Brian is "pure evil" and he wishes him dead. Unfortunately,
Robert does not see how much he is "pure evil", for threatening and
harassing Richard Graham and his colleagues, and spending his every
waking moments thinking up new ways to libel and tarnish the reputation
of an innocent man, a doctor no less who devotes his life to helping
adolescents, and who has never been on this group and has nothing to do
with this group of lunatics.

In my thread "Does anyone have anything but lies to say here?" I have
already proven that Robert Morein has been lying about his charges of
"shill", "scam", "crack addict", "Richard Graham", etc. etc.
(http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...e18771622f3639)

Therefore, this post is just to confirm that Crazy Bob's crazy
allegations can be safely dismissed, and I will no longer even be
"pretending" to take any such allegations from him seriously, or from
his faithful little donkey boy, Shovels. We can take Robert's false
allegations for the joke that it is, and the joke that he has become
since making them. Thank you for your attention, that is all.


ROBERT MOREIN ADMITTING TO ME THAT HE TRIED MY TWEAK:

A Few Words From Robert Morein, The "Closet Tweaker"....

(but don't you dare try to get the tweaker to come out of the closet!
Otherwise he'll get very angry indeed, after getting very embarassed
and humiliated, and then he'll call you a "shill", and a "crack addict"
and a "psychiatrist" and all KINDS of crazy things!):

----- Original Message -----
From: ". ."
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 4:21 AM
Subject: The Lying Side of George M. Middius

BTW, Sander's mention of the apparent fact that
amplifier outputs act like inputs for RF may serve as the basis of a tweak that
I could relate to my favorite system of thinking. But I did finally give
your weird idea a go, on the weekend. I saw the black marker lying next to
a cd, and I was in the mood.... I felt more than a little silly, but I
thought I'd better get it out of my system and you know what? It
really seemed to do something. I don't know if I was drawing it
correctly, but every cd I tried the l-shape on, seemed to improve
the sound. Not in any easily classifiable way, but there was definitely
something happening every time it was was applied. The music seemed
smoother, more natural.. a little less tiring, even. But I don't buy any of
that "as seen on tv" quantum mumbo jumbo. If it isn't expectation, then
there's probably a good reason for how it works.

Told you! (I love saying that..). And don't rule out the quantum mumbo jumbo!
There's a lot about our universe that isn't at all obvious. Are you familiar with
Schroedinger's cat? Okay...how about the double slit experiment? I'm getting into
some tweaks that deal with open jacks (input or output) that relate to MY favourite
system of thinking. (audio on a quantum level).

Stereophile took note
of the apparent
possibility that RF may lock up slew-limited
components in amplifiers. This
is debatable, but it suggests that large ferrite
snap-around cores might be
useful things to put on speaker leads, at the end
nearest the amp. You can
see such things in use on many computer accessory
cables and laptop
wall-warts, in these cases, to prevent RF from
exiting the machine.

I noticed my DVD player has one of these on its power
cord. I'm not at all sure if I'm remembering this
right, but I think I may have read where they may have
a degrading effect on sound. It wont hurt to try but I
would definitely listen carefully before leaving them
on my wires. One of my Belt tweaks involves installing
lead pipes at the ends of the speaker wires. Haven't
tried that yet though.



A Few More Words From The 2-Faced Weasel Robert Morein,
on His Good Friends Arny & George:

---------------------------

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:02:28 -0500
From: "Robert Morein" Add to Address BookAdd to
Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Subject: The Lying Side of George M. Middius
To: ". ."


--- Robert Morein wrote:
wrote:

Richard,
I'm not concerned at all. My "demand" was
tongue-in-cheek.

I thought as much, but just in case, I wanted it "on
the record" that George was lying and that I did not
say anything about you in email. I didn't post this
publicly, because I could care less whether anyone
else thought I was lying.

As you have
pointed out, we had better enjoy the perversity,
because there isn't much
else. It really is Monty Python's "room for
arguments."

Yup, I was thinking about RAO being just like the MP
skit today.

At least we have a
place to go was once a target of Middius; he
finally decided he couldn't
"get" me.

I guess you must have ignored him long enough. Problem
is, I aint sticking around long enough to wear out the
little ankle biter.

Personally, I rate George as far less of a
menace than Arny
Krueger.

Funny, I was thinking the opposite. That somehow,
Krueger was a kind soul in comparison with George. (I
think that while Krueger is a supreme asshole, George
is actually more mean-spirited). I found that even
though Arny is most definitely my opponent (I insult
him all the time...), I could at least have a fairly
reasonable discussion with him. But with George, it's
"all business". You just can't reason with the troll.

Since Middius has no ideology, there's nothing to reason about.

To my mind, Middius is like a mosquito,
perpetually annoying and
impossible to get rid of,

That's what he has become to me, an annoying mosquito.
It would take all of my time just to go after him,
when there's SO many more important people to go
after.... so I've mostly ignored him, letting him get
into his little buzzing fits.

but without Arny's crucifying jaws.

I don't know... these days, I find Arny a bit of a
limp tiger. I mean he's been trashed so much by so
many, that must take a beating out of him, and make
him seem less credible.

For me, it is not a question of personal annoyance. Arny is a
self-appointed prophet of the idea that the audible threshold of
perfection is much
lower than most audiophiles experience. He gains support from a
considerable
number of engineers. I consider this dangerous to the art and science
of high fidelity. Hence, it is not a personal issue. Middius is, for
those
so affected, strictly a personal issue. While Arny speaks with an
assumed
mantle of authority, Middius does not.

During the Cold War, the U.S. used proxies, many/most of which were
odious.. IMHO, Middius is useful proxy.

Having admitted that it was indeed he who animated the "Jamie" persona,
Shovels now reveals the whereabouts of his long-suffering mum.

I ... am ... a "murderer"

I hope you got paid better for that than the paltry pittance you glean
from the magic creams you peddle.




--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

wrote in message
oups.com...

I couldn't help but notice after reading 525 messages on the subject in
the last couple of weeks, that Robert Morein and his little work mule
"Shovels", are on a high gear campaign to brand me as a "shill", a
"crack addict", a "cocaine user", a "murderer", and a "psychiatrist for
adolescents/newsletter editor" named Dr. R. Graham. (What can I say, I
wear many hats...).

Of course, not a grain of anything Robert says here about me or my
tweaks, is true. Robert knows that I'm not a cocaine user, because he's
on cocaine right now as we speak.

Good one, Richard. But to no avail. The situation will persist indefinitely.

Love,
SHP

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Having admitted that it was indeed he who animated the "Jamie" persona,
Shovels now reveals the whereabouts of his long-suffering mum.

I ... am ... a "murderer"

I hope you got paid better for that than the paltry pittance you glean
from the magic creams you peddle.

How kind of you, George. I wish him ill.

soundhaspriority

Get some help mate, and fek off and stop clogging up the board with the
useless ****.

OK. You're not this and that and not something else. A very
long read.
Wouldn't it save your and every one else time if you just
said
in a few words WHAT ARE YOU? Till you do the best guess is that
you're a paid PR man for the Belts.
Ludovic Mirabel

----------------------------------------------------
wrote:
I couldn't help but notice after reading 525 messages on the subject in
the last couple of weeks, that Robert Morein and his little work mule
"Shovels", are on a high gear campaign to brand me as a "shill", a
"crack addict", a "cocaine user", a "murderer", and a "psychiatrist for
adolescents/newsletter editor" named Dr. R. Graham. (What can I say, I
wear many hats...).

Of course, not a grain of anything Robert says here about me or my
tweaks, is true. Robert knows that I'm not a cocaine user, because he's
on cocaine right now as we speak. He can tell when someone's a "user",
and I think most of us can tell that he's a drug addict (if he isn't,
it means he's crazier than we all thought). Robert knows I'm not Dr.
Graham, because he harassed Dr. Graham, his wife, and his colleagues in
phone calls and emails, including threats at 3 in the morning (he
admitted as much in one of his posts about contacting Graham's
colleagues at the NHS and Priory). He was quite firmly told that Dr.
Graham does not post to usenet and that he'd be arrested if he
continues to try to contact Graham or his colleagues. Dr. Graham
himself wrote about how he was too busy to post on PWB's site, let
alone the rest of Usenet. Robert also knows my FREE TWEAKS! are not a
"scam", because he tried one of them (the "L-Shape"), and found that it
did produce an audible difference. (see email below). He also knows
that I'm not a "shill" for PWB, and don't work for them, because
earlier on in email (back when he was still sane...), I told him what I
do for a living.

His phony "shill campaign", full of silly but malicious lies, is a
result of me mentioning in passing what he wrote to me in his email
(partially reprinted below), about trying the L-shape. It made Robert
feel very angry and very shameful and embarassed that I mentioned that
(whereas I thought he'd be proud to admit it....silly me!). He later
told me that it could harm his reputation with the IEEE, and even made
some laughable attempt at slapping "Dr. Richard Graham" (whom like the
fool he is, really did think I was at the time...) with a lawsuit, if
"he" continued to declare that Robert had tried the L-shape. I was very
tempted to tell Robert to go to hell and sue me, just to see how that
would play out in court.....:

Judge: "And so Mr. Morein, you say the person sitting here today, Dr.
Richard Graham, posting under the alias of a newsgroup contributor
who's email account is described as ", which
you are bringing suit for libelous behaviour towards you, for his
alleging that you tried an "L-shape tweak", whatever that is and I
won't ask, and that this has caused great harm to your reputation with
the IEEE, and SAG. And what is your evidence that the contributor
posting under the moniker " is in fact, Dr.
Richard Graham? You WHAT? You believe this "
is Dr. Graham simply because you did a search on the web for fifteen
seconds, and found the phrase "soundhaspriority" in a newsletter edited
by Dr. Graham?!? And that's it? That's all the evidence you have that
Mr. SHP is Dr. Richard Graham?!

courtroom breaks out into snickers and guffaws

Robert Morein: "Uh..... yes, your honor. But you see, there's also
these unmistakable similarities in the way they both write....."

Judge (indignant): "WHAT similarities...."

Robert: "Well... uhmmm I ..... uh.... well, they're both writing in
English, maybe?"

court burts out into giant laughter

Judge: "Bailiff, arrest this man at once and GET HIM OUT OF MY COURT
ROOM!!"

courtoom screaming in hysterical laughter at this point


....But I didn't. Instead, I pretended that Robert never told me he'd
tried the L-shape, and
posted a retraction as he requested, simply because I'm a nice
philanthropist-type guy, and I felt sorry for Robert. He "seemed so
fragile and vulnerable, like a newborn deer". He also went on to
mention that "certain people" (ie. Brian McCarty) could use the
information of him trying the L-shape tweak against him. Apparently,
Robert tells me this is why he hides his web businesses under proxy
servers and such, so that Brian doesn't know about them...

From all the emails he wrote to me about Brian, its clear that our poor
Crazy Bob lives in absolute terror of Brian McCarty. To put it in terms
that Shovels can understand, Brian is to Robert Morein what Jabba The
Hut is to Luke Skywalker. Apparently, Brian is so vastly powerful and
omniscient, he can cause Robert's neighbours to suffer strokes and
heart attacks, and do great damage to Robert's friends. According to
Robert, Brian is "pure evil" and he wishes him dead. Unfortunately,
Robert does not see how much he is "pure evil", for threatening and
harassing Richard Graham and his colleagues, and spending his every
waking moments thinking up new ways to libel and tarnish the reputation
of an innocent man, a doctor no less who devotes his life to helping
adolescents, and who has never been on this group and has nothing to do
with this group of lunatics.

In my thread "Does anyone have anything but lies to say here?" I have
already proven that Robert Morein has been lying about his charges of
"shill", "scam", "crack addict", "Richard Graham", etc. etc.
(http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...e18771622f3639)

Therefore, this post is just to confirm that Crazy Bob's crazy
allegations can be safely dismissed, and I will no longer even be
"pretending" to take any such allegations from him seriously, or from
his faithful little donkey boy, Shovels. We can take Robert's false
allegations for the joke that it is, and the joke that he has become
since making them. Thank you for your attention, that is all.


ROBERT MOREIN ADMITTING TO ME THAT HE TRIED MY TWEAK:

A Few Words From Robert Morein, The "Closet Tweaker"....

(but don't you dare try to get the tweaker to come out of the closet!
Otherwise he'll get very angry indeed, after getting very embarassed
and humiliated, and then he'll call you a "shill", and a "crack addict"
and a "psychiatrist" and all KINDS of crazy things!):

----- Original Message -----
From: ". ."
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 4:21 AM
Subject: The Lying Side of George M. Middius

BTW, Sander's mention of the apparent fact that
amplifier outputs act like inputs for RF may serve as the basis of a tweak that
I could relate to my favorite system of thinking. But I did finally give
your weird idea a go, on the weekend. I saw the black marker lying next to
a cd, and I was in the mood.... I felt more than a little silly, but I
thought I'd better get it out of my system and you know what? It
really seemed to do something. I don't know if I was drawing it
correctly, but every cd I tried the l-shape on, seemed to improve
the sound. Not in any easily classifiable way, but there was definitely
something happening every time it was was applied. The music seemed
smoother, more natural.. a little less tiring, even. But I don't buy any of
that "as seen on tv" quantum mumbo jumbo. If it isn't expectation, then
there's probably a good reason for how it works.

Told you! (I love saying that..). And don't rule out the quantum mumbo jumbo!
There's a lot about our universe that isn't at all obvious. Are you familiar with
Schroedinger's cat? Okay...how about the double slit experiment? I'm getting into
some tweaks that deal with open jacks (input or output) that relate to MY favourite
system of thinking. (audio on a quantum level).

Stereophile took note
of the apparent
possibility that RF may lock up slew-limited
components in amplifiers. This
is debatable, but it suggests that large ferrite
snap-around cores might be
useful things to put on speaker leads, at the end
nearest the amp. You can
see such things in use on many computer accessory
cables and laptop
wall-warts, in these cases, to prevent RF from
exiting the machine.

I noticed my DVD player has one of these on its power
cord. I'm not at all sure if I'm remembering this
right, but I think I may have read where they may have
a degrading effect on sound. It wont hurt to try but I
would definitely listen carefully before leaving them
on my wires. One of my Belt tweaks involves installing
lead pipes at the ends of the speaker wires. Haven't
tried that yet though.



A Few More Words From The 2-Faced Weasel Robert Morein,
on His Good Friends Arny & George:

---------------------------

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:02:28 -0500
From: "Robert Morein" Add to Address BookAdd to
Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Subject: The Lying Side of George M. Middius
To: ". ."


--- Robert Morein wrote:
wrote:

Richard,
I'm not concerned at all. My "demand" was
tongue-in-cheek.

I thought as much, but just in case, I wanted it "on
the record" that George was lying and that I did not
say anything about you in email. I didn't post this
publicly, because I could care less whether anyone
else thought I was lying.

As you have
pointed out, we had better enjoy the perversity,
because there isn't much
else. It really is Monty Python's "room for
arguments."

Yup, I was thinking about RAO being just like the MP
skit today.

At least we have a
place to go was once a target of Middius; he
finally decided he couldn't
"get" me.

I guess you must have ignored him long enough. Problem
is, I aint sticking around long enough to wear out the
little ankle biter.

Personally, I rate George as far less of a
menace than Arny
Krueger.

Funny, I was thinking the opposite. That somehow,
Krueger was a kind soul in comparison with George. (I
think that while Krueger is a supreme asshole, George
is actually more mean-spirited). I found that even
though Arny is most definitely my opponent (I insult
him all the time...), I could at least have a fairly
reasonable discussion with him. But with George, it's
"all business". You just can't reason with the troll.

Since Middius has no ideology, there's nothing to reason about.

To my mind, Middius is like a mosquito,
perpetually annoying and
impossible to get rid of,

That's what he has become to me, an annoying mosquito.
It would take all of my time just to go after him,
when there's SO many more important people to go
after.... so I've mostly ignored him, letting him get
into his little buzzing fits.

but without Arny's crucifying jaws.

I don't know... these days, I find Arny a bit of a
limp tiger. I mean he's been trashed so much by so
many, that must take a beating out of him, and make
him seem less credible.

For me, it is not a question of personal annoyance. Arny is a
self-appointed prophet of the idea that the audible threshold of
perfection is much
lower than most audiophiles experience. He gains support from a
considerable
number of engineers. I consider this dangerous to the art and science
of high fidelity. Hence, it is not a personal issue. Middius is, for
those
so affected, strictly a personal issue. While Arny speaks with an
assumed
mantle of authority, Middius does not.

During the Cold War, the U.S. used proxies, many/most of which were
odious.. IMHO, Middius is useful proxy.

He's still trying, hopelessly, to manipulate us. With all the success he's
had in berating teens, he can't understand why it doesn't work here.

Would you buy a used car from this man?


" wrote in message
ups.com...
OK. You're not this and that and not something else. A very
long read.
Wouldn't it save your and every one else time if you just
said
in a few words WHAT ARE YOU? Till you do the best guess is that
you're a paid PR man for the Belts.
Ludovic Mirabel

----------------------------------------------------
wrote:
I couldn't help but notice after reading 525 messages on the subject in
the last couple of weeks, that Robert Morein and his little work mule
"Shovels", are on a high gear campaign to brand me as a "shill", a
"crack addict", a "cocaine user", a "murderer", and a "psychiatrist for
adolescents/newsletter editor" named Dr. R. Graham. (What can I say, I
wear many hats...).

Of course, not a grain of anything Robert says here about me or my
tweaks, is true. Robert knows that I'm not a cocaine user, because he's
on cocaine right now as we speak. He can tell when someone's a "user",
and I think most of us can tell that he's a drug addict (if he isn't,
it means he's crazier than we all thought). Robert knows I'm not Dr.
Graham, because he harassed Dr. Graham, his wife, and his colleagues in
phone calls and emails, including threats at 3 in the morning (he
admitted as much in one of his posts about contacting Graham's
colleagues at the NHS and Priory). He was quite firmly told that Dr.
Graham does not post to usenet and that he'd be arrested if he
continues to try to contact Graham or his colleagues. Dr. Graham
himself wrote about how he was too busy to post on PWB's site, let
alone the rest of Usenet. Robert also knows my FREE TWEAKS! are not a
"scam", because he tried one of them (the "L-Shape"), and found that it
did produce an audible difference. (see email below). He also knows
that I'm not a "shill" for PWB, and don't work for them, because
earlier on in email (back when he was still sane...), I told him what I
do for a living.

His phony "shill campaign", full of silly but malicious lies, is a
result of me mentioning in passing what he wrote to me in his email
(partially reprinted below), about trying the L-shape. It made Robert
feel very angry and very shameful and embarassed that I mentioned that
(whereas I thought he'd be proud to admit it....silly me!). He later
told me that it could harm his reputation with the IEEE, and even made
some laughable attempt at slapping "Dr. Richard Graham" (whom like the
fool he is, really did think I was at the time...) with a lawsuit, if
"he" continued to declare that Robert had tried the L-shape. I was very
tempted to tell Robert to go to hell and sue me, just to see how that
would play out in court.....:

Judge: "And so Mr. Morein, you say the person sitting here today, Dr.
Richard Graham, posting under the alias of a newsgroup contributor
who's email account is described as ", which
you are bringing suit for libelous behaviour towards you, for his
alleging that you tried an "L-shape tweak", whatever that is and I
won't ask, and that this has caused great harm to your reputation with
the IEEE, and SAG. And what is your evidence that the contributor
posting under the moniker " is in fact, Dr.
Richard Graham? You WHAT? You believe this "
is Dr. Graham simply because you did a search on the web for fifteen
seconds, and found the phrase "soundhaspriority" in a newsletter edited
by Dr. Graham?!? And that's it? That's all the evidence you have that
Mr. SHP is Dr. Richard Graham?!

courtroom breaks out into snickers and guffaws

Robert Morein: "Uh..... yes, your honor. But you see, there's also
these unmistakable similarities in the way they both write....."

Judge (indignant): "WHAT similarities...."

Robert: "Well... uhmmm I ..... uh.... well, they're both writing in
English, maybe?"

court burts out into giant laughter

Judge: "Bailiff, arrest this man at once and GET HIM OUT OF MY COURT
ROOM!!"

courtoom screaming in hysterical laughter at this point


....But I didn't. Instead, I pretended that Robert never told me he'd
tried the L-shape, and
posted a retraction as he requested, simply because I'm a nice
philanthropist-type guy, and I felt sorry for Robert. He "seemed so
fragile and vulnerable, like a newborn deer". He also went on to
mention that "certain people" (ie. Brian McCarty) could use the
information of him trying the L-shape tweak against him. Apparently,
Robert tells me this is why he hides his web businesses under proxy
servers and such, so that Brian doesn't know about them...

From all the emails he wrote to me about Brian, its clear that our poor
Crazy Bob lives in absolute terror of Brian McCarty. To put it in terms
that Shovels can understand, Brian is to Robert Morein what Jabba The
Hut is to Luke Skywalker. Apparently, Brian is so vastly powerful and
omniscient, he can cause Robert's neighbours to suffer strokes and
heart attacks, and do great damage to Robert's friends. According to
Robert, Brian is "pure evil" and he wishes him dead. Unfortunately,
Robert does not see how much he is "pure evil", for threatening and
harassing Richard Graham and his colleagues, and spending his every
waking moments thinking up new ways to libel and tarnish the reputation
of an innocent man, a doctor no less who devotes his life to helping
adolescents, and who has never been on this group and has nothing to do
with this group of lunatics.

In my thread "Does anyone have anything but lies to say here?" I have
already proven that Robert Morein has been lying about his charges of
"shill", "scam", "crack addict", "Richard Graham", etc. etc.
(http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...e18771622f3639)

Therefore, this post is just to confirm that Crazy Bob's crazy
allegations can be safely dismissed, and I will no longer even be
"pretending" to take any such allegations from him seriously, or from
his faithful little donkey boy, Shovels. We can take Robert's false
allegations for the joke that it is, and the joke that he has become
since making them. Thank you for your attention, that is all.


ROBERT MOREIN ADMITTING TO ME THAT HE TRIED MY TWEAK:

A Few Words From Robert Morein, The "Closet Tweaker"....

(but don't you dare try to get the tweaker to come out of the closet!
Otherwise he'll get very angry indeed, after getting very embarassed
and humiliated, and then he'll call you a "shill", and a "crack addict"
and a "psychiatrist" and all KINDS of crazy things!):

----- Original Message -----
From: ". ."
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 4:21 AM
Subject: The Lying Side of George M. Middius

BTW, Sander's mention of the apparent fact that
amplifier outputs act like inputs for RF may serve as the basis of a
tweak that
I could relate to my favorite system of thinking. But I did finally
give
your weird idea a go, on the weekend. I saw the black marker lying
next to
a cd, and I was in the mood.... I felt more than a little silly, but I
thought I'd better get it out of my system and you know what? It
really seemed to do something. I don't know if I was drawing it
correctly, but every cd I tried the l-shape on, seemed to improve
the sound. Not in any easily classifiable way, but there was
definitely
something happening every time it was was applied. The music seemed
smoother, more natural.. a little less tiring, even. But I don't buy
any of
that "as seen on tv" quantum mumbo jumbo. If it isn't expectation,
then
there's probably a good reason for how it works.

Told you! (I love saying that..). And don't rule out the quantum mumbo
jumbo!
There's a lot about our universe that isn't at all obvious. Are you
familiar with
Schroedinger's cat? Okay...how about the double slit experiment? I'm
getting into
some tweaks that deal with open jacks (input or output) that relate to
MY favourite
system of thinking. (audio on a quantum level).

Stereophile took note
of the apparent
possibility that RF may lock up slew-limited
components in amplifiers. This
is debatable, but it suggests that large ferrite
snap-around cores might be
useful things to put on speaker leads, at the end
nearest the amp. You can
see such things in use on many computer accessory
cables and laptop
wall-warts, in these cases, to prevent RF from
exiting the machine.

I noticed my DVD player has one of these on its power
cord. I'm not at all sure if I'm remembering this
right, but I think I may have read where they may have
a degrading effect on sound. It wont hurt to try but I
would definitely listen carefully before leaving them
on my wires. One of my Belt tweaks involves installing
lead pipes at the ends of the speaker wires. Haven't
tried that yet though.



A Few More Words From The 2-Faced Weasel Robert Morein,
on His Good Friends Arny & George:

---------------------------

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:02:28 -0500
From: "Robert Morein" Add to Address BookAdd to
Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Subject: The Lying Side of George M. Middius
To: ". ."


--- Robert Morein wrote:
wrote:

Richard,
I'm not concerned at all. My "demand" was
tongue-in-cheek.

I thought as much, but just in case, I wanted it "on
the record" that George was lying and that I did not
say anything about you in email. I didn't post this
publicly, because I could care less whether anyone
else thought I was lying.

As you have
pointed out, we had better enjoy the perversity,
because there isn't much
else. It really is Monty Python's "room for
arguments."

Yup, I was thinking about RAO being just like the MP
skit today.

At least we have a
place to go was once a target of Middius; he
finally decided he couldn't
"get" me.

I guess you must have ignored him long enough. Problem
is, I aint sticking around long enough to wear out the
little ankle biter.

Personally, I rate George as far less of a
menace than Arny
Krueger.

Funny, I was thinking the opposite. That somehow,
Krueger was a kind soul in comparison with George. (I
think that while Krueger is a supreme asshole, George
is actually more mean-spirited). I found that even
though Arny is most definitely my opponent (I insult
him all the time...), I could at least have a fairly
reasonable discussion with him. But with George, it's
"all business". You just can't reason with the troll.

Since Middius has no ideology, there's nothing to reason about.

To my mind, Middius is like a mosquito,
perpetually annoying and
impossible to get rid of,

That's what he has become to me, an annoying mosquito.
It would take all of my time just to go after him,
when there's SO many more important people to go
after.... so I've mostly ignored him, letting him get
into his little buzzing fits.

but without Arny's crucifying jaws.

I don't know... these days, I find Arny a bit of a
limp tiger. I mean he's been trashed so much by so
many, that must take a beating out of him, and make
him seem less credible.

For me, it is not a question of personal annoyance. Arny is a
self-appointed prophet of the idea that the audible threshold of
perfection is much
lower than most audiophiles experience. He gains support from a
considerable
number of engineers. I consider this dangerous to the art and science
of high fidelity. Hence, it is not a personal issue. Middius is, for
those
so affected, strictly a personal issue. While Arny speaks with an
assumed
mantle of authority, Middius does not.

During the Cold War, the U.S. used proxies, many/most of which were
odious.. IMHO, Middius is useful proxy.

wrote:

Wouldn't it save your and every one else time if you just
said
in a few words WHAT ARE YOU? Till you do the best guess is that
you're a paid PR man for the Belts.

Oh, c'mon. Who would ever *pay* somebody to behave like that in public?

He's neither a Beltist nor a salesman. Just a garden variety troll,
and anyone who spends time arguing with him is wasting his time.

// Walt

Walt said:

anyone who spends time arguing with him is wasting his time.

Why do you post to RAO, anyway?






--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

George M. Middius wrote:
Walt said:

anyone who spends time arguing with him is wasting his time.

Why do you post to RAO, anyway?

Good question. I strolled over here to ask a legitimate audio
question, found an enormous pie fight in progress and joined in. At
this point I should probably lay off the custard flinging and get back
on topic.

BTW, the original question (which was never answered) was about 2 1/2
way speakers and whence they came, if anyone wants to pick up that ball.

Why do you post to RAO?




--
// Walt

Walt said:

Why do you post to RAO, anyway?

Good question. I strolled over here to ask a legitimate audio
question, found an enormous pie fight in progress and joined in. At
this point I should probably lay off the custard flinging and get back
on topic.

How immature of you.

BTW, the original question (which was never answered) was about 2 1/2
way speakers and whence they came, if anyone wants to pick up that ball.

Not I.

Why do you post to RAO?

I like watching meatheads and cyborgs have public meltdowns. On occasion,
I've been known to pour some kerosene on the fire myself.





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

In article ,
Walt wrote:

George M. Middius wrote:
Walt said:

anyone who spends time arguing with him is wasting his time.

Why do you post to RAO, anyway?

Good question. I strolled over here to ask a legitimate audio
question, found an enormous pie fight in progress and joined in. At
this point I should probably lay off the custard flinging and get back
on topic.

BTW, the original question (which was never answered) was about 2 1/2
way speakers and whence they came, if anyone wants to pick up that ball.

Do you mean a d'Appolito Configuration or Array? Mine came from Scotland.

Stephen

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...

I like watching meatheads and cyborgs have public meltdowns. On occasion,
I've been known to pour some kerosene on the fire myself.


Not to metion your voluntary bus driving stints.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
Walt wrote:

BTW, the original question (which was never answered) was about 2 1/2
way speakers and whence they came, if anyone wants to pick up that ball.


Do you mean a d'Appolito Configuration or Array? Mine came from Scotland.

No, I don't think so. I'm not sure what a d'Appolito Configuration is.

A 2 1/2 way speaker is where you have a tweeter and two woofers, one
of which is rolled off above 400 hz or so. Usually the woofers are
the same size. This design is quite common, I've auditioned a bunch,
and liked none. Curious about the backstory...

--

// Walt

In article ,
Walt wrote:

MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
Walt wrote:

BTW, the original question (which was never answered) was about 2 1/2
way speakers and whence they came, if anyone wants to pick up that ball.


Do you mean a d'Appolito Configuration or Array? Mine came from Scotland.

No, I don't think so. I'm not sure what a d'Appolito Configuration is.

A 2 1/2 way speaker is where you have a tweeter and two woofers, one
of which is rolled off above 400 hz or so. Usually the woofers are
the same size. This design is quite common, I've auditioned a bunch,
and liked none. Curious about the backstory...

The d'Appolito has the woofers flanking the tweeter, commonly referred
to as "MTM" ("mids" instead of "woofers"). The benefits include
increased sensitivity compared to two-way, and a relatively uniform
frequency response on-axis as well as avoiding the dreaded "Allison
Effect." I like my Linn Kabers, which are sealed-box MTM.

I'd imagine cheap TMM arrays might not be so hot, like the typical
big-box store product (Polk, etc). Some that may be okay: PSB, Quad,
Paradigm.

Stephen

MINe 109 wrote:
In article ,
Walt wrote:


MINe 109 wrote:


In article ,
Walt wrote:

BTW, the original question (which was never answered) was about 2 1/2
way speakers and whence they came, if anyone wants to pick up that ball.


Do you mean a d'Appolito Configuration or Array? Mine came from Scotland.

No, I don't think so. I'm not sure what a d'Appolito Configuration is.

A 2 1/2 way speaker is where you have a tweeter and two woofers, one
of which is rolled off above 400 hz or so. Usually the woofers are
the same size. This design is quite common, I've auditioned a bunch,
and liked none. Curious about the backstory...


The d'Appolito has the woofers flanking the tweeter, commonly referred
to as "MTM" ("mids" instead of "woofers"). The benefits include
increased sensitivity compared to two-way, and a relatively uniform
frequency response on-axis as well as avoiding the dreaded "Allison
Effect." I like my Linn Kabers, which are sealed-box MTM.


Are both of the woofers (or mids) reproducing the same frequency
range (i.e. ~20 hz to 2 khz)? If so, it's just a two way system with
two woofers. To be a 2 1/2 way, you need a driver that handles 20 to
400 hz, another driver that handles 20 to 2 khz, and a tweeter that
handes 2k and above. ( crossover points are illustrative, obviously
you can move them around without changing the N-wayness of the system)

Not that there's anything wrong with 2 way - in fact I find that 2 way
usually sounds better than 2 1/2.

I'd imagine cheap TMM arrays might not be so hot, like the typical
big-box store product (Polk, etc). Some that may be okay: PSB, Quad,
Paradigm.


I auditioned some Polks and was unimpressed. Not sure of the model.
The Paradigm "Studio" line was pretty good, the "Monitor" line was
merely OK. IIRC, the Paradigms with two woofers had them configured
TMM, not MTM to use your notation. In every line I listened to, from
every manufacturer, the 2 way sounded better than th 2 1/2 way - more
natural, less "flabby" in the low mids.


--
// Walt

"Walt" wrote in message
...
George M. Middius wrote:
Walt said:

anyone who spends time arguing with him is wasting his time.

Why do you post to RAO, anyway?

Good question. I strolled over here to ask a legitimate audio question,
found an enormous pie fight in progress and joined in. At this point I
should probably lay off the custard flinging and get back on topic.

BTW, the original question (which was never answered) was about 2 1/2 way
speakers and whence they came, if anyone wants to pick up that ball.

I don't know, but I have not found the same affection for 2 1/2 way speakers
as I have for good three way designs. I've heard quite afew.

wrote:

OK. You're not this and that and not something else. A very
long read.

Sorry if that hurt your brain. That's your brain's fault, not mine.

Wouldn't it save your and every one else time if you just
said in a few words WHAT ARE YOU?

What the hell kind of question is that, "WHAT ARE YOU!??" I'm an
audiophile, you dumb *******. Is that too complicated for you to get
your little head past? Unlike you, I'm a real audiophile (read: an
active audiophile).

Till you do the best guess is that
you're a paid PR man for the Belts.
Ludovic Mirabel

Listen good you dumb *******, if I was a paid PR man for -anyone-, I
wouldn't be calling you a "dumb *******", would I? Particularly since
you are one of the few who admitted trying my tweaks. That might in the
eyes of a rational person who had half a brain in his head, suggest
you're one of my prime targets. Now you tell me: are you ready to buy a
bottle of "morphic green sex cream" after me calling you a dumb
*******? Eh, you dumb *******? How many can I put you down for? Stupid
****.

Go to the back of the classroom, along with your buddy Morein, and go
eat each other's boogers. That's about the best one could expect from
your level of intelligence and perception. My best guess is that you're
a retard. Ludovic.

You wanna save time? Don't bother me and stop asking me stupid
questions.

wrote:
wrote:

OK. You're not this and that and not something else. A very
long read.

Sorry if that hurt your brain. That's your brain's fault, not mine.

Wouldn't it save your and every one else time if you just
said in a few words WHAT ARE YOU?

What the hell kind of question is that, "WHAT ARE YOU!??" I'm an
audiophile, you dumb *******. Is that too complicated for you to get
your little head past? Unlike you, I'm a real audiophile (read: an
active audiophile).

Till you do the best guess is that
you're a paid PR man for the Belts.
Ludovic Mirabel

Listen good you dumb *******, if I was a paid PR man for -anyone-, I
wouldn't be calling you a "dumb *******", would I? Particularly since
you are one of the few who admitted trying my tweaks. That might in the
eyes of a rational person who had half a brain in his head, suggest
you're one of my prime targets. Now you tell me: are you ready to buy a
bottle of "morphic green sex cream" after me calling you a dumb
*******? Eh, you dumb *******? How many can I put you down for? Stupid
****.

Go to the back of the classroom, along with your buddy Morein, and go
eat each other's boogers. That's about the best one could expect from
your level of intelligence and perception. My best guess is that you're
a retard. Ludovic.

You wanna save time? Don't bother me and stop asking me stupid
questions.

-------------------------------------------------------

What fury! What language!
And all because one asks him politely who he is and proposes that for
lack of innformation other than fire belching the reasonable guess is
that he advertises for the Belt couple.
The insults and so on can be an "original" marketing strategy mixed
with
an admixture of genuine fury at the lack of success. Even de Waal
shrugs off any suggestion of purchasing silver foil or "chemical X"
cream.
I still think that by RAO standards you are a great entertainer. Don't
give up. Fella might buy the cream yet.
Ludovic Mirabel
genuine fury at being laughed at

In article ,
Walt wrote:

MINe 109 wrote:
In article ,
Walt wrote:


MINe 109 wrote:


In article ,
Walt wrote:

BTW, the original question (which was never answered) was about 2 1/2
way speakers and whence they came, if anyone wants to pick up that ball.


Do you mean a d'Appolito Configuration or Array? Mine came from Scotland.

No, I don't think so. I'm not sure what a d'Appolito Configuration is.

A 2 1/2 way speaker is where you have a tweeter and two woofers, one
of which is rolled off above 400 hz or so. Usually the woofers are
the same size. This design is quite common, I've auditioned a bunch,
and liked none. Curious about the backstory...


The d'Appolito has the woofers flanking the tweeter, commonly referred
to as "MTM" ("mids" instead of "woofers"). The benefits include
increased sensitivity compared to two-way, and a relatively uniform
frequency response on-axis as well as avoiding the dreaded "Allison
Effect." I like my Linn Kabers, which are sealed-box MTM.


Are both of the woofers (or mids) reproducing the same frequency
range (i.e. ~20 hz to 2 khz)? If so, it's just a two way system with
two woofers. To be a 2 1/2 way, you need a driver that handles 20 to
400 hz, another driver that handles 20 to 2 khz, and a tweeter that
handes 2k and above. ( crossover points are illustrative, obviously
you can move them around without changing the N-wayness of the system)

Not that there's anything wrong with 2 way - in fact I find that 2 way
usually sounds better than 2 1/2.

The Kabers are 2 1/2 way, but I don't know the crossover points off-hand.

I'd imagine cheap TMM arrays might not be so hot, like the typical
big-box store product (Polk, etc). Some that may be okay: PSB, Quad,
Paradigm.


I auditioned some Polks and was unimpressed. Not sure of the model.
The Paradigm "Studio" line was pretty good, the "Monitor" line was
merely OK. IIRC, the Paradigms with two woofers had them configured
TMM, not MTM to use your notation. In every line I listened to, from
every manufacturer, the 2 way sounded better than th 2 1/2 way - more
natural, less "flabby" in the low mids.

That's entirely possible. Add ported enclosures to the equation and lots
can go wrong.

Stephen

, aka Ludovic Mirabel, shrieked out like an hysterical
schoolgirl:

wrote:
wrote:

What fury! What language!

What a hysterical reaction. Calm yourself down Ludovic, I'm sure your
body parts are still intact. However, your brain still seems to be
malfunctioning. You might want to get that checked out at the factory.

And all because one asks him politely who he is and proposes that for
lack of innformation other than fire belching the reasonable guess is
that he advertises for the Belt couple.

By the same stupid reasoning you give, that which only a dumb *******
like yourself could possibly come up with, the reasonable guess one
might make about you is that you advertize for "the Belt couple". Other
such "reasonable guesses" (according to your standards and those of the
rest of your colleagues on RAO) one could make about you, is that
you're a crack addict, a cocaine fiend, a criminal, a theif, a whore, a
murderer, and a psychiatrist specializing in adolescent behaviour.

Point being, you don't even have the wherewithal to understand what
"reason" and "rationality" is, because as it is with you and the rest
of your group of dumb bigots, "reasonable guess=idiotic presumption".
Being the nitwitted arrogant ******* you are, the phrase "I don't know"
doesn't seem to be part of your general vocabulary. So you prefer to
think of yourself as an expert on all things you don't know anything
about. A good scientist or researcher realizes that a "reasonable
guess" can not be made, when there is a lack of information.

At one point, I thought you did have a capacity for reason, as you did
make a half-hearted attempt to try one of my tweaks. That was until I
saw your reaction when you didn't do it correctly and it didn't do
anything for you. It was even more hysterical than this one! You
started turning blue, red, purple, green and yellow with a sickly
combination of rage, embarassment and self-loathing. Then you turned
toward my direction and let out a full force shrieking blast at me that
overpowered the shrieks of a thousand Japanese schoolgirls. All because
you were too dumb to figure out how a piece of paper, animal picture
and aspirin worked. I'm still feeling reverberations from that immense
pain and self-loathing that you have in you from that experience, in
all of your messages to me. And laughing my head off at you, because of
it.

I can just imagine your medical colleagues thinking about you spending
your retirement years trolling an audio newsgroup every day, and
fiddling about with bits of paper, aspirin and pictures of a dog, in
the hopes of improving your sound system. That must have been -very-
embarassing for you, when people laughed at you over that, I imagine.

The insults and so on can be an "original" marketing strategy mixed
with an admixture of genuine fury at the lack of success.

Right! Another "reasonable guess"! What a brilliant deduction,
Sherlock! Give the man a ceegar!

I don't know what an "admixture" is in that discombobulated piece of
rotten melon you call a brain, but indeed, I agree that would be an
"original" marketing strategy. Along with the idea that I gave Fella
about giving each person who tried my free tweaks an obligatory punch
in the face. However.... let's see you prove that your mad rant here is
indeed a "marketing strategy", prove that I am using it, and prove that
it works? Oh, running away so soon, Mirabel? What a shock. Looks like
your brilliant "marketing strategy deduction" is going to have to fend
for itself here, all alone.

Even de Waal
shrugs off any suggestion of purchasing silver foil or "chemical X"
cream.

LOL! So much for your "original marketing strateygy" idea! Look, it's
still struggling like a dying fish! Aren't you going to even TRY to
defend it?!

I still think that by RAO standards, you're a mindless bore. And your
egomaniacal tirades against ScottW for being a mindless bore, are quite
the bit of irony on your part.

Fella might buy the cream yet.

Off of you maybe. Do you give volume discounts for morphic green sex
cream? Looks like Robert and Shovels could use some as well.


"I tried your paper/pinhole/aspirin tweak and I feel embarassed and
humiliated!" - Ludovic Mirabel

wrote in message
oups.com...

, aka Ludovic Mirabel, shrieked out like an hysterical
schoolgirl:

wrote:
wrote:

What fury! What language!

What a hysterical reaction. Calm yourself down Ludovic,

No, Richard. Ludovic is right. You are a shill for PWB Electronics. You are
here under false pretenses. You try to bilk people for a worthless
"product", a magical "cream." You refuse to identify yourself.

You are a bad guy. We will continue to hassle you for the indefinite future.

Love,
SHP

Nope, since I'm not ready yet to part with my Citroën.

--

- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -

" wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:
wrote:

OK. You're not this and that and not something else. A very
long read.

Sorry if that hurt your brain. That's your brain's fault, not mine.

Wouldn't it save your and every one else time if you just
said in a few words WHAT ARE YOU?

What the hell kind of question is that, "WHAT ARE YOU!??" I'm an
audiophile, you dumb *******. Is that too complicated for you to get
your little head past? Unlike you, I'm a real audiophile (read: an
active audiophile).

Till you do the best guess is that
you're a paid PR man for the Belts.
Ludovic Mirabel

Listen good you dumb *******, if I was a paid PR man for -anyone-, I
wouldn't be calling you a "dumb *******", would I? Particularly since
you are one of the few who admitted trying my tweaks. That might in the
eyes of a rational person who had half a brain in his head, suggest
you're one of my prime targets. Now you tell me: are you ready to buy a
bottle of "morphic green sex cream" after me calling you a dumb
*******? Eh, you dumb *******? How many can I put you down for? Stupid
****.

Go to the back of the classroom, along with your buddy Morein, and go
eat each other's boogers. That's about the best one could expect from
your level of intelligence and perception. My best guess is that you're
a retard. Ludovic.

You wanna save time? Don't bother me and stop asking me stupid
questions.

-------------------------------------------------------

What fury! What language!
And all because one asks him politely who he is and proposes that for
lack of innformation other than fire belching the reasonable guess is
that he advertises for the Belt couple.
The insults and so on can be an "original" marketing strategy mixed
with
an admixture of genuine fury at the lack of success. Even de Waal
shrugs off any suggestion of purchasing silver foil or "chemical X"
cream.
I still think that by RAO standards you are a great entertainer. Don't
give up. Fella might buy the cream yet.
Ludovic Mirabel
genuine fury at being laughed at

Ludovic, I would have to say that at this point, Richard is the only person,
aside from Brian L. McCarty, who I've met on r.a.o. who is inherently
malicious. Here is a man who seeks to rob us with a worthless product, while
simultaneously insulting our intelligence. As a practicing psychiatrist,
Richard is well acquainted with the phenomena of habituation. Given
sufficient exposure, the theory goes, a person can become habituated and
inattentive to aspects of a situation. Here, as you have correctly pointed
out, one of the salient issues is that Richard refuses to identify himself.
No one in his right mind would enter into a transaction with an anonymous
individual. However, it is Richard's forlorn hope that, with sufficient
repetition, some of us will cease to note this fact.

Richard just doesn't get it. R.A.O. is in some respects an organism with
adhoc but extremely effective defenses. In this case, the antibodies are
people's attitudes, as well as their responses, which continue to be
archived. Richard should examine the fate of Brian L. McCarty. After a
period of years, his accumulated enemies, and what they did to him behind
the scenes, and the large Google record grew so large that it effectively
prevented him from actualizing his goal of being a web entrepreneur. He
sacrificed an important element of his professional career in return for the
privilege of harassing individuals on the Internet, a very bad trade indeed.
And it appears that Richard Graham is doing the same thing.

Richard, we cannot discount the possibility that you might sell a few vials
of cream here. But the damage you are doing both yourself, and the Belts, is
immense. No one can do business in a hostile environment. Your attempt at
psychological manipulation is unprecedented in Usenet. When Herr Goebels
controlled the media, the Big Lie had power. Here, where everyone has the
same power of communication, the Big Lie is ineffective. My suggestion to
you is simply to choose another venue. I don't think any of us are
interested in what you do outside of Usenet.

wrote:
, aka Ludovic Mirabel, shrieked out like an hysterical
schoolgirl:

wrote:
wrote:

What fury! What language!

What a hysterical reaction. Calm yourself down Ludovic, I'm sure your
body parts are still intact. However, your brain still seems to be
malfunctioning. You might want to get that checked out at the factory.

And all because one asks him politely who he is and proposes that for
lack of innformation other than fire belching the reasonable guess is
that he advertises for the Belt couple.

By the same stupid reasoning you give, that which only a dumb *******
like yourself could possibly come up with, the reasonable guess one
might make about you is that you advertize for "the Belt couple". Other
such "reasonable guesses" (according to your standards and those of the
rest of your colleagues on RAO) one could make about you, is that
you're a crack addict, a cocaine fiend, a criminal, a theif, a whore, a
murderer, and a psychiatrist specializing in adolescent behaviour.

Point being, you don't even have the wherewithal to understand what
"reason" and "rationality" is, because as it is with you and the rest
of your group of dumb bigots, "reasonable guess=idiotic presumption".
Being the nitwitted arrogant ******* you are, the phrase "I don't know"
doesn't seem to be part of your general vocabulary. So you prefer to
think of yourself as an expert on all things you don't know anything
about. A good scientist or researcher realizes that a "reasonable
guess" can not be made, when there is a lack of information.

At one point, I thought you did have a capacity for reason, as you did
make a half-hearted attempt to try one of my tweaks. That was until I
saw your reaction when you didn't do it correctly and it didn't do
anything for you. It was even more hysterical than this one! You
started turning blue, red, purple, green and yellow with a sickly
combination of rage, embarassment and self-loathing. Then you turned
toward my direction and let out a full force shrieking blast at me that
overpowered the shrieks of a thousand Japanese schoolgirls. All because
you were too dumb to figure out how a piece of paper, animal picture
and aspirin worked. I'm still feeling reverberations from that immense
pain and self-loathing that you have in you from that experience, in
all of your messages to me. And laughing my head off at you, because of
it.

I can just imagine your medical colleagues thinking about you spending
your retirement years trolling an audio newsgroup every day, and
fiddling about with bits of paper, aspirin and pictures of a dog, in
the hopes of improving your sound system. That must have been -very-
embarassing for you, when people laughed at you over that, I imagine.

The insults and so on can be an "original" marketing strategy mixed
with an admixture of genuine fury at the lack of success.

Right! Another "reasonable guess"! What a brilliant deduction,
Sherlock! Give the man a ceegar!

I don't know what an "admixture" is in that discombobulated piece of
rotten melon you call a brain, but indeed, I agree that would be an
"original" marketing strategy. Along with the idea that I gave Fella
about giving each person who tried my free tweaks an obligatory punch
in the face. However.... let's see you prove that your mad rant here is
indeed a "marketing strategy", prove that I am using it, and prove that
it works? Oh, running away so soon, Mirabel? What a shock. Looks like
your brilliant "marketing strategy deduction" is going to have to fend
for itself here, all alone.

Even de Waal
shrugs off any suggestion of purchasing silver foil or "chemical X"
cream.

LOL! So much for your "original marketing strateygy" idea! Look, it's
still struggling like a dying fish! Aren't you going to even TRY to
defend it?!

I still think that by RAO standards, you're a mindless bore. And your
egomaniacal tirades against ScottW for being a mindless bore, are quite
the bit of irony on your part.

Fella might buy the cream yet.

Off of you maybe. Do you give volume discounts for morphic green sex
cream? Looks like Robert and Shovels could use some as well.


"I tried your paper/pinhole/aspirin tweak and I feel embarassed and
humiliated!" - Ludovic Mirabel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. SHP you're not doing yourself justice.
You insist on being taken seriously. Worse you're belching fire
imitating
a fear-inspiring dragon.
But we both know that deep down you realise that your
main
asset is your
entertainment value. Or maybe you don't. If so take my word for it.
I'll try the serioussness fitting now. Watch me:
Yes: you provide cogent reasons why you keep us all on
tenterhooks
about your identity. Perfectly sensible to write thousands of words
in explanation. Perfectly sensible proposing morphing resonances and
quantum theory as background to 5 pinholes, cat picture and aspirin
tab.
composition for improving audio. Perfectly reasonable to slip in,
accidentally of
course, the address for purchase of "chemical X" audio cream. Twice in
one paragraph.
Perfect fit-yes?
You're quite wrong. You don't upset me. On the
contrary as
I told you I'd miss you if you truly left us without a follow up
address.
If you were as wise as you're clever you'd
appreciate
the compliment.
Ludovic Mirabel

soundhaspriority aka Crazy Bob, went on an insane paranoid rant for 45
minutes, and it looked like this:

" wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:
wrote:

OK. You're not this and that and not something else. A very
long read.

Sorry if that hurt your brain. That's your brain's fault, not mine.

Wouldn't it save your and every one else time if you just
said in a few words WHAT ARE YOU?

What the hell kind of question is that, "WHAT ARE YOU!??" I'm an
audiophile, you dumb *******. Is that too complicated for you to get
your little head past? Unlike you, I'm a real audiophile (read: an
active audiophile).

Till you do the best guess is that
you're a paid PR man for the Belts.
Ludovic Mirabel

Listen good you dumb *******, if I was a paid PR man for -anyone-, I
wouldn't be calling you a "dumb *******", would I? Particularly since
you are one of the few who admitted trying my tweaks. That might in the
eyes of a rational person who had half a brain in his head, suggest
you're one of my prime targets. Now you tell me: are you ready to buy a
bottle of "morphic green sex cream" after me calling you a dumb
*******? Eh, you dumb *******? How many can I put you down for? Stupid
****.

Go to the back of the classroom, along with your buddy Morein, and go
eat each other's boogers. That's about the best one could expect from
your level of intelligence and perception. My best guess is that you're
a retard. Ludovic.

You wanna save time? Don't bother me and stop asking me stupid
questions.

-------------------------------------------------------

What fury! What language!
And all because one asks him politely who he is and proposes that for
lack of innformation other than fire belching the reasonable guess is
that he advertises for the Belt couple.
The insults and so on can be an "original" marketing strategy mixed
with
an admixture of genuine fury at the lack of success. Even de Waal
shrugs off any suggestion of purchasing silver foil or "chemical X"
cream.
I still think that by RAO standards you are a great entertainer. Don't
give up. Fella might buy the cream yet.
Ludovic Mirabel
genuine fury at being laughed at

Ludovic, I would have to say that at this point, Richard is the only person,
aside from Brian L. McCarty, who I've met on r.a.o. who is inherently
malicious. Here is a man who seeks to rob us with a worthless product, while
simultaneously insulting our intelligence. As a practicing psychiatrist,
Richard is well acquainted with the phenomena of habituation. Given
sufficient exposure, the theory goes, a person can become habituated and
inattentive to aspects of a situation. Here, as you have correctly pointed
out, one of the salient issues is that Richard refuses to identify himself.
No one in his right mind would enter into a transaction with an anonymous
individual. However, it is Richard's forlorn hope that, with sufficient
repetition, some of us will cease to note this fact.

Richard just doesn't get it. R.A.O. is in some respects an organism with
adhoc but extremely effective defenses. In this case, the antibodies are
people's attitudes, as well as their responses, which continue to be
archived. Richard should examine the fate of Brian L. McCarty. After a
period of years, his accumulated enemies, and what they did to him behind
the scenes, and the large Google record grew so large that it effectively
prevented him from actualizing his goal of being a web entrepreneur. He
sacrificed an important element of his professional career in return for the
privilege of harassing individuals on the Internet, a very bad trade indeed.
And it appears that Richard Graham is doing the same thing.

Richard, we cannot discount the possibility that you might sell a few vials
of cream here. But the damage you are doing both yourself, and the Belts, is
immense. No one can do business in a hostile environment. Your attempt at
psychological manipulation is unprecedented in Usenet. When Herr Goebels
controlled the media, the Big Lie had power. Here, where everyone has the
same power of communication, the Big Lie is ineffective. My suggestion to
you is simply to choose another venue. I don't think any of us are
interested in what you do outside of Usenet.

The worm in your brain hurting you again, Crazy Bob? So sorry to hear.

Love,
SHP

wrote:

wrote:

, aka Ludovic Mirabel, shrieked out like an hysterical
schoolgirl:

What a hysterical reaction. Calm yourself down Ludovic, I'm sure your
body parts are still intact. However, your brain still seems to be
malfunctioning. You might want to get that checked out at the factory.

"I tried your paper/pinhole/aspirin tweak and I feel embarassed and
humiliated!" - Ludovic Mirabel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. SHP you're not justice.

Two acres and a bushel will get you five grains of corn.

You insist on being taken seriously. Worse you're belching fire
imitating a fear-inspiring dragon.

No, I'm just having fun being entertained by you. Don't be so afraid of
me and my ideas, Ludovic, I don't bite. My little gnarly friend Shovels
might though, but that's why I keep him on a short leash.

But we both know that deep down you realise that your
main asset is your tweaks.

(Shhhhhhhh! Keep that on the downlow, will you? Otherwise, everyone's
gonna want to be trying them, and I don't have enough to go around...)

I disagree with you, but only because you're wrong. As you always are,
Ludy. I have so many assets, I don't even have a 'main' one. But enough
about me. As we've already established you're a hopeless bore and an
arrogant pathological liar. What do you suppose -your- main asset here
is?

Or maybe you don't. If so take my word for it.

Oh, okay. Why shouldn't I take the "word" of an ignorant yutz who has
no idea what he's talking about, ever, and has never proven a single
arrogant lie of his in the entire time I've been here? I just answered
my own question, didn't I?

I'll try the serioussness fitting now. Watch me:

Uh yea, whatever you say, "Gollum".

Yes: you provide cogent reasons why you keep us all on
tenterhooks about your identity.

I never fail to be fascinated at how so many people have SO little
going in their little lives, that my so-called "identity" is at the
topmost of their thoughts these days. Shovels claims everyone here has
"jobs", but you all seem to be either retired or as in the case of
Robert, never worked in the first place.

As for my identity, its in all of my posts, you silly nitwit. As for my
"usenet identity", well I've dropped many hints about it all over my
messages, since the beginning. No one here is smart enough to have
gotten it yet and quite frankly, that's one of the things that amuses
me so much and keeps me laughing at you bunch of goofs. Some of you in
particular, -really- should have gotten it by now. Besides, I thought
Morein cleared up the "identity" thing for you, when he went on a
lunatic crusade against Richard Graham? If you don't believe I'm
Graham, why aren't you explaining this to Morein and Shovels, et al.?

Perfectly sensible to write thousands of words
in explanation.

Why of course. It is if you like writing and can write. It isn't if
you're a moron and can't even read 5 words without getting confused,
let alone thousands.

Perfectly sensible proposing morphing resonances and
quantum theory as background to 5 pinholes, cat picture and aspirin
tab composition for improving audio.

Why of course, once you fully understand the relation. It's as
perfectly sensible as it was for YOU to fiddle with putting together
said 5 pinholes, cat picture and aspirin tablet in the hopes of
improving your audio. insert evil laugh

Perfectly reasonable to slip in, accidentally of course, the address for purchase of
"chemical X" audio cream. Twice in one paragraph.

Are you talking about PWB products from http://www.belt.demon.co.uk?
Because I don't know anything sold on the website at
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk that fits any description of a product
called "Chemical X Audio Cream". Maybe you're thinking of the products
that Robert Morein shills here? I think that's one of his, along with
his "morphic green sex cream" and DHM spray (how does his jingle go
again? "A little dab'll kill ya"..).

You're quite wrong. You don't upset me.

Sorry. That's true in my case but in yours? I don't believe that for a
minute.

If you were as wise as you're clever you'd appreciate
the compliment.

I already told you I did. What, do you want it engraved on a silk
hankerchief? I find that I have to tell you a lot of things several
times before it sinks in. Given your ripe old retirement age, I'm sure
you're not as quick as you once were. But then, given your latest
brilliant "deduction" about me, that I'm Dr. Richard Graham shilling
products to the innocent lambs of RAO in a new avant-garde type
marketing strategy whereby you attack your potential customers, there's
no evidence that you ever were.

wrote in message
oups.com...
soundhaspriority aka Crazy Bob, went on an insane paranoid rant for 45
minutes, and it looked like this:

" wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:
wrote:

OK. You're not this and that and not something else. A very
long read.

Sorry if that hurt your brain. That's your brain's fault, not mine.

Wouldn't it save your and every one else time if you
just
said in a few words WHAT ARE YOU?

What the hell kind of question is that, "WHAT ARE YOU!??" I'm an
audiophile, you dumb *******. Is that too complicated for you to get
your little head past? Unlike you, I'm a real audiophile (read: an
active audiophile).

Till you do the best guess is that
you're a paid PR man for the Belts.
Ludovic Mirabel

Listen good you dumb *******, if I was a paid PR man for -anyone-, I
wouldn't be calling you a "dumb *******", would I? Particularly since
you are one of the few who admitted trying my tweaks. That might in
the
eyes of a rational person who had half a brain in his head, suggest
you're one of my prime targets. Now you tell me: are you ready to buy
a
bottle of "morphic green sex cream" after me calling you a dumb
*******? Eh, you dumb *******? How many can I put you down for? Stupid
****.

Go to the back of the classroom, along with your buddy Morein, and go
eat each other's boogers. That's about the best one could expect from
your level of intelligence and perception. My best guess is that
you're
a retard. Ludovic.

You wanna save time? Don't bother me and stop asking me stupid
questions.

-------------------------------------------------------

What fury! What language!
And all because one asks him politely who he is and proposes that for
lack of innformation other than fire belching the reasonable guess is
that he advertises for the Belt couple.
The insults and so on can be an "original" marketing strategy mixed
with
an admixture of genuine fury at the lack of success. Even de Waal
shrugs off any suggestion of purchasing silver foil or "chemical X"
cream.
I still think that by RAO standards you are a great entertainer. Don't
give up. Fella might buy the cream yet.
Ludovic Mirabel
genuine fury at being laughed at

Ludovic, I would have to say that at this point, Richard is the only
person,
aside from Brian L. McCarty, who I've met on r.a.o. who is inherently
malicious. Here is a man who seeks to rob us with a worthless product,
while
simultaneously insulting our intelligence. As a practicing psychiatrist,
Richard is well acquainted with the phenomena of habituation. Given
sufficient exposure, the theory goes, a person can become habituated and
inattentive to aspects of a situation. Here, as you have correctly
pointed
out, one of the salient issues is that Richard refuses to identify
himself.
No one in his right mind would enter into a transaction with an anonymous
individual. However, it is Richard's forlorn hope that, with sufficient
repetition, some of us will cease to note this fact.

Richard just doesn't get it. R.A.O. is in some respects an organism with
adhoc but extremely effective defenses. In this case, the antibodies are
people's attitudes, as well as their responses, which continue to be
archived. Richard should examine the fate of Brian L. McCarty. After a
period of years, his accumulated enemies, and what they did to him behind
the scenes, and the large Google record grew so large that it effectively
prevented him from actualizing his goal of being a web entrepreneur. He
sacrificed an important element of his professional career in return for
the
privilege of harassing individuals on the Internet, a very bad trade
indeed.
And it appears that Richard Graham is doing the same thing.

Richard, we cannot discount the possibility that you might sell a few
vials
of cream here. But the damage you are doing both yourself, and the Belts,
is
immense. No one can do business in a hostile environment. Your attempt at
psychological manipulation is unprecedented in Usenet. When Herr Goebels
controlled the media, the Big Lie had power. Here, where everyone has the
same power of communication, the Big Lie is ineffective. My suggestion to
you is simply to choose another venue. I don't think any of us are
interested in what you do outside of Usenet.

The worm in your brain hurting you again, Crazy Bob? So sorry to hear.

Love,
SHP

Richard, your quest is pointless. It will not result in benefit to PWB
Electronics or yourself.
Love,
SHP

" wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
, aka Ludovic Mirabel, shrieked out like an hysterical
schoolgirl:

wrote:
wrote:

What fury! What language!

What a hysterical reaction. Calm yourself down Ludovic, I'm sure your
body parts are still intact. However, your brain still seems to be
malfunctioning. You might want to get that checked out at the factory.

And all because one asks him politely who he is and proposes that for
lack of innformation other than fire belching the reasonable guess is
that he advertises for the Belt couple.

By the same stupid reasoning you give, that which only a dumb *******
like yourself could possibly come up with, the reasonable guess one
might make about you is that you advertize for "the Belt couple". Other
such "reasonable guesses" (according to your standards and those of the
rest of your colleagues on RAO) one could make about you, is that
you're a crack addict, a cocaine fiend, a criminal, a theif, a whore, a
murderer, and a psychiatrist specializing in adolescent behaviour.

Point being, you don't even have the wherewithal to understand what
"reason" and "rationality" is, because as it is with you and the rest
of your group of dumb bigots, "reasonable guess=idiotic presumption".
Being the nitwitted arrogant ******* you are, the phrase "I don't know"
doesn't seem to be part of your general vocabulary. So you prefer to
think of yourself as an expert on all things you don't know anything
about. A good scientist or researcher realizes that a "reasonable
guess" can not be made, when there is a lack of information.

At one point, I thought you did have a capacity for reason, as you did
make a half-hearted attempt to try one of my tweaks. That was until I
saw your reaction when you didn't do it correctly and it didn't do
anything for you. It was even more hysterical than this one! You
started turning blue, red, purple, green and yellow with a sickly
combination of rage, embarassment and self-loathing. Then you turned
toward my direction and let out a full force shrieking blast at me that
overpowered the shrieks of a thousand Japanese schoolgirls. All because
you were too dumb to figure out how a piece of paper, animal picture
and aspirin worked. I'm still feeling reverberations from that immense
pain and self-loathing that you have in you from that experience, in
all of your messages to me. And laughing my head off at you, because of
it.

I can just imagine your medical colleagues thinking about you spending
your retirement years trolling an audio newsgroup every day, and
fiddling about with bits of paper, aspirin and pictures of a dog, in
the hopes of improving your sound system. That must have been -very-
embarassing for you, when people laughed at you over that, I imagine.

The insults and so on can be an "original" marketing strategy mixed
with an admixture of genuine fury at the lack of success.

Right! Another "reasonable guess"! What a brilliant deduction,
Sherlock! Give the man a ceegar!

I don't know what an "admixture" is in that discombobulated piece of
rotten melon you call a brain, but indeed, I agree that would be an
"original" marketing strategy. Along with the idea that I gave Fella
about giving each person who tried my free tweaks an obligatory punch
in the face. However.... let's see you prove that your mad rant here is
indeed a "marketing strategy", prove that I am using it, and prove that
it works? Oh, running away so soon, Mirabel? What a shock. Looks like
your brilliant "marketing strategy deduction" is going to have to fend
for itself here, all alone.

Even de Waal
shrugs off any suggestion of purchasing silver foil or "chemical X"
cream.

LOL! So much for your "original marketing strateygy" idea! Look, it's
still struggling like a dying fish! Aren't you going to even TRY to
defend it?!

I still think that by RAO standards, you're a mindless bore. And your
egomaniacal tirades against ScottW for being a mindless bore, are quite
the bit of irony on your part.

Fella might buy the cream yet.

Off of you maybe. Do you give volume discounts for morphic green sex
cream? Looks like Robert and Shovels could use some as well.


"I tried your paper/pinhole/aspirin tweak and I feel embarassed and
humiliated!" - Ludovic Mirabel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. SHP you're not doing yourself justice.
You insist on being taken seriously. Worse you're belching fire
imitating
a fear-inspiring dragon.
But we both know that deep down you realise that your
main
asset is your
entertainment value. Or maybe you don't. If so take my word for it.
I'll try the serioussness fitting now. Watch me:
Yes: you provide cogent reasons why you keep us all on
tenterhooks
about your identity. Perfectly sensible to write thousands of words
in explanation. Perfectly sensible proposing morphing resonances and
quantum theory as background to 5 pinholes, cat picture and aspirin
tab.
composition for improving audio. Perfectly reasonable to slip in,
accidentally of
course, the address for purchase of "chemical X" audio cream. Twice in
one paragraph.
Perfect fit-yes?
You're quite wrong. You don't upset me. On the
contrary as
I told you I'd miss you if you truly left us without a follow up
address.
If you were as wise as you're clever you'd
appreciate
the compliment.
Ludovic Mirabel

Ludovic, you're right. Richard's presence is entertainment. We have the
Arnies, we have the dogmatists, we have the honestly involved subjectivists,
but we were missing a fraud. Richard Graham's shilling makes r.a.o. a
complete menu of interesting characters.

wrote in message
oups.com...

Shovels wrote:

Walt said:
Why do you post to RAO?


I like watching meatheads and cyborgs have public meltdowns.

So which one do you consider yourself, meathead or cyborg? I consider
you a combination of the two..

- soundhaspriority

None of the above. Actually, Walt is a perceptive critic.

Love,
SHP

wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:

wrote:

, aka Ludovic Mirabel, shrieked out like an hysterical
schoolgirl:

What a hysterical reaction. Calm yourself down Ludovic, I'm sure your
body parts are still intact. However, your brain still seems to be
malfunctioning. You might want to get that checked out at the factory.

"I tried your paper/pinhole/aspirin tweak and I feel embarassed and
humiliated!" - Ludovic Mirabel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. SHP you're not justice.

Two acres and a bushel will get you five grains of corn.

You insist on being taken seriously. Worse you're belching fire
imitating a fear-inspiring dragon.

No, I'm just having fun being entertained by you. Don't be so afraid of
me and my ideas, Ludovic, I don't bite. My little gnarly friend Shovels
might though, but that's why I keep him on a short leash.

But we both know that deep down you realise that your
main asset is your tweaks.

(Shhhhhhhh! Keep that on the downlow, will you? Otherwise, everyone's
gonna want to be trying them, and I don't have enough to go around...)

I disagree with you, but only because you're wrong. As you always are,
Ludy. I have so many assets, I don't even have a 'main' one. But enough
about me. As we've already established you're a hopeless bore and an
arrogant pathological liar. What do you suppose -your- main asset here
is?

Or maybe you don't. If so take my word for it.

Oh, okay. Why shouldn't I take the "word" of an ignorant yutz who has
no idea what he's talking about, ever, and has never proven a single
arrogant lie of his in the entire time I've been here? I just answered
my own question, didn't I?

I'll try the serioussness fitting now. Watch me:

Uh yea, whatever you say, "Gollum".

Yes: you provide cogent reasons why you keep us all on
tenterhooks about your identity.

I never fail to be fascinated at how so many people have SO little
going in their little lives, that my so-called "identity" is at the
topmost of their thoughts these days. Shovels claims everyone here has
"jobs", but you all seem to be either retired or as in the case of
Robert, never worked in the first place.

As for my identity, its in all of my posts, you silly nitwit. As for my
"usenet identity", well I've dropped many hints about it all over my
messages, since the beginning. No one here is smart enough to have
gotten it yet and quite frankly, that's one of the things that amuses
me so much and keeps me laughing at you bunch of goofs. Some of you in
particular, -really- should have gotten it by now. Besides, I thought
Morein cleared up the "identity" thing for you, when he went on a
lunatic crusade against Richard Graham? If you don't believe I'm
Graham, why aren't you explaining this to Morein and Shovels, et al.?

Perfectly sensible to write thousands of words
in explanation.

Why of course. It is if you like writing and can write. It isn't if
you're a moron and can't even read 5 words without getting confused,
let alone thousands.

Perfectly sensible proposing morphing resonances and
quantum theory as background to 5 pinholes, cat picture and aspirin
tab composition for improving audio.

Why of course, once you fully understand the relation. It's as
perfectly sensible as it was for YOU to fiddle with putting together
said 5 pinholes, cat picture and aspirin tablet in the hopes of
improving your audio. insert evil laugh

Perfectly reasonable to slip in, accidentally of course, the address for
purchase of
"chemical X" audio cream. Twice in one paragraph.

Are you talking about PWB products from http://www.belt.demon.co.uk?
Because I don't know anything sold on the website at
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk that fits any description of a product
called "Chemical X Audio Cream". Maybe you're thinking of the products
that Robert Morein shills here? I think that's one of his, along with
his "morphic green sex cream" and DHM spray (how does his jingle go
again? "A little dab'll kill ya"..).

You're quite wrong. You don't upset me.

Sorry. That's true in my case but in yours? I don't believe that for a
minute.

If you were as wise as you're clever you'd appreciate
the compliment.

I already told you I did. What, do you want it engraved on a silk
hankerchief? I find that I have to tell you a lot of things several
times before it sinks in. Given your ripe old retirement age, I'm sure
you're not as quick as you once were. But then, given your latest
brilliant "deduction" about me, that I'm Dr. Richard Graham shilling
products to the innocent lambs of RAO in a new avant-garde type
marketing strategy whereby you attack your potential customers, there's
no evidence that you ever were.

The facts are obvious to us, Richard.
Love,
SHP

soundhaspriority wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...
soundhaspriority aka Crazy Bob, went on an insane paranoid rant for 45
minutes, and it looked like this:

" wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:
wrote:

OK. You're not this and that and not something else. A very
long read.

Sorry if that hurt your brain. That's your brain's fault, not mine.

Wouldn't it save your and every one else time if you
just
said in a few words WHAT ARE YOU?

What the hell kind of question is that, "WHAT ARE YOU!??" I'm an
audiophile, you dumb *******. Is that too complicated for you to get
your little head past? Unlike you, I'm a real audiophile (read: an
active audiophile).

Till you do the best guess is that
you're a paid PR man for the Belts.
Ludovic Mirabel

Listen good you dumb *******, if I was a paid PR man for -anyone-, I
wouldn't be calling you a "dumb *******", would I? Particularly since
you are one of the few who admitted trying my tweaks. That might in
the
eyes of a rational person who had half a brain in his head, suggest
you're one of my prime targets. Now you tell me: are you ready to buy
a
bottle of "morphic green sex cream" after me calling you a dumb
*******? Eh, you dumb *******? How many can I put you down for? Stupid
****.

Go to the back of the classroom, along with your buddy Morein, and go
eat each other's boogers. That's about the best one could expect from
your level of intelligence and perception. My best guess is that
you're
a retard. Ludovic.

You wanna save time? Don't bother me and stop asking me stupid
questions.

-------------------------------------------------------

What fury! What language!
And all because one asks him politely who he is and proposes that for
lack of innformation other than fire belching the reasonable guess is
that he advertises for the Belt couple.
The insults and so on can be an "original" marketing strategy mixed
with
an admixture of genuine fury at the lack of success. Even de Waal
shrugs off any suggestion of purchasing silver foil or "chemical X"
cream.
I still think that by RAO standards you are a great entertainer. Don't
give up. Fella might buy the cream yet.
Ludovic Mirabel
genuine fury at being laughed at

Ludovic, I would have to say that at this point, Richard is the only
person,
aside from Brian L. McCarty, who I've met on r.a.o. who is inherently
malicious. Here is a man who seeks to rob us with a worthless product,
while
simultaneously insulting our intelligence. As a practicing psychiatrist,
Richard is well acquainted with the phenomena of habituation. Given
sufficient exposure, the theory goes, a person can become habituated and
inattentive to aspects of a situation. Here, as you have correctly
pointed
out, one of the salient issues is that Richard refuses to identify
himself.
No one in his right mind would enter into a transaction with an anonymous
individual. However, it is Richard's forlorn hope that, with sufficient
repetition, some of us will cease to note this fact.

Richard just doesn't get it. R.A.O. is in some respects an organism with
adhoc but extremely effective defenses. In this case, the antibodies are
people's attitudes, as well as their responses, which continue to be
archived. Richard should examine the fate of Brian L. McCarty. After a
period of years, his accumulated enemies, and what they did to him behind
the scenes, and the large Google record grew so large that it effectively
prevented him from actualizing his goal of being a web entrepreneur. He
sacrificed an important element of his professional career in return for
the
privilege of harassing individuals on the Internet, a very bad trade
indeed.
And it appears that Richard Graham is doing the same thing.

Richard, we cannot discount the possibility that you might sell a few
vials
of cream here. But the damage you are doing both yourself, and the Belts,
is
immense. No one can do business in a hostile environment. Your attempt at
psychological manipulation is unprecedented in Usenet. When Herr Goebels
controlled the media, the Big Lie had power. Here, where everyone has the
same power of communication, the Big Lie is ineffective. My suggestion to
you is simply to choose another venue. I don't think any of us are
interested in what you do outside of Usenet.

The worm in your brain hurting you again, Crazy Bob? So sorry to hear.

Love,
SHP

Richard, your quest is pointless. It will not result in benefit to PWB
Electronics or yourself.
Love,
SHP

Richard, -your- quest is pointless. It will not result in benefit to
PWB
Electronics or yourself.

soundhaspriority wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:

wrote:

, aka Ludovic Mirabel, shrieked out like an hysterical
schoolgirl:

What a hysterical reaction. Calm yourself down Ludovic, I'm sure your
body parts are still intact. However, your brain still seems to be
malfunctioning. You might want to get that checked out at the factory.

"I tried your paper/pinhole/aspirin tweak and I feel embarassed and
humiliated!" - Ludovic Mirabel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. SHP you're not justice.

Two acres and a bushel will get you five grains of corn.

You insist on being taken seriously. Worse you're belching fire
imitating a fear-inspiring dragon.

No, I'm just having fun being entertained by you. Don't be so afraid of
me and my ideas, Ludovic, I don't bite. My little gnarly friend Shovels
might though, but that's why I keep him on a short leash.

But we both know that deep down you realise that your
main asset is your tweaks.

(Shhhhhhhh! Keep that on the downlow, will you? Otherwise, everyone's
gonna want to be trying them, and I don't have enough to go around...)

I disagree with you, but only because you're wrong. As you always are,
Ludy. I have so many assets, I don't even have a 'main' one. But enough
about me. As we've already established you're a hopeless bore and an
arrogant pathological liar. What do you suppose -your- main asset here
is?

Or maybe you don't. If so take my word for it.

Oh, okay. Why shouldn't I take the "word" of an ignorant yutz who has
no idea what he's talking about, ever, and has never proven a single
arrogant lie of his in the entire time I've been here? I just answered
my own question, didn't I?

I'll try the serioussness fitting now. Watch me:

Uh yea, whatever you say, "Gollum".

Yes: you provide cogent reasons why you keep us all on
tenterhooks about your identity.

I never fail to be fascinated at how so many people have SO little
going in their little lives, that my so-called "identity" is at the
topmost of their thoughts these days. Shovels claims everyone here has
"jobs", but you all seem to be either retired or as in the case of
Robert, never worked in the first place.

As for my identity, its in all of my posts, you silly nitwit. As for my
"usenet identity", well I've dropped many hints about it all over my
messages, since the beginning. No one here is smart enough to have
gotten it yet and quite frankly, that's one of the things that amuses
me so much and keeps me laughing at you bunch of goofs. Some of you in
particular, -really- should have gotten it by now. Besides, I thought
Morein cleared up the "identity" thing for you, when he went on a
lunatic crusade against Richard Graham? If you don't believe I'm
Graham, why aren't you explaining this to Morein and Shovels, et al.?

Perfectly sensible to write thousands of words
in explanation.

Why of course. It is if you like writing and can write. It isn't if
you're a moron and can't even read 5 words without getting confused,
let alone thousands.

Perfectly sensible proposing morphing resonances and
quantum theory as background to 5 pinholes, cat picture and aspirin
tab composition for improving audio.

Why of course, once you fully understand the relation. It's as
perfectly sensible as it was for YOU to fiddle with putting together
said 5 pinholes, cat picture and aspirin tablet in the hopes of
improving your audio. insert evil laugh

Perfectly reasonable to slip in, accidentally of course, the address for
purchase of
"chemical X" audio cream. Twice in one paragraph.

Are you talking about PWB products from http://www.belt.demon.co.uk?
Because I don't know anything sold on the website at
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk that fits any description of a product
called "Chemical X Audio Cream". Maybe you're thinking of the products
that Robert Morein shills here? I think that's one of his, along with
his "morphic green sex cream" and DHM spray (how does his jingle go
again? "A little dab'll kill ya"..).

You're quite wrong. You don't upset me.

Sorry. That's true in my case but in yours? I don't believe that for a
minute.

If you were as wise as you're clever you'd appreciate
the compliment.

I already told you I did. What, do you want it engraved on a silk
hankerchief? I find that I have to tell you a lot of things several
times before it sinks in. Given your ripe old retirement age, I'm sure
you're not as quick as you once were. But then, given your latest
brilliant "deduction" about me, that I'm Dr. Richard Graham shilling
products to the innocent lambs of RAO in a new avant-garde type
marketing strategy whereby you attack your potential customers, there's
no evidence that you ever were.

The facts are obvious to us, Richard.
Love,
SHP

The facts are obvious to _us_, Richard.

Love,
SHP

Mr. SHP, I'm disappointed. You seem to be giving up. When you
started you didn't have to resort to forging text. Just one example: I
did not say "Your main asset are your tweaks" Not a bit of it, This is
what I said black on white:
"But we both know that deep down you realise that your main
asset is your entertainment value. Or maybe you don't. If so take my
word for it."
Very different: yes, no?
Later you extract sentences out of context to make it easier
for you to spout your usual ad-line and reinsert Belt's email address
for ordering. Once again you put it in twice in case anyone missed the
first two repeats.
Forgery is forgery. Even if it is made up to look funny ha ha.
It means you can think of no better answer.
Pity! Watching someone so voluble reduced to babbling is no
longer entertaining. It is like watching a mouse wriggle in a trap
Ludovic Mirabel
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
wrote:
wrote:

wrote:

, aka Ludovic Mirabel, shrieked out like an hysterical
schoolgirl:

What a hysterical reaction. Calm yourself down Ludovic, I'm sure your
body parts are still intact. However, your brain still seems to be
malfunctioning. You might want to get that checked out at the factory.

"I tried your paper/pinhole/aspirin tweak and I feel embarassed and
humiliated!" - Ludovic Mirabel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHP version:
Mr SHP you're not justice (sic,sic,sic L.M.. )
What I said
Mr SHP you're not doing yourself justice
Two acres and a bushel will get you five grains of corn.

And so it goes on: Compare my posting with SHP edition of it:

You insist on being taken seriously. Worse you're belching fire
imitating a fear-inspiring dragon.

No, I'm just having fun being entertained by you. Don't be so afraid of
me and my ideas, Ludovic, I don't bite. My little gnarly friend Shovels
might though, but that's why I keep him on a short leash.

But we both know that deep down you realise that your
main asset is your tweaks.

(Shhhhhhhh! Keep that on the downlow, will you? Otherwise, everyone's
gonna want to be trying them, and I don't have enough to go around...)

I disagree with you, but only because you're wrong. As you always are,
Ludy. I have so many assets, I don't even have a 'main' one. But enough
about me. As we've already established you're a hopeless bore and an
arrogant pathological liar. What do you suppose -your- main asset here
is?

Or maybe you don't. If so take my word for it.

Oh, okay. Why shouldn't I take the "word" of an ignorant yutz who has
no idea what he's talking about, ever, and has never proven a single
arrogant lie of his in the entire time I've been here? I just answered
my own question, didn't I?

I'll try the serioussness fitting now. Watch me:

Uh yea, whatever you say, "Gollum".

Yes: you provide cogent reasons why you keep us all on
tenterhooks about your identity.

I never fail to be fascinated at how so many people have SO little
going in their little lives, that my so-called "identity" is at the
topmost of their thoughts these days. Shovels claims everyone here has
"jobs", but you all seem to be either retired or as in the case of
Robert, never worked in the first place.

As for my identity, its in all of my posts, you silly nitwit. As for my
"usenet identity", well I've dropped many hints about it all over my
messages, since the beginning. No one here is smart enough to have
gotten it yet and quite frankly, that's one of the things that amuses
me so much and keeps me laughing at you bunch of goofs. Some of you in
particular, -really- should have gotten it by now. Besides, I thought
Morein cleared up the "identity" thing for you, when he went on a
lunatic crusade against Richard Graham? If you don't believe I'm
Graham, why aren't you explaining this to Morein and Shovels, et al.?

Perfectly sensible to write thousands of words
in explanation.

Why of course. It is if you like writing and can write. It isn't if
you're a moron and can't even read 5 words without getting confused,
let alone thousands.

Perfectly sensible proposing morphing resonances and
quantum theory as background to 5 pinholes, cat picture and aspirin
tab composition for improving audio.

Why of course, once you fully understand the relation. It's as
perfectly sensible as it was for YOU to fiddle with putting together
said 5 pinholes, cat picture and aspirin tablet in the hopes of
improving your audio. insert evil laugh

Perfectly reasonable to slip in, accidentally of course, the address for purchase of
"chemical X" audio cream. Twice in one paragraph.

Are you talking about PWB products from http://www.belt.demon.co.uk?
Because I don't know anything sold on the website at
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk that fits any description of a product
called "Chemical X Audio Cream". Maybe you're thinking of the products
that Robert Morein shills here? I think that's one of his, along with
his "morphic green sex cream" and DHM spray (how does his jingle go
again? "A little dab'll kill ya"..).

You're quite wrong. You don't upset me.

Sorry. That's true in my case but in yours? I don't believe that for a
minute.

If you were as wise as you're clever you'd appreciate
the compliment.

I already told you I did. What, do you want it engraved on a silk
hankerchief? I find that I have to tell you a lot of things several
times before it sinks in. Given your ripe old retirement age, I'm sure
you're not as quick as you once were. But then, given your latest
brilliant "deduction" about me, that I'm Dr. Richard Graham shilling
products to the innocent lambs of RAO in a new avant-garde type
marketing strategy whereby you attack your potential customers, there's
no evidence that you ever were.

aka Luadovic Mirabel, is disappointed again:

Mr. SHP, I'm disappointed.

Well keep trying. Don't give up. I have confidence in you, that you'll
see the light at the end of the dark tunnel. If you persist with my
tweaks.

You seem to be giving up.

You're misreading my signals, Mr. Ludocris. I'm only getting started.

When you
started you didn't have to resort to forging text. Just one example: I
did not say "But we both know that deep down you realise that your main
asset is your entertainment value. Or maybe you don't. If so take my
word for it." Not a bit of it, This is what I said black on white:
"Your main asset are your tweaks."
Very different: yes, no?

Yes, I can see your point, it is rather different. I guess something
must have gotten mixed up in the cut and paste. So I take it what you
meant to say was, my main asset is my tweaks, while your main asset is
your entertainment value. Fair enough. You do provide a fair bit of
entertainment value, I'll give you that.

Later you extract sentences out of context to make it easier
for you to spout your usual ad-line and reinsert Belt's email address
at http://www.belt.demon.co.uk for ordering. Once again you put
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk in twice in case anyone missed the
first two repeats.

I don't know why Ludovic, but I have a strange sudden desire to buy two
vials of cream electret and some gold message foils. Would you happen
to have Belt's website addy handy?

Frippery is frippery. Even if it is made up to look funny ha ha.
It means you can think of no better answer.

I don't know how to answer that.

Pity! Watching someone so voluble reduced to babbling is no
longer entertaining. It is like watching a mouse wriggle in a trap

Or just like watching Robert Morein, n'est ce pas? Nice doin' business
wit' ya, Ludy! (But seriously, you should maybe cut down on the
shilling a little. This -is- a non-commercial newsgroup after all, and
we don't take too kindly to "shillers").

Lunatic Mirrorbell
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

wrote in message
oups.com...
aka Luadovic Mirabel, is disappointed again:

Mr. SHP, I'm disappointed.

Well keep trying. Don't give up. I have confidence in you, that you'll
see the light at the end of the dark tunnel. If you persist with my
tweaks.

You seem to be giving up.

You're misreading my signals, Mr. Ludocris. I'm only getting started.

Be prepared to make r.a.o. the occupation of a lifetime, Richard. As Brian
L. McCarty learned, there is no release.

Love,
SHP

Keep on trying.
Regards Ludovic M.
----------------------------------------------------
wrote:
aka Luadovic Mirabel, is disappointed again:

Mr. SHP, I'm disappointed.

Well keep trying. Don't give up. I have confidence in you, that you'll
see the light at the end of the dark tunnel. If you persist with my
tweaks.

You seem to be giving up.

You're misreading my signals, Mr. Ludocris. I'm only getting started.

When you
started you didn't have to resort to forging text. Just one example: I
did not say "But we both know that deep down you realise that your main
asset is your entertainment value. Or maybe you don't. If so take my
word for it." Not a bit of it, This is what I said black on white:
"Your main asset are your tweaks."
Very different: yes, no?

Yes, I can see your point, it is rather different. I guess something
must have gotten mixed up in the cut and paste. So I take it what you
meant to say was, my main asset is my tweaks, while your main asset is
your entertainment value. Fair enough. You do provide a fair bit of
entertainment value, I'll give you that.

Later you extract sentences out of context to make it easier
for you to spout your usual ad-line and reinsert Belt's email address
at http://www.belt.demon.co.uk for ordering. Once again you put
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk in twice in case anyone missed the
first two repeats.

I don't know why Ludovic, but I have a strange sudden desire to buy two
vials of cream electret and some gold message foils. Would you happen
to have Belt's website addy handy?

Frippery is frippery. Even if it is made up to look funny ha ha.
It means you can think of no better answer.

I don't know how to answer that.

Pity! Watching someone so voluble reduced to babbling is no
longer entertaining. It is like watching a mouse wriggle in a trap

Or just like watching Robert Morein, n'est ce pas? Nice doin' business
wit' ya, Ludy! (But seriously, you should maybe cut down on the
shilling a little. This -is- a non-commercial newsgroup after all, and
we don't take too kindly to "shillers").

Lunatic Mirrorbell
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

wrote:

Keep on trying.
Regards Ludovic M.

Speaking of trying, why don't you "try" taking your own advice for a
change? I think it would be a refreshing change for you, instead of
pretending that you have nothing to learn, and only to teach.
Particularly since you are so very ignorant about so very many things,
it leaves a lot of opportunity to learn new things. Such as about
audio. You say you tried one of my tweaks and that you LITERALLY nearly
died of embarassment after it didn't work for you. Then you cursed me
out like a drunken whore and went on a mad rampage to discredit and
defame me for what you perceive as having embarassed you to (near)
death.

Well the point is, you're alive, and I'm quite sure its not the only
silly thing you've done in your life. Making RAO into your cheap little
retirement village has to be a close second. You're not very
intelligent or wise to believe that just because this one tweak didn't
work for you that one time, the entire scientific basis for the tweaks
is completely bogus, given that it does work for hundreds of people,
hundreds of times, including some of your fellow colleagues on this
group. Since you are retired, and its PAINFULLY CLEAR you have little
to do with your days, you can't say you don't have the time to try
tweaks. I suggest the L-shape printout for your next "silly
experiment". Print it out as described, use it as described, you may
well find yourself "coming clean" for different reasons than you did
the last time. Just because you're over the hill Mirabel, doesn't mean
that you are dead and can't learn anything new.

"Keep trying!".

Words to live by....

Love,

SHP

p.s. Thank you for retaining my original attack title against your
friend Crazy Bob. It saves me the trouble of revising it.


----------------------------------------------------
wrote:
aka Luadovic Mirabel, is disappointed again:

Mr. SHP, I'm disappointed.

Well keep trying. Don't give up. I have confidence in you, that you'll
see the light at the end of the dark tunnel. If you persist with my
tweaks.

You seem to be giving up.

You're misreading my signals, Mr. Ludocris. I'm only getting started.

When you
started you didn't have to resort to forging text. Just one example: I
did not say "But we both know that deep down you realise that your main
asset is your entertainment value. Or maybe you don't. If so take my
word for it." Not a bit of it, This is what I said black on white:
"Your main asset are your tweaks."
Very different: yes, no?

Yes, I can see your point, it is rather different. I guess something
must have gotten mixed up in the cut and paste. So I take it what you
meant to say was, my main asset is my tweaks, while your main asset is
your entertainment value. Fair enough. You do provide a fair bit of
entertainment value, I'll give you that.

Later you extract sentences out of context to make it easier
for you to spout your usual ad-line and reinsert Belt's email address
at http://www.belt.demon.co.uk for ordering. Once again you put
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk in twice in case anyone missed the
first two repeats.

I don't know why Ludovic, but I have a strange sudden desire to buy two
vials of cream electret and some gold message foils. Would you happen
to have Belt's website addy handy?

Frippery is frippery. Even if it is made up to look funny ha ha.
It means you can think of no better answer.

I don't know how to answer that.

Pity! Watching someone so voluble reduced to babbling is no
longer entertaining. It is like watching a mouse wriggle in a trap

Or just like watching Robert Morein, n'est ce pas? Nice doin' business
wit' ya, Ludy! (But seriously, you should maybe cut down on the
shilling a little. This -is- a non-commercial newsgroup after all, and
we don't take too kindly to "shillers").

Lunatic Mirrorbell
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:

Keep on trying.
Regards Ludovic M.

Speaking of trying, why don't you "try" taking your own advice for a
change? I think it would be a refreshing change for you, instead of
pretending that you have nothing to learn, and only to teach.

But not from a bad man like you, Doctor Richard Graham.

Love,
SHP

wrote in message
oups.com...

[snip]
Finally, sixth of all: You run around like a madman claiming I am
"raping and pillaging RAO" with my intent to shill the group. Next you
write what you just did, implying you want me to stay. So how can you
expect people here to possibly believe you are sincere, when you say
you are trying to protect them from my evil presence, while at the same
time, you are trying to encourage me to stick around?

Well said, Doctor Richard Graham.
Love,
SHP