Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am a string player (violist) and I play primarily classical music.
I want a recording device in order to do the following: Record myself practising (more often than not, in a small room) so that I can playback and hear what I just did (basically using it as a learning tool). Record rehearsals in order to listen to them later for balance, intonation, ensemble, etc. And make good quality recordings of chamber music concerts. These would be in small performance venues like church auditoriums (most of the time, quite resonant and ambient spaces). I want to be able to do some editing, like removing applause, or adding it (ha ha). And I want to be able to make copies and put them on CDs, or whatever media is appropriate, without losing any quality. I've been researching the minidisc recorders and the Nomad Jukebox 3. From what I've learned, there is a loss of information when copying from the recorder to a computer because of copyright protection that the minidisc recorders have built in them. But I have no idea how much effect that loss of info would have and if it would be enough to make me decide not to go that way. Is it a discernible difference? I'd like to spend under $500. Any help about microphones and accessories would also be appreciated. Thanks Ben |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ben" wrote in message
om I am a string player (violist) and I play primarily classical music. I want a recording device in order to do the following: Record myself practicing (more often than not, in a small room) so that I can playback and hear what I just did (basically using it as a learning tool). Record rehearsals in order to listen to them later for balance, intonation, ensemble, etc. And make good quality recordings of chamber music concerts. These would be in small performance venues like church auditoriums (most of the time, quite resonant and ambient spaces). I do this sort of thing all the time. It's entirely feasible to make *normal* sounding recordings in such places, but not with a 2-track recorder. I want to be able to do some editing, like removing applause, or adding it (ha ha). And I want to be able to make copies and put them on CDs, or whatever media is appropriate, without losing any quality. This is best done by transferring your recording to a PC and do the editing there. Your goal is probably going to be to produce a MP3 or an audio CD, and a PC is a very good place to do that. I've been researching the minidisc recorders and the Nomad Jukebox 3. Forget the Minidisk thing, that's so yesterday. OTOH modern hard disk recorders like the Nomad Jukebox 3 or a iRiver IHP 120 or 140 are IMO & IME the way to go. From what I've learned, there is a loss of information when copying from the recorder to a computer because of copyright protection that the minidisc recorders have built in them. It's not the copyright protection, but rather the lossy compression. But I have no idea how much effect that loss of info would have and if it would be enough to make me decide not to go that way. With the two hard disk recorders I mentioned, you have the choice of a number of forms of lossy compression, or totally uncompressed .wav files. Is it a discernible difference? I know of no form of lossy compression or bitrate that unconditionally escaped detection by trained listeners with a free choice of kinds of music to test with, and close comparisons. That all said, 192 kbps MP3 compression can be really pretty good. Note that with the two recorders I've specifically mentioned, you don't have to use lossy compression. You have the option of lossless recording, at some cost in convenience. BTW, I'm not speaking theoretically. I have a Nomad Jukebox 3, and did something pretty comparable to what you want to do as recently as this past Friday night. On Friday night was handing the mixing console for a deer meat banquet at my church. The dinner included some live music and a speaker who is pretty well-known among in this area. Several people wanted recordings. So, I hooked one of the outputs of my console to the line input on my Nomad Jukebox. Because I didn't have a lot of disk space left, I didn't have a lot of batter charge left and I didn't have the charger with me, I decided to go with a 192 Kbps MP3. I turned on the recorder and recorded about two hours of the banquet. This resulted in a 750 megabyte MP3 file. When I got home I did a Firewire transfer of my MP3 file to a PC, and did my editing in Adobe Audition. When I was done, I burned a CD. I took the CD to church today, burned a few copies for a couple of the guys who organized the banquet, and left one for the church office to duplicate for anybody who wants one. The recording is not one of the high quality pieces that I do with my 12 track recorder, but frankly under the conditions (I had to do the complete setup from scratch starting about 3 pm Friday afternoon) it was good enough for the purpose. No doubt far better than what has been done before, which involved a cassette machine. The sound quality was not limited by the recorder, but rather by the fact that the mixdown I recorded was not for the purpose of recording, but rather for sound reinforcement. I'd like to spend under $500. Seems possible if you go very light on the other parts of the system. The hard drive recorder itself will probably be about half of that and could run much more than half. You might only be able to afford two microphones and a minimum-sized console on that tight of a budget. OTOH, you could get started on the budget you mention, particularly if you have the PC and use one of the good shareware/freeware editors like Goldwave, Audacity, or the one that might have come with the CD burning software on your PC. Any help about microphones and accessories would also be appreciated. I don't think that you want to duplicate the exact console and other equipment I used Friday night, just because it was somewhat based on local availability. Here are some recommendations for getting started. Besides the hard disk recorder you need a small mixer and some microphones. Depending on how many microphones you need, pick something from Behringer's catalog at www.behringer.com. Once you've picked out a model of console with enough mic inputs, search google and eBay and you'll be able to find many different retailers. If I were starting out making recordings such as the ones you seem to want to make, I would start out with a couple pairs of microphones. One pair would be Behringer ECM-8000s which are small omnidirectional microphones. They are good for picking up the overall sound of a performance. They are also good for instruments like pianos and drum kits. Another other microphones would be MXL 603s. They are good for most other instruments and can be used for vocals with external pop filters. CAD 195s and Shure SM58s good vocal mics that have fairly good pop filters built in. Look for the mics and stands the same way you looked for the console. For cables and external pop filters, check the retailer who sold you the mics and stands, and also www.markertek.com . |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ben wrote:
I'd like to spend under $500. Any help about microphones and accessories would also be appreciated. I'd be tempted to get a small laptop and do it that way. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want a recording device in order to do the following:
I've been researching the minidisc recorders and the Nomad Jukebox 3. For what it's worth, I bought a Sony MZ NF-810 last week (seems like close to Sony's top of the line for mini disc machines). Nice little device, but I think I'm going to replace it with an iRiver. The minidisc is pretty cool: 320 minutes on a disc....but you still have to carry around the minidiscs and swap them to get the programming you want. Also, the Sony "SonicStage" application used for managing songs/playlists has a pretty poor UI and uses a proprietary-albeit-more-efficient format (as opposed to MP3). The iRiver type of device attracts me because *everything* is on the device...nothing to fumble with, nothing to carry. Seems to me like minidisc device still has a few good points: 1) Price: I think I paid about $250....and I'll probably wind up selling it for half that. 2) Durability: Several people who sound like they know say that hard drive devices aren't that good for, say, jogging - something about bouncing it around while it's taking one of it's intermittant gulps of data from the HD. 3) Batteries: THe iPod replacement battery is reputedly something like a hundred bucks and, according to some, not readily available and warranty-voiding if the user cracks the case to install it. Can't imagine iRiver's is any better. The minidisc takes a user-replacable "gum stick" battery and can work on a single plain-vanilla AA alkaline when needed. Seems to me like if five hours of music on a disc is good enough, the minidisc might be good enough. Actually, I may keep this one if I can figure out how to conveniently create MD discs from MusicMatch Jukebox playlists. OTOH, anybody want a Sony MD player cheap? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Portable Field Recorder -Recommendations Sought | General | |||
Flash memory recorder without built-in memory. Is there one? | General | |||
can portable cassette recorder record on Type II tapes? | General | |||
Sony TCD-D7 Portable DAT Recorder | General |