---Original Message---
From: "Perry L. Adler" homerramone2000@y...
Date: Mon Feb 2, 2004 8:33 am
Subject: Superbowl Ads
http://www.suprmchaos.com/home.index.html

Superbowl Ads
CBS lied like a Bush about issues ads.

CNN tried to make up for traitor Novak's psychotic attack on a bystander in NH
by allowing the Moveon.org ad to run. This was the same ad that CBS deemed to
controversial to screen during the Super Bowl. To see the ad in question, go to:
www.moveon.org/front/.

I changed channels to watch, it was on at about 20.17 EST in case you missed it.

So... what of CBS?

We don't do issues ads they said.
We don't do ads that might be found offensive they said.

No issues?
Not offensive?

Liars.

Most ads were for beer, violent horror movies or penis erection drugs - not one
but two of them (Levitra and Cialis)!

Nothing offensive - fun for all the family...

CBS, I call rubbish on that claim. You showed us...

A man being bitten in the genitals by a dog
A man soliciting for sex and having his pubic hair ripped out
Setting fire to horse flatulence
A pet pony being shot to death
Children forced to eat soap for saying the word "****"
An elderly man assaulting an elderly woman and knocking her down with a stick
A man injuring his neck attempting a motorcycle stunt
A man having a face painted on his naked chest and belly
A monkey overtly asking a woman for a bestial sexual relationship (A campaign
ad for Rick Santorum perhaps?)
A woman brushing the hair on her husbands' back
Oh, and if you want soft core porn, CBS will have it on the Grammys next week
judging by their ads.

As for a 'fun for all the family' half time show... I call rubbish on that as
well, CBS.

A partial strip tease during the song by P. Diddy and Nelly.
Kid Rock wearing our nation's flag with a huge hole cut in it while singing
about crack heads and Methadone clinics.
Janet Jackson in her S & M outfit singing while backed by her cross-dressing
male dancers. No issues for Janet, 'No to bigotry and illiteracy.' Those aren't
issues. Right.
Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson having simulated sex on stage and ending
the show with Justin ripping off half of Janet's dress to reveal her right
breast.

Family fun at CBS? Hypocritical liars.

I must give a special thanks to you, CBS, for forcing me to explain to my kids;
"Erections lasting more than four hours are rare but require immediate medical
attention." That was a more uncomfortable experience than having to explain that
Bush has spent a huge portion of their future income on a war based on his lies.

Or maybe it wasn't.

They took it pretty well; ten year olds don't seem to fully grasp the concept of
having their future earnings stolen before they even reach middle school.

Which is the odd one out?

A. An ad telling us we should choose to vote
B. An ad asking if our kids should smoke
C. An ad asking if our kids should pay off the national debt
D. An ad recommending open source code
E. An ad for soft ware so kids can 'live up to their full potential'
You know already the answer but more important:

Why is it the odd one out? Could it be that our speech is no longer free in
America due to the biased acts of such censors as CBS?



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.571 / Virus Database: 361 - Release Date: 1/26/2004

In news attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:

: On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:11:08 -0500, "clamnebula"
: wrote:
:
:: A man being bitten in the genitals by a dog
:
: Yup, and very funny. Do you understand humor?
:
:: A man soliciting for sex and having his pubic hair ripped out
:
: Huh? Who did that one?
:
:: Setting fire to horse flatulence
:
: Which was really funny, and one of the best.
:
:: A pet pony being shot to death
:
: No such ad. I saw ALL of them. You can see them online one AOL,
: ifilm, and probably other sites. There was NO SUCH AD. (I would have
: found this offensive myself.) Look on www.ifilm.com and tell me which
: one it is.
:
:: Children forced to eat soap for saying the word "****"
:
: Is your humor device broken?
:
:: An elderly man assaulting an elderly woman and knocking her down
:: with a stick
:
: All in fun. Learn to laugh
:
:: A man injuring his neck attempting a motorcycle stunt
:
: What do you expect from AOL? Stupid commercial I thought.
:
:: A man having a face painted on his naked chest and belly
:
: This one was pretty dull, I have to admit that.
:
:: A monkey overtly asking a woman for a bestial sexual relationship
:: (A campaign ad for Rick Santorum perhaps?)
:
: Also funny
:
:: A woman brushing the hair on her husbands' back
:
: Another boring one.
:
:: Oh, and if you want soft core porn, CBS will have it on the Grammys
:: next week judging by their ads.
:
: And you profess to being a "christian" I suppose.
:
: Oh, and by the way. Anyone offended by Janet Jacksons breast is much
: sicker than those of us who laughed our butts off, then went back to
: watching the game. Unless you are 12 years old, you should have seen
: hundreds of breasts by now, and they all look pretty much the same. No
: big deal, it's just the media that turned it into a big deal, and
: these so called "christians" who cant stand the sight of the human
: body (probably because they are butt ugly themselves).

you missed the point:

CBS refused to air an anti-Bush commercial, stating that they didn't
carry "issues" ads, or ads that were controversial...

i don't think the poster really felt that any of the above were terribly
offensive - just contrary to what CBS said. they are hypocrites for
running any and all of the above, yet refusing to run the anti-Bush ad,
because it's too "risque."

..impervious wrote:

CBS refused to air an anti-Bush commercial, stating that they didn't
carry "issues" ads, or ads that were controversial...

i don't think the poster really felt that any of the above were terribly
offensive - just contrary to what CBS said. they are hypocrites for
running any and all of the above, yet refusing to run the anti-Bush ad,
because it's too "risque."

The jews at CBS-Viacom-MTV led by their rabbi Sumner Redstone refused to
run the advertisment which was in no way offensive.

The jews really are filth...

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:17:17 GMT, ".impervious"
wrote:

In news attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:

: On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:11:08 -0500, "clamnebula"
: wrote:
:
:: A man being bitten in the genitals by a dog
:
: Yup, and very funny. Do you understand humor?
:
:: A man soliciting for sex and having his pubic hair ripped out
:
: Huh? Who did that one?
:
:: Setting fire to horse flatulence
:
: Which was really funny, and one of the best.
:
:: A pet pony being shot to death
:
: No such ad. I saw ALL of them. You can see them online one AOL,
: ifilm, and probably other sites. There was NO SUCH AD. (I would have
: found this offensive myself.) Look on www.ifilm.com and tell me which
: one it is.
:
:: Children forced to eat soap for saying the word "****"
:
: Is your humor device broken?
:
:: An elderly man assaulting an elderly woman and knocking her down
:: with a stick
:
: All in fun. Learn to laugh
:
:: A man injuring his neck attempting a motorcycle stunt
:
: What do you expect from AOL? Stupid commercial I thought.
:
:: A man having a face painted on his naked chest and belly
:
: This one was pretty dull, I have to admit that.
:
:: A monkey overtly asking a woman for a bestial sexual relationship
:: (A campaign ad for Rick Santorum perhaps?)
:
: Also funny
:
:: A woman brushing the hair on her husbands' back
:
: Another boring one.
:
:: Oh, and if you want soft core porn, CBS will have it on the Grammys
:: next week judging by their ads.
:
: And you profess to being a "christian" I suppose.
:
: Oh, and by the way. Anyone offended by Janet Jacksons breast is much
: sicker than those of us who laughed our butts off, then went back to
: watching the game. Unless you are 12 years old, you should have seen
: hundreds of breasts by now, and they all look pretty much the same. No
: big deal, it's just the media that turned it into a big deal, and
: these so called "christians" who cant stand the sight of the human
: body (probably because they are butt ugly themselves).

you missed the point:

CBS refused to air an anti-Bush commercial, stating that they didn't
carry "issues" ads, or ads that were controversial...

i don't think the poster really felt that any of the above were terribly
offensive - just contrary to what CBS said. they are hypocrites for
running any and all of the above, yet refusing to run the anti-Bush ad,
because it's too "risque."


So, how many political ads did you see during the game?



Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke

".impervious" wrote in message
...
In news attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:

: On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:11:08 -0500, "clamnebula"
: wrote:
:
:: A man being bitten in the genitals by a dog
:
: Yup, and very funny. Do you understand humor?
:
:: A man soliciting for sex and having his pubic hair ripped out
:
: Huh? Who did that one?
:
:: Setting fire to horse flatulence
:
: Which was really funny, and one of the best.
:
:: A pet pony being shot to death
:
: No such ad. I saw ALL of them. You can see them online one AOL,
: ifilm, and probably other sites. There was NO SUCH AD. (I would have
: found this offensive myself.) Look on www.ifilm.com and tell me which
: one it is.
:
:: Children forced to eat soap for saying the word "****"
:
: Is your humor device broken?
:
:: An elderly man assaulting an elderly woman and knocking her down
:: with a stick
:
: All in fun. Learn to laugh
:
:: A man injuring his neck attempting a motorcycle stunt
:
: What do you expect from AOL? Stupid commercial I thought.
:
:: A man having a face painted on his naked chest and belly
:
: This one was pretty dull, I have to admit that.
:
:: A monkey overtly asking a woman for a bestial sexual relationship
:: (A campaign ad for Rick Santorum perhaps?)
:
: Also funny
:
:: A woman brushing the hair on her husbands' back
:
: Another boring one.
:
:: Oh, and if you want soft core porn, CBS will have it on the Grammys
:: next week judging by their ads.
:
: And you profess to being a "christian" I suppose.
:
: Oh, and by the way. Anyone offended by Janet Jacksons breast is much
: sicker than those of us who laughed our butts off, then went back to
: watching the game. Unless you are 12 years old, you should have seen
: hundreds of breasts by now, and they all look pretty much the same. No
: big deal, it's just the media that turned it into a big deal, and
: these so called "christians" who cant stand the sight of the human
: body (probably because they are butt ugly themselves).

you missed the point:

CBS refused to air an anti-Bush commercial, stating that they didn't
carry "issues" ads, or ads that were controversial...

i don't think the poster really felt that any of the above were terribly
offensive - just contrary to what CBS said. they are hypocrites for
running any and all of the above, yet refusing to run the anti-Bush ad,
because it's too "risque."


No, YOU miss the point. CBS was straightforward, they don't air politically
based ads. Can you point to one that has been aired in recent Super Bowl
history, by FOX, ABC, NBC?

No, you can't.

"clamnebula" wrote in message
.. .
---Original Message---
From: "Perry L. Adler" homerramone2000@y...
Date: Mon Feb 2, 2004 8:33 am
Subject: Superbowl Ads
http://www.suprmchaos.com/home.index.html

Superbowl Ads
CBS lied like a Bush about issues ads.

CNN tried to make up for traitor Novak's psychotic attack on a bystander
in NH
by allowing the Moveon.org ad to run. This was the same ad that CBS deemed
to
controversial to screen during the Super Bowl. To see the ad in question,
go to:
www.moveon.org/front/.

I changed channels to watch, it was on at about 20.17 EST in case you
missed it.

So... what of CBS?

We don't do issues ads they said.
We don't do ads that might be found offensive they said.

No issues?
Not offensive?

Liars.

Most ads were for beer, violent horror movies or penis erection drugs -
not one
but two of them (Levitra and Cialis)!

Nothing offensive - fun for all the family...

CBS, I call rubbish on that claim. You showed us...

A man being bitten in the genitals by a dog
A man soliciting for sex and having his pubic hair ripped out
Setting fire to horse flatulence
A pet pony being shot to death
Children forced to eat soap for saying the word "****"
An elderly man assaulting an elderly woman and knocking her down with a
stick
A man injuring his neck attempting a motorcycle stunt
A man having a face painted on his naked chest and belly
A monkey overtly asking a woman for a bestial sexual relationship (A
campaign
ad for Rick Santorum perhaps?)
A woman brushing the hair on her husbands' back
Oh, and if you want soft core porn, CBS will have it on the Grammys next
week
judging by their ads.

As for a 'fun for all the family' half time show... I call rubbish on that
as
well, CBS.

A partial strip tease during the song by P. Diddy and Nelly.
Kid Rock wearing our nation's flag with a huge hole cut in it while
singing
about crack heads and Methadone clinics.
Janet Jackson in her S & M outfit singing while backed by her
cross-dressing
male dancers. No issues for Janet, 'No to bigotry and illiteracy.' Those
aren't
issues. Right.
Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson having simulated sex on stage and
ending
the show with Justin ripping off half of Janet's dress to reveal her right
breast.

Family fun at CBS? Hypocritical liars.

I must give a special thanks to you, CBS, for forcing me to explain to my
kids;
"Erections lasting more than four hours are rare but require immediate
medical
attention." That was a more uncomfortable experience than having to
explain that
Bush has spent a huge portion of their future income on a war based on his
lies.

Or maybe it wasn't.

They took it pretty well; ten year olds don't seem to fully grasp the
concept of
having their future earnings stolen before they even reach middle school.

Which is the odd one out?

A. An ad telling us we should choose to vote
B. An ad asking if our kids should smoke
C. An ad asking if our kids should pay off the national debt
D. An ad recommending open source code
E. An ad for soft ware so kids can 'live up to their full potential'
You know already the answer but more important:

Why is it the odd one out? Could it be that our speech is no longer free
in
America due to the biased acts of such censors as CBS?


Most Americans would rather watch a horse fart lit up
than watch the moveone.org ad. Not that there is much difference.
Its all about entertainment value. If you all could stop being so
overtly mean, maybe you all will come off alittle funnier.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Polybius" wrote in message
...
.impervious wrote:

CBS refused to air an anti-Bush commercial, stating that they didn't
carry "issues" ads, or ads that were controversial...

i don't think the poster really felt that any of the above were terribly
offensive - just contrary to what CBS said. they are hypocrites for
running any and all of the above, yet refusing to run the anti-Bush ad,
because it's too "risque."

The jews at CBS-Viacom-MTV led by their rabbi Sumner Redstone refused to
run the advertisment which was in no way offensive.

The jews really are filth...


Please, capitalize the 'J" in "Jews", to show proper respect.
Then you can say any nasty crap you want.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"The Frog." wrote in message
s.com...

So, how many political ads did you see during the game?

I saw two when I switched over to CNN.

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:12:44 -0500, "Sockpuppet Yustabe"
wrote:


"Polybius" wrote in message
...
.impervious wrote:

CBS refused to air an anti-Bush commercial, stating that they didn't
carry "issues" ads, or ads that were controversial...

i don't think the poster really felt that any of the above were terribly
offensive - just contrary to what CBS said. they are hypocrites for
running any and all of the above, yet refusing to run the anti-Bush ad,
because it's too "risque."

The jews at CBS-Viacom-MTV led by their rabbi Sumner Redstone refused to
run the advertisment which was in no way offensive.

The jews really are filth...


Please, capitalize the 'J" in "Jews", to show proper respect.
Then you can say any nasty crap you want.

Here, here....

Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke

"Submariner" wrote in message
...

"The Frog." wrote in message
s.com...

So, how many political ads did you see during the game?

I saw two when I switched over to CNN.

Why? To get your left wing slant fix for the day?

You completely missed the point. CBS refused to run a MoveOn ad because it was
too controversial,
yet as clamnebula pointed out, they ran all this other stuff.. Clamnebula,
wasn't advocating censorship,
he was exposing CBS's partisanship and hypocrisy.

For the record, though, I wouldn't call the stuff they aired family fare, and
while I'm sure you and your dorm
buddies had a real howl (I would have at your age), but the fact is that there
*were* 12 year olds and younger
watching. "Crank-Yankers" is funny but it's not ready for Saturday morning
cartoons.

wrote in message
news
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:11:08 -0500, "clamnebula"
wrote:

A man being bitten in the genitals by a dog

Yup, and very funny. Do you understand humor?

A man soliciting for sex and having his pubic hair ripped out

Huh? Who did that one?

Setting fire to horse flatulence

Which was really funny, and one of the best.

A pet pony being shot to death

No such ad. I saw ALL of them. You can see them online one AOL,
ifilm, and probably other sites. There was NO SUCH AD. (I would have
found this offensive myself.) Look on www.ifilm.com and tell me which
one it is.

Children forced to eat soap for saying the word "****"

Is your humor device broken?

An elderly man assaulting an elderly woman and knocking her down with a
stick

All in fun. Learn to laugh

A man injuring his neck attempting a motorcycle stunt

What do you expect from AOL? Stupid commercial I thought.

A man having a face painted on his naked chest and belly

This one was pretty dull, I have to admit that.

A monkey overtly asking a woman for a bestial sexual relationship (A
campaign
ad for Rick Santorum perhaps?)

Also funny

A woman brushing the hair on her husbands' back

Another boring one.

Oh, and if you want soft core porn, CBS will have it on the Grammys next
week
judging by their ads.

And you profess to being a "christian" I suppose.

Oh, and by the way. Anyone offended by Janet Jacksons breast is much
sicker than those of us who laughed our butts off, then went back to
watching the game. Unless you are 12 years old, you should have seen
hundreds of breasts by now, and they all look pretty much the same. No
big deal, it's just the media that turned it into a big deal, and
these so called "christians" who cant stand the sight of the human
body (probably because they are butt ugly themselves).

Good Day

"Submariner" wrote in message
...
You completely missed the point. CBS refused to run a MoveOn ad because it
was
too controversial,
yet as clamnebula pointed out, they ran all this other stuff.. Clamnebula,
wasn't advocating censorship,
he was exposing CBS's partisanship and hypocrisy.

Um, the truth of the matter is that the MoveOn.org ad was a political ad.
Period. Whether the other ads were controversial or not is irrelevent, they
weren't political ads. CBS was not partisan, not hypocritical. They were
straightforward and said they don't run such ads. Show me a Super Bowl that
has run political ads for that matter... Fox, NBC, ABC?........ They just
don't do it.

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 22:13:57 GMT, "Thomas Trust"
wrote:


"Submariner" wrote in message
...
You completely missed the point. CBS refused to run a MoveOn ad because it
was
too controversial,
yet as clamnebula pointed out, they ran all this other stuff.. Clamnebula,
wasn't advocating censorship,
he was exposing CBS's partisanship and hypocrisy.

Um, the truth of the matter is that the MoveOn.org ad was a political ad.
Period. Whether the other ads were controversial or not is irrelevent, they
weren't political ads. CBS was not partisan, not hypocritical. They were
straightforward and said they don't run such ads. Show me a Super Bowl that
has run political ads for that matter... Fox, NBC, ABC?........ They just
don't do it.

It is the same stuff when they lose an election. It's always some
nefarious plot to stifle them.


Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke

"Polybius" wrote in message
...
.impervious wrote:

CBS refused to air an anti-Bush commercial, stating that they didn't
carry "issues" ads, or ads that were controversial...

i don't think the poster really felt that any of the above were terribly
offensive - just contrary to what CBS said. they are hypocrites for
running any and all of the above, yet refusing to run the anti-Bush ad,
because it's too "risque."

The jews at CBS-Viacom-MTV led by their rabbi Sumner Redstone refused to
run the advertisment which was in no way offensive.

The jews really are filth...


Speaking as an atheist with no known Jewish roots, the filth is between your
ears.

"clamnebula" wrote in message
.. .
---Original Message---
From: "Perry L. Adler" homerramone2000@y...
Date: Mon Feb 2, 2004 8:33 am
Subject: Superbowl Ads
http://www.suprmchaos.com/home.index.html

Superbowl Ads
CBS lied like a Bush about issues ads.

CNN tried to make up for traitor Novak's psychotic attack on a bystander
in NH
by allowing the Moveon.org ad to run. This was the same ad that CBS deemed
to
controversial to screen during the Super Bowl. To see the ad in question,
go to:
www.moveon.org/front/.

Well, CNN is the official news channel of the Democratic party.

I changed channels to watch, it was on at about 20.17 EST in case you
missed it.

So... what of CBS?

We don't do issues ads they said.
We don't do ads that might be found offensive they said.

No issues?
Not offensive?

Liars.

Most ads were for beer,

Lots of people like beer.

violent horror movies
Lots of people like horror movies.

or penis erection drugs - not one
but two of them (Levitra and Cialis)!

So? Viagra is part of the lexicon these days. It's not as controversial as
anything moveon.org has to say.

Nothing offensive - fun for all the family...

CBS, I call rubbish on that claim. You showed us...

A man being bitten in the genitals by a dog
A man soliciting for sex and having his pubic hair ripped out
Setting fire to horse flatulence
A pet pony being shot to death
Children forced to eat soap for saying the word "****"
An elderly man assaulting an elderly woman and knocking her down with a
stick
A man injuring his neck attempting a motorcycle stunt
A man having a face painted on his naked chest and belly
A monkey overtly asking a woman for a bestial sexual relationship (A
campaign
ad for Rick Santorum perhaps?)
A woman brushing the hair on her husbands' back
Oh, and if you want soft core porn, CBS will have it on the Grammys next
week
judging by their ads.

Aside from the lie about the pony, which never happened, what's the big
deal? It's called humor. Much different than teling outright lies like
moveon does.

As for a 'fun for all the family' half time show... I call rubbish on that
as
well, CBS.

I thought it sucked, but then I don't like football either. I only watch
teh SB for the commercials.

A partial strip tease during the song by P. Diddy and Nelly.
Kid Rock wearing our nation's flag with a huge hole cut in it while
singing
about crack heads and Methadone clinics.
Janet Jackson in her S & M outfit singing while backed by her
cross-dressing
male dancers. No issues for Janet, 'No to bigotry and illiteracy.' Those
aren't
issues. Right.
Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson having simulated sex on stage and
ending
the show with Justin ripping off half of Janet's dress to reveal her right
breast.

Family fun at CBS? Hypocritical liars.

Still not as disgusting as Moveon.

I must give a special thanks to you, CBS, for forcing me to explain to my
kids;
"Erections lasting more than four hours are rare but require immediate
medical
attention." That was a more uncomfortable experience than having to
explain that
Bush has spent a huge portion of their future income on a war based on his
lies.

Or maybe it wasn't.

Anybody hurt?

They took it pretty well; ten year olds don't seem to fully grasp the
concept of
having their future earnings stolen before they even reach middle school.

They aren't fully indoctrinated in the Democratic philosophy yet,eh?

Which is the odd one out?

A. An ad telling us we should choose to vote
B. An ad asking if our kids should smoke
C. An ad asking if our kids should pay off the national debt
D. An ad recommending open source code
E. An ad for soft ware so kids can 'live up to their full potential'
You know already the answer but more important:

Why is it the odd one out? Could it be that our speech is no longer free
in
America due to the biased acts of such censors as CBS?

It's never been free on network TV. They have no obligation to air the
propaganda and lies of any political party. If they choose to air it at
all, youhave to pay.

The First Ammendment doesn't grant the right to have your views on TV.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.571 / Virus Database: 361 - Release Date: 1/26/2004

Sockpuppet Yustabe said:

Please, capitalize the 'J" in "Jews", to show proper respect.
Then you can say any nasty crap you want.

I think you mean "may", not "can". Troglodytes aren't known for
exceptional communication skill.

"Geo", YACA, said:

I saw two when I switched over to CNN.

Why? To get your left wing slant fix for the day?

Don't you pine for the days when CNN openly endorse the murder of
abortion doctors?

In article ,
".impervious" wrote:

CBS refused to air an anti-Bush commercial, stating that they didn't
carry "issues" ads, or ads that were controversial...

i don't think the poster really felt that any of the above were terribly
offensive - just contrary to what CBS said. they are hypocrites for
running any and all of the above, yet refusing to run the anti-Bush ad,
because it's too "risque."

What we have here is a failure to communicate. Controversial doesn't
mean offensive. Plenty of their ads were offensive, but the PRODUCTS
aren't controversial, unless you think people shouldn't seek to boost
their erections or drink beer.

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Polybius" wrote in message
...

.impervious wrote:

CBS refused to air an anti-Bush commercial, stating that they didn't
carry "issues" ads, or ads that were controversial...

i don't think the poster really felt that any of the above were terribly
offensive - just contrary to what CBS said. they are hypocrites for
running any and all of the above, yet refusing to run the anti-Bush ad,
because it's too "risque."

The jews at CBS-Viacom-MTV led by their rabbi Sumner Redstone refused to
run the advertisment which was in no way offensive.

The jews really are filth...



Speaking as an atheist with no known Jewish roots, the filth is between your
ears.

Yeah, sure jewboy...funny how you kikes, when you are caught red handed
claim to be atheists...)))))))))))

Is jew Sumner Redstone one of your cult?

"The-Frog." wrote in message
s.com...
snip
Quit morphing, buttplug.
\plonk

Unless you are 12 years old, you should have seen
hundreds of breasts by now, and they all look pretty much the same.


Is this the results of ABX DBTs?

"Polybius" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Polybius" wrote in message
...

.impervious wrote:

CBS refused to air an anti-Bush commercial, stating that they didn't
carry "issues" ads, or ads that were controversial...

i don't think the poster really felt that any of the above were
terribly
offensive - just contrary to what CBS said. they are hypocrites for
running any and all of the above, yet refusing to run the anti-Bush ad,
because it's too "risque."

The jews at CBS-Viacom-MTV led by their rabbi Sumner Redstone refused to
run the advertisment which was in no way offensive.

The jews really are filth...



Speaking as an atheist with no known Jewish roots, the filth is between
your
ears.

Yeah, sure jewboy...funny how you kikes, when you are caught red handed
claim to be atheists...)))))))))))

Is jew Sumner Redstone one of your cult?




Is Hitler one of yours, idiot.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message
...
Unless you are 12 years old, you should have seen
hundreds of breasts by now, and they all look pretty much the same.


Is this the results of ABX DBTs?

No, DBF's, double blind feels.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---