I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.

What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

ScottW

ScottW wrote:

He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.


Godwin. Discussion over.


// Walt

ScottW wrote:
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.

What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

I kind of like Dobbs.


Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

I've heard other righties say the same thing; Hannity, for example.

From: ScottW - view profile
Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 10:16 pm
Email: "ScottW"

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.

Rush probably said the left is stupid.

I didn't hear his show. I'm just guessing.

He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Scott, you apparently listen to (and believe) most any right-wing
talk-show host.

How about this hypothesis:

The left believes that what seperates the US from the rest of the world
is our civil rights, which the founding fathers thought important
enough to place in a Bill of Rights. The right wants to put things that
*eliminate* rights for people in the bill of rights.

How about the thought that the left isn't a bunch of treasonous people
intent on destroying the US. The right cannot believe that. How about
the original intent of the framers of our Constitution trying to limit
not only the power of political parties but also that of special
interests. Some of us perceive the right as institutionalizing the
influence of special interests. That (to me) is far more treasonous.

When I listen to right-wing radio (and I do, as my military training
tells me to keep an eye on the enemy to the maximum extent possible) I
find myself wondering: has the left ever done *anything* of value, or
for the good of the US? And has the right ever done *anything* wrong?

I was asked by the Dems to run against the local Congressman at the
local caucuses a few weeks ago. Being a business owner and a military
retiree seems to be a valuable commodity politically these days.

I told them no. The republican Congressman here is a moderate, who does
not pander to the extreme religious right and (although he has some
different values than mine) strikes me as honest and forthright. He's
in the middle (but slightly to the right). I'm in the middle (but to
the left). I can deal with that.

The reason I've given you and nob so much **** is that you are both so
far to the right that it strikes me as a farce or a parody (has the
left ever done *anything* of value, or for the good of the US? And has
the right ever done *anything* wrong?).

I think most people are in the middle. If you want to talk about an
excluded middle, you only need to look at the political structure in
the US today.

So here you have a serious reply to a post of yours. The next time you
choose to post some brainless right-wing crap, perhaps you'll better
understand why I'll ridicule you.

PS: the role of our government either federal, state or local, is not
to be our 'moral compass.' We all get to decide that on our own.

I like Brownback or Frist for the republicans. That would show people
who's actually running the republicans these days.

For the Dems, I'm still for Warner.

From: Walt
Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 10:46 pm
Email: Walt

ScottW wrote:
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Godwin. Discussion over.

Can I write "Formosa, discussion over" whenever Arny posts?

Maybe we all should.

ScottW wrote:
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...

I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.


What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Actually, I think he implied that extreme nationalism can lead to the
violation of the rights of minorities.

I believe something like that did occur in Nazi Germany called the
Holocaust.

I could be mistaken, though.

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.

It would be nice to have one who more thoroughly understands the economy.
Of course if he were also to be honest the Democrats would savage him to
hell and back.

They seem no to like the way real capitalism works.

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:ncF_f.6835$EA3.4298@dukeread10...

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.

What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.


I used to listen to Dennis a lot when he was on KABC, but his show didn't do
well enough and then he copped to the fact that he likes tubed gear, how can
you trust a guy like that?

I did love one of his stories about why he doesn't suspect that there is as
much racism and anti-Semitism as some might believe.

Seems he and his family were in the car on the way to Temple when a carload
of young men drove by shouting things like "Dirty Jew" and others. He said
he thought to himself that this was it the first time he'd ever really
confronted anti-Semitism. Until a few minutes later when he saw the same
car load of young men screaming the same things at a car of black people.
Made him think that a lot of what passes for racism, is just people being
assholes.

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From: ScottW - view profile
Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 10:16 pm
Email: "ScottW"

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.

Rush probably said the left is stupid.

I didn't hear his show. I'm just guessing.

He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Scott, you apparently listen to (and believe) most any right-wing
talk-show host.

How about this hypothesis:

The left believes that what seperates the US from the rest of the world
is our civil rights, which the founding fathers thought important
enough to place in a Bill of Rights. The right wants to put things that
*eliminate* rights for people in the bill of rights.


Wow did you read that from some tract they had at the Democratic party HQ?

My perception of the GOP is not that they want to deny any legitiamte civil
rights, but define them as they more approriately should be.

How about the thought that the left isn't a bunch of treasonous people
intent on destroying the US.

I don't know that they are smart enough to conjure up that well formed a
notion, but one does have to ask after all the damage the Dems policies have
wrought, why they don't back off from some of their looney ideas.

The right cannot believe that. How about
the original intent of the framers of our Constitution trying to limit
not only the power of political parties but also that of special
interests. Some of us perceive the right as institutionalizing the
influence of special interests. That (to me) is far more treasonous.

The only reason special interests have power is because government created
it for them by passing laws that treat business as some sort of government
cash cow that they can plunder as they choose.
People who don't like getting ****ed by government cparice started paying
politicians to vothe the way they want.

Naturally government payofffs and the like have been around for a long time,
cazn you say Tammany Hall?

When I listen to right-wing radio (and I do, as my military training
tells me to keep an eye on the enemy to the maximum extent possible) I
find myself wondering: has the left ever done *anything* of value, or
for the good of the US? And has the right ever done *anything* wrong?


The obvious answer is that they have both done some good but only when it
was so overwhelmingly bad for them not to, and even that sort of threat
doesn't guarantee they will always.

I was asked by the Dems to run against the local Congressman at the
local caucuses a few weeks ago. Being a business owner and a military
retiree seems to be a valuable commodity politically these days.

I told them no. The republican Congressman here is a moderate, who does
not pander to the extreme religious right and (although he has some
different values than mine) strikes me as honest and forthright. He's
in the middle (but slightly to the right). I'm in the middle (but to
the left). I can deal with that.

The reason I've given you and nob so much **** is that you are both so
far to the right that it strikes me as a farce or a parody (has the
left ever done *anything* of value, or for the good of the US? And has
the right ever done *anything* wrong?).


That's the thing you think you know where I am and you couldn't be more
wrong more often.


I think most people are in the middle. If you want to talk about an
excluded middle, you only need to look at the political structure in
the US today.

I think most people want people to work for what they get and no favors from
governemt.

So here you have a serious reply to a post of yours. The next time you
choose to post some brainless right-wing crap, perhaps you'll better
understand why I'll ridicule you.


Because you are a left wing Kool Aid drinking Leftist, we knew that.

PS: the role of our government either federal, state or local, is not
to be our 'moral compass.' We all get to decide that on our own.

Yet neither side isever completely comfortable letting us do so.

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...

ScottW wrote:
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.

What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

I kind of like Dobbs.


Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

I've heard other righties say the same thing; Hannity, for example.


Segments of the very far left do. They openly talk about it.
Ward Churchill, for example



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Clyde Slick said:

Segments of the very far left do. They openly talk about it.
Ward Churchill, for example

The anarchists are not "the far left" as far as I know.




--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

In article ,
"Clyde Slick" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...

ScottW wrote:
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.

What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

I kind of like Dobbs.


Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

I've heard other righties say the same thing; Hannity, for example.


Segments of the very far left do. They openly talk about it.
Ward Churchill, for example

Churchill's just a kook, not a typical lefty. On the other hand,
several righty talking heads say that the left wants America
destroyed... Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, et al.

Jenn said:

Segments of the very far left do. They openly talk about it.
Ward Churchill, for example

Churchill's just a kook, not a typical lefty. On the other hand,
several righty talking heads say that the left wants America
destroyed... Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, et al.

I'd like to see certain segments of America destroyed, or at least heavily
reorganized. Does that count?





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

Schizoid Man wrote:
ScottW wrote:
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...

I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.


What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Actually, I think he implied that extreme nationalism can lead to the
violation of the rights of minorities.

I believe something like that did occur in Nazi Germany called the
Holocaust.

I could be mistaken, though.


I don't think I'd call that Nationalism, it's something else since it
made criminals out of persons who were born in Germany and whose only
crime was their religion.

I don't have much concept of nationalism, for me it's more about the
place being in line with what is rational, and IMO the USA comes closer
to full rationalism than any other country.

That doesn't mean there is no room for improvement, because there
obviously is.

Any place that allows for the concept of a right to the fruits of
someone else's labor has room for improvment.

In article .com,
" wrote:

Schizoid Man wrote:
ScottW wrote:
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...

I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.


What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Actually, I think he implied that extreme nationalism can lead to the
violation of the rights of minorities.

I believe something like that did occur in Nazi Germany called the
Holocaust.

I could be mistaken, though.


I don't think I'd call that Nationalism, it's something else since it
made criminals out of persons who were born in Germany and whose only
crime was their religion.

You are so very, very wrong here, Mike. You truly need to review your
history.

wrote:
Schizoid Man wrote:

ScottW wrote:

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...


I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.


What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Actually, I think he implied that extreme nationalism can lead to the
violation of the rights of minorities.

I believe something like that did occur in Nazi Germany called the
Holocaust.

I could be mistaken, though.



I don't think I'd call that Nationalism, it's something else since it
made criminals out of persons who were born in Germany and whose only
crime was their religion.

Errr... Mikey, you might be overdue for a history lesson. Perhaps one in
semantics also might be a good idea.

What do you think the blond, blue-eyed Aryans thought they were doing?
They thought they were being nationalistic by kicking the crap out of
the non-blondes.

I suggest an excellent two-part biography on Hitler - Hubris and Nemesis
- by Ian Kershaw.

From:
Date: Tues, Apr 11 2006 3:13 am
Email: "

They seem no to like the way real capitalism works.

So what do you do for a living?

From: Jenn
Date: Tues, Apr 11 2006 6:30 pm
Email: Jenn

I don't think I'd call that Nationalism, it's something else since it
made criminals out of persons who were born in Germany and whose only
crime was their religion.

You are so very, very wrong here, Mike. You truly need to review your
history.

I'd advise him to study German history from 1918~1936.

But I predict it won't sink in, as it doesn't fit into his neatly
preconceived ideas.

To paraphrase, "Kristallnacht, indeed, Wolf!"

From:
Date: Tues, Apr 11 2006 3:34 am
Email: "

How about this hypothesis:

The left believes that what seperates the US from the rest of the world
is our civil rights, which the founding fathers thought important
enough to place in a Bill of Rights. The right wants to put things that
*eliminate* rights for people in the bill of rights.

Wow did you read that from some tract they had at the Democratic party HQ?

Of course, nob. Nobody (with the confirmed exception of you, of course)
can think anything through on their own, or make their own decisions.

My perception of the GOP is not that they want to deny any legitiamte civil
rights, but define them as they more approriately should be.

Like a Constitutional amendment against gay marriage for example. Like
reversing Roe v. Wade, for example.

Now that you've pointed it out, I can see it all so much more clearly
now. Thank you.

How about the thought that the left isn't a bunch of treasonous people
intent on destroying the US.

I don't know that they are smart enough to conjure up that well formed a
notion, but one does have to ask after all the damage the Dems policies have
wrought, why they don't back off from some of their looney ideas.

I agree. Why confront global warming, for example? That's obviously a
leftist plot to drive down corporate profits.

The left is indeed too stupid to 'conjure up a well-formed notion' like
treason. Perhaps that's why it's up to those brilliant republicans to
be treasonous all on their own, and who seem intent on bringing about
the Second Coming that much earlier.

The right cannot believe that. How about
the original intent of the framers of our Constitution trying to limit
not only the power of political parties but also that of special
interests. Some of us perceive the right as institutionalizing the
influence of special interests. That (to me) is far more treasonous.

The only reason special interests have power is because government created
it for them by passing laws that treat business as some sort of government
cash cow that they can plunder as they choose.
People who don't like getting ****ed by government cparice started paying
politicians to vothe the way they want.

Ah, yes. If there were no taxes, there would be no reason for graft or
bribery.

Brilliant deduction. What university can proudly call you an alum, nob?
And where can I get the matchbook with the application on it?

I take it that you wholly support the Energy Bill, for example. I'm
just not bright enough to see how that was good for the country, I'm
afraid.

Say, have you noticed all the things suddenly going on around ethanol?
Wasn't it you that told me I was stupid for thinking that might be a
short-term solution? LOL! Dr. Nob swings and misses again!

Naturally government payofffs and the like have been around for a long time,
cazn you say Tammany Hall?

No, but I can say 'DeLay and Abramoff.' Does that count?

When I listen to right-wing radio (and I do, as my military training
tells me to keep an eye on the enemy to the maximum extent possible) I
find myself wondering: has the left ever done *anything* of value, or
for the good of the US? And has the right ever done *anything* wrong?

The obvious answer is that they have both done some good but only when it
was so overwhelmingly bad for them not to, and even that sort of threat
doesn't guarantee they will always.

Why don't you run for president, nob? It appears that you are the only
one smart enough to solve everything.

I was asked by the Dems to run against the local Congressman at the
local caucuses a few weeks ago. Being a business owner and a military
retiree seems to be a valuable commodity politically these days.

I told them no. The republican Congressman here is a moderate, who does
not pander to the extreme religious right and (although he has some
different values than mine) strikes me as honest and forthright. He's
in the middle (but slightly to the right). I'm in the middle (but to
the left). I can deal with that.

The reason I've given you and nob so much **** is that you are both so
far to the right that it strikes me as a farce or a parody (has the
left ever done *anything* of value, or for the good of the US? And has
the right ever done *anything* wrong?).

That's the thing you think you know where I am and you couldn't be more
wrong more often.

Sorry, nob. There are these things, like posts that you've written,
that prove that you're lying. For example, you call me a 'Kool aid
drinking leftist.' Yet you have no similar label for someone on the
right, like 'Neocon fascist Christian raper of the nation.'

So it is 100% valid to look at your posts and to draw conclusions from
them. You are a republican apologist, at the very least.

I think most people are in the middle. If you want to talk about an
excluded middle, you only need to look at the political structure in
the US today.

I think most people want people to work for what they get and no favors from
governemt.

Buy an island and form your own personal Nirvana then. To have anarchy,
no social programs, and therefore no taxes, in a nation of 300 million
is naive at best. Sorry, nob: maybe you will have to move to find that
which you seek.

So here you have a serious reply to a post of yours. The next time you
choose to post some brainless right-wing crap, perhaps you'll better
understand why I'll ridicule you.

Because you are a left wing Kool Aid drinking Leftist, we knew that.

No, nob. Because you and toopid accept whatever you agree with and
discard the rest. You believe in propaganda. That strikes me as
unintelligent.

PS: the role of our government either federal, state or local, is not
to be our 'moral compass.' We all get to decide that on our own.

Yet neither side isever completely comfortable letting us do so.

So tell me, nob: how does the left try to control your moral behavior?

That is the territory of the right.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:

So tell me, nob: how does the left try to control your moral behavior?

That is the territory of the right.

Jesus Saves.

Amen.

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From: ScottW - view profile
Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 10:16 pm
Email: "ScottW"

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.

Rush probably said the left is stupid.

I didn't hear his show. I'm just guessing.

You do that a lot. Then quickly confusing those
guesses with the facts.


He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Scott, you apparently listen to (and believe) most any right-wing
talk-show host.

You obviously leap to conclusions unsupported by the evidence.
I said I thought that was a bizaare point of view but somehow
your myopic blindness makes that invisible to you.


How about this hypothesis:

The left believes that what seperates the US from the rest of the world
is our civil rights, which the founding fathers thought important
enough to place in a Bill of Rights. The right wants to put things that
*eliminate* rights for people in the bill of rights.

How about the thought that the left isn't a bunch of treasonous people
intent on destroying the US. The right cannot believe that. How about
the original intent of the framers of our Constitution trying to limit
not only the power of political parties but also that of special
interests. Some of us perceive the right as institutionalizing the
influence of special interests. That (to me) is far more treasonous.

When I listen to right-wing radio (and I do, as my military training
tells me to keep an eye on the enemy to the maximum extent possible) I
find myself wondering: has the left ever done *anything* of value, or
for the good of the US? And has the right ever done *anything* wrong?

I was asked by the Dems to run against the local Congressman at the
local caucuses a few weeks ago. Being a business owner and a military
retiree seems to be a valuable commodity politically these days.

I told them no. The republican Congressman here is a moderate, who does
not pander to the extreme religious right and (although he has some
different values than mine) strikes me as honest and forthright. He's
in the middle (but slightly to the right). I'm in the middle (but to
the left). I can deal with that.

The reason I've given you and nob so much **** is that you are both so
far to the right that it strikes me as a farce or a parody (has the
left ever done *anything* of value, or for the good of the US? And has
the right ever done *anything* wrong?).

You've got your lefty panties on so tight you immediately attack
while usually being completely confused about my position.
Keeping your twisted perceptions and paranoid delusions
about my position straight simply isn't worth the effort.


I think most people are in the middle. If you want to talk about an
excluded middle, you only need to look at the political structure in
the US today.

Funny, why do I feel totally unrepresented?


So here you have a serious reply to a post of yours.

The only thing serious revealed by your post was how ****ed up
your comprehension is.

The next time you
choose to post some brainless right-wing crap, perhaps you'll better
understand why I'll ridicule you.

Ridicule away...with every unwarranted attack you reveal your true
psychotic nature and lack of acceptance of the truth.

ScottW

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
ScottW wrote:
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...

I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.


What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Actually, I think he implied that extreme nationalism can lead to the
violation of the rights of minorities.

and the left believes that can happen in America.


I believe something like that did occur in Nazi Germany called the
Holocaust.

Yup, so do you think that history could be repeated in the US?

ScottW

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
wrote:
Schizoid Man wrote:

ScottW wrote:

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...


I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.


What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Actually, I think he implied that extreme nationalism can lead to the
violation of the rights of minorities.

I believe something like that did occur in Nazi Germany called the
Holocaust.

I could be mistaken, though.



I don't think I'd call that Nationalism, it's something else since it
made criminals out of persons who were born in Germany and whose only
crime was their religion.

Errr... Mikey, you might be overdue for a history lesson. Perhaps one in
semantics also might be a good idea.

What do you think the blond, blue-eyed Aryans thought they were doing?
They thought they were being nationalistic by kicking the crap out of the
non-blondes.

Hitler wasn't blonde.....

Purification of the nation.... was it nationalism or racism?
I think both, racism which used nationalism as
a means.

ScottW

" wrote in message
...

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.

It would be nice to have one who more thoroughly understands the economy.

I am not a big fan of our current "free market" trade practices.

ScottW

From: ScottW
Date: Tues, Apr 11 2006 10:16 pm
Email: "ScottW"

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.

Rush probably said the left is stupid.

I didn't hear his show. I'm just guessing.

You do that a lot. Then quickly confusing those
guesses with the facts.

Why do you say that?

You pick an obscure right wing shill (like all the other obscure
right-wing shills that you choose to quote here on a nearly daily
basis, e.g. Hugh Hewitt, the news awards site, etc. ad nauseum) and
then further disseminate their views, no matter how 'bizarre' you may
find them.

Your protest rings as hollow as nob saying that he isn't a
right-winger.

By the way, did Rush actually do a show where he didn't call the left
stupid? I find that hard to believe. It's a fact that he does so on
virtually every show. Those right-wing radio hosts are a very strange
bunch. So why do you listen to them so much, Mr. Moderate?

He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Scott, you apparently listen to (and believe) most any right-wing
talk-show host.

You obviously leap to conclusions unsupported by the evidence.
I said I thought that was a bizaare point of view but somehow
your myopic blindness makes that invisible to you.

See above. All you do is post right wing crap from suspect sources.
That is apparently all that you read. Your conclusions use the same
faulty logic as theirs.

The reason I've given you and nob so much **** is that you are both so
far to the right that it strikes me as a farce or a parody (has the
left ever done *anything* of value, or for the good of the US? And has
the right ever done *anything* wrong?).

You've got your lefty panties on so tight you immediately attack
while usually being completely confused about my position.
Keeping your twisted perceptions and paranoid delusions
about my position straight simply isn't worth the effort.

So you're a liberal after all. You're right: my myopic blindness hid
that from me.

Based on what you've posted here, you're a typical brainless neocon
with a couple of small anomalies.

I think most people are in the middle. If you want to talk about an
excluded middle, you only need to look at the political structure in
the US today.

Funny, why do I feel totally unrepresented?

Because your chosen party has been usurped by radical Christians? And
you finally realize that by voting for them you have supported their
agenda? And you thought that somehow they'd suddenly become reasonable
and change?

That's my guess. Why don't you tell me?

So here you have a serious reply to a post of yours.

The only thing serious revealed by your post was how ****ed up
your comprehension is.

Really. LOL! I'd say I'm a bit more perceptive than you think, Mr.
Moderate.;-)

The next time you
choose to post some brainless right-wing crap, perhaps you'll better
understand why I'll ridicule you.

Ridicule away...with every unwarranted attack you reveal your true
psychotic nature and lack of acceptance of the truth.

The truth is that you have a vast posting history showing you to be on
the far right in nearly every category. 'leftist panties in a bunch' is
about as good as nob's 'kool aid' comments and equally useful.

And you post eversomany unbiased views of the left. LOL! My god, but
you're toopid.

So what uber-right view from some minor republican shill will you post
next? I can hardly wait.

From: ScottW
Date: Tues, Apr 11 2006 10:18 pm
Email: "ScottW"

Actually, I think he implied that extreme nationalism can lead to the
violation of the rights of minorities.

and the left believes that can happen in America.

Correction: the left *knows* that it is happening in America right now.

I believe something like that did occur in Nazi Germany called the
Holocaust.

Yup, so do you think that history could be repeated in the US?

If you know anything about history, you know that it repeats itself
regardless of geographic boundaries.

From: ScottW - view profile
Date: Tues, Apr 11 2006 10:28 pm
Email: "ScottW"

I don't think I'd call that Nationalism, it's something else since it
made criminals out of persons who were born in Germany and whose only
crime was their religion.

Errr... Mikey, you might be overdue for a history lesson. Perhaps one in
semantics also might be a good idea.

What do you think the blond, blue-eyed Aryans thought they were doing?
They thought they were being nationalistic by kicking the crap out of the
non-blondes.

Hitler wasn't blonde.....

Good one.

Purification of the nation.... was it nationalism or racism?
I think both, racism which used nationalism as
a means.

It was started as a purely nationalistic idea in the 1920s: the Jewish
businessmen and bankers were strangling the German economy, and so on.
The Jews were to blame for Germany's economic woes after WWI.

Hitler and crew carried it to the extreme, of course, but to deny its
roots in jingoism is to deny history.

ScottW wrote:
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message

I believe something like that did occur in Nazi Germany called the
Holocaust.

Yup, so do you think that history could be repeated in the US?

I don't know, Scott. If I do some day acquire the ability to see the
future, I'll definitely give you a couple of stock tips.

ScottW wrote:
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...

wrote:

Schizoid Man wrote:


ScottW wrote:


"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...



I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.


What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

Actually, I think he implied that extreme nationalism can lead to the
violation of the rights of minorities.

I believe something like that did occur in Nazi Germany called the
Holocaust.

I could be mistaken, though.



I don't think I'd call that Nationalism, it's something else since it
made criminals out of persons who were born in Germany and whose only
crime was their religion.

Errr... Mikey, you might be overdue for a history lesson. Perhaps one in
semantics also might be a good idea.

What do you think the blond, blue-eyed Aryans thought they were doing?
They thought they were being nationalistic by kicking the crap out of the
non-blondes.


Hitler wasn't blonde.....

An educated man. Not blonde indeed. In fact, he had quite a thick streak
of Jewish blood. But I suppose that's inconsequential once you've
blurred the lines between nationalism and racism, hysteria and madness.

The same Nietzsche-esque propaganda that gave Hitler astronomical
support has been repeatedly applied and re-applied by the right to blur
the lines between free speech and treason. Odd.

Purification of the nation.... was it nationalism or racism?
I think both, racism which used nationalism as
a means.

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Clyde Slick said:

Segments of the very far left do. They openly talk about it.
Ward Churchill, for example

The anarchists are not "the far left" as far as I know.


they're not exactly moderates.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Clyde Slick" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...

ScottW wrote:
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.

What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

I kind of like Dobbs.


Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

I've heard other righties say the same thing; Hannity, for example.


Segments of the very far left do. They openly talk about it.
Ward Churchill, for example

Churchill's just a kook, not a typical lefty. On the other hand,
several righty talking heads say that the left wants America
destroyed... Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, et al.

They certainly say that the far left is destroying America,
whether intentionally, or not.

Churchill is a typical far leftist.

There are leftists and far leftists, and rightists and far rightists.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Jenn said:

Segments of the very far left do. They openly talk about it.
Ward Churchill, for example

Churchill's just a kook, not a typical lefty. On the other hand,
several righty talking heads say that the left wants America
destroyed... Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, et al.

I'd like to see certain segments of America destroyed, or at least heavily
reorganized. Does that count?


I'll trade you a Utah for a San Francisco.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:18:51 -0700, "ScottW"
wrote:

Actually, I think he implied that extreme nationalism can lead to the
violation of the rights of minorities.

and the left believes that can happen in America.

It already HAS happened in the US.

Clyde Slick said:

The anarchists are not "the far left" as far as I know.

they're not exactly moderates.

Isn't the traditional definition of "political left" a belief that
government should be the vehicle for social change and enlightenment? It's
difficult to put that together with a bunch who want all government to be
eliminated.





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

Clyde Slick said:

Churchill is a typical far leftist.

Wow. Are you channeling duh-Mikey?





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

Clyde Slick said:

I'd like to see certain segments of America destroyed, or at least heavily
reorganized. Does that count?

I'll trade you a Utah for a San Francisco.

Actually, I was talking about the corruption in legislatures, the
misguided phoney morality that gives us the "war on drugs", and the
military-industrial complex. But your flagrant homophobic comment doesn't
surprise me.





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

In article ,
"Clyde Slick" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Clyde Slick" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...

ScottW wrote:
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
I believe John Cornyn had once referred to him as a "new god".

Lou Dobbs.

What's wrong with Dobbs and his put America first approach?
He makes as much sense as anyone right now.

I kind of like Dobbs.


Dennis Praegher today said the left hates the right because of
nationalist sentiment... which they associate with Hitler.
I thought that was pretty bizaare.
He implied the left wants to see America destroyed
like the free world destroyed Nazi Germany.

I've heard other righties say the same thing; Hannity, for example.


Segments of the very far left do. They openly talk about it.
Ward Churchill, for example

Churchill's just a kook, not a typical lefty. On the other hand,
several righty talking heads say that the left wants America
destroyed... Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, et al.

They certainly say that the far left is destroying America,
whether intentionally, or not.

Actually, I've heard each of them say that the left wants to
intentionally destroy the country.


Churchill is a typical far leftist.


There are leftists and far leftists, and rightists and far rightists.

OK, I might buy that. Kind of like Coulter is a typical right-winger
and Tim McVeigh was an extreme right-winger?




--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Jenn said:

Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, et al.

They certainly say that the far left is destroying America,
whether intentionally, or not.

Actually, I've heard each of them say that the left wants to
intentionally destroy the country.

For some right-wingers, enforcing separation of church and state amounts
to "destroying the country". I've even heard some neocons say that
criticizing Dubya is worse than criticizing Clinton. Treasonously worse.





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.